Trump has now been implicated in a federal crime

[boedicca]

Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election. The hush money was to protect his personal spotless reputation.

Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election.

Doesn't matter, it wasn't a campaign expense.

How do you know that? Did you talk to Trump?

And by the way, prosecutors will charge it as a campaign finance crime/felony/expense because of the obvious. He needed to hide an affair weeks before the election, the money was not reported, it exceeded $2700 dollars, and it was reported to have come from stolen money out of his charity. Under federal law, an individual could not donate more than $2,700 directly to Trump’s primary or general election campaign in 2016. A $130,000 payment would far exceed that limit. Remember, Trump already lied about where the money came from. So for you to say it is not a campaign expense, is the joke of the day. Since Trump was lying, how in the hell do you know if it was an expense or not? Lol!

How do you know that?

Because it's not a campaign expense.
Why do you feel it is?

I asked you two questions. Can't you answer?

Under federal law, an individual could not donate more than $2,700 directly to Trump’s primary or general election campaign in 2016.

I agree, a donation that size to the campaign would be an issue. This wasn't. It isn't.

Under what guidelines do you draw your conclusion?

Remember, Trump already lied about where the money came from.

So what?

Lol! Because that tells us everything you idiot. He wasn't straight with the American people exposing his lies about the source of the money. If you don't know the source, how can you claim it is or isn't a campaign expense? Answer, you can't, which is why you are so full of shit.

So for you to say it is not a campaign expense,

Was a check cut to the campaign? From the campaign?

You tell me? You are the one who said it wasn't an expense. Lol!

Under what guidelines do you draw your conclusion?

Cohen didn't write a $130,000 payment to the campaign.
Daniels didn't receive a $130,000 payment from the campaign.

He wasn't straight with the American people exposing his lies about the source of the money.

Oh no! A politician wasn't straight with the American people. How unique.

You tell me?

No, neither occurred.

You are the one who said it wasn't an expense.

Only because it wasn't.

Trump didn't do anything that remotely approaches Bubba's toxic behavior and mendacity.

But I want to say one thing to the American people. I want you to listen to me. I'm going to say this again: I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky. I never told anybody to lie. Not a single time. Never. These allegations are false. And I need to go back to work for the American people.

 

[OKTexas]

You just make it up as you go, and use DNC bullshit talking points....ROTFLMFAO!!!

WHen it was discovered that Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign was guilty of violations involving nearly $2 million – an amount that dwarfs the $280,000 in Cohen’s case – the Obama Justice Department decided not to prosecute. Instead, the matter was quietly disposed of by a $375,000 fine by the Federal Election Commission.

A new head of the DOJ, will simply refuse to prosecute. As they did with the mulatto....watch the ABNORMALS Heads explode then....full RETARD....LOLOLOL!

Dumbfuck, the DoJ can’t touch a sitting president. You really are dumber than shit.

Asshole. All it takes is a CHANGE in DOJ regulations AS THEY DID FOR CLINTON, to indict a sitting president, it is up to the AMMENDABLE DOJ REGS......STUPID ASS!

LOLOL

What a moron you are, eh? Clinton was never indicted with any crime by the DoJ while he was president.

You idiots never learn. What a pity.

No, he plead out in a State court.

.

After he was president. And under the agreement he wouldn’t be indicted.

No indictment was necessary he plead to the crimes.

.

 

[Sunsettommy]

The breaking news is that Trump violated three different campaign finance laws with the assistance of Michael Cohen according to prosecutors for the southern district of New York, and Trump is being implicated as a felon. Washington Post: Breaking News, World, US, DC News & Analysis

Late Friday, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York filed a document arguing that Michael Cohen, until last year President Trump’s personal attorney, should receive a substantial prison sentence for violations of federal law to which Cohen admitted guilt in August.


Analysis | The government implicates Trump and the Trump campaign in federal campaign finance violations

Did you bother to read the actual DOCUMENT, that outlines Cohens crimes and lies, but NEVER mention Trump at all?

Michael Cohen Sentencing Memo

Washington Compost is BSing you...…. again!

