Trump has been EXONERATED of all charges.

[Faun]

Regardless of their excuses, for the first time in U.S. history, the Senate held an impeachment trial and refused to let witnesses testify.

I love the way you use words to twist an spin an argument. It wasn't a refusal. They voted that it wasn't necessary. Completely different reason.

Again, the only time that witnesses were called in to the senate for an impeachment trial was to get clarification of testimony by witnesses in the house impeachment They didn't want nor need any clarification from the 13 witnesses. There was over 5 fucking hours of witness testimony used in the senate trial. To say there were none is not only disingenuous. It makes you look foolish trying to pass that shit off as a reason for needing to call NEW witnesses. Completely different shit. New witnesses NEVER have been called in ANY impeachment. Tell the fucking dems in your side of the House of illrepute to get their shit together and do their fucking job.

They didn't vote it wasn't necessary. There was no reason given. It simply put to a vote and it was voted down.

This still remains the only impeachment trial in U.S. history to not allow witnesses to testify.

They only need one reason. And it's a reason that keeps getting brought up here as a disservice to America. They are representing their constituency. Last I checked that's their fucking job. They work for the people and the people they represent. If they aren't representing their constituency then they aren't holding up their oath or end of the bargain. It's what America was built on and it's viewed here by the liberals as something bad.

Not it's not bad, it's just "Orange man is bad, must impeach".

Again... there was no reason given. It was put up for a vote and all 100 Senators voted for their own reasons. The reason you're giving is your reason not necessarily theirs.

If they didn't vote with the desires of their constituency on this, then they most likely be removed at their next election cycle.

They voted for whatever reasons they felt like. Again... the reason you gave is your reason.

 

[Ame®icano]

his ass kissers are still whining --

FOREVER IMPEACHED

 

[bripat9643]

We did not hear from anyone directly involved with the president


Perhaps next time YOUR House Clowns won't try to overturn an election on hearsay and feelings, Sport.

Perhaps next time the president will honor legal subpoenas, Sport.

Except...

They weren't legal. Dems should have taken the to the courts for them to decide. But if you read the rules, subpoena power has to be granted to a committee in congress by a full House vote and Nancy just skipped that step.

Soooooo

Yur wrong.

They were legal.

Eastlan v. United States Servicemen's Fund

Issuance of subpoenas such as the one in question is a legitimate use by Congress of its power to investigate, and the subpoena power may be exercised by a committee acting, as here, on behalf of one of the Houses.

The subpoenas were illegitimate, douchebag:

Contempt of Congress - Wikipedia

As announced in Wilkinson v. United States,[9] a Congressional committee must meet three requirements for its subpoenas to be "legally sufficient." First, the committee's investigation of the broad subject area must be authorized by its chamber; second, the investigation must pursue "a valid legislative purpose" but does not need to involve legislation and does not need to specify the ultimate intent of Congress; and third, the specific inquiries must be pertinent to the subject matter area that has been authorized for investigation.​

 

[Faun]

LOLOL

They're not invalid because you say they are. You're hallucinating again.

No court ruled they were valid, Fuckwit.

You lost, Loser. Deal with it.

The Supreme Court had already done that years ago, dumbfuck. Try and keep up, will ya?

They ruled YEARS ago the subpoenas issued in Dec were valid?

Your meltdown if becoming hilarious beyond belief.

LOLOL

Dumbfuck, SCOTUS rulings don't expire.

The House should have referenced that ruling when they took the WH to court then. They didn't.

Oops!

They didn't have to.

 

[bluzman61]

13 were called by the House Clowns. Over 120 clips of their testimony were played.

You can post that lie another 100 times and it will still be a lie, Fuckwit.

That lie won't fly. Get a new one.

And none were allowed to testify in the trial. First time evah in U.S. history.

13 did, liar. Their under oath testimony was played.

EPIC MELTDOWN BY FAUN!

LOL

And still, for the first time in U.S. history, zero witnesses were called in to testify.

Nope. The Dims called 18 witnesses.

Not in the trial, they didn't. The Senate voted against allowing any witnesses to testify.

Your love for our president keeps going on...........and on........and on. Thank you for showing this.

 

[Ame®icano]

Please show us all this "hidden" evidence, moron.


Innocent until proven guilty. He was not proven guilty, therefore Trump is INNOCENT.

Shove up up your ass moron. We did not hear from anyone directly involved with the president because trump blocked them from testifying. So don't ask me to show a mother fucking thing. Ask trump why he was scared to let pompeo, pence, giuliani, mulvaney, bolton, parnas, fruman and himself testify. Innocent until proven guilty you say? Why does that only seem to apply when republi9cans are breaking the law?

