Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There are no men that can enforce something that doesn't exist. Trump has been officially implicated in federal crimes. The non-existent "deep state" has not. Trump will have to deal with his own criminal liability before he thinks he can go out and deal with some make believe fantasy that you and he have.Trump has been implicated in a filing to be considered as a felon, who will need to answer for and defend himself against. The Congress would step in to put a check on the nonsense you are pedaling.Mueller will get many counter charges
Blackmail because of a witch hunt to cover up democrat crimes
And treason
Trump has the men and the military to make the charges stick
Wrong
The real charges are against the deep state for treason and trump has the men to enforce it
Mulehead totally lost it where rigging the investigation with nearly all democrat investigators
The media was caught rigging the debate against the voters fair election by giving the questions to Hillary
And then guy caught again the DNC rigged the election against democrat voters against sanders
This stuff is high treason and then the deep state uses black mail crime to cover up and try to make trump not go after the criminals
Black mail and high treason will be the charges that will stick because trump has the men
Too late bub. Talk to the prosecutors. They are calling it a contribution due to the nature of the payment. IT was hidden and never reported, and Trump said he knew nothing about it, which he lied about. The prosecutors are calling it a felony.To use a porn star as leverage by paying her off in a presidential campaign to keep her quiet is a campaign finance violation, because he paid her over $2700 dollars and did not report it. Look it up fools.BULLSHIT that writing a settlement with a porn actress who is blackmailing you is a crime. It's NOT. Never WILL be. And it's got nothing to with the TYPE OF EXTORTION that's threatened. Could be any of the personally embarrassing accusations I named above.
Where'd you get the idea it's ILLEGAL to write "settlement agreements" on extorting people in power?
To use a porn star as leverage by paying her off in a presidential campaign to keep her quiet is a campaign finance violation.
Link?
52 U.S. Code § 30104 - Reporting requirements
You’re welcome.
Cohen paid her out of campaign funds?
Link?
Talk to the prosecutors. They are calling it a contribution due to the nature of the payment. IT was hidden and never reported, and Trump said he knew nothing about it, which he lied about. The prosecutors are calling it a felony.
Proof CNN did all this?The real crime of rigging elections was done by CNN by rigging the debate and the democrat party rigging the nomination. All rigged to stop s fair election and to stop the voters
Guilty of the highest crime of treason
What does any of this have to do with Trump and his illegal election?Too late bub. Talk to the prosecutors. They are calling it a contribution due to the nature of the payment. IT was hidden and never reported, and Trump said he knew nothing about it, which he lied about. The prosecutors are calling it a felony.To use a porn star as leverage by paying her off in a presidential campaign to keep her quiet is a campaign finance violation, because he paid her over $2700 dollars and did not report it. Look it up fools.
To use a porn star as leverage by paying her off in a presidential campaign to keep her quiet is a campaign finance violation.
Link?
52 U.S. Code § 30104 - Reporting requirements
You’re welcome.
Cohen paid her out of campaign funds?
Link?Talk to the prosecutors. They are calling it a contribution due to the nature of the payment. IT was hidden and never reported, and Trump said he knew nothing about it, which he lied about. The prosecutors are calling it a felony.
The headline on the website Pravda
trumpeted President Vladimir V. Putin’s latest coup,...
"Russian Nuclear Energy Conquers the World"
The article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West.
The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers
and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling
much of the global uranium supply chain.
But the untold story behind that story is one that involves
not just the Russian president, but also a former American president
and a woman who would like to be the next one.
At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.
the sale gave the Russians control of
one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States.
Since uranium is considered a strategic asset,
with implications for national security,
the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of
representatives from a number of United States government agencies.
Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show,
a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation.
Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation
to make four donations totaling $2.35 million.
Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons,
despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck
with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors.
Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
And shortly after the Russians announced their intention
to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One,
Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech
from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin
that was promoting Uranium One stock.
September 2005:
Frank Giustra, a Canadian mining financier,
wins a major uranium deal in Kazakhstan for his company, UrAsia,
days after visiting the country with former President Bill Clinton.
2006:
Mr. Giustra donates $31.3 million to the Clinton Foundation
February 2007:
UrAsia merges with a South African mining company
and assumes the name Uranium One.
In the next two months, the company expands into the United States.
June 2008:
Negotations begin for an investment in Uranium One
by the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom
2008-2010:
Uranium One and former UrAsia investors
make $8.65 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation.