Here is more exposing that Cohen hasn't provided anything against Trump:

SDNY Releases Cohen Sentencing Memo – Apparently Media Reports of Cohen Cooperation Were Greatly Exaggerated…
Posted on December 7, 2018 by sundance

"Within a sentencing memo filed today (full pdf below) the US Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of New York recommends “a substantial term of imprisonment” for Michael Cohen, who has pleaded guilty to fraud and tax charges and campaign finance crimes, as well as lying to Congress.

Reading through the memo – the content of cooperation, and the details that surface as a result therein, are entirely different from all previous media claims:"

Don't be so easily conned by the Media!

 

[Faun]

That makes zero sense. Of course there is proof, or Cohen would not have pled guilty. Of course there is proof, or federal prosecutors would not have declared it as fact in court. And spare me the goofy 'spiracy nonsense.

People plea to lesser crimes all the time that they didn't commit. That's not proof they actually did it. The charge was nothing but a way to try to connect Trump to wrong doing. It's no where close to proof that Trump did anything improper.

.

Yeah, people plea guilty to lesser crimes when offered a deal. But they’re still guilty of the original charges. How stupid do you have to be to plead guilty to any crime, and face prison, when you’re completely innocent?

Stop trying to play word games fool. Pleading to a lesser charge for a prosecutors agreement to drop a more serious one happens all the time. And yeah, it's entirely possible you could be totally innocent of the lesser crime, that doesn't make you completely innocent, does it.

.

”Stop trying to play word games fool. Pleading to a lesser charge for a prosecutors agreement to drop a more serious one happens all the time.”

Is English your second language? I just said that.

People plea to lesser crimes all the time that they didn't commit.​

Yet you claim Cohen committed everything he plead to, yet it has never been proven in court.

.

Quote me saying that......

 

[Faun]

He didn't want his voters finding out either.

Oddly, I believe he was more worried about Melania.

and considering her reaction to the news, he had reason

Of course you do.

Of course you do.

Comes from having a working brain.

Let me know when you find one. You realize, if trump cared about not hurting Melanie, he wouldn’t have cheated on her while she was carrying his child; or any other time.

Let me know when you find one.

Found it long ago...


Been using it for years.



Not seeing a lot of difference between his and Clinton, in the sexual advances area.

yet y'all gave him a pass

Now WTF does that have to do with you idiotically saying trump hid Stormy for Melanie’s sake when it’s clear, he just doesn’t care that much about whether or not he hurts her?

 

[Faun]

Dumbfuck, the DoJ can’t touch a sitting president. You really are dumber than shit.

Asshole. All it takes is a CHANGE in DOJ regulations AS THEY DID FOR CLINTON, to indict a sitting president, it is up to the AMMENDABLE DOJ REGS......STUPID ASS!

LOLOL

What a moron you are, eh? Clinton was never indicted with any crime by the DoJ while he was president.

You idiots never learn. What a pity.

No, he plead out in a State court.

.

After he was president. And under the agreement he wouldn’t be indicted.

No indictment was necessary he plead to the crimes.

.

So what?

 

[skookerasbil]

Dang.....some enormous bumpy cucumbers coming for some folks on this thread.....

Butter up s0ns!!

 

[RealDave]

Why do you find it so difficult to defend Trump's criminal actions?

The Michael Cohen Sentencing Memos Are Damning for Trump

"In September, 2015, Trump approved Cohen’s plan to reach out to the Russian government.

"That November, Cohen 'spoke with a Russian national who claimed to be a ‘trusted person’ in the Russian Federation who could offer the campaign ‘political synergy’ and ‘synergy on a government level.’

"Cohen’s contact 'repeatedly proposed' a meeting between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, suggesting that it would have a 'phenomenal' effect on Trump’s efforts to build a Trump Tower in Moscow, which Mueller’s filing calls the 'Moscow Project.'"

Are you truly gullible enough to believe Trump is NOT a gold-plated con man who lies as often as most people breathe?

He is in the first couple of stages of the grieving process.

Which of those Seven Stages of Grief do you imagine Trump currently occupies?

The Michael Cohen Sentencing Memos Are Damning for Trump

"The Southern District of New York’s simultaneously released sentencing memo also has serious legal ramifications for the President.

"In describing how Cohen bought the silence of two women with whom Trump had affairs in order to help Trump win the Presidency, it makes clear that Cohen 'acted in coordination with and at the direction of Individual-1.'

