Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,353
- 81,200
- 2,635
The expert witness knew that what Trump was accused of doing was not illegal. So that means he didn’t have to know if Trump did it or not.
Ex: Lisa is accused of making a hamburger for dinner. The prosecutor is trying her for that and trying to prove it to the jury. An expert witness testifies that making hamburger is not illegal. End of case.
As far as the defense stopping the expert witness, that was because the judge refused to grant immunity. It was the judge’s way of blocking the testimony.
You libs are evil. This was a nothing case about a misdemeanor - if THAT - and used by the Dems to stop their #1 political rival for preventing the continued transformation of America. That they even got this far with a sham charge shows just how far into that transformation we have sunk.
You're fucked in the head, Lisa. Trump wasn't accused of making a hamburger. He was accused, AND convicted of committing a felony. At max, he's facing 136 years in prison. That ain't no burger.