Christmas Eve?
He vetoed it long before then.
Believing cnn [sic] is like believing the National Enquirer.
He didn't veto it AT ALL. If he had, Congress could have had something tangible to override.
But eggshell-boi wouldn't have been able to handle that, so he caved.
In other news, English capitalizes acronyms, hence "CNN" not "cnn". You can't even pronounce "cnn".
In other news, English capitalizes acronyms, hence "CNN" not "cnn". You can't even pronounce "cnn".
'cnn' hasn't deserved that honor for over 10 years.. IMO
It isn't an "honor". It's how the language works, by virtue of the fact that each letter stands for a word. Exactly the same as "NSDAP" or "CIA" or "RNC" or "JFK". Upper case denotes a function; in English the first word in a sentence; a proper name as opposed to generic, or an acronym. In German it also designates a noun, as it used to do in English, which you could see in action in your Constitution if you had one: "such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct"... "Congress shall make no Law...". None of that has anything to do with any "honor".
See what I did there? I capitalized the word "Constitution" to distinguish it as a specific --- the US Constitution --- from some random generic "constitution".
When you write "cnn" you're writing an impossible word. You can't pronounce "cnn" without some vowel movement. If you can't have a vowel movement, see your doctor.
why are you having a problem understanding I'm dissing that supposed news source?
Is you hat really on that tight?
You're not. You're just too lazy to hit the goddam shift key.
Not to be lost in all this is that your point was wrong anyway. Rump never did veto the bill, so while believing "cnn" may be folly, "CNN" didn't claim any such thing. So maybe it's your name that should be all lower case.