Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
WRONG!Otherwise known as following the money, the law, and the criminals. Don't you just love it?The breaking news is that Trump violated three different campaign finance laws with the assistance of Michael Cohen according to prosecutors for the southern district of New York, and Trump is being implicated as a felon. Washington Post: Breaking News, World, US, DC News & Analysis
Late Friday, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York filed a document arguing that Michael Cohen, until last year President Trump’s personal attorney, should receive a substantial prison sentence for violations of federal law to which Cohen admitted guilt in August.
Analysis | The government implicates Trump and the Trump campaign in federal campaign finance violations
Democrats and fake news .. almosts looking for used up sluts and porno lawyers to hump for bucks and political cheap shots ..
Yet I'll bet you supported willie not being removed for his admitted crimes. Hypocrite much?
.
I absolutely 100% did. I never once made excuses for his behavior. He needed to go.What about him? I called him a piece of shit for cheating on his wife.Where did I say it’s not consensual? And what cheater did I not call out for being a cheater?Got to love the regressives selective morality. LMAO What happened to the consensual adults thing? Hypocrite.
.
How about the one who committed perjury and obstruction over what you folks said was a consensual affair, you folks claimed it wasn't really a crime.
.
Did you support his removal for his admitted crimes?
.
Scary stuff, PilgrimCan you read? He needed to hide an affair weeks before the election, the money was not reported, it exceeded $2700 dollars, and it was reported to have come from stolen money out of his charity. Under federal law, an individual could not donate more than $2,700 directly to Trump’s primary or general election campaign in 2016. A $130,000 payment would far exceed that limit. Remember, Trump already lied about where the money came from. So for you to say it is not a campaign expense, is the joke of the day. Since Trump was lying, how in the hell do you know if it was an expense or not? Lol! Learn to read the obvious fool.how is it obvious?How do you know that? Did you talk to Trump?Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election. The hush money was to protect his personal spotless reputation.
Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election.
Doesn't matter, it wasn't a campaign expense.
And by the way, prosecutors will charge it as a campaign finance crime/felony/expense because of the obvious. He needed to hide an affair weeks before the election, the money was not reported, it exceeded $2700 dollars, and it was reported to have come from stolen money out of his charity. Under federal law, an individual could not donate more than $2,700 directly to Trump’s primary or general election campaign in 2016. A $130,000 payment would far exceed that limit. Remember, Trump already lied about where the money came from. So for you to say it is not a campaign expense, is the joke of the day. Since Trump was lying, how in the hell do you know if it was an expense or not? Lol!
Anyone who voted for or supports Trump really shouldn't lecture about embarrassment:Which of those Seven Stages of Grief do you imagine Trump currently occupies?He is in the first couple of stages of the grieving process.Why do you find it so difficult to defend Trump's criminal actions?
The Michael Cohen Sentencing Memos Are Damning for Trump
"In September, 2015, Trump approved Cohen’s plan to reach out to the Russian government.
"That November, Cohen 'spoke with a Russian national who claimed to be a ‘trusted person’ in the Russian Federation who could offer the campaign ‘political synergy’ and ‘synergy on a government level.’
"Cohen’s contact 'repeatedly proposed' a meeting between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, suggesting that it would have a 'phenomenal' effect on Trump’s efforts to build a Trump Tower in Moscow, which Mueller’s filing calls the 'Moscow Project.'"
Are you truly gullible enough to believe Trump is NOT a gold-plated con man who lies as often as most people breathe?
The Michael Cohen Sentencing Memos Are Damning for Trump
"The Southern District of New York’s simultaneously released sentencing memo also has serious legal ramifications for the President.
"In describing how Cohen bought the silence of two women with whom Trump had affairs in order to help Trump win the Presidency, it makes clear that Cohen 'acted in coordination with and at the direction of Individual-1.'
"Three months ago, Cohen said in his guilty plea that this was true and that the President was implicated in a criminal scheme to sway the election.
"Now, though, federal prosecutors working under Robert Khuzami, the acting U.S. Attorney, feel confident enough in this assertion that they have tied themselves to it."
I'm guessing "Anger."
President was implicated in a criminal scheme to sway the election.
By saying he didn't have sex with that woman? Or paying off another girl almost a million dollars in a civil suit while he was president?
