Trump has now been implicated in a federal crime

[Lumpy 1]

The breaking news is that Trump violated three different campaign finance laws with the assistance of Michael Cohen according to prosecutors for the southern district of New York, and Trump is being implicated as a felon. Washington Post: Breaking News, World, US, DC News & Analysis

Late Friday, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York filed a document arguing that Michael Cohen, until last year President Trump’s personal attorney, should receive a substantial prison sentence for violations of federal law to which Cohen admitted guilt in August.


Analysis | The government implicates Trump and the Trump campaign in federal campaign finance violations

Democrats and fake news .. almosts looking for used up sluts and porno lawyers to hump for bucks and political cheap shots ..

Otherwise known as following the money, the law, and the criminals. Don't you just love it?

Well, if Dems weren't such political cowards and took responsibility for their own lawlessness/criminal acts I'd be able to take your line of puritanical crap seriously. (personal insult deleted) ...

btw .. welcome to the USMB .. you fit right in...

 

[The Purge]

CNN Host, Reporter Agree Impeaching Trump Over Sex is Dem Hypocrisy with Icky Witnesses!

Michael Isikoff, Chief Investigative Correpondent for Yahoo News, is unable to find any real proof of Trump-Russia collusion based on the latest court filings by Special Counsel Robert Mueller when he appeared on CNN's December 8 Smerconish show, hosted by Michael Smerconish.



But first, Isikoff agreed with Smerconish on the appearance of Democratic hypocrisy on impeaching over sex. Rep. Jerrold Nadler "eloquently" argued Clinton shouldn't be impeached for lying to conceal an affair with an intern. So how is Nadler going to impeach using sketchy witnesses like Stormy Daniels and Michael Avenatti?

Read more at newsbusters.org ...

Even Michael Isikoff finds NO definitive proof of collusion. So now the Democrats want to impeach Trump for basically the same thing for what the Justice Department dropped charges against John Edwards.

 

[Marion Morrison]

OP is based on the Stormy Daniel's stuff. That's a mighty shaky foundation.

Especially since she lost in court.

 

[BWK]

The breaking news is that Trump violated three different campaign finance laws with the assistance of Michael Cohen according to prosecutors for the southern district of New York, and Trump is being implicated as a felon. Washington Post: Breaking News, World, US, DC News & Analysis

Late Friday, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York filed a document arguing that Michael Cohen, until last year President Trump’s personal attorney, should receive a substantial prison sentence for violations of federal law to which Cohen admitted guilt in August.


Analysis | The government implicates Trump and the Trump campaign in federal campaign finance violations

Democrats and fake news .. almosts looking for used up sluts and porno lawyers to hump for bucks and political cheap shots ..

Otherwise known as following the money, the law, and the criminals. Don't you just love it?

Well, if Dems weren't such political cowards and took responsibility for their own lawlessness/criminal acts I'd be able to take your line of puritanical crap seriously. (personal insult deleted) ...

btw .. welcome to the USMB .. you fit right in...

What "lawless/criminal acts?"

 

[BWK]

OP is based on the Stormy Daniel's stuff. That's a mighty shaky foundation.

According to who, you? Lol! What's your premise? We currently have prosecutors from the SDNY who say different. What are your legal arguments?

 

[Marion Morrison]

The breaking news is that Trump violated three different campaign finance laws with the assistance of Michael Cohen according to prosecutors for the southern district of New York, and Trump is being implicated as a felon. Washington Post: Breaking News, World, US, DC News & Analysis

Late Friday, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York filed a document arguing that Michael Cohen, until last year President Trump’s personal attorney, should receive a substantial prison sentence for violations of federal law to which Cohen admitted guilt in August.


Analysis | The government implicates Trump and the Trump campaign in federal campaign finance violations

Democrats and fake news .. almosts looking for used up sluts and porno lawyers to hump for bucks and political cheap shots ..

Otherwise known as following the money, the law, and the criminals. Don't you just love it?

Well, if Dems weren't such political cowards and took responsibility for their own lawlessness/criminal acts I'd be able to take your line of puritanical crap seriously. (personal insult deleted) ...

btw .. welcome to the USMB .. you fit right in...

What "lawless/criminal acts?"

Ignoring Congressional subpeona for a server, one. Destroying evidence, two.

BTW, Mueller will be getting some of that.

 

[OKTexas]

yes, Trump ATTORNEY

He 'reimbursed' Cohen?

How does that cover Trump paying Stormy?

Trump paid for it... then didn’t report it.

It was a personal expense paid with his own money, he didn't need to report it.

.

LOLOL

You moron. Go learn campaign finance laws.

A previous FEC chairman said it wasn't a violation, I'll take his word over yours any day.

.

LOL

What does that have to do with your ignorance over campaign finance laws? It doesn’t matter if contributions come directly from the candidate or from elseware; if it’s of value to their campaign, it has to be reported.