"Three months ago, Cohen said in his guilty plea that this was true and that the President was implicated in a criminal scheme to sway the election.

"Now, though, federal prosecutors working under Robert Khuzami, the acting U.S. Attorney, feel confident enough in this assertion that they have tied themselves to it."

I'm guessing "Anger."

President was implicated in a criminal scheme to sway the election.


By saying he didn't have sex with that woman? Or paying off another girl almost a million dollars in a civil suit while he was president?


Quit embarrassing yourselves..


.

Anyone who voted for or supports Trump really shouldn't lecture about embarrassment:

Michael Cohen told Mueller's office about contacts between Trump aides and Russia

"After the filing from Mueller, Trump tweeted that it 'totally clears the President. Thank you!'

"But in fact there was nothing in either court filing that exonerated Trump, and one portion strongly suggested that Trump was personally involved in a campaign finance violation.

"The Manhattan prosecutors said Cohen had paid off two women to suppress their stories about affairs with Trump — a campaign expense that was improperly not reported — and said he did so "in coordination with and at the direction of" Trump."

And I'll say it again and again here. If Trump is an embarrassment, then the Demon-crats ought to be shamed out of politics completely because of Trump... He was actually a referendum on Demon-crats failures in policy, and in other radical position's the crats had taken over the years.

Otherwise everything came to a head, and Trump is bursting the Demon-crat pimples one by one, but do you think the crats are thankful for the clearer skin Trump has given to them ?? Nope, they just want to relapse into obscurity once again, and especially as the voters dig deeper in order to get the answers wanted in it all, and they are not the answers being sought after.

Yet another dumbass Trumpette blaming Democrats because he was so fucking stupid to have voted for Trump.

 

[RealDave]

That makes zero sense. Of course there is proof, or Cohen would not have pled guilty. Of course there is proof, or federal prosecutors would not have declared it as fact in court. And spare me the goofy 'spiracy nonsense.

People plea to lesser crimes all the time that they didn't commit. That's not proof they actually did it. The charge was nothing but a way to try to connect Trump to wrong doing. It's no where close to proof that Trump did anything improper.

.

Yeah, people plea guilty to lesser crimes when offered a deal. But they’re still guilty of the original charges. How stupid do you have to be to plead guilty to any crime, and face prison, when you’re completely innocent?

Stop trying to play word games fool. Pleading to a lesser charge for a prosecutors agreement to drop a more serious one happens all the time. And yeah, it's entirely possible you could be totally innocent of the lesser crime, that doesn't make you completely innocent, does it.

.

”Stop trying to play word games fool. Pleading to a lesser charge for a prosecutors agreement to drop a more serious one happens all the time.”

Is English your second language? I just said that.

People plea to lesser crimes all the time that they didn't commit.​

Yet you claim Cohen committed everything he plead to, yet it has never been proven in court.

.

So, you think he needs to go to court when he admitted these things?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

She will say the money came from Cohen......a violation

Unless Cohen paid from campaign funds, how is it a violation?

It’s a violation because it wasn’t reported.

It wasn't a campaign expenditure, no reason to report it.

Of course it was. Keeping a porn star from going public just 11 days before an election with her account of an affair with Trump was certainly a benefit to his campaign.

And yet, not a campaign expense.

The New York Times published many, many articles which they thought were a benefit to the Hillary campaign, yet they didn't report a single one as a campaign contribution.

There’s no evidence Clinton paid them for it. So there’s no monetary value.

There’s no evidence Clinton paid them for it.

A bunch of positive stories in the New York Times....no monetary value?

You can't be serious.

 

[Auld Phart]

Oddly, I believe he was more worried about Melania.

and considering her reaction to the news, he had reason

Of course you do.

Of course you do.

Comes from having a working brain.

Let me know when you find one. You realize, if trump cared about not hurting Melanie, he wouldn’t have cheated on her while she was carrying his child; or any other time.

Let me know when you find one.

Found it long ago...


Been using it for years.



Not seeing a lot of difference between his and Clinton, in the sexual advances area.

yet y'all gave him a pass

Now WTF does that have to do with you idiotically saying trump hid Stormy for Melanie’s sake when it’s clear, he just doesn’t care that much about whether or not he hurts her?