Quit embarrassing yourselves..
.
Michael Cohen told Mueller's office about contacts between Trump aides and Russia
"After the filing from Mueller, Trump tweeted that it 'totally clears the President. Thank you!'
"But in fact there was nothing in either court filing that exonerated Trump, and one portion strongly suggested that Trump was personally involved in a campaign finance violation.
"The Manhattan prosecutors said Cohen had paid off two women to suppress their stories about affairs with Trump — a campaign expense that was improperly not reported — and said he did so "in coordination with and at the direction of" Trump."
It's a felony. Just ask prosecutors.Obama was fined for inadvertently not reporting campaign finances. We’ll see if the FEC finds the same for trump, who secretively paid off a porn star to keep her mouth shut.
It's all comes down to intent, did Trump intend to violate laws he had never been subject to just a year before? Candidates rely on lawyers to keep them straight, Trumps lawyer seems to have failed. That doesn't prove intent on Trump, if it was a violation at all, which is debatable. BTW failing to report is failing to report, where's the equal treatment under the law?
.
Trump: get some money to Story for her silence
Cohen: But that is illegal
Trump Do it.
Who cares? It's a civil suit..
.
We'll see how it plays out.
Victory is Near: SpyGate is Timed to Blow
"Remember, Trump knows everything and can prove it. This includes SpyGate, ObamaGate, The Clinton Foundation, Uranium One, Benghazi, Iran Deal. EVERYTHING.
He has all the evidence to nail Obama, Clinton and their cronies to the wall and has armed his cannons for firing, when the timing is right.
BUT he isn’t ready to fire, just yet.
Trump has had to prepare the terrain first.
Remember, since his inauguration, Trump has appointed loyalists to the key agencies that protect the Republic. The DOJ, FBI, CIA, NSA, SCOTUS, Senate (judiciary appointments) and other agencies are all led by Trump appointees.
The military establishment is also 100% behind Trump.
Trump knows that he is close to victory, but has not yet won the war. Why?
Robert Mueller’s SC and FakeNews, the last serious enemy holdouts, have yet to be defeated."
======================
"
For example, right now Mueller is trying to frame the four individuals who will be revealed as targets of illegal FISAs - Manafort, Flynn, Papadopoulos and Page - as suspicious liars. This is for FakeNews to activate later.
Mueller is also (desperately) trying to create a false narrative that the Russians hacked the DNC and then leaked it to WikiLeaks, then waited for the green light by the Trump campaign to release them. FakeNews is pushing this lie, 24/7."
"
They need fresh meat, in the form of information, to keep up their assault on Trump.
In order to create narratives, Mueller needs access to fresh intelligence. For FakeNews to do the same, they need fresh leaks.
Trump isn’t going to give them either."
"
Mueller was probably hoping to try and keep his witch-hunt going until the new Congress is sworn in, on Jan 3, 2019.
That will now be very difficult.
Time is against him."
"
Mueller’s new strategy will likely be to release a damning report, that he hopes the House can use to impeach Trump. One problem : Whitaker has the power to block its release.
One thing seems certain. Mueller will be closed down, in my opinion, before the end of the year. If not sooner.
Victory is Near: SpyGate is Timed to Blow
If you think Trump doesn't have all the information and knows what he's doing, you're wrong. He holds all the cards. Just waiting for the right time to lay them on the table.
No. Did you??I’m tellin’ ya, bro.These folks are so unbelievably stupid.LOLOLAsshole. All it takes is a CHANGE in DOJ regulations AS THEY DID FOR CLINTON, to indict a sitting president, it is up to the AMMENDABLE DOJ REGS......STUPID ASS!Dumbfuck, the DoJ can’t touch a sitting president. You really are dumber than shit.
What a moron you are, eh? Clinton was never indicted with any crime by the DoJ while he was president.
You idiots never learn. What a pity.
OH MY! Do we have a budding bormance here?
.
Tell me it ain't so bro.
You jealous bro?
...you scared bro?
Still skipping over my posts I see, you scared bro?
You mad bro?