Uranium One investors stand to profit on a Rosatom deal
June 2009:
Rosatom subsidiary ARMZ
takes a 17 percent ownership stake in Uranium One
2010-2011:
Investors give millions more in donations to the Clinton Foundation
June 2010:
Rosatom seeks majority ownership of Uranium One,
pending approval by the Committee on Foreign Investment
in the United States, of which the State Department is a member.
Rosatom says it does not plan to increase its stake in Uranium One
or to take the company private.
June 29, 2010:
Bill Clinton is paid $500,000 for a speech in Moscow
by a Russian investment bank with ties to the Kremlin
that assigned a buy rating to Uranium One stock
October 2010:
Rosatom’s majority ownership approved by
Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States.
January 2013:
Rosatom takes full control of Uranium One and takes it private
Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation
Now...I didn't even mention the millions of dollars
from Russian investors and government agencies,
given to a small, off shore company,
which Podesta sat on the Executive Board
Podesta failed to disclose, not only the money but,
his involvement in this company, which had a stake in the sale
Now...unless you and your ilk
are capable of pulling your heads out of your asses
and admitting whose REALLY guilty of criminal conduct....
THEN FUCK OFF!
COLLUSION... RUSSIA... TREASON... CORRUPTED
*********CLINTONS*********
There are no men that can enforce something that doesn't exist. Trump has been officially implicated in federal crimes. The non-existent "deep state" has not. Trump will have to deal with his own criminal liability before he thinks he can go out and deal with some make believe fantasy that you and he have.Trump has been implicated in a filing to be considered as a felon, who will need to answer for and defend himself against. The Congress would step in to put a check on the nonsense you are pedaling.Mueller will get many counter charges
Blackmail because of a witch hunt to cover up democrat crimes
And treason
Trump has the men and the military to make the charges stick
Wrong
The real charges are against the deep state for treason and trump has the men to enforce it
Mulehead totally lost it where rigging the investigation with nearly all democrat investigators
The media was caught rigging the debate against the voters fair election by giving the questions to Hillary
And then guy caught again the DNC rigged the election against democrat voters against sanders
This stuff is high treason and then the deep state uses black mail crime to cover up and try to make trump not go after the criminals
Black mail and high treason will be the charges that will stick because trump has the men
There are no men that can enforce something that doesn't exist. Trump has been officially implicated in federal crimes. The non-existent "deep state" has not. Trump will have to deal with his own criminal liability before he thinks he can go out and deal with some make believe fantasy that you and he have.Trump has been implicated in a filing to be considered as a felon, who will need to answer for and defend himself against. The Congress would step in to put a check on the nonsense you are pedaling.Mueller will get many counter charges
Blackmail because of a witch hunt to cover up democrat crimes
And treason
Trump has the men and the military to make the charges stick
Wrong
The real charges are against the deep state for treason and trump has the men to enforce it
Mulehead totally lost it where rigging the investigation with nearly all democrat investigators
The media was caught rigging the debate against the voters fair election by giving the questions to Hillary
And then guy caught again the DNC rigged the election against democrat voters against sanders
This stuff is high treason and then the deep state uses black mail crime to cover up and try to make trump not go after the criminals
Black mail and high treason will be the charges that will stick because trump has the men
I love off topic cowards. They never produce anything. Lol!But apparently the OP and our ABNORMALS feel that THIS BULLSHIT is so much more important than the Magic Negro spending $310 MILLION of tax payers money ILLEGALLY on this.....
On more than one occasion, former President Barack Obama and others have referred to his presidency as “scandal-free,” or “not having any significant scandals.” In the video below, Obama claims that his presidency has not had “the kinds of scandals that have plagued other administrations.”
On more than one occasion, former President Barack Obama and others have referred to his presidency as “scandal-free,” or “not having any significant scandals.” In the video below, Obama claims that his presidency has not had “the kinds of scandals that have plagued other administrations.”
But the facts about his presidency paint a very different picture in regards to scandals. Words and phrases such as “IRS,” “Fast and Furious,” and “Benghazi” bring to mind scandals of significance that occurred under his watch.
In the latest example of significant scandals of his presidency, The Washington Examiner has reported that he approved “$310 million in free legal advice to illegal aliens.” Giving aid to law breakers, via tax payer funds, isn’t exactly a non-scandal.
The Washington Examiner wrote that this was done despite the fact that it is against federal law to use tax payer funds to help illegal aliens avoid deportation. But the Obama administration okayed it and did it, anyway.
