Trump fans want Kelly banned from future debates

GOP In Chaos As Trump Supporters Sign Petition To Remove Megyn Kelly From Debates
Posted by Shannon Argueta
SPREAD THE WORD!
email.png


Presidential candidate and America’s biggest loudmouth, Donald Trump, is causing quite an uproar in the GOP. Since Trump announced his bid for the White House, the leaders of the party have been banging their heads against the wall as they try to figure out a way to stop him from completely obliterating their already poor chances of winning the presidential race in 2016. On Thursday night, liberals sat on the edge of their seats waiting for Trump to cause chaos within the Republican party once again and we were not disappointed. During the debate the real estate mogul was forced to answer tough questions about his sexism and misogyny by Fox News’ golden girl Megyn Kelly. Her legitimate questions caused Trump to cry that he was being “treated unfairly,” on Friday, insult the debate moderator again and now 17,000 Trump fans are calling for her removal in an online petition.

cuz rabid RWs are all about free speech, right?

:lmao::lmao::lmao:
Pretty funny...lol
 
It doesn't matter. If it wasn't Kelly the RNC would have someone else ask inappropriate questions.

If the republican leadership really wanted to collapse Trump's support all they have to do is convince Jeb Bush to withdraw.

Some people like myself in my current predicament......are presumed guilty till proven innocent. People whom use secret - privileged and secret surveillance information for their own use, and/or play the investigator role.....believing they have all the answers and their theory is sound.

People whom intimidate others ( like me )..... because if the real truth came out, more than likely criminal charges could be initiated against the real wrong doers.

People whom believe that an individual is really a terrible person, but in the end when the facts come out - the same people whom really hated your guts, whom wanted to see your demise, whom wanted you too move thousands of miles away.......all pat you on the back and say "Buddy ole pal". "I know you were right all along."

People whom use sensitive and secret surveillance info for their own benefit....need to be incarcerated. People whom intimidate others.....need to be incarcerated. People whom commit witness tampering and intimidate witnesses......need to be incarcerated. People whom "Molest others" ( severe physical and mental harassment ).....need to be incarcerated.

Sincerity is palpable !

Secrecy is the key to survival !

Shadow 355
Oh, ouch! Your grammar! It's 'people who,' NOT 'people whom.'
 
how cute to see a leftwinger WHO hated on FOX NEWS care for some woman host on the station. isn't is so sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet


How telling..........a FAUX News devotee choosing to defend someone that calls her a fat pig, dog, slob and disgusting animal .....over her former shes-the-best-moderator-in-the-world (KellY) at the-best-ever TV station - Faux News...bwhahaha....this is getting more entertaining by the minute.

Trump s comment about Megyn Kelly roils GOP race
'Other Republican presidential candidates backed Erickson's decision. Former Florida governor Jeb Bush told the RedState attendees that Trump's comments about Kelly insult all women, and they make up more than half the national electorate.

"Do we want to win?" Bush said.'

Clearly not.
Bush seems to be the only viable candidate in the GOP clown car. I think he may be the only one who grasps politics on a national scale, understandably, given the family background.
 
Last edited:


Donald Trump - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia


Fox News and Megyn Kelly do have a point.

Trumps fans must be really scared of Megyn, or they would not take that stance,

Quotes : "A 2011 report by the Center for Responsive Politics showed that over two decades of US elections, Donald Trump made contributions to campaigns of both Republican Party and Democratic Party candidates."


"Trump is a known World Wrestling Entertainment fan and friend of WWE owner Vince McMahon. He has hosted two WrestleMania events in the Trump Plaza and has been an active participant in several of the shows.[83] Trump's Trump Taj Mahal in Atlantic City was host to the 1991 WBF Championship (which was owned by WWE, known at the time as the "World Wrestling Federation"). Trump was interviewed by Jesse Ventura ringside at..." o_O:scared1:

"He ran for the presidential nomination of the Reform Party in 2000, winning the party's California primary."