After he was president. And under the agreement he wouldn’t be indicted.LOLOLAsshole. All it takes is a CHANGE in DOJ regulations AS THEY DID FOR CLINTON, to indict a sitting president, it is up to the AMMENDABLE DOJ REGS......STUPID ASS!Dumbfuck, the DoJ can’t touch a sitting president. You really are dumber than shit.You just make it up as you go, and use DNC bullshit talking points....ROTFLMFAO!!!When the evidence shows he broke the law by paying off a porn star, stole money from the government, colluded with the NRA & Russia, sent Kushner to avoid MBS on how to lie about his killing? His name will be shit outside of Trump world.
Lets start naming which Republicans will lead the charge: Romney, Grahm,
WHen it was discovered that Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign was guilty of violations involving nearly $2 million – an amount that dwarfs the $280,000 in Cohen’s case – the Obama Justice Department decided not to prosecute. Instead, the matter was quietly disposed of by a $375,000 fine by the Federal Election Commission.
A new head of the DOJ, will simply refuse to prosecute. As they did with the mulatto....watch the ABNORMALS Heads explode then....full RETARD....LOLOLOL!
What a moron you are, eh? Clinton was never indicted with any crime by the DoJ while he was president.
You idiots never learn. What a pity.
No, he plead out in a State court.
.
Let me know when you find one. You realize, if trump cared about not hurting Melanie, he wouldn’t have cheated on her while she was carrying his child; or any other time.He didn't want his voters finding out either.Oh? Then why did he wait so many years before paying off Daniels?
Maybe because...
up to his run for president, Melania didn't know about the affair, and he didn't want it coming out?
Oddly, I believe he was more worried about Melania.
and considering her reaction to the news, he had reason
Of course you do.
Of course you do.
Comes from having a working brain.
LOLOLOLOLLOLOLLOLOLTrump was only accused of rape by two women, I wouldn’t call him a “serial rapist.”
Bill paid off Paula jones for rape..
So you still can't figure this out can you
Dumbfuck, Paula Jones never even accused Bill Clinton of rape. Exactly how rightarded are you??
Then why the fuck **** did Bill pay her off?
That piece of shit president was a seriel rapist..and you know it
You’re such a fucking retard, ShortBus.
He didn’t pay her off for rape as she never accused him of that.
You have any idea just how fucking stupid you look? Seriously, you don’t know shit.
Bill raped her you stupid fuck
So I raped you in jail and I paid you a million dollars to shut the fuck up .
Your asshole hurting you don't think I raped you?
There’s no evidence Clinton paid them for it. So there’s no monetary value.Of course it was. Keeping a porn star from going public just 11 days before an election with her account of an affair with Trump was certainly a benefit to his campaign.It’s a violation because it wasn’t reported.Let’s ask Stormy how she was paid
She will say the money came from Cohen......a violation
If Trump claims he paid Cohen......show us the check
She will say the money came from Cohen......a violation
Unless Cohen paid from campaign funds, how is it a violation?
It wasn't a campaign expenditure, no reason to report it.
And yet, not a campaign expense.
The New York Times published many, many articles which they thought were a benefit to the Hillary campaign, yet they didn't report a single one as a campaign contribution.
And I'll say it again and again here. If Trump is an embarrassment, then the Demon-crats ought to be shamed out of politics completely because of Trump... He was actually a referendum on Demon-crats failures in policy, and in other radical position's the crats had taken over the years.Anyone who voted for or supports Trump really shouldn't lecture about embarrassment:Which of those Seven Stages of Grief do you imagine Trump currently occupies?He is in the first couple of stages of the grieving process.Why do you find it so difficult to defend Trump's criminal actions?Go buy a clue...
Adam Schiff's Statements Are Frequently False Or Missing Key Details
The Federalist
View attachment 233788
Jan 30, 2018 · Adam Schiff is portrayed by many in the media as a straight shooter. His record in reality is of fanning the flames of every single Trump-Russia collusion allegation out there. ... As soon as the committee had finished voting, ranking member Rep. Adam Schiff ran to the cameras to spin
The Michael Cohen Sentencing Memos Are Damning for Trump
"In September, 2015, Trump approved Cohen’s plan to reach out to the Russian government.
"That November, Cohen 'spoke with a Russian national who claimed to be a ‘trusted person’ in the Russian Federation who could offer the campaign ‘political synergy’ and ‘synergy on a government level.’
