Trump desire to suspend the Constitution is not a deal breaker to Republicans

[BlindBoo]

Political Corruption For Dummies:
Operation Russian Collusion Crossfire Hurricane COUP
Hunter Biden's Laptop

So big boy, how did the investigation into the investigator of Trumpybear, with Durham go? Catch any Big Fish. Doesn't the FBI have the alleged laptop? What have they said about it?

 

[Sixties Fan]

LOL. I'm supposed to prove to you that we have law enforcement in the US?

I posted the facts. You prefer to do as Trump does. Blame all others.

Still the need to blame Nancy Pelosi for anything wrong which happened during those 4 years.

 

[Indeependent]

One was protests against police brutality
The other was REPUBLICANS storming our Capitol

Sure…national protests everywhere and statues destroyed and still rampant violent crime in Blue Cities.
Stick your bull crap up your rear end.

 

[rightwinger]

Sure…national protests everywhere and statues destroyed and still rampant violent crime in Blue Cities.
Stick your bull crap up your rear end.

Statues?

 

[Indeependent]

Statues?

You’re joking, right?
You’re stating that destroying and defacing public property is A-Ok?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

No. The problem is we are hearing you and have stopped believing you.

If you were hearing Trump, you’d hear his contempt for the Constitution and the rule of law.

You would hear that Trump wants to destroy the Constitution and establish an authoritarian dictatorship.

And you’d hear that Trump wants to ‘justify’ destroying the Constitution based on lies about ‘fraud’ and ‘cheating.’

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Oh fuck you.

This statement is insanity.

This statement is bait. Well okay, I’ll take the bait. Nancy spat on the Constitution nearly every day of her political career. If she ever knew the law, then all that means is that her actions were malicious and flagrant tyranny and not just incompetence and stupidity.

It’s perfectly sane and true - Pelosi knows the law and would never go against the Constitution.

That you disagree with Pelosi’s policy positions doesn’t mean she’s ‘going against’ the Constitution.

 

[rightwinger]

Right. So that is how much you “respect the Constitution,” you don’t know its contents, it doesn’t matter what it says, and SCOTUS is always right…

Oh… except for when it isn’t, of course. Let’s not accuse of even having that as a principle. You people don’t do standards or principles.

I know more about the Constitution than the man YOU voted for President

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Show us where Speaker Pelosi called for such a thing.

And conservatives will cite the Speaker’s advocacy for an assault weapon ban – which isn’t ‘going against’ the Constitution.

Assault weapon bans are perfectly Constitutional, the Supreme Court having never ruled to invalidate them.

Conservatives are as predictable as they are dishonest.

 

[Indeependent]

I know more about the Constitution than the man YOU voted for President

We’re not interested in your digestive system.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

Nooooo. It is every rational person trying to stop massacres with weapons which should not be in civilian hands, because those weapons belong in the Military ONLY.

Fewer Military weapons in civilian hands = fewer mass shootings = fewer people wounded or dead, ESPECIALLY children under 18.

Choose wisely.

Should this weapon be banned?

 

[Sixties Fan]

Can you prove that Trump deliberately downsized the Capitol police force for that day?

There has been no such allegation.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

And conservatives will cite the Speaker’s advocacy for an assault weapon ban – which isn’t ‘going against’ the Constitution.

Assault weapon bans are perfectly Constitutional, the Supreme Court having never ruled to invalidate them.

Conservatives are as predictable as they are dishonest.

Did the Supreme Court rule Trump's tweet to be unconstitutional?

 

[dudmuck]

I was wondering how long it would take before someone on the left started posting pictures. Is that the best you can do?

 

[Sixties Fan]

Should this weapon be banned?View attachment 735009

Is that an assault Military weapon? No?

Then it is not going to be banned.

You do not even know what assault weapons look like?

 

[Indeependent]

Is that an assault Military weapon? No?

Then it is not going to be banned.

You do not even know what assault weapons look like?

Tell us what you know about assault weapons.

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

One was protests against police brutality

Police brutality, like shooting someone with a sexual assault warrant while violating a restraining order, holding a knife, ignoring police commands and trying to enter a vehicle with kids?

That kind of “brutality” was why those assholes burned Kenosha.

Shame there weren’t more Rittenhouses out there to prevent that.

And conservatives will cite the Speaker’s advocacy for an assault weapon ban – which isn’t ‘going against’ the Constitution.

Absolute dishonesty on your part at this point. Has to be bad faith flamebait, no other possible explanation.

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED, you piece of shit.

Rhetorical question: can you read?

 

[Slade3200]

Comparing 1 day and a mob of 300 to a whole year of destruction.
Not very becoming of you.

I don’t remember making that comparison. When do you think I did that?

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

You do not even know what assault weapons look like?

“Assault weapons” doesn’t mean anything inherent you stupid fuck.

 

[Indeependent]

I don’t remember making that comparison. When do you think I did that?

Try reading into you posts.