The Immigration Reform Law Institute explained that the funds were directed at helping unaccompanied illegal alien minors...
Read more at westernjournal.com ..
And Trump is not going to enforce his will over the rule of law. He has already been implicated in crimes. Get out of your nineteenth century bubble. You live in total fantasy land.There are no men that can enforce something that doesn't exist. Trump has been officially implicated in federal crimes. The non-existent "deep state" has not. Trump will have to deal with his own criminal liability before he thinks he can go out and deal with some make believe fantasy that you and he have.Trump has been implicated in a filing to be considered as a felon, who will need to answer for and defend himself against. The Congress would step in to put a check on the nonsense you are pedaling.Mueller will get many counter charges
Blackmail because of a witch hunt to cover up democrat crimes
And treason
Trump has the men and the military to make the charges stick
Wrong
The real charges are against the deep state for treason and trump has the men to enforce it
Mulehead totally lost it where rigging the investigation with nearly all democrat investigators
The media was caught rigging the debate against the voters fair election by giving the questions to Hillary
And then guy caught again the DNC rigged the election against democrat voters against sanders
This stuff is high treason and then the deep state uses black mail crime to cover up and try to make trump not go after the criminals
Black mail and high treason will be the charges that will stick because trump has the men
Wake up to reality. Andrew Jackson enforced his will over the courts.
Because he had the power. The men
He doesn't need to. He already used his own.Well Trump could ALWAYS USE the Harry Reid defense for cheating...
Washington Post
View attachment 233667
Mar 31, 2015 · Harry Reid's appalling defense of his attack on Mitt Romney's perfectly legal tax record .... And to defend that behavior by saying, "Well, we won, didn't we?
Yes, whatever happened to the attorney/client privelage....apparently the DemonRATS and Mulehead have just SWEPT THAT AWAY SO IT IS NO LONGER A VIABLE DEFENSE FOR ANYONE BEING PROSECUTED!!!....Shall we call it the DemonRat Nuclear option?I love off topic cowards. They never produce anything. Lol!But apparently the OP and our ABNORMALS feel that THIS BULLSHIT is so much more important than the Magic Negro spending $310 MILLION of tax payers money ILLEGALLY on this.....
On more than one occasion, former President Barack Obama and others have referred to his presidency as “scandal-free,” or “not having any significant scandals.” In the video below, Obama claims that his presidency has not had “the kinds of scandals that have plagued other administrations.”
On more than one occasion, former President Barack Obama and others have referred to his presidency as “scandal-free,” or “not having any significant scandals.” In the video below, Obama claims that his presidency has not had “the kinds of scandals that have plagued other administrations.”
But the facts about his presidency paint a very different picture in regards to scandals. Words and phrases such as “IRS,” “Fast and Furious,” and “Benghazi” bring to mind scandals of significance that occurred under his watch.
In the latest example of significant scandals of his presidency, The Washington Examiner has reported that he approved “$310 million in free legal advice to illegal aliens.” Giving aid to law breakers, via tax payer funds, isn’t exactly a non-scandal.
The Washington Examiner wrote that this was done despite the fact that it is against federal law to use tax payer funds to help illegal aliens avoid deportation. But the Obama administration okayed it and did it, anyway.
The Immigration Reform Law Institute explained that the funds were directed at helping unaccompanied illegal alien minors...
Read more at westernjournal.com ..
The breaking news is that Trump violated three different campaign finance laws with the assistance of Michael Cohen according to prosecutors for the southern district of New York, and Trump is being implicated as a felon. Washington Post: Breaking News, World, US, DC News & Analysis
Late Friday, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York filed a document arguing that Michael Cohen, until last year President Trump’s personal attorney, should receive a substantial prison sentence for violations of federal law to which Cohen admitted guilt in August.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...paign-finance-law-violations/?utm_term=.1abb6
There is no "attorney client privilege" when the attorney and his client are both felons.Yes, whatever happened to the attorney/client privelage....apparently the DemonRATS and Mulehead have just SWEPT THAT AWAY SO IT IS NO LONGER A VIABLE DEFENSE FOR ANYONE BEING PROSECUTED!!!....Shall we call it the DemonRat Nuclear option?I love off topic cowards. They never produce anything. Lol!But apparently the OP and our ABNORMALS feel that THIS BULLSHIT is so much more important than the Magic Negro spending $310 MILLION of tax payers money ILLEGALLY on this.....