"Cohen’s contact 'repeatedly proposed' a meeting between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, suggesting that it would have a 'phenomenal' effect on Trump’s efforts to build a Trump Tower in Moscow, which Mueller’s filing calls the 'Moscow Project.'"
Are you truly gullible enough to believe Trump is NOT a gold-plated con man who lies as often as most people breathe?
The Michael Cohen Sentencing Memos Are Damning for Trump
"The Southern District of New York’s simultaneously released sentencing memo also has serious legal ramifications for the President.
"In describing how Cohen bought the silence of two women with whom Trump had affairs in order to help Trump win the Presidency, it makes clear that Cohen 'acted in coordination with and at the direction of Individual-1.'
"Three months ago, Cohen said in his guilty plea that this was true and that the President was implicated in a criminal scheme to sway the election.
"Now, though, federal prosecutors working under Robert Khuzami, the acting U.S. Attorney, feel confident enough in this assertion that they have tied themselves to it."
I'm guessing "Anger."
President was implicated in a criminal scheme to sway the election.
By saying he didn't have sex with that woman? Or paying off another girl almost a million dollars in a civil suit while he was president?
Quit embarrassing yourselves..
.
Michael Cohen told Mueller's office about contacts between Trump aides and Russia
"After the filing from Mueller, Trump tweeted that it 'totally clears the President. Thank you!'
"But in fact there was nothing in either court filing that exonerated Trump, and one portion strongly suggested that Trump was personally involved in a campaign finance violation.
"The Manhattan prosecutors said Cohen had paid off two women to suppress their stories about affairs with Trump — a campaign expense that was improperly not reported — and said he did so "in coordination with and at the direction of" Trump."
”Stop trying to play word games fool. Pleading to a lesser charge for a prosecutors agreement to drop a more serious one happens all the time.”Yeah, people plea guilty to lesser crimes when offered a deal. But they’re still guilty of the original charges. How stupid do you have to be to plead guilty to any crime, and face prison, when you’re completely innocent?That makes zero sense. Of course there is proof, or Cohen would not have pled guilty. Of course there is proof, or federal prosecutors would not have declared it as fact in court. And spare me the goofy 'spiracy nonsense.No trial --- no proof.
People plea to lesser crimes all the time that they didn't commit. That's not proof they actually did it. The charge was nothing but a way to try to connect Trump to wrong doing. It's no where close to proof that Trump did anything improper.
.
Stop trying to play word games fool. Pleading to a lesser charge for a prosecutors agreement to drop a more serious one happens all the time. And yeah, it's entirely possible you could be totally innocent of the lesser crime, that doesn't make you completely innocent, does it.
.
Is English your second language? I just said that.
People plea to lesser crimes all the time that they didn't commit.
Let me know when you find one. You realize, if trump cared about not hurting Melanie, he wouldn’t have cheated on her while she was carrying his child; or any other time.He didn't want his voters finding out either.Maybe because...
up to his run for president, Melania didn't know about the affair, and he didn't want it coming out?
Oddly, I believe he was more worried about Melania.
and considering her reaction to the news, he had reason
Of course you do.
Of course you do.
Comes from having a working brain.
Let me know when you find one.
Why on Earth would Russians bribe a junior Senator who had no say in approving the Rosatom business deal?? You make no sense.Who were the Russians bribing? Almost all of the money came from Canadians.LOLOLToo late bub. Talk to the prosecutors. They are calling it a contribution due to the nature of the payment. IT was hidden and never reported, and Trump said he knew nothing about it, which he lied about. The prosecutors are calling it a felony.Talk to the prosecutors. They are calling it a contribution due to the nature of the payment. IT was hidden and never reported, and Trump said he knew nothing about it, which he lied about. The prosecutors are calling it a felony.
The headline on the website Pravda
trumpeted President Vladimir V. Putin’s latest coup,...
"Russian Nuclear Energy Conquers the World"
The article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West.
The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers
and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling
much of the global uranium supply chain.
But the untold story behind that story is one that involves
not just the Russian president, but also a former American president
and a woman who would like to be the next one.
At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.
the sale gave the Russians control of
one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States.
Since uranium is considered a strategic asset,
with implications for national security,
the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of
representatives from a number of United States government agencies.
Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show,
a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation.
Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation
to make four donations totaling $2.35 million.
Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons,
despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck
with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors.
Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
And shortly after the Russians announced their intention
to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One,
Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech
from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin
that was promoting Uranium One stock.
September 2005:
Frank Giustra, a Canadian mining financier,
wins a major uranium deal in Kazakhstan for his company, UrAsia,
days after visiting the country with former President Bill Clinton.
2006:
Mr. Giustra donates $31.3 million to the Clinton Foundation
February 2007:
UrAsia merges with a South African mining company
and assumes the name Uranium One.
In the next two months, the company expands into the United States.
June 2008:
Negotations begin for an investment in Uranium One
by the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom
2008-2010:
Uranium One and former UrAsia investors
make $8.65 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation.
Uranium One investors stand to profit on a Rosatom deal
June 2009:
Rosatom subsidiary ARMZ
takes a 17 percent ownership stake in Uranium One
2010-2011:
Investors give millions more in donations to the Clinton Foundation
June 2010:
Rosatom seeks majority ownership of Uranium One,
pending approval by the Committee on Foreign Investment
in the United States, of which the State Department is a member.
Rosatom says it does not plan to increase its stake in Uranium One
or to take the company private.
June 29, 2010:
Bill Clinton is paid $500,000 for a speech in Moscow
by a Russian investment bank with ties to the Kremlin
that assigned a buy rating to Uranium One stock
October 2010:
Rosatom’s majority ownership approved by
Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States.
January 2013:
Rosatom takes full control of Uranium One and takes it private
Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation
Now...I didn't even mention the millions of dollars
from Russian investors and government agencies,
given to a small, off shore company,
which Podesta sat on the Executive Board
Podesta failed to disclose, not only the money but,
his involvement in this company, which had a stake in the sale
Now...unless you and your ilk
are capable of pulling your heads out of your asses
and admitting whose REALLY guilty of criminal conduct....
THEN FUCK OFF!
COLLUSION... RUSSIA... TREASON... CORRUPTED
*********CLINTONS*********
How many times has this narrative been debunked?
Almost all of the donations from Giustra came before Hillary was Secretary of State and Bill collecting $500,000 for speech was in line with how much he was paid for other speeches, which went as high as $700,000.
Almost all of the donations from Giustra came before Hillary was Secretary of State
The Russians were bribing a sitting US Senator?
Who were the Russians bribing?
The junior Senator from New York.
Almost all of the money came from Canadians.
From business partners of Russians..
Scary stuff, PilgrimCan you read? He needed to hide an affair weeks before the election, the money was not reported, it exceeded $2700 dollars, and it was reported to have come from stolen money out of his charity. Under federal law, an individual could not donate more than $2,700 directly to Trump’s primary or general election campaign in 2016. A $130,000 payment would far exceed that limit. Remember, Trump already lied about where the money came from. So for you to say it is not a campaign expense, is the joke of the day. Since Trump was lying, how in the hell do you know if it was an expense or not? Lol! Learn to read the obvious fool.how is it obvious?How do you know that? Did you talk to Trump?Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election.
Doesn't matter, it wasn't a campaign expense.
And by the way, prosecutors will charge it as a campaign finance crime/felony/expense because of the obvious. He needed to hide an affair weeks before the election, the money was not reported, it exceeded $2700 dollars, and it was reported to have come from stolen money out of his charity. Under federal law, an individual could not donate more than $2,700 directly to Trump’s primary or general election campaign in 2016. A $130,000 payment would far exceed that limit. Remember, Trump already lied about where the money came from. So for you to say it is not a campaign expense, is the joke of the day. Since Trump was lying, how in the hell do you know if it was an expense or not? Lol!
Anyone who voted for or supports Trump really shouldn't lecture about embarrassment:Which of those Seven Stages of Grief do you imagine Trump currently occupies?He is in the first couple of stages of the grieving process.
The Michael Cohen Sentencing Memos Are Damning for Trump
"The Southern District of New York’s simultaneously released sentencing memo also has serious legal ramifications for the President.
"In describing how Cohen bought the silence of two women with whom Trump had affairs in order to help Trump win the Presidency, it makes clear that Cohen 'acted in coordination with and at the direction of Individual-1.'
