Butch_Coolidge
Gold Member
- Jul 20, 2018
- 3,940
- 389
- 170
But, but, but, impeachment [emoji1787].
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LOLPoor dumbfuck ^^^ can't post without lying. In reality, I actually said Impeached Trump was not guilty until proven innocent.Faun thinks you are guilty until proven innocent. Innocent until proven guilty doesn't apply to impeachments.t
You also don't know anything about how lawyers defend their client. Boy, you'd be poor if you were a lawyer.
An innocent man does not block witnesses that can prove his innocence. Your excuses don't work.
Sorry, YOUR side has to "prove" his guilt.![]()
Like I always say, if conservatives didn't lie, they'd have absolutely nothing to say.
Poor stupid little yellow coward. Hey asshole, in this country one does not have to prove innocence. Burden of proof is on YOU dumbestfuck. Keep showing how dumb you are. Slapping you is so easy.
LOLPoor dumbfuck ^^^ can't post without lying. In reality, I actually said Impeached Trump was not guilty until proven innocent.Faun thinks you are guilty until proven innocent. Innocent until proven guilty doesn't apply to impeachments.t
An innocent man does not block witnesses that can prove his innocence. Your excuses don't work.
Sorry, YOUR side has to "prove" his guilt.![]()
Like I always say, if conservatives didn't lie, they'd have absolutely nothing to say.
Poor stupid little yellow coward. Hey asshole, in this country one does not have to prove innocence. Burden of proof is on YOU dumbestfuck. Keep showing how dumb you are. Slapping you is so easy.
Yet another dumbfuck who doesn't understand presumption of innocence applies to criminal cases, not political procedures.
Then why are you and your cronies constantly blubbering about a "fair trial?" Presumption of innocence is one of the critical components of a fair trial.LOLPoor dumbfuck ^^^ can't post without lying. In reality, I actually said Impeached Trump was not guilty until proven innocent.Faun thinks you are guilty until proven innocent. Innocent until proven guilty doesn't apply to impeachments.t
An innocent man does not block witnesses that can prove his innocence. Your excuses don't work.
Sorry, YOUR side has to "prove" his guilt.![]()
Like I always say, if conservatives didn't lie, they'd have absolutely nothing to say.
Poor stupid little yellow coward. Hey asshole, in this country one does not have to prove innocence. Burden of proof is on YOU dumbestfuck. Keep showing how dumb you are. Slapping you is so easy.
Yet another dumbfuck who doesn't understand presumption of innocence applies to criminal cases, not political procedures.
How so? We knew he was going to be acquitted. He's still forever impeached. His name will always be mentioned along with Johnson, almost impeached Nixon and Clinton when anyone talks about how there's been 3 presidents impeached.18 were called in the House.And none were called.The witnesses they wanted to be called were Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, Adolph Schiffless and the so-called whistleblower.Given some 75% thought witnesses should be called, it probably infuriates a lot of people.That infuriates you losers, nice [emoji106]!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quit lying.
Dims got their gay asses handed to them. [emoji1787]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
LOLYou are still a lying moron.Still the only impeachment trial in U.S. history to not call a single witness. What are you cons afraid of?What happens in the Senate is not a trial in the legal sense. It's a political process.^^^ a fucking moron who still doesn't know the difference between an inquiry/hearing and a trial.The Dims called 18 witnesses, moron.LOL
And still -- only impeachment trial in history to not call a single witness.![]()
Someone who claims to understand this shit should understand that.
Read and get an education, Fuckwit.
Tips for Using Video Testimony at Trial - Magna Legal Services
Also, they voted against ADDING ADDITIONAL WITNESSES, Dummy. To ADD witnesses there has to already BE witnesses.
You lose again...............
WASHINGTON – A razor-thin majority of Senate Republicans on Friday voted against a Democratic proposal to admit additional witnesses and documents into President Donald Trump’s impeachment trial.
Senate votes against calling new witnesses in Trump's impeachment trial
Clinton's trial called witnesses to testify.Same rules as the Clinton trial.The trial was the sham. That's what everybody knows.<YAWN!>Still the only impeachment trial in U.S. history to not call a single witness. What are you cons afraid of?What happens in the Senate is not a trial in the legal sense. It's a political process.^^^ a fucking moron who still doesn't know the difference between an inquiry/hearing and a trial.![]()
Someone who claims to understand this shit should understand that.
How does it matter? It means nothing. The impeachment was a sham. Everyone knows that.
Nope, not innocent. You should have paid better attention to Roberts, he declared Impeached Trump "not guilty," not "innocent."LOLPoor dumbfuck ^^^ can't post without lying. In reality, I actually said Impeached Trump was not guilty until proven innocent.Faun thinks you are guilty until proven innocent. Innocent until proven guilty doesn't apply to impeachments.Sorry, YOUR side has to "prove" his guilt.![]()
Like I always say, if conservatives didn't lie, they'd have absolutely nothing to say.