"
Four of Trump's businesses have declared Chapter 11 bankruptcy.[148] According to a 2011 report by Forbes, these were due to over-leveraged hotel and casino businesses in Atlantic City: Trump’s Taj Mahal (1991), Trump Plaza Hotel (1992), Trump Hotels and Casino Resorts (2004), and Trump Entertainment Resorts (2009).[149][150] Trump said "I've used the laws of this country to pare debt. … We'll have the company. We'll throw it into a chapter. We'll negotiate with the banks. We'll make a fantastic deal. You know, it's like on 'The Apprentice'. It's not personal. It's just business."[151] He indicated that other "great entrepreneurs" do the same.[149]"

"In January 2002, the Securities and Exchange Commission brought a financial-reporting case against Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts Inc...."




Shadow 355
 
Listen to the libs bitching about free speech just after celebrating Trump being "disinvited" to the second debate.
Listen to the conservative exhibit his ignorance of what constitutes 'free speech.”
Free speech to you is liberal speech. Anything else, not so much.
No, moron – free speech concerns solely the relationship between government and those governed, not between and among private persons and organizations, such as Fox, the RNC, or individual republican candidates.

A private organization not allowing a political candidate to participate at a debate doesn't constitute a 'violation' of 'free speech.'

Given your posting history, you truly are this stupid.
Look at the deflection, everybody. :lol:

:cuckoo::cuckoo::lol:
 
Listen to the libs bitching about free speech just after celebrating Trump being "disinvited" to the second debate.
Listen to the conservative exhibit his ignorance of what constitutes 'free speech.”
Free speech to you is liberal speech. Anything else, not so much.
No, moron – free speech concerns solely the relationship between government and those governed, not between and among private persons and organizations, such as Fox, the RNC, or individual republican candidates.

A private organization not allowing a political candidate to participate at a debate doesn't constitute a 'violation' of 'free speech.'

Given your posting history, you truly are this stupid.
Look at the deflection, everybody. :lol:

:cuckoo::cuckoo::lol:
Congratulations. 5 posts in a row and not one of them with substance. Icons, grammar corrections, and name calling. Good job, airhead.
 
Listen to the conservative exhibit his ignorance of what constitutes 'free speech.”
Free speech to you is liberal speech. Anything else, not so much.
No, moron – free speech concerns solely the relationship between government and those governed, not between and among private persons and organizations, such as Fox, the RNC, or individual republican candidates.

A private organization not allowing a political candidate to participate at a debate doesn't constitute a 'violation' of 'free speech.'

Given your posting history, you truly are this stupid.
Look at the deflection, everybody. :lol:

:cuckoo::cuckoo::lol:
Congratulations. 5 posts in a row and not one of them with substance. Icons, grammar corrections, and name calling. Good job, airhead.

A picture is worth a thousand words. There is no point in repeating what has already been said.


To repeatedly say stupid and ignorant things, as you do, and to repeatedly insult people with the same insults does not make you a poster of any substance at all. Understanding that less often means more is something probably beyond your comprehension.


You love to call others stupid and airheads or to misinterpret what they say, such as insinuating someone is drinking, because you either don't understand or don't appreciate what they are saying: that's what shows you to be limited.


You live in a glass house: you need to learn not to throw so many stones. You are obviously dense, narrow minded, unintelligent, ignorant and bigoted, yet you continue to say that others are such. That illustrates in neon lights your own very extensive limitations.


In real life, you are not even someone I would dignify with any attention, interchange or engagement whatsoever: you are too uneducated, stupid, ignorant, and just plain boorish. A quintessential knuckle dragger.
 
Last edited:
how cute to see a leftwinger WHO hated on FOX NEWS care for some woman host on the station. isn't is so sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet


How telling..........a FAUX News devotee choosing to defend someone that calls her a fat pig, dog, slob and disgusting animal .....over her former shes-the-best-moderator-in-the-world (KellY) at the-best-ever TV station - Faux News...bwhahaha....this is getting more entertaining by the minute.

Trump s comment about Megyn Kelly roils GOP race
'Other Republican presidential candidates backed Erickson's decision. Former Florida governor Jeb Bush told the RedState attendees that Trump's comments about Kelly insult all women, and they make up more than half the national electorate.