He kept it from her for 10 years..

Think about it.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The headline on the website Pravda
trumpeted President Vladimir V. Putin’s latest coup,...
"Russian Nuclear Energy Conquers the World"

The article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West.
The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers
and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling
much of the global uranium supply chain.

But the untold story behind that story is one that involves
not just the Russian president, but also a former American president
and a woman who would like to be the next one.

At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

the sale gave the Russians control of
one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States.

Since uranium is considered a strategic asset,
with implications for national security,
the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of
representatives from a number of United States government agencies.
Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show,
a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation.

Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation
to make four donations totaling $2.35 million.
Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons,
despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck
with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors.
Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention
to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One,
Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech
from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin
that was promoting Uranium One stock.



September 2005:

Frank Giustra, a Canadian mining financier,
wins a major uranium deal in Kazakhstan for his company, UrAsia,
days after visiting the country with former President Bill Clinton.


2006:

Mr. Giustra donates $31.3 million to the Clinton Foundation


February 2007:

UrAsia merges with a South African mining company
and assumes the name Uranium One.
In the next two months, the company expands into the United States.


June 2008:

Negotations begin for an investment in Uranium One
by the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom


2008-2010:

Uranium One and former UrAsia investors
make $8.65 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation.
Uranium One investors stand to profit on a Rosatom deal


June 2009:

Rosatom subsidiary ARMZ
takes a 17 percent ownership stake in Uranium One


2010-2011:

Investors give millions more in donations to the Clinton Foundation


June 2010:

Rosatom seeks majority ownership of Uranium One,
pending approval by the Committee on Foreign Investment
in the United States, of which the State Department is a member.

Rosatom says it does not plan to increase its stake in Uranium One
or to take the company private.


June 29, 2010:

Bill Clinton is paid $500,000 for a speech in Moscow
by a Russian investment bank with ties to the Kremlin
that assigned a buy rating to Uranium One stock


October 2010:

Rosatom’s majority ownership approved by
Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States.


January 2013:

Rosatom takes full control of Uranium One and takes it private

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation

Now...I didn't even mention the millions of dollars
from Russian investors and government agencies,
given to a small, off shore company,
which Podesta sat on the Executive Board

Podesta failed to disclose, not only the money but,
his involvement in this company, which had a stake in the sale

Now...unless you and your ilk
are capable of pulling your heads out of your asses
and admitting whose REALLY guilty of criminal conduct....

THEN FUCK OFF!

COLLUSION... RUSSIA... TREASON... CORRUPTED
*********CLINTONS*********

LOLOL

How many times has this narrative been debunked?

Almost all of the donations from Giustra came before Hillary was Secretary of State and Bill collecting $500,000 for speech was in line with how much he was paid for other speeches, which went as high as $700,000.

Almost all of the donations from Giustra came before Hillary was Secretary of State

The Russians were bribing a sitting US Senator?

Who were the Russians bribing? Almost all of the money came from Canadians.

Who were the Russians bribing?

The junior Senator from New York.

Almost all of the money came from Canadians.

From business partners of Russians..

Why on Earth would Russians bribe a junior Senator who had no say in approving the Rosatom business deal?? You make no sense.

And no, the money did not come from business partners of Russia as it was donated years before Rosatom sought to purchase a share of Uranium One. And Giustra, the Canadian who donated most of the money to the Clinton Foundation, did so before he left Uranium One which was also prior to the Rosatom deal.

One would expect, if rightards had a brain, they would at some point learn that this shit has been so thoroughly debunked (even by Fox News), that they would give up on it and move on.

But no, no one ever accused a rightard if having a brain.

Why on Earth would Russians bribe a junior Senator

That is an excellent question. Maybe they were buying influence?

And no, the money did not come from business partners of Russia

Giustra didn't have business interests with Russia/Russians?

 

[Wyatt earp]

He is in the first couple of stages of the grieving process.

Which of those Seven Stages of Grief do you imagine Trump currently occupies?

The Michael Cohen Sentencing Memos Are Damning for Trump

"The Southern District of New York’s simultaneously released sentencing memo also has serious legal ramifications for the President.