And it matters not whose word you take. What matters is what the FEC does and what the House does.

Actually not. Dual purpose expenses that benefit the candidate personally and has a benefit to the campaign as well, aren't campaign expenses. A campaign expense has to be solely related to the campaign and would not have been spent if not for the campaign. Are you claiming there was no dual benefit?

Seems you may not know as much as you think. Look it up.

.

 

[BWK]

The breaking news is that Trump violated three different campaign finance laws with the assistance of Michael Cohen according to prosecutors for the southern district of New York, and Trump is being implicated as a felon. Washington Post: Breaking News, World, US, DC News & Analysis

Late Friday, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York filed a document arguing that Michael Cohen, until last year President Trump’s personal attorney, should receive a substantial prison sentence for violations of federal law to which Cohen admitted guilt in August.


Analysis | The government implicates Trump and the Trump campaign in federal campaign finance violations

Democrats and fake news .. almosts looking for used up sluts and porno lawyers to hump for bucks and political cheap shots ..

Otherwise known as following the money, the law, and the criminals. Don't you just love it?

Well, if Dems weren't such political cowards and took responsibility for their own lawlessness/criminal acts I'd be able to take your line of puritanical crap seriously. (personal insult deleted) ...

btw .. welcome to the USMB .. you fit right in...

What "lawless/criminal acts?"

Ignoring Congressional subpeona for a server, one.

That's a lie, but thanks for your input. You always are a great source for fabrications. Now move along.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

How do you know that?

Because it's not a campaign expense.
Why do you feel it is?

I asked you two questions. Can't you answer?

Under federal law, an individual could not donate more than $2,700 directly to Trump’s primary or general election campaign in 2016.

I agree, a donation that size to the campaign would be an issue. This wasn't. It isn't.

Under what guidelines do you draw your conclusion?

Remember, Trump already lied about where the money came from.

So what?

Lol! Because that tells us everything you idiot. He wasn't straight with the American people exposing his lies about the source of the money. If you don't know the source, how can you claim it is or isn't a campaign expense? Answer, you can't, which is why you are so full of shit.

So for you to say it is not a campaign expense,

Was a check cut to the campaign? From the campaign?

You tell me? You are the one who said it wasn't an expense. Lol!

Under what guidelines do you draw your conclusion?

Cohen didn't write a $130,000 payment to the campaign.
Daniels didn't receive a $130,000 payment from the campaign.

You still aren't answering the question. You making the claim doesn't make it so. How do you know the money paid to Daniels didn't come from the charitable foundation or the campaign? Which by the way, has been reported as essentially being a big source for campaign expenditures, which is illegal. And that is probably why prosecutors have labeled this a campaign financing felony.

He wasn't straight with the American people exposing his lies about the source of the money.

Oh no! A politician wasn't straight with the American people. How unique.

Exposing your own stupid counter responses is all we need to know boss. Thanks! You just said nothing.

You tell me?

No, neither occurred.

That doesn't tell me anything either. Lol! You seem to be at a loss there hot shot.

You are the one who said it wasn't an expense.

Only because it wasn't.

Based on my previous questions from this current post of mine, I'm still asking the same question for which you seem to be paralyzed to answer. Telling me "because it wasn't", is a losers way of saying I don't know.

Based on my previous questions from this current post of mine, I'm still asking the same question for which you seem to be paralyzed to answer.

How is it a campaign expense?
Did it pay a campaign worker?
Pay for campaign ads?
Pay for transport to a campaign event?
Pay for campaign fundraising?
Paid out of campaign funds?

No?

Okay, not a campaign expense.

If it benefits a campaign it most certainly benefits a candidate.
And how did it do that? It used money from a charity, it didn't report the money that cheated the electorate out of a fair election, and it used measures to hide an affair that would have looked bad for the candidate.

The fact that it may or may not have paid campaign workers, ads, events, etc. is a useless distraction of an argument on your part. Illegal is one thing, your distraction is another.

Prosecutors are looking at all of that, and concluded that Trump conspired to commit a felony. You however, can't give us any intelligent reasons for why it is not an expense, other than to say it isn't. Which still tells us nothing.

If it benefits a campaign it most certainly benefits a candidate.

Not a campaign expense.

Personal use - FEC.gov

More simply, if the expense would exist even in the absence of the candidacy or even if the officeholder were not in office, then the personal use ban applies.

NDAs for porn stars would exist whether you're a candidate or not. That's why using campaign funds for them is prohibited. That's why using personal funds is not prohibited.

 

[BWK]

I asked you two questions. Can't you answer?

Under what guidelines do you draw your conclusion?

Lol! Because that tells us everything you idiot. He wasn't straight with the American people exposing his lies about the source of the money. If you don't know the source, how can you claim it is or isn't a campaign expense? Answer, you can't, which is why you are so full of shit.