We did not hear from anyone directly involved with the president


Perhaps next time YOUR House Clowns won't try to overturn an election on hearsay and feelings, Sport.

Perhaps next time the president will honor legal subpoenas, Sport.

Stuff it. Have you been a liar all of your life?

"That leaves civil contempt as a possible legal avenue. Congress can ask a federal court to compel obedience to a subpoena. This can take a while. In October 2011 Eric Holder, Barack Obama’s attorney-general, received a congressional subpoena. Mr Obama tried to block it by declaring executive privilege, in June 2012. A court rejected Mr Obama’s blanket claim of privilege, but not until January 2016."

Donald Trump is not the first president to fight subpoenas

He is the first president to face an impeachment trial with no witnesses.

He's first president whose impeachment started before he was sworn in.

 

[Faun]

It shows it's a legal construct.

So you are back to "you are guilty until you prove you are innocent" in impeachment trials.

Sure is hard to keep up with your flip-flops.

Nope, never said that, dumbfuck. You're hallucinating again.

Yes, you did. When you claimed the presumption of innocence doesn't apply outside a court.

MELTDOWN ON STEROIDS.

Because it's a legal construct. You're the one claiming, without proof, it also applies to impeachment.

It does apply to impeachment. Why would it be any different than any other venue where you are accused of something in America?

Man, you really need to get a grip. You are about to blow a gasket with this meltdown.

Prove it applies to impeachment.....

 

[Nostra]

13 were called by the House Clowns. Over 120 clips of their testimony were played.

You can post that lie another 100 times and it will still be a lie, Fuckwit.

That lie won't fly. Get a new one.

And none were allowed to testify in the trial. First time evah in U.S. history.

13 did, liar. Their under oath testimony was played.

EPIC MELTDOWN BY FAUN!

LOL

And still, for the first time in U.S. history, zero witnesses were called in to testify.

Nope. The Dims called 18 witnesses.

Not in the trial, they didn't. The Senate voted against allowing any witnesses to testify.

The voted against ADDING ADDITIONAL WITNESSES, Dummy. To ADD witnesses there has to already BE witnesses.

You lose again...............

WASHINGTON – A razor-thin majority of Senate Republicans on Friday voted against a Democratic proposal to admit additional witnesses and documents into President Donald Trump’s impeachment trial.


Senate votes against calling new witnesses in Trump's impeachment trial

 

[Faun]

Ima give Faun some time to collect a coherent thought. My foot is getting sore from kicking his ass.

Get a grip, Son. I'll check back later.

LOLOL

You're hallucinating again.

 

[Nostra]

So you are back to "you are guilty until you prove you are innocent" in impeachment trials.

Sure is hard to keep up with your flip-flops.

Nope, never said that, dumbfuck. You're hallucinating again.

Yes, you did. When you claimed the presumption of innocence doesn't apply outside a court.

MELTDOWN ON STEROIDS.

Because it's a legal construct. You're the one claiming, without proof, it also applies to impeachment.

It does apply to impeachment. Why would it be any different than any other venue where you are accused of something in America?

Man, you really need to get a grip. You are about to blow a gasket with this meltdown.

Prove it applies to impeachment.....

Once again you are claiming Trump was guilty until proven innocent. Do you even know what country this is?

 

[bripat9643]

13 were called by the House Clowns. Over 120 clips of their testimony were played.

You can post that lie another 100 times and it will still be a lie, Fuckwit.

That lie won't fly. Get a new one.

And none were allowed to testify in the trial. First time evah in U.S. history.

13 did, liar. Their under oath testimony was played.

EPIC MELTDOWN BY FAUN!

LOL

And still, for the first time in U.S. history, zero witnesses were called in to testify.

Nope. The Dims called 18 witnesses.

Not in the trial, they didn't. The Senate voted against allowing any witnesses to testify.

The House is where witnesses are called and cross examined.

 

[Ame®icano]

"Not guilty."

Not guilty ≠ innocent.

OJ Simpson was also found to be not guilty.

And again, Impeached Trump is still impeached.

 

[bluzman61]

Ima give Faun some time to collect a coherent thought. My foot is getting sore from kicking his ass.

Get a grip, Son. I'll check back later.

LOLOL

You're hallucinating again.

And your love for our president keeps going on........and on. Thanks SO much for sharing your unbridled love.

 

[Ame®icano]

Perhaps next time the president will honor legal subpoenas, Sport.

obama fast and furious subpoenas - Google Search


Cocksucker Obama tossed the subpoenas in her CLOSET, and YOU CHEERED when she did.....

Lie. I saw several hearings where Holder testified. And they turned over documents. Trump denied all documents and all testimonies. Not some.