On more than one occasion, former President Barack Obama and others have referred to his presidency as “scandal-free,” or “not having any significant scandals.” In the video below, Obama claims that his presidency has not had “the kinds of scandals that have plagued other administrations.”
On more than one occasion, former President Barack Obama and others have referred to his presidency as “scandal-free,” or “not having any significant scandals.” In the video below, Obama claims that his presidency has not had “the kinds of scandals that have plagued other administrations.”
But the facts about his presidency paint a very different picture in regards to scandals. Words and phrases such as “IRS,” “Fast and Furious,” and “Benghazi” bring to mind scandals of significance that occurred under his watch.
In the latest example of significant scandals of his presidency, The Washington Examiner has reported that he approved “$310 million in free legal advice to illegal aliens.” Giving aid to law breakers, via tax payer funds, isn’t exactly a non-scandal.
The Washington Examiner wrote that this was done despite the fact that it is against federal law to use tax payer funds to help illegal aliens avoid deportation. But the Obama administration okayed it and did it, anyway.
The Immigration Reform Law Institute explained that the funds were directed at helping unaccompanied illegal alien minors...
Read more at westernjournal.com ..
The breaking news is that Trump violated three different campaign finance laws with the assistance of Michael Cohen according to prosecutors for the southern district of New York, and Trump is being implicated as a felon. Washington Post: Breaking News, World, US, DC News & Analysis
Late Friday, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York filed a document arguing that Michael Cohen, until last year President Trump’s personal attorney, should receive a substantial prison sentence for violations of federal law to which Cohen admitted guilt in August.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...paign-finance-law-violations/?utm_term=.1abb6
What does any of this have to do with Trump and his illegal election?Too late bub. Talk to the prosecutors. They are calling it a contribution due to the nature of the payment. IT was hidden and never reported, and Trump said he knew nothing about it, which he lied about. The prosecutors are calling it a felony.To use a porn star as leverage by paying her off in a presidential campaign to keep her quiet is a campaign finance violation.
Link?
52 U.S. Code § 30104 - Reporting requirements
You’re welcome.
Cohen paid her out of campaign funds?
Link?Talk to the prosecutors. They are calling it a contribution due to the nature of the payment. IT was hidden and never reported, and Trump said he knew nothing about it, which he lied about. The prosecutors are calling it a felony.
The headline on the website Pravda
trumpeted President Vladimir V. Putin’s latest coup,...
"Russian Nuclear Energy Conquers the World"
The article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West.
The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers
and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling
much of the global uranium supply chain.
But the untold story behind that story is one that involves
not just the Russian president, but also a former American president
and a woman who would like to be the next one.
At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.
the sale gave the Russians control of
one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States.
Since uranium is considered a strategic asset,
with implications for national security,
the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of
representatives from a number of United States government agencies.
Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show,
a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation.
Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation
to make four donations totaling $2.35 million.
Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons,
despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck
with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors.
Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
And shortly after the Russians announced their intention
to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One,
Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech
from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin
that was promoting Uranium One stock.
September 2005:
Frank Giustra, a Canadian mining financier,
wins a major uranium deal in Kazakhstan for his company, UrAsia,
days after visiting the country with former President Bill Clinton.
2006:
Mr. Giustra donates $31.3 million to the Clinton Foundation
February 2007:
UrAsia merges with a South African mining company
and assumes the name Uranium One.
In the next two months, the company expands into the United States.
June 2008:
Negotations begin for an investment in Uranium One
by the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom
2008-2010:
Uranium One and former UrAsia investors
make $8.65 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation.
Uranium One investors stand to profit on a Rosatom deal
June 2009:
Rosatom subsidiary ARMZ
takes a 17 percent ownership stake in Uranium One
2010-2011:
Investors give millions more in donations to the Clinton Foundation
June 2010:
Rosatom seeks majority ownership of Uranium One,
pending approval by the Committee on Foreign Investment
in the United States, of which the State Department is a member.
Rosatom says it does not plan to increase its stake in Uranium One
or to take the company private.
June 29, 2010:
Bill Clinton is paid $500,000 for a speech in Moscow
by a Russian investment bank with ties to the Kremlin
that assigned a buy rating to Uranium One stock
October 2010:
Rosatom’s majority ownership approved by
Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States.