"In describing how Cohen bought the silence of two women with whom Trump had affairs in order to help Trump win the Presidency, it makes clear that Cohen 'acted in coordination with and at the direction of Individual-1.'

"Three months ago, Cohen said in his guilty plea that this was true and that the President was implicated in a criminal scheme to sway the election.

"Now, though, federal prosecutors working under Robert Khuzami, the acting U.S. Attorney, feel confident enough in this assertion that they have tied themselves to it."

I'm guessing "Anger."

President was implicated in a criminal scheme to sway the election.


By saying he didn't have sex with that woman? Or paying off another girl almost a million dollars in a civil suit while he was president?


Quit embarrassing yourselves..


.

Anyone who voted for or supports Trump really shouldn't lecture about embarrassment:

Michael Cohen told Mueller's office about contacts between Trump aides and Russia

"After the filing from Mueller, Trump tweeted that it 'totally clears the President. Thank you!'

"But in fact there was nothing in either court filing that exonerated Trump, and one portion strongly suggested that Trump was personally involved in a campaign finance violation.

"The Manhattan prosecutors said Cohen had paid off two women to suppress their stories about affairs with Trump — a campaign expense that was improperly not reported — and said he did so "in coordination with and at the direction of" Trump."

And I'll say it again and again here. If Trump is an embarrassment, then the Demon-crats ought to be shamed out of politics completely because of Trump... He was actually a referendum on Demon-crats failures in policy, and in other radical position's the crats had taken over the years.

Otherwise everything came to a head, and Trump is bursting the Demon-crat pimples one by one, but do you think the crats are thankful for the clearer skin Trump has given to them ?? Nope, they just want to relapse into obscurity once again, and especially as the voters dig deeper in order to get the answers wanted in it all, and they are not the answers being sought after.

Yet another dumbass Trumpette blaming Democrats because he was so fucking stupid to have voted for Trump.

Once again you created Trump by putting a jiffy lube dumb ass from Chicago as president .

.

 

[OKTexas]

It was a personal expense paid with his own money, he didn't need to report it.

.

LOLOL

You moron. Go learn campaign finance laws.

A previous FEC chairman said it wasn't a violation, I'll take his word over yours any day.

.

LOL

What does that have to do with your ignorance over campaign finance laws? It doesn’t matter if contributions come directly from the candidate or from elseware; if it’s of value to their campaign, it has to be reported.

And it matters not whose word you take. What matters is what the FEC does and what the House does.

Actually not. Dual purpose expenses that benefit the candidate personally and has a benefit to the campaign as well, aren't campaign expenses. A campaign expense has to be solely related to the campaign and would not have been spent if not for the campaign. Are you claiming there was no dual benefit?

Seems you may not know as much as you think. Look it up.

.

LOLOL

Which also has nothing to do with your ignorance that trump did not have to report it because he paid the contribution to his own campaign.

I never said that, stop trying to put words in my mouth. I said it was a personal expense, if it's ruled as dual purpose, it still wouldn't have needed to be reported. The facts and FEC guides have been posted, try reading them instead of pushing your BS.

.

 

[RealDave]

He didn't want his voters finding out either.

Oddly, I believe he was more worried about Melania.

and considering her reaction to the news, he had reason

Of course you do.

Of course you do.

Comes from having a working brain.

Let me know when you find one. You realize, if trump cared about not hurting Melanie, he wouldn’t have cheated on her while she was carrying his child; or any other time.

Let me know when you find one.

Found it long ago...


Been using it for years.



Not seeing a lot of difference between his and Clinton, in the sexual advances area.

yet y'all gave him a pass

Was Clinton ever elected after all this came to light? No.

Did Trump's YES & you assfucks still voted for him.

THAT is the fucking difference you stupid shit.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election.

Doesn't matter, it wasn't a campaign expense.

How do you know that? Did you talk to Trump?

And by the way, prosecutors will charge it as a campaign finance crime/felony/expense because of the obvious. He needed to hide an affair weeks before the election, the money was not reported, it exceeded $2700 dollars, and it was reported to have come from stolen money out of his charity. Under federal law, an individual could not donate more than $2,700 directly to Trump’s primary or general election campaign in 2016. A $130,000 payment would far exceed that limit. Remember, Trump already lied about where the money came from. So for you to say it is not a campaign expense, is the joke of the day. Since Trump was lying, how in the hell do you know if it was an expense or not? Lol!