You tell me? You are the one who said it wasn't an expense. Lol!

Under what guidelines do you draw your conclusion?

Cohen didn't write a $130,000 payment to the campaign.
Daniels didn't receive a $130,000 payment from the campaign.

You still aren't answering the question. You making the claim doesn't make it so. How do you know the money paid to Daniels didn't come from the charitable foundation or the campaign? Which by the way, has been reported as essentially being a big source for campaign expenditures, which is illegal. And that is probably why prosecutors have labeled this a campaign financing felony.

He wasn't straight with the American people exposing his lies about the source of the money.

Oh no! A politician wasn't straight with the American people. How unique.

Exposing your own stupid counter responses is all we need to know boss. Thanks! You just said nothing.

You tell me?

No, neither occurred.

That doesn't tell me anything either. Lol! You seem to be at a loss there hot shot.

You are the one who said it wasn't an expense.

Only because it wasn't.

Based on my previous questions from this current post of mine, I'm still asking the same question for which you seem to be paralyzed to answer. Telling me "because it wasn't", is a losers way of saying I don't know.

Based on my previous questions from this current post of mine, I'm still asking the same question for which you seem to be paralyzed to answer.

How is it a campaign expense?
Did it pay a campaign worker?
Pay for campaign ads?
Pay for transport to a campaign event?
Pay for campaign fundraising?
Paid out of campaign funds?

No?

Okay, not a campaign expense.

If it benefits a campaign it most certainly benefits a candidate.
And how did it do that? It used money from a charity, it didn't report the money that cheated the electorate out of a fair election, and it used measures to hide an affair that would have looked bad for the candidate.

The fact that it may or may not have paid campaign workers, ads, events, etc. is a useless distraction of an argument on your part. Illegal is one thing, your distraction is another.

Prosecutors are looking at all of that, and concluded that Trump conspired to commit a felony. You however, can't give us any intelligent reasons for why it is not an expense, other than to say it isn't. Which still tells us nothing.

If it benefits a campaign it most certainly benefits a candidate.

Not a campaign expense.

View attachment 233811

Personal use - FEC.gov

More simply, if the expense would exist even in the absence of the candidacy or even if the officeholder were not in office, then the personal use ban applies.

NDAs for porn stars would exist whether you're a candidate or not. That's why using campaign funds for them is prohibited. That's why using personal funds is not prohibited.

And what does illegal use of charitable contribution funds come under when paying off porn stars weeks before the election?

How do personal use expenditures coming from a bogus charity, apply in this case? It's stolen money.

 

[Marion Morrison]

That's a lie, but thanks for your input. You always are a great source for fabrications. Now move along.

Next!

Lisa Page will not appear for Capitol Hill interview despite subpoena, attorney says

 

[BWK]

That's a lie, but thanks for your input. You always are a great source for fabrications. Now move along.

Next!

Lisa Page will not appear for Capitol Hill interview despite subpoena, attorney says

Why should she? She's committed no criminal acts. Again you've proven to be a liar. Thanks!

 

[OKTexas]

OH MY! Do we have a budding bormance here?

.

Lol! Are you jealous?

ROFLMFAO, not lately.

.

"Not lately?" So jealousy comes in spurts for you? Interesting!

Maybe 40 years ago, then I grew up. I see you haven't made the transition yet.

.

I never claimed to run in spurts. And by the way, for the guy who "grew up 40 years ago", who was it who brought up a "bromance" again?

"Not lately" doesn't mean spurts, of course for a propagandist, that doesn't really matter does it? And it wasn't me sucking up to a fellow troll. But hey, don't lose faith, you may make the transition yet, loser.

.

 

[Lumpy 1]

The breaking news is that Trump violated three different campaign finance laws with the assistance of Michael Cohen according to prosecutors for the southern district of New York, and Trump is being implicated as a felon. Washington Post: Breaking News, World, US, DC News & Analysis

Late Friday, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York filed a document arguing that Michael Cohen, until last year President Trump’s personal attorney, should receive a substantial prison sentence for violations of federal law to which Cohen admitted guilt in August.


Analysis | The government implicates Trump and the Trump campaign in federal campaign finance violations

Democrats and fake news .. almosts looking for used up sluts and porno lawyers to hump for bucks and political cheap shots ..

Otherwise known as following the money, the law, and the criminals. Don't you just love it?

Well, if Dems weren't such political cowards and took responsibility for their own lawlessness/criminal acts I'd be able to take your line of puritanical crap seriously. (personal insult deleted) ...

btw .. welcome to the USMB .. you fit right in...

What "lawless/criminal acts?"

Seriously ... you;re that uninformed .. you must absorb left wing parasite news quite zestfully...