January 2013:
Rosatom takes full control of Uranium One and takes it private
Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation
Now...I didn't even mention the millions of dollars
from Russian investors and government agencies,
given to a small, off shore company,
which Podesta sat on the Executive Board
Podesta failed to disclose, not only the money but,
his involvement in this company, which had a stake in the sale
Now...unless you and your ilk
are capable of pulling your heads out of your asses
and admitting whose REALLY guilty of criminal conduct....
THEN FUCK OFF!
COLLUSION... RUSSIA... TREASON... CORRUPTED
*********CLINTONS*********
Really?!...that's your responseWhat does any of this have to do with Trump and his illegal election?
There is no "attorney client privilege" when the attorney and his client are both felons.Yes, whatever happened to the attorney/client privelage....apparently the DemonRATS and Mulehead have just SWEPT THAT AWAY SO IT IS NO LONGER A VIABLE DEFENSE FOR ANYONE BEING PROSECUTED!!!....Shall we call it the DemonRat Nuclear option?I love off topic cowards. They never produce anything. Lol!But apparently the OP and our ABNORMALS feel that THIS BULLSHIT is so much more important than the Magic Negro spending $310 MILLION of tax payers money ILLEGALLY on this.....
On more than one occasion, former President Barack Obama and others have referred to his presidency as “scandal-free,” or “not having any significant scandals.” In the video below, Obama claims that his presidency has not had “the kinds of scandals that have plagued other administrations.”
On more than one occasion, former President Barack Obama and others have referred to his presidency as “scandal-free,” or “not having any significant scandals.” In the video below, Obama claims that his presidency has not had “the kinds of scandals that have plagued other administrations.”
But the facts about his presidency paint a very different picture in regards to scandals. Words and phrases such as “IRS,” “Fast and Furious,” and “Benghazi” bring to mind scandals of significance that occurred under his watch.
In the latest example of significant scandals of his presidency, The Washington Examiner has reported that he approved “$310 million in free legal advice to illegal aliens.” Giving aid to law breakers, via tax payer funds, isn’t exactly a non-scandal.
The Washington Examiner wrote that this was done despite the fact that it is against federal law to use tax payer funds to help illegal aliens avoid deportation. But the Obama administration okayed it and did it, anyway.
The Immigration Reform Law Institute explained that the funds were directed at helping unaccompanied illegal alien minors...
Read more at westernjournal.com ..
The breaking news is that Trump violated three different campaign finance laws with the assistance of Michael Cohen according to prosecutors for the southern district of New York, and Trump is being implicated as a felon. Washington Post: Breaking News, World, US, DC News & Analysis
Late Friday, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York filed a document arguing that Michael Cohen, until last year President Trump’s personal attorney, should receive a substantial prison sentence for violations of federal law to which Cohen admitted guilt in August.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...paign-finance-law-violations/?utm_term=.1abb6
Yes! And it's the one you can't answer.What does any of this have to do with Trump and his illegal election?Too late bub. Talk to the prosecutors. They are calling it a contribution due to the nature of the payment. IT was hidden and never reported, and Trump said he knew nothing about it, which he lied about. The prosecutors are calling it a felony.
Cohen paid her out of campaign funds?
Link?Talk to the prosecutors. They are calling it a contribution due to the nature of the payment. IT was hidden and never reported, and Trump said he knew nothing about it, which he lied about. The prosecutors are calling it a felony.
The headline on the website Pravda
trumpeted President Vladimir V. Putin’s latest coup,...
"Russian Nuclear Energy Conquers the World"
The article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West.
The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers
and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling
much of the global uranium supply chain.
But the untold story behind that story is one that involves
not just the Russian president, but also a former American president
and a woman who would like to be the next one.
At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.
the sale gave the Russians control of
one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States.
Since uranium is considered a strategic asset,
with implications for national security,
the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of
representatives from a number of United States government agencies.
Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show,
a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation.
Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation
to make four donations totaling $2.35 million.
Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons,
despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck
with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors.
Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
And shortly after the Russians announced their intention
to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One,
Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech
from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin
that was promoting Uranium One stock.
September 2005:
Frank Giustra, a Canadian mining financier,
wins a major uranium deal in Kazakhstan for his company, UrAsia,
days after visiting the country with former President Bill Clinton.
2006:
Mr. Giustra donates $31.3 million to the Clinton Foundation
February 2007:
UrAsia merges with a South African mining company
and assumes the name Uranium One.
In the next two months, the company expands into the United States.