"Three months ago, Cohen said in his guilty plea that this was true and that the President was implicated in a criminal scheme to sway the election.
"Now, though, federal prosecutors working under Robert Khuzami, the acting U.S. Attorney, feel confident enough in this assertion that they have tied themselves to it."
I'm guessing "Anger."
President was implicated in a criminal scheme to sway the election.
By saying he didn't have sex with that woman? Or paying off another girl almost a million dollars in a civil suit while he was president?
Quit embarrassing yourselves..
.
Michael Cohen told Mueller's office about contacts between Trump aides and Russia
"After the filing from Mueller, Trump tweeted that it 'totally clears the President. Thank you!'
"But in fact there was nothing in either court filing that exonerated Trump, and one portion strongly suggested that Trump was personally involved in a campaign finance violation.
"The Manhattan prosecutors said Cohen had paid off two women to suppress their stories about affairs with Trump — a campaign expense that was improperly not reported — and said he did so "in coordination with and at the direction of" Trump."
It's a felony. Just ask prosecutors.It's all comes down to intent, did Trump intend to violate laws he had never been subject to just a year before? Candidates rely on lawyers to keep them straight, Trumps lawyer seems to have failed. That doesn't prove intent on Trump, if it was a violation at all, which is debatable. BTW failing to report is failing to report, where's the equal treatment under the law?
.
Trump: get some money to Story for her silence
Cohen: But that is illegal
Trump Do it.
Who cares? It's a civil suit..
.
We'll see how it plays out.
Victory is Near: SpyGate is Timed to Blow
"Remember, Trump knows everything and can prove it. This includes SpyGate, ObamaGate, The Clinton Foundation, Uranium One, Benghazi, Iran Deal. EVERYTHING.
He has all the evidence to nail Obama, Clinton and their cronies to the wall and has armed his cannons for firing, when the timing is right.
BUT he isn’t ready to fire, just yet.
Trump has had to prepare the terrain first.
Remember, since his inauguration, Trump has appointed loyalists to the key agencies that protect the Republic. The DOJ, FBI, CIA, NSA, SCOTUS, Senate (judiciary appointments) and other agencies are all led by Trump appointees.
The military establishment is also 100% behind Trump.
Trump knows that he is close to victory, but has not yet won the war. Why?
Robert Mueller’s SC and FakeNews, the last serious enemy holdouts, have yet to be defeated."
======================
"
For example, right now Mueller is trying to frame the four individuals who will be revealed as targets of illegal FISAs - Manafort, Flynn, Papadopoulos and Page - as suspicious liars. This is for FakeNews to activate later.
Mueller is also (desperately) trying to create a false narrative that the Russians hacked the DNC and then leaked it to WikiLeaks, then waited for the green light by the Trump campaign to release them. FakeNews is pushing this lie, 24/7."
"
They need fresh meat, in the form of information, to keep up their assault on Trump.
In order to create narratives, Mueller needs access to fresh intelligence. For FakeNews to do the same, they need fresh leaks.
Trump isn’t going to give them either."
"
Mueller was probably hoping to try and keep his witch-hunt going until the new Congress is sworn in, on Jan 3, 2019.
That will now be very difficult.
Time is against him."
"
Mueller’s new strategy will likely be to release a damning report, that he hopes the House can use to impeach Trump. One problem : Whitaker has the power to block its release.
One thing seems certain. Mueller will be closed down, in my opinion, before the end of the year. If not sooner.
Victory is Near: SpyGate is Timed to Blow
If you think Trump doesn't have all the information and knows what he's doing, you're wrong. He holds all the cards. Just waiting for the right time to lay them on the table.
Your link:
"Trump & Sun Tzu - The Art of War"
The Art of (the) War Deal?
Why on Earth would Tussians bribe a junior Senator who had no say in approving the Rosatom business deal?? You make no sense.Who were the Russians bribing? Almost all of the money came from Canadians.LOLOLThe headline on the website Pravda
trumpeted President Vladimir V. Putin’s latest coup,...
"Russian Nuclear Energy Conquers the World"
The article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West.
The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers
and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling
much of the global uranium supply chain.