How do you know that?

Because it's not a campaign expense.
Why do you feel it is?

I asked you two questions. Can't you answer?

Under federal law, an individual could not donate more than $2,700 directly to Trump’s primary or general election campaign in 2016.

I agree, a donation that size to the campaign would be an issue. This wasn't. It isn't.

Under what guidelines do you draw your conclusion?

Remember, Trump already lied about where the money came from.

So what?

Lol! Because that tells us everything you idiot. He wasn't straight with the American people exposing his lies about the source of the money. If you don't know the source, how can you claim it is or isn't a campaign expense? Answer, you can't, which is why you are so full of shit.

So for you to say it is not a campaign expense,

Was a check cut to the campaign? From the campaign?

You tell me? You are the one who said it wasn't an expense. Lol!

Under what guidelines do you draw your conclusion?

Cohen didn't write a $130,000 payment to the campaign.
Daniels didn't receive a $130,000 payment from the campaign.

He wasn't straight with the American people exposing his lies about the source of the money.

Oh no! A politician wasn't straight with the American people. How unique.

You tell me?

No, neither occurred.

You are the one who said it wasn't an expense.

Only because it wasn't.

It doesn’t have to come from, or go to, the campaign. It only has to be of value to the campaign. And apparently, it was worth $130,000 of value to the campaign to avoid the public from hearing about a major scandal just 11 days before an election.

It doesn’t have to come from, or go to, the campaign. It only has to be of value to the campaign.

What was the value of Bernie's endorsement to Hillary's campaign? Must have been worth millions.

 

[Auld Phart]

LOLOL

How many times has this narrative been debunked?

Almost all of the donations from Giustra came before Hillary was Secretary of State and Bill collecting $500,000 for speech was in line with how much he was paid for other speeches, which went as high as $700,000.

Almost all of the donations from Giustra came before Hillary was Secretary of State

The Russians were bribing a sitting US Senator?

Who were the Russians bribing? Almost all of the money came from Canadians.

Who were the Russians bribing?

The junior Senator from New York.

Almost all of the money came from Canadians.

From business partners of Russians..

Why on Earth would Russians bribe a junior Senator who had no say in approving the Rosatom business deal?? You make no sense.

And no, the money did not come from business partners of Russia as it was donated years before Rosatom sought to purchase a share of Uranium One. And Giustra, the Canadian who donated most of the money to the Clinton Foundation, did so before he left Uranium One which was also prior to the Rosatom deal.

One would expect, if rightards had a brain, they would at some point learn that this shit has been so thoroughly debunked (even by Fox News), that they would give up on it and move on.

But no, no one ever accused a rightard if having a brain.

Why on Earth would Russians bribe a junior Senator

That is an excellent question. Maybe they were buying influence?

And no, the money did not come from business partners of Russia

Giustra didn't have business interests with Russia/Russians?

Why on Earth would Russians bribe a junior Senator

She knows where the bodies are buried?

 

[RealDave]

Which of those Seven Stages of Grief do you imagine Trump currently occupies?

The Michael Cohen Sentencing Memos Are Damning for Trump

"The Southern District of New York’s simultaneously released sentencing memo also has serious legal ramifications for the President.

"In describing how Cohen bought the silence of two women with whom Trump had affairs in order to help Trump win the Presidency, it makes clear that Cohen 'acted in coordination with and at the direction of Individual-1.'

"Three months ago, Cohen said in his guilty plea that this was true and that the President was implicated in a criminal scheme to sway the election.

"Now, though, federal prosecutors working under Robert Khuzami, the acting U.S. Attorney, feel confident enough in this assertion that they have tied themselves to it."

I'm guessing "Anger."

President was implicated in a criminal scheme to sway the election.


By saying he didn't have sex with that woman? Or paying off another girl almost a million dollars in a civil suit while he was president?


Quit embarrassing yourselves..


.

Anyone who voted for or supports Trump really shouldn't lecture about embarrassment:

Michael Cohen told Mueller's office about contacts between Trump aides and Russia

"After the filing from Mueller, Trump tweeted that it 'totally clears the President. Thank you!'