June 2008:
Negotations begin for an investment in Uranium One
by the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom
2008-2010:
Uranium One and former UrAsia investors
make $8.65 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation.
Uranium One investors stand to profit on a Rosatom deal
June 2009:
Rosatom subsidiary ARMZ
takes a 17 percent ownership stake in Uranium One
2010-2011:
Investors give millions more in donations to the Clinton Foundation
June 2010:
Rosatom seeks majority ownership of Uranium One,
pending approval by the Committee on Foreign Investment
in the United States, of which the State Department is a member.
Rosatom says it does not plan to increase its stake in Uranium One
or to take the company private.
June 29, 2010:
Bill Clinton is paid $500,000 for a speech in Moscow
by a Russian investment bank with ties to the Kremlin
that assigned a buy rating to Uranium One stock
October 2010:
Rosatom’s majority ownership approved by
Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States.
January 2013:
Rosatom takes full control of Uranium One and takes it private
Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation
Now...I didn't even mention the millions of dollars
from Russian investors and government agencies,
given to a small, off shore company,
which Podesta sat on the Executive Board
Podesta failed to disclose, not only the money but,
his involvement in this company, which had a stake in the sale
Now...unless you and your ilk
are capable of pulling your heads out of your asses
and admitting whose REALLY guilty of criminal conduct....
THEN FUCK OFF!
COLLUSION... RUSSIA... TREASON... CORRUPTED
*********CLINTONS*********Really?!...that's your responseWhat does any of this have to do with Trump and his illegal election?
This is why people voted for Trump
Ha, knock yourself out on your own ignorance and stupidity. So far, the law has taken the Republican Sheep out to the wood shed, and there is nothing you can do about it. There is no attorney client privilege when the two have been implicated in concocting the same crime. There are no rights when the two of them are committing the same crime dumb ass.There is no "attorney client privilege" when the attorney and his client are both felons.Yes, whatever happened to the attorney/client privelage....apparently the DemonRATS and Mulehead have just SWEPT THAT AWAY SO IT IS NO LONGER A VIABLE DEFENSE FOR ANYONE BEING PROSECUTED!!!....Shall we call it the DemonRat Nuclear option?I love off topic cowards. They never produce anything. Lol!But apparently the OP and our ABNORMALS feel that THIS BULLSHIT is so much more important than the Magic Negro spending $310 MILLION of tax payers money ILLEGALLY on this.....
On more than one occasion, former President Barack Obama and others have referred to his presidency as “scandal-free,” or “not having any significant scandals.” In the video below, Obama claims that his presidency has not had “the kinds of scandals that have plagued other administrations.”
On more than one occasion, former President Barack Obama and others have referred to his presidency as “scandal-free,” or “not having any significant scandals.” In the video below, Obama claims that his presidency has not had “the kinds of scandals that have plagued other administrations.”
But the facts about his presidency paint a very different picture in regards to scandals. Words and phrases such as “IRS,” “Fast and Furious,” and “Benghazi” bring to mind scandals of significance that occurred under his watch.
In the latest example of significant scandals of his presidency, The Washington Examiner has reported that he approved “$310 million in free legal advice to illegal aliens.” Giving aid to law breakers, via tax payer funds, isn’t exactly a non-scandal.
The Washington Examiner wrote that this was done despite the fact that it is against federal law to use tax payer funds to help illegal aliens avoid deportation. But the Obama administration okayed it and did it, anyway.
The Immigration Reform Law Institute explained that the funds were directed at helping unaccompanied illegal alien minors...
Read more at westernjournal.com ..
The breaking news is that Trump violated three different campaign finance laws with the assistance of Michael Cohen according to prosecutors for the southern district of New York, and Trump is being implicated as a felon. Washington Post: Breaking News, World, US, DC News & Analysis
Late Friday, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York filed a document arguing that Michael Cohen, until last year President Trump’s personal attorney, should receive a substantial prison sentence for violations of federal law to which Cohen admitted guilt in August.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...paign-finance-law-violations/?utm_term=.1abb6
Bullshit...you COMMUNIST/DemonRATS could care less about ESTABLISHED LAW AND LEGAL PRECEDENTS.....SAME SHIT that ALL COMMUNIST DICTATORS do, walk all over a person's rights and privelages
Yes! And it's the one you can't answer.What does any of this have to do with Trump and his illegal election?Too late bub. Talk to the prosecutors. They are calling it a contribution due to the nature of the payment. IT was hidden and never reported, and Trump said he knew nothing about it, which he lied about. The prosecutors are calling it a felony.Cohen paid her out of campaign funds?