But the untold story behind that story is one that involves
not just the Russian president, but also a former American president
and a woman who would like to be the next one.
At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.
the sale gave the Russians control of
one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States.
Since uranium is considered a strategic asset,
with implications for national security,
the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of
representatives from a number of United States government agencies.
Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show,
a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation.
Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation
to make four donations totaling $2.35 million.
Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons,
despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck
with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors.
Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
And shortly after the Russians announced their intention
to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One,
Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech
from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin
that was promoting Uranium One stock.
September 2005:
Frank Giustra, a Canadian mining financier,
wins a major uranium deal in Kazakhstan for his company, UrAsia,
days after visiting the country with former President Bill Clinton.
2006:
Mr. Giustra donates $31.3 million to the Clinton Foundation
February 2007:
UrAsia merges with a South African mining company
and assumes the name Uranium One.
In the next two months, the company expands into the United States.
June 2008:
Negotations begin for an investment in Uranium One
by the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom
2008-2010:
Uranium One and former UrAsia investors
make $8.65 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation.
Uranium One investors stand to profit on a Rosatom deal
June 2009:
Rosatom subsidiary ARMZ
takes a 17 percent ownership stake in Uranium One
2010-2011:
Investors give millions more in donations to the Clinton Foundation
June 2010:
Rosatom seeks majority ownership of Uranium One,
pending approval by the Committee on Foreign Investment
in the United States, of which the State Department is a member.
Rosatom says it does not plan to increase its stake in Uranium One
or to take the company private.
June 29, 2010:
Bill Clinton is paid $500,000 for a speech in Moscow
by a Russian investment bank with ties to the Kremlin
that assigned a buy rating to Uranium One stock
October 2010:
Rosatom’s majority ownership approved by
Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States.
January 2013:
Rosatom takes full control of Uranium One and takes it private
Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation
Now...I didn't even mention the millions of dollars
from Russian investors and government agencies,
given to a small, off shore company,
which Podesta sat on the Executive Board
Podesta failed to disclose, not only the money but,
his involvement in this company, which had a stake in the sale
Now...unless you and your ilk
are capable of pulling your heads out of your asses
and admitting whose REALLY guilty of criminal conduct....
THEN FUCK OFF!
COLLUSION... RUSSIA... TREASON... CORRUPTED
*********CLINTONS*********
How many times has this narrative been debunked?
Almost all of the donations from Giustra came before Hillary was Secretary of State and Bill collecting $500,000 for speech was in line with how much he was paid for other speeches, which went as high as $700,000.
Almost all of the donations from Giustra came before Hillary was Secretary of State
The Russians were bribing a sitting US Senator?
Who were the Russians bribing?
The junior Senator from New York.
Almost all of the money came from Canadians.
From business partners of Russians..
And no, the money did not come from business partners of Russia as it was donated years before Rosatom sought to purchase a share of Uranium One. And Giustra, the Canadian who donated most of the money to the Clinton Foundation, did so before he left Uranium One which was also prior to the Rosatom deal.
One would expect, if rightards had a brain, they would at some point learn that this shit has been so thoroughly debunked (even by Fox News), that they would give up on it and move on.
But no, no one ever accused a rightard if having a brain.
But no, no one ever accused a rightard if having a brain
LOLOLLOLLOLOLTrump paid for it... then didn’t report it.
It was a personal expense paid with his own money, he didn't need to report it.
.
You moron. Go learn campaign finance laws.
A previous FEC chairman said it wasn't a violation, I'll take his word over yours any day.
.
What does that have to do with your ignorance over campaign finance laws? It doesn’t matter if contributions come directly from the candidate or from elseware; if it’s of value to their campaign, it has to be reported.
And it matters not whose word you take. What matters is what the FEC does and what the House does.
Actually not. Dual purpose expenses that benefit the candidate personally and has a benefit to the campaign as well, aren't campaign expenses. A campaign expense has to be solely related to the campaign and would not have been spent if not for the campaign. Are you claiming there was no dual benefit?
Seems you may not know as much as you think. Look it up.
.
Why, yes, they have. Thanks for asking.Why on Earth would Tussians bribe a junior Senator who had no say in approving the Rosatom business deal?? You make no sense.Who were the Russians bribing? Almost all of the money came from Canadians.Almost all of the donations from Giustra came before Hillary was Secretary of State
The Russians were bribing a sitting US Senator?