Poor stupid little yellow coward. Hey asshole, in this country one does not have to prove innocence. Burden of proof is on YOU dumbestfuck. Keep showing how dumb you are. Slapping you is so easy.
Yet another dumbfuck who doesn't understand presumption of innocence applies to criminal cases, not political procedures.
Exonerated. Innocent of charges. Forever.
Doesn't matter, Moron. They are still considered witnesses. I'm surprised you are back for another beatdown on this.........wait, no I'm not.LOLYou are still a lying moron.Still the only impeachment trial in U.S. history to not call a single witness. What are you cons afraid of?What happens in the Senate is not a trial in the legal sense. It's a political process.^^^ a fucking moron who still doesn't know the difference between an inquiry/hearing and a trial.The Dims called 18 witnesses, moron.![]()
Someone who claims to understand this shit should understand that.
Read and get an education, Fuckwit.
Tips for Using Video Testimony at Trial - Magna Legal Services
Also, they voted against ADDING ADDITIONAL WITNESSES, Dummy. To ADD witnesses there has to already BE witnesses.
You lose again...............
WASHINGTON – A razor-thin majority of Senate Republicans on Friday voted against a Democratic proposal to admit additional witnesses and documents into President Donald Trump’s impeachment trial.
Senate votes against calling new witnesses in Trump's impeachment trial
Dumbfuck, you still can't question a video.![]()
Of a fair criminal trial, fucking moron.Then why are you and your cronies constantly blubbering about a "fair trial?" Presumption of innocence is one of the critical components of a fair trial.LOLPoor dumbfuck ^^^ can't post without lying. In reality, I actually said Impeached Trump was not guilty until proven innocent.Faun thinks you are guilty until proven innocent. Innocent until proven guilty doesn't apply to impeachments.Sorry, YOUR side has to "prove" his guilt.![]()
Like I always say, if conservatives didn't lie, they'd have absolutely nothing to say.
Poor stupid little yellow coward. Hey asshole, in this country one does not have to prove innocence. Burden of proof is on YOU dumbestfuck. Keep showing how dumb you are. Slapping you is so easy.
Yet another dumbfuck who doesn't understand presumption of innocence applies to criminal cases, not political procedures.
Clinton's trial called witnesses to testify.Same rules as the Clinton trial.The trial was the sham. That's what everybody knows.<YAWN!>Still the only impeachment trial in U.S. history to not call a single witness. What are you cons afraid of?What happens in the Senate is not a trial in the legal sense. It's a political process.
Someone who claims to understand this shit should understand that.
How does it matter? It means nothing. The impeachment was a sham. Everyone knows that.
LOLDoesn't matter, Moron. They are still considered witnesses. I'm surprised you are back for another beatdown on this.........wait, no I'm not.LOLYou are still a lying moron.Still the only impeachment trial in U.S. history to not call a single witness. What are you cons afraid of?What happens in the Senate is not a trial in the legal sense. It's a political process.^^^ a fucking moron who still doesn't know the difference between an inquiry/hearing and a trial.![]()
Someone who claims to understand this shit should understand that.
Read and get an education, Fuckwit.
Tips for Using Video Testimony at Trial - Magna Legal Services
Also, they voted against ADDING ADDITIONAL WITNESSES, Dummy. To ADD witnesses there has to already BE witnesses.
You lose again...............
WASHINGTON – A razor-thin majority of Senate Republicans on Friday voted against a Democratic proposal to admit additional witnesses and documents into President Donald Trump’s impeachment trial.
Senate votes against calling new witnesses in Trump's impeachment trial
Dumbfuck, you still can't question a video.![]()
Tips for Using Video Testimony at Trial - Magna Legal Services
Liar.Clinton's trial called witnesses to testify.Same rules as the Clinton trial.The trial was the sham. That's what everybody knows.<YAWN!>Still the only impeachment trial in U.S. history to not call a single witness. What are you cons afraid of?
How does it matter? It means nothing. The impeachment was a sham. Everyone knows that.
So did Trumps...................10 more than Clinton's.
LOLDoesn't matter, Moron. They are still considered witnesses. I'm surprised you are back for another beatdown on this.........wait, no I'm not.LOLYou are still a lying moron.Still the only impeachment trial in U.S. history to not call a single witness. What are you cons afraid of?What happens in the Senate is not a trial in the legal sense. It's a political process.
Someone who claims to understand this shit should understand that.
Read and get an education, Fuckwit.
Tips for Using Video Testimony at Trial - Magna Legal Services
Also, they voted against ADDING ADDITIONAL WITNESSES, Dummy. To ADD witnesses there has to already BE witnesses.
You lose again...............
