Trump Junior mocks near rape victim Dr Ford on Instagram

[MarcATL]

What rape victim? She doesn't remember where it happened, she doesn't remember when it happened...she didn't tell any friends or family that it happened, not even her BFFs, and she didn't tell her husband until 2012 where he found out with a therapist where she didn't even name Kavanaugh as one of the attackers...

So again, you asshat.....what rape victim?

I said NEAR rape victim. She has been quite specific about what happened. Doesn't remember - WTF?
Don't you have new NRA propaganda or something to post? Carry on ...

WTF is a near rape victim?

Gawd you people are the dumbest c**ts on the planet.

A "near rape victim" is one who was pushed into a bedroom, tossed on bed, pounced upon, hand held over mouth to stop screaming as perp ground away at her crotch while attempting to remove her swimsuit, thought she might not ONLY be raped but might DIE. What more do you need?

No, it's a made-up term by an extremeist. You, in other words.

Having created bogus terms like "race baiter" and "reverse racism", you Republicans should know about made up claptrap.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

 

[DrLove]

What rape victim? She doesn't remember where it happened, she doesn't remember when it happened...she didn't tell any friends or family that it happened, not even her BFFs, and she didn't tell her husband until 2012 where he found out with a therapist where she didn't even name Kavanaugh as one of the attackers...

So again, you asshat.....what rape victim?

I said NEAR rape victim. She has been quite specific about what happened. Doesn't remember - WTF?
Don't you have new NRA propaganda or something to post? Carry on ...

WTF is a near rape victim?

Gawd you people are the dumbest c**ts on the planet.

A "near rape victim" is one who was pushed into a bedroom, tossed on bed, pounced upon, hand held over mouth to stop screaming as perp ground away at her crotch while attempting to remove her swimsuit, thought she might not ONLY be raped but might DIE. What more do you need?

No, it's a made-up term by an extremeist. You, in other words.

Having created bogus terms like "race baiter" and "reverse racism", you Republicans should know about made up claptrap.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

"Reverse Racism"?
One of my VERY favorites!!

 

[flacaltenn]

Drunken Ford was a high school whore, how come she was not home studying?


.

'Something's Wrong with Her': Christine Ford's Students Savage Her in Reviews

""Christine ford is the worst educator I have ever experienced," one student wrote. "Avoid taking her class and avoid any interaction with this person. I feel like she has something wrong with her and I am surprised no one has caught this. Also avoid Fullerton's MSW program as long as she is there." -- Student

Rape and sexual assault is serious, as serious as claiming to be part American Indian. Our modern Progressive Socialist democrat Party has absolutely no problem lying about either

Yeah. But to be fair, those anonymous student evals are like those hysterical reviews of USMB that all the permanently banned write at the "rate websites pages". The nuthatches we banned are ranting just like they did when they were annoying folks here on the boards. It's almost an ENDORSEMENT for USMB, that these folks are angry at us because we ditched them..

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Well this is interesting:

Allegations that Trump’s SCOTUS nominee Brett Kavanaugh attempted to rape a woman when he was in high school emerged this past week. Now his formerly anonymous accuser is coming forward, has identified herself, provided evidence corroborating her story, and taken a lie detector test, administrated by a former FBI agent.

....Ford took a polygraph test in early August, then decided to remain anonymous, despite the results affirming her honesty. However, her identity leaked, and reporters tried to question her. She decided she would come forward on her own terms.

Brett Kavanaugh's Accuser Offers Corroborating Data Including A Lie Detector Test

She passed a lie detector. Will Kavanaugh and Judge do the same?

She passed a lie detector test in which she answered that she had no recollection of when it happened, where it happened or the people who were there.

That makes passing a lie detector test easy.

 

[martybegan]

Well this is interesting:

Allegations that Trump’s SCOTUS nominee Brett Kavanaugh attempted to rape a woman when he was in high school emerged this past week. Now his formerly anonymous accuser is coming forward, has identified herself, provided evidence corroborating her story, and taken a lie detector test, administrated by a former FBI agent.

....Ford took a polygraph test in early August, then decided to remain anonymous, despite the results affirming her honesty. However, her identity leaked, and reporters tried to question her. She decided she would come forward on her own terms.