 

[Picaro]

Ah, yet another fake news thread. How many of these' Trump iz going down any minute now!!!" stories have there been the last two years? I bet some future grad student thesis will find hundreds of thousands of these idiotic stupid hack tabloid stories. Why are they in 'Current Events' anyway? They aren't 'events' or real news.

 

[Picaro]

Trump paid for it... then didn’t report it.

It was a personal expense paid with his own money, he didn't need to report it.

.

LOLOL

You moron. Go learn campaign finance laws.

A previous FEC chairman said it wasn't a violation, I'll take his word over yours any day.

.

LOL

What does that have to do with your ignorance over campaign finance laws? It doesn’t matter if contributions come directly from the candidate or from elseware; if it’s of value to their campaign, it has to be reported.

And it matters not whose word you take. What matters is what the FEC does and what the House does.

Actually not. Dual purpose expenses that benefit the candidate personally and has a benefit to the campaign as well, aren't campaign expenses. A campaign expense has to be solely related to the campaign and would not have been spent if not for the campaign. Are you claiming there was no dual benefit?

Seems you may not know as much as you think. Look it up.

.

I see nothing illegal about using campaign money to fight off obviously baseless opposition rubbish put out soley for political reasons, like everything the press and Democrats throws at Trump, including fake harassment lawsuits from attention whores.

 

[BWK]

The breaking news is that Trump violated three different campaign finance laws with the assistance of Michael Cohen according to prosecutors for the southern district of New York, and Trump is being implicated as a felon. Washington Post: Breaking News, World, US, DC News & Analysis

Late Friday, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York filed a document arguing that Michael Cohen, until last year President Trump’s personal attorney, should receive a substantial prison sentence for violations of federal law to which Cohen admitted guilt in August.


Analysis | The government implicates Trump and the Trump campaign in federal campaign finance violations

Democrats and fake news .. almosts looking for used up sluts and porno lawyers to hump for bucks and political cheap shots ..

Otherwise known as following the money, the law, and the criminals. Don't you just love it?

Well, if Dems weren't such political cowards and took responsibility for their own lawlessness/criminal acts I'd be able to take your line of puritanical crap seriously. (personal insult deleted) ...

btw .. welcome to the USMB .. you fit right in...

What "lawless/criminal acts?"

Seriously ... you;re that uninformed .. you must absorb left wing parasite news quite zestfully...

I'll tell you the same thing that I caught the other one lying about. What lawless acts?

 

[OKTexas]

The breaking news is that Trump violated three different campaign finance laws with the assistance of Michael Cohen according to prosecutors for the southern district of New York, and Trump is being implicated as a felon. Washington Post: Breaking News, World, US, DC News & Analysis

Late Friday, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York filed a document arguing that Michael Cohen, until last year President Trump’s personal attorney, should receive a substantial prison sentence for violations of federal law to which Cohen admitted guilt in August.


Analysis | The government implicates Trump and the Trump campaign in federal campaign finance violations

Democrats and fake news .. almosts looking for used up sluts and porno lawyers to hump for bucks and political cheap shots ..

Otherwise known as following the money, the law, and the criminals. Don't you just love it?

Yet I'll bet you supported willie not being removed for his admitted crimes. Hypocrite much?

.

 

[BWK]

The breaking news is that Trump violated three different campaign finance laws with the assistance of Michael Cohen according to prosecutors for the southern district of New York, and Trump is being implicated as a felon. Washington Post: Breaking News, World, US, DC News & Analysis

Late Friday, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York filed a document arguing that Michael Cohen, until last year President Trump’s personal attorney, should receive a substantial prison sentence for violations of federal law to which Cohen admitted guilt in August.


Analysis | The government implicates Trump and the Trump campaign in federal campaign finance violations

Democrats and fake news .. almosts looking for used up sluts and porno lawyers to hump for bucks and political cheap shots ..

Otherwise known as following the money, the law, and the criminals. Don't you just love it?

Yet I'll bet you supported willie not being removed for his admitted crimes. Hypocrite much?

.

WRONG!

 

[OKTexas]

Omitting what trump said about women is what crooks do

Trump told Billy bush on the bus that if you are a star you can do anything to women including grabbing them by their private parts Trump was upset at how women have been brainwashed to give to rock stars anything they want and not their husbands and hero vets

Trump is right as rain

Outrageously crooked minds that omits the part that shows what trump is trying to say

Trump has the men and the men will stop this outright crookedness by democrats and their brainwashed voters

In that video, Trump also confessed to attempting to commit adultery. That’s also “right as rain,” huh?

Got to love the regressives selective morality. LMAO What happened to the consensual adults thing? Hypocrite.

.

Where did I say it’s not consensual? And what cheater did I not call out for being a cheater?

How about the one who committed perjury and obstruction over what you folks said was a consensual affair, you folks claimed it wasn't really a crime.

.

What about him? I called him a piece of shit for cheating on his wife.

Did you support his removal for his admitted crimes?

.