"But in fact there was nothing in either court filing that exonerated Trump, and one portion strongly suggested that Trump was personally involved in a campaign finance violation.

"The Manhattan prosecutors said Cohen had paid off two women to suppress their stories about affairs with Trump — a campaign expense that was improperly not reported — and said he did so "in coordination with and at the direction of" Trump."

And I'll say it again and again here. If Trump is an embarrassment, then the Demon-crats ought to be shamed out of politics completely because of Trump... He was actually a referendum on Demon-crats failures in policy, and in other radical position's the crats had taken over the years.

Otherwise everything came to a head, and Trump is bursting the Demon-crat pimples one by one, but do you think the crats are thankful for the clearer skin Trump has given to them ?? Nope, they just want to relapse into obscurity once again, and especially as the voters dig deeper in order to get the answers wanted in it all, and they are not the answers being sought after.

Yet another dumbass Trumpette blaming Democrats because he was so fucking stupid to have voted for Trump.

Once again you created Trump by putting a jiffy lube dumb ass from Chicago as president .

.

Here we go again. A stupid fuck blaming his vote for Trump on the election of Obama.

I guess you must be claiming putting a black man in the White House fired up all you racist fucks???

 

[OKTexas]

Got to love the regressives selective morality. LMAO What happened to the consensual adults thing? Hypocrite.

.

Where did I say it’s not consensual? And what cheater did I not call out for being a cheater?

How about the one who committed perjury and obstruction over what you folks said was a consensual affair, you folks claimed it wasn't really a crime.

.

What about him? I called him a piece of shit for cheating on his wife.

Did you support his removal for his admitted crimes?

.

Nope. I didn’t see where lying about an affair was that big of a deal and it had nothing to do with his presidency other than the humiliation he brought to it.

Perjury and obstruction are felonies, that made it a big deal, hypocrite.

.

 

[RealDave]

How do you know that? Did you talk to Trump?

And by the way, prosecutors will charge it as a campaign finance crime/felony/expense because of the obvious. He needed to hide an affair weeks before the election, the money was not reported, it exceeded $2700 dollars, and it was reported to have come from stolen money out of his charity. Under federal law, an individual could not donate more than $2,700 directly to Trump’s primary or general election campaign in 2016. A $130,000 payment would far exceed that limit. Remember, Trump already lied about where the money came from. So for you to say it is not a campaign expense, is the joke of the day. Since Trump was lying, how in the hell do you know if it was an expense or not? Lol!

How do you know that?

Because it's not a campaign expense.
Why do you feel it is?

I asked you two questions. Can't you answer?

Under federal law, an individual could not donate more than $2,700 directly to Trump’s primary or general election campaign in 2016.

I agree, a donation that size to the campaign would be an issue. This wasn't. It isn't.

Under what guidelines do you draw your conclusion?

Remember, Trump already lied about where the money came from.

So what?

Lol! Because that tells us everything you idiot. He wasn't straight with the American people exposing his lies about the source of the money. If you don't know the source, how can you claim it is or isn't a campaign expense? Answer, you can't, which is why you are so full of shit.

So for you to say it is not a campaign expense,

Was a check cut to the campaign? From the campaign?

You tell me? You are the one who said it wasn't an expense. Lol!

Under what guidelines do you draw your conclusion?

Cohen didn't write a $130,000 payment to the campaign.
Daniels didn't receive a $130,000 payment from the campaign.

He wasn't straight with the American people exposing his lies about the source of the money.

Oh no! A politician wasn't straight with the American people. How unique.

You tell me?

No, neither occurred.

You are the one who said it wasn't an expense.

Only because it wasn't.

It doesn’t have to come from, or go to, the campaign. It only has to be of value to the campaign. And apparently, it was worth $130,000 of value to the campaign to avoid the public from hearing about a major scandal just 11 days before an election.

It doesn’t have to come from, or go to, the campaign. It only has to be of value to the campaign.

What was the value of Bernie's endorsement to Hillary's campaign? Must have been worth millions.

Really, you are claiming Hillary bribed Bernie??? Really??? You are that pathetic?