Brett Kavanaugh's Accuser Offers Corroborating Data Including A Lie Detector Test

She passed a lie detector. Will Kavanaugh and Judge do the same?

A person can pass a polygraph by believing something that isn't true is true (to them)

meanwhile some people fail them even when truthful due to their own nature.

It's why they aren't allowed in court.

Kavenaugh is willing to testify under oath to the Senate Committee that he had nothing to do with it.

Yeah, but people can also pass a polygraph by saying things that are true. If Kavanaugh ALSO passes, then its utility is greatly diminished.

But if Kavanaugh fails while Ford passed? That's a strong indication that Ford's account is accurate.

So will Kavanaugh take a polygraph? After all, Ford already did. And passed.

Actually it isn't considering how long ago all this stuff was.

He won't because as a lawyer he knows it can only hurt him.

 

[martybegan]

Well this is interesting:

Allegations that Trump’s SCOTUS nominee Brett Kavanaugh attempted to rape a woman when he was in high school emerged this past week. Now his formerly anonymous accuser is coming forward, has identified herself, provided evidence corroborating her story, and taken a lie detector test, administrated by a former FBI agent.

....Ford took a polygraph test in early August, then decided to remain anonymous, despite the results affirming her honesty. However, her identity leaked, and reporters tried to question her. She decided she would come forward on her own terms.

Brett Kavanaugh's Accuser Offers Corroborating Data Including A Lie Detector Test

She passed a lie detector. Will Kavanaugh and Judge do the same?

A person can pass a polygraph by believing something that isn't true is true (to them)
meanwhile some people fail them even when truthful due to their own nature.
It's why they aren't allowed in court.
Kavenaugh is willing to testify under oath to the Senate Committee that he had nothing to do with it.

Well if Kav believes he did no wrong .. then hook his ass up to the Poly and let's see what happens!
Of course, it is possible that he and his "blackout drunk drooling" pal don't remember anything about it.

Trump: Only the BEST People!

The thing with polygraphs about things that happened that long ago is that a person can make themself believe something happened, even if it didn't.

 

[hadit]

Well this is interesting:

Allegations that Trump’s SCOTUS nominee Brett Kavanaugh attempted to rape a woman when he was in high school emerged this past week. Now his formerly anonymous accuser is coming forward, has identified herself, provided evidence corroborating her story, and taken a lie detector test, administrated by a former FBI agent.

....Ford took a polygraph test in early August, then decided to remain anonymous, despite the results affirming her honesty. However, her identity leaked, and reporters tried to question her. She decided she would come forward on her own terms.

Brett Kavanaugh's Accuser Offers Corroborating Data Including A Lie Detector Test

She passed a lie detector. Will Kavanaugh and Judge do the same?

A person can pass a polygraph by believing something that isn't true is true (to them)

meanwhile some people fail them even when truthful due to their own nature.

It's why they aren't allowed in court.

Kavenaugh is willing to testify under oath to the Senate Committee that he had nothing to do with it.

Yeah, but people can also pass a polygraph by saying things that are true. If Kavanaugh ALSO passes, then its utility is greatly diminished.

But if Kavanaugh fails while Ford passed? That's a strong indication that Ford's account is accurate.

So will Kavanaugh take a polygraph? After all, Ford already did. And passed.

Actually it isn't considering how long ago all this stuff was.

He won't because as a lawyer he knows it can only hurt him.

That's true. He could pass one with no problem and the haters would still insist he's lying, raped a girl and wears white after Labor Day.

 

[DrLove]

Well this is interesting:

Allegations that Trump’s SCOTUS nominee Brett Kavanaugh attempted to rape a woman when he was in high school emerged this past week. Now his formerly anonymous accuser is coming forward, has identified herself, provided evidence corroborating her story, and taken a lie detector test, administrated by a former FBI agent.

....Ford took a polygraph test in early August, then decided to remain anonymous, despite the results affirming her honesty. However, her identity leaked, and reporters tried to question her. She decided she would come forward on her own terms.

Brett Kavanaugh's Accuser Offers Corroborating Data Including A Lie Detector Test

She passed a lie detector. Will Kavanaugh and Judge do the same?

A person can pass a polygraph by believing something that isn't true is true (to them)
meanwhile some people fail them even when truthful due to their own