Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,962
- 86,329
- 2,635
LOLOLThey ruled YEARS ago the subpoenas issued in Dec were valid?The Supreme Court had already done that years ago, dumbfuck. Try and keep up, will ya?No court ruled they were valid, Fuckwit.LOLOLHow does that have any bearing on the invalid subpoenas the House issued due to the fact they didn't have a vote to initiate impeachment proceedings?LOL
I already posted a link to the Eastland v. U.S. Servicemen's Fund case....
Have someone explain to you the implication of Eastland's name appearing first in that case.
Hint: It doesn't.
They're not invalid because you say they are. You're hallucinating again.
You lost, Loser. Deal with it.
Your meltdown if becoming hilarious beyond belief.![]()
Dumbfuck, SCOTUS rulings don't expire.