Who were the Russians bribing?
The junior Senator from New York.
Almost all of the money came from Canadians.
From business partners of Russians..
And no, the money did not come from business partners of Russia as it was donated years before Rosatom sought to purchase a share of Uranium One. And Giustra, the Canadian who donated most of the money to the Clinton Foundation, did so before he left Uranium One which was also prior to the Rosatom deal.
One would expect, if rightards had a brain, they would at some point learn that this shit has been so thoroughly debunked (even by Fox News), that they would give up on it and move on.
But no, no one ever accused a rightard if having a brain.
But no, no one ever accused a rightard if having a brain
anyone ever accuse you of it?
If it was “rubbish,” why pay her off?LOLLOLOLIt was a personal expense paid with his own money, he didn't need to report it.
.
You moron. Go learn campaign finance laws.
A previous FEC chairman said it wasn't a violation, I'll take his word over yours any day.
.
What does that have to do with your ignorance over campaign finance laws? It doesn’t matter if contributions come directly from the candidate or from elseware; if it’s of value to their campaign, it has to be reported.
And it matters not whose word you take. What matters is what the FEC does and what the House does.
Actually not. Dual purpose expenses that benefit the candidate personally and has a benefit to the campaign as well, aren't campaign expenses. A campaign expense has to be solely related to the campaign and would not have been spent if not for the campaign. Are you claiming there was no dual benefit?
Seems you may not know as much as you think. Look it up.
.
I see nothing illegal about using campaign money to fight off obviously baseless opposition rubbish put out soley for political reasons, like everything the press and Democrats throws at Trump, including fake harassment lawsuits from attention whores.
Nope. I didn’t see where lying about an affair was that big of a deal and it had nothing to do with his presidency other than the humiliation he brought to it.What about him? I called him a piece of shit for cheating on his wife.Where did I say it’s not consensual? And what cheater did I not call out for being a cheater?In that video, Trump also confessed to attempting to commit adultery. That’s also “right as rain,” huh?
Got to love the regressives selective morality. LMAO What happened to the consensual adults thing? Hypocrite.
.
How about the one who committed perjury and obstruction over what you folks said was a consensual affair, you folks claimed it wasn't really a crime.
.
Did you support his removal for his admitted crimes?
.
Imbecile, if it goes to the Senate, that means he’s already been impeached.Impeachment doesn’t require intent.Obama was fined for inadvertently not reporting campaign finances. We’ll see if the FEC finds the same for trump, who secretively paid off a porn star to keep her mouth shut.LOLOL
Again, it’s up to the FEC to decide. Their evidence? That trump didn’t pay Stormy to stay silent for 10 years until his election was just 11 days away. Clearly not to hide it from Melanie.
And if the FEC finds he violated campaign finance laws, then the House can impeach him based on the same evidence that he didn’t pay her off for 10 years.
Maobama was fined 370,000 by the FEC, where was your impeachment talk then? Hypocrite.
.
It's all comes down to intent, did Trump intend to violate laws he had never been subject to just a year before? Candidates rely on lawyers to keep them straight, Trumps lawyer seems to have failed. That doesn't prove intent on Trump, if it was a violation at all, which is debatable. BTW failing to report is failing to report, where's the equal treatment under the law?
.
It does in a trial in the senate. You're just not too smart, are ya?
.
No. Did you??I’m tellin’ ya, bro.These folks are so unbelievably stupid.LOLOLAsshole. All it takes is a CHANGE in DOJ regulations AS THEY DID FOR CLINTON, to indict a sitting president, it is up to the AMMENDABLE DOJ REGS......STUPID ASS!
What a moron you are, eh? Clinton was never indicted with any crime by the DoJ while he was president.
You idiots never learn. What a pity.
OH MY! Do we have a budding bormance here?
.
But thanks for letting the forum know what you were thinking when you called other guys, “bro.”Tell me it ain't so bro.You jealous bro?...you scared bro?Still skipping over my posts I see, you scared bro?You mad bro?
Your slobbering responseThese folks are so unbelievably stupid.
Definitely a budding bromance.I’m tellin’ ya, bro.