Again you lie. Cite your sources liar

Of course he's lying. If he turned documents over, why Barry issued executive privilege?

 

[Dick Foster]

No - the Senate determined that there was no need for ADDITIONAL witnesses. They brought a weak ass case in which they claimed they had overwhelming evidence. Please think about that real hard. It's easy to see why the senate said no more witnesses are needed. The dem's said they had overwhelming evidence, they reviewed it, found it to be lacking merit and voila - Exonerated forever.

Regardless of their excuses, for the first time in U.S. history, the Senate held an impeachment trial and refused to let witnesses testify.

I love the way you use words to twist an spin an argument. It wasn't a refusal. They voted that it wasn't necessary. Completely different reason.

Again, the only time that witnesses were called in to the senate for an impeachment trial was to get clarification of testimony by witnesses in the house impeachment They didn't want nor need any clarification from the 13 witnesses. There was over 5 fucking hours of witness testimony used in the senate trial. To say there were none is not only disingenuous. It makes you look foolish trying to pass that shit off as a reason for needing to call NEW witnesses. Completely different shit. New witnesses NEVER have been called in ANY impeachment. Tell the fucking dems in your side of the House of illrepute to get their shit together and do their fucking job.

They didn't vote it wasn't necessary. There was no reason given. It simply put to a vote and it was voted down.

This still remains the only impeachment trial in U.S. history to not allow witnesses to testify.

13 witnesses testified, liar.

You really don't care how much of a fucking idiot you look like on this board, huh?

Your meltdown is epic!

Zero witnesses were called to testify in the trial. Stop lying.

Witness testimony from all the witnesses in the house were replayed over and over again in the senate trial. Basically they had nothing worth being said to say.
Did you not watch? I did, almost every last minute as I did what house proceedings that were covered including the televised committee hearings.
Indeed, I need no one to put words in my mouth because I took in all of the necessary information myself in order to make up my own mind. I decided that the entire process was improper and utterly ridiculous from the get go and it was entirety a partisan and very dangerous shit show and a kangaroo court that should be of serious concern to every last citizen in this nation.
I suggest you start digesting the facts before reacting to all of the smoke being pumped up your ass by an entirely selfinterested political party made up of complete assholes. .

 

[bripat9643]

When it comes right down to it, the republicans in the senate are a bunch of pussies.
Sen. Sherrod Brown: In private, Republicans admit they acquitted Trump out of fear

Why should any Republican believe a Democrat Senator? All the Democrat Senators proved they are sleazy dishonest douchebags.

 

[Ame®icano]

Being that libs can’t top their previous absurdities right now they are safe spacing with their feelings that this one is not over.

Nadless just announce he will subpoena Bolton.

Too funny.

Let him issue the subpoena. Maybe he learned the procedure this time. Then invoke EP, just to drive him nutz.

 

[Vandalshandle]

Trump may have been exonerated by the GOP senate, but he is still an incompetent asshole. He always will be.

 

[Dragonlady]

Suck it, Dimwingers. Your clusterfuck has blown up in your faces.

Now it's over, and you are losers.

You must be very frightened or you wouldn't be trying to convince yourself that Trump has won anything here. His crimes have been exposed and his brazen disregard for the Constitution and the laws of the land cannot be denied, even as most of the Republicans Senators are lying to themselves that he's been chastened or he now knows better.

We always knew that Trump would be acquitted in the Senate, but now the Republican Party's lies of being the party of law and order have been exposed. Power at all costs, will cost them power.

 

[BlindBoo]

No - the Senate determined that there was no need for ADDITIONAL witnesses

Because they already made up their mind that no matter what evidence was presented they were willing to accept this type of corruption. Why bother bringing in more damning evidence of the corruption, that would be just piling on wouldn't it. That's so unfair to old Trumpybear.

Because the articles were weak ass sauce and weren't impeachable offenses.

More than enough to prove the failed Ukraine Shakedown.

They were all in on it and we all know it! But he got close......

I actually like the fact that he wanted Burisma investigated. I'm definitely on the anti-corruption bandwagon. That is some sleazy shit going on there. I'm also in agreement with going after Biden and his son. I, personally don't want someone running for president if they aren't clean. Let's check it out and if he's clean then so be it. But this impeachment scam is the same thing in different clothing.

Trump - Exonerated
Biden - ?

Pole vaulting to Burisma and the Biden huh? The allegations of corruption stem from 2010 - 2012 while the Ukraine was still aligned with Russia. Specifically what crimes are you suggesting Hunter committed in accepting the job offer? Don't rely on the he was making money because of his name, no crime there.