Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,353
- 81,079
- 2,635
They wouldn't even do that, dumbass.
LOLOL
You don't think the media projects the winner of States on election night, fucking moron??
![cuckoo :cuckoo: :cuckoo:](/styles/smilies/cuckoo.gif)
![201104_abc_maine_projection_hpMain_16x9_992.jpg](https://s.abcnews.com/images/Politics/201104_abc_maine_projection_hpMain_16x9_992.jpg?w=992)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They wouldn't even do that, dumbass.
They declared the winner on the night of the election. Hillary conceded the next day.Poor fucking moron, you still possess the intellect of a very young kid. They were still counting votes in December in 2016...
![]()
What could possibly be taking so long in the US vote count?
You can blame legislation designed to help citizens cast their ballots.qz.com
Yes they do, based on the returns. On 2020 many states had no returns until days later.LOLOL
Yiu don't think the media projects the winner of States on election night, fucking moron??
![]()
They declared the winner on the night of the election. Hillary conceded the next day.
You are a stupendous dumbass.
Yes they do, based on the returns. On 2020 many states had no returns until days later.
<YAWN!>No, fucking moron. They projected Trump would win based on the votes already counted. Based on those projections, Hillary had no chance of winning. But they were still counting votes in some states into December. You're a complete fucking moron.
Spare me the horseshit. The news outlets always reported the winner by the following morning in previous elections.
You're still a punk ass little kid. Check your avatar.That should be easy to prove. They have records of when the results were reported, dumbass. I've watched every election since I was a kid. None ever went undecided longer than the following morning except for the 2000 election where Florida was the only hold out. They had a couple of counts done by the following morning.
<YAWN!>
No one cares, asshole.
What's your point, dumbass?
What’s obvious is that you don’t give a shit about the truth.Truth is you've overlooked the obvious.
It was Trumpy's previous embrace of sidney that is hilarious.Taz is so ridiculous at this point that he expects Trump to embrace Powell despite the fact that she has (albeit under legal coercion) flipped to become a witness for the gubmint.![]()
I have never seen evidence that President Trump ever retained Ms. Powell as one of his lawyers.It was Trumpy's previous embrace of sidney that is hilarious.
And she may be flipping on her flipping!!! lol
Thanks for the concise post. I think Trump's own statements show Powell represented him in election denials. But that's not a beef.I have never seen evidence that President Trump ever retained Ms. Powell as me of his lawyers.
She was absolutely one of the lawyers who brought (or attempted to bring) cases on behalf of the claim that the election had been “stolen.”
Her work was shoddy. That’s also true.
But now she is copping a plea pursuant to a plea deal requiring her to testify contrary to much of the very stuff she had previously asserted and sworn to.
She may not be as lacking in credibility as Michael Cohen. But she certainly now lacks any true credibility.
But don’t let me deter you from having a little fap over the fact that she has flipped.
![]()
You just shot yourself in the ass.They report when there's enough of the vote in to make a determination. Many states didn't even start counting until days later.
Elections are not decided based on projections ya dumb fuck.No, fucking moron. They projected Trump would win based on the votes already counted. Based on those projections, Hillary had no chance of winning. But they were still counting votes in some states into December. You're a complete fucking moron.
I was a long time prosecutor. Later a defense attorney. Most of my colleagues on both sides agree with me that there is a great deal of baggage that comes from a witness who has flipped in exchange for sentencing consideration. And the cross examinations where such a witness has made previously contradictory sworn statements are fun for the defense attorneys and often excruciating for the prosecution.Thanks for the concise post. I think Trump's own statements show Powell represented him in election denials. But that's not a beef.
But Trump's trying to discredit her now are hilarious.
Generally, I find "flippers" to be not very credible unless the facts fit their "new account" and there are other sources of information. It's up to the jury.
How so?You just shot yourself in the ass.