"Do we want to win?" Bush said.'

Clearly not.
Bush seems to be the only viable candidate in the GOP clown car. I think he may be the only one who grasps politics on a national scale, understandably, given the family background.

Kasich would be a better choice IMO.
 
quid pro quo. Trump uninvited-Kelly no more moderator.
Sounds like a plan to me.

A "Writ of mandamus" was sent to Trumps Attorney, having Trumps Attorney ORDER Donald Trump to no longer participate in debates, due Mr.Trump showing off his assinine behavior. ;) :cool:

Shadow 355
It's 'asinine.' You need to do grammar and spell check, unless you intended, in this case, a play on words. Mr. Trump does behave like an ass.
 
I want her advanced, myself. It's her job to put these guys on the spot, and she did it well.

Absolutely agree and I hope that when the Dems do real debates, the candidates are asked tough and appropriate questions .My bet is that not one of them will go all to pieces, name call like a grade school drop out and blame the moderator or he or she said.

A reminder - the RWs did this exact same thing, blamed Candy Crowley because their candidate couldn't take the pressure of the debate.
 
Who gave Kelly that question and told her to ask it? It's not Kelly's fault although she will pay the price.
 
how cute to see a leftwinger WHO hated on FOX NEWS care for some woman host on the station. isn't is so sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet


Don't see much support for Kelly, but it is odd that this is the only time the right has acknowledged the one sided behavior that fox is known for. You really should read the OP. There is nothing there in support of fox or Kelly.

Stephanie can't read.....she's just angry because her idol Trump was exposed for what he is and she thinks we are defending Kelly. Kelly isn't smart enough or bold enough to have come up with those questions on her own. We've all known that Faux tells their commentators what to say.....so watch Faux News unleash it's wrath on Trump. It's going to be really fun watching. :popcorn:

I'm willing to bet that Kelly doesn't get fired.
Why should she be fired? You're really out of touch.
Listen to this review with all the history of those comment. Kelly SHOULD be fired as it WAS a set up.


That whiney Levin guy is as dumb as trump.
 
It doesn't matter. If it wasn't Kelly the RNC would have someone else ask inappropriate questions.

If the republican leadership really wanted to collapse Trump's support all they have to do is convince Jeb Bush to withdraw.

Some people like myself in my current predicament......are presumed guilty till proven innocent. People whom use secret - privileged and secret surveillance information for their own use, and/or play the investigator role.....believing they have all the answers and their theory is sound.

People whom intimidate others ( like me )..... because if the real truth came out, more than likely criminal charges could be initiated against the real wrong doers.

People whom believe that an individual is really a terrible person, but in the end when the facts come out - the same people whom really hated your guts, whom wanted to see your demise, whom wanted you too move thousands of miles away.......all pat you on the back and say "Buddy ole pal". "I know you were right all along."

People whom use sensitive and secret surveillance info for their own benefit....need to be incarcerated. People whom intimidate others.....need to be incarcerated. People whom commit witness tampering and intimidate witnesses......need to be incarcerated. People whom "Molest others" ( severe physical and mental harassment ).....need to be incarcerated.

Sincerity is palpable !

Secrecy is the key to survival !

Shadow 355


Sounds like taking your meds regularly would be your first step to survival.
 
I just went over a 37 minute review of what was said. It was totally taken out of context from start to finish. It was a hatchet job pure and simple.

Here is that review double checking just exactly what happened. After listening to this I no longer think FOX should even be trusted to air a fair debate. And that's coming from me a long time ULTRA Conservative...


BLATANT hypocrisy. But is anyone really surprised? No.
 
I want her advanced, myself. It's her job to put these guys on the spot, and she did it well.

She just put him on the spot. She should have asked Chris Christie why he gets into shouting matches with perfect strangers on the Jersey boardwalk or asked Rick Perry how his criminal trial is going for him down in Austin if they WEREN'T putting Trump on the spot.

The blatant way that the first question was skewed, about going independent if a candidate didn't get the nomination, was clearly skewed and biased.

I think it's hilarious that the GOP is eating its own. I've been saying that for a long time and now we're seeing it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top