WASHINGTON – A razor-thin majority of Senate Republicans on Friday voted against a Democratic proposal to admit additional witnesses and documents into President Donald Trump’s impeachment trial.
Senate votes against calling new witnesses in Trump's impeachment trial
Dumbfuck, you still can't question a video.![]()
Tips for Using Video Testimony at Trial - Magna Legal Services
Dumbfuck, they were witnesses before the trial. This is the only impeachment trial in U.S. history to not call in witnesses to testify.
1/3....batting average of .333LOLDoesn't matter, Moron. They are still considered witnesses. I'm surprised you are back for another beatdown on this.........wait, no I'm not.LOLYou are still a lying moron.Still the only impeachment trial in U.S. history to not call a single witness. What are you cons afraid of?What happens in the Senate is not a trial in the legal sense. It's a political process.
Someone who claims to understand this shit should understand that.
Read and get an education, Fuckwit.
Tips for Using Video Testimony at Trial - Magna Legal Services
Also, they voted against ADDING ADDITIONAL WITNESSES, Dummy. To ADD witnesses there has to already BE witnesses.
You lose again...............
WASHINGTON – A razor-thin majority of Senate Republicans on Friday voted against a Democratic proposal to admit additional witnesses and documents into President Donald Trump’s impeachment trial.
Senate votes against calling new witnesses in Trump's impeachment trial
Dumbfuck, you still can't question a video.![]()
Tips for Using Video Testimony at Trial - Magna Legal Services
Dumbfuck, they were witnesses before the trial. This is the only impeachment trial in U.S. history to not call in witnesses to testify.
LOLPoor dumbfuck ^^^ can't post without lying. In reality, I actually said Impeached Trump was not guilty until proven innocent.Faun thinks you are guilty until proven innocent. Innocent until proven guilty doesn't apply to impeachments.t
An innocent man does not block witnesses that can prove his innocence. Your excuses don't work.
Sorry, YOUR side has to "prove" his guilt.![]()
Like I always say, if conservatives didn't lie, they'd have absolutely nothing to say.
Poor stupid little yellow coward. Hey asshole, in this country one does not have to prove innocence. Burden of proof is on YOU dumbestfuck. Keep showing how dumb you are. Slapping you is so easy.
Yet another dumbfuck who doesn't understand presumption of innocence applies to criminal cases, not political procedures.
Of a fair criminal trial, fucking moron.Then why are you and your cronies constantly blubbering about a "fair trial?" Presumption of innocence is one of the critical components of a fair trial.LOLPoor dumbfuck ^^^ can't post without lying. In reality, I actually said Impeached Trump was not guilty until proven innocent.Faun thinks you are guilty until proven innocent. Innocent until proven guilty doesn't apply to impeachments.![]()
Like I always say, if conservatives didn't lie, they'd have absolutely nothing to say.
Poor stupid little yellow coward. Hey asshole, in this country one does not have to prove innocence. Burden of proof is on YOU dumbestfuck. Keep showing how dumb you are. Slapping you is so easy.
Yet another dumbfuck who doesn't understand presumption of innocence applies to criminal cases, not political procedures.![]()
How so? We knew he was going to be acquitted. He's still forever impeached. His name will always be mentioned along with Johnson, almost impeached Nixon and Clinton when anyone talks about how there's been 3 presidents impeached.18 were called in the House.And none were called.The witnesses they wanted to be called were Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, Adolph Schiffless and the so-called whistleblower.Given some 75% thought witnesses should be called, it probably infuriates a lot of people.
Quit lying.
Dims got their gay asses handed to them. [emoji1787]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Adolph Schiffler called 17 witnesses, dumbass. Trump got to call zero.Liar.Clinton's trial called witnesses to testify.Same rules as the Clinton trial.The trial was the sham. That's what everybody knows.<YAWN!>
How does it matter? It means nothing. The impeachment was a sham. Everyone knows that.
So did Trumps...................10 more than Clinton's.
Zero witnessed were called to testify at Impeached Trump's trial
Of any fair trial, moron. Just admit that you don't give a damn about a fair trial.Of a fair criminal trial, fucking moron.Then why are you and your cronies constantly blubbering about a "fair trial?" Presumption of innocence is one of the critical components of a fair trial.LOLPoor dumbfuck ^^^ can't post without lying. In reality, I actually said Impeached Trump was not guilty until proven innocent.Faun thinks you are guilty until proven innocent. Innocent until proven guilty doesn't apply to impeachments.![]()
Like I always say, if conservatives didn't lie, they'd have absolutely nothing to say.
Poor stupid little yellow coward. Hey asshole, in this country one does not have to prove innocence. Burden of proof is on YOU dumbestfuck. Keep showing how dumb you are. Slapping you is so easy.
Yet another dumbfuck who doesn't understand presumption of innocence applies to criminal cases, not political procedures.![]()