Link?Talk to the prosecutors. They are calling it a contribution due to the nature of the payment. IT was hidden and never reported, and Trump said he knew nothing about it, which he lied about. The prosecutors are calling it a felony.
The headline on the website Pravda
trumpeted President Vladimir V. Putin’s latest coup,...
"Russian Nuclear Energy Conquers the World"
The article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West.
The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers
and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling
much of the global uranium supply chain.
But the untold story behind that story is one that involves
not just the Russian president, but also a former American president
and a woman who would like to be the next one.
At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.
the sale gave the Russians control of
one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States.
Since uranium is considered a strategic asset,
with implications for national security,
the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of
representatives from a number of United States government agencies.
Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show,
a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation.
Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation
to make four donations totaling $2.35 million.
Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons,
despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck
with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors.
Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
And shortly after the Russians announced their intention
to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One,
Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech
from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin
that was promoting Uranium One stock.
September 2005:
Frank Giustra, a Canadian mining financier,
wins a major uranium deal in Kazakhstan for his company, UrAsia,
days after visiting the country with former President Bill Clinton.
2006:
Mr. Giustra donates $31.3 million to the Clinton Foundation
February 2007:
UrAsia merges with a South African mining company
and assumes the name Uranium One.
In the next two months, the company expands into the United States.
June 2008:
Negotations begin for an investment in Uranium One
by the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom
2008-2010:
Uranium One and former UrAsia investors
make $8.65 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation.
Uranium One investors stand to profit on a Rosatom deal
June 2009:
Rosatom subsidiary ARMZ
takes a 17 percent ownership stake in Uranium One
2010-2011:
Investors give millions more in donations to the Clinton Foundation
June 2010:
Rosatom seeks majority ownership of Uranium One,
pending approval by the Committee on Foreign Investment
in the United States, of which the State Department is a member.
Rosatom says it does not plan to increase its stake in Uranium One
or to take the company private.
June 29, 2010:
Bill Clinton is paid $500,000 for a speech in Moscow
by a Russian investment bank with ties to the Kremlin
that assigned a buy rating to Uranium One stock
October 2010:
Rosatom’s majority ownership approved by
Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States.
January 2013:
Rosatom takes full control of Uranium One and takes it private
Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation
Now...I didn't even mention the millions of dollars
from Russian investors and government agencies,
given to a small, off shore company,
which Podesta sat on the Executive Board
Podesta failed to disclose, not only the money but,
his involvement in this company, which had a stake in the sale
Now...unless you and your ilk
are capable of pulling your heads out of your asses
and admitting whose REALLY guilty of criminal conduct....
THEN FUCK OFF!
COLLUSION... RUSSIA... TREASON... CORRUPTED
*********CLINTONS*********Really?!...that's your responseWhat does any of this have to do with Trump and his illegal election?
This is why people voted for Trump
Mueller's report makes that claim, not me. You idiot, how would I detail the conversation? You folks ask stupid questions as a distraction, and think it is magically going to help your argument. Spoiler alert; it's not. Try and keep it real people. You can't go anywhere with stupid arguments.There are no men that can enforce something that doesn't exist. Trump has been officially implicated in federal crimes. The non-existent "deep state" has not. Trump will have to deal with his own criminal liability before he thinks he can go out and deal with some make believe fantasy that you and he have.Trump has been implicated in a filing to be considered as a felon, who will need to answer for and defend himself against. The Congress would step in to put a check on the nonsense you are pedaling.Mueller will get many counter charges
Blackmail because of a witch hunt to cover up democrat crimes
And treason
Trump has the men and the military to make the charges stick
Wrong
The real charges are against the deep state for treason and trump has the men to enforce it
Mulehead totally lost it where rigging the investigation with nearly all democrat investigators
The media was caught rigging the debate against the voters fair election by giving the questions to Hillary
And then guy caught again the DNC rigged the election against democrat voters against sanders
This stuff is high treason and then the deep state uses black mail crime to cover up and try to make trump not go after the criminals
Black mail and high treason will be the charges that will stick because trump has the men
Feel free to detail the conversation where Trump instructed his lawyer to do anything illegal. If what he asked was illegal wouldn't his lawyer have a duty to tell him he couldn't do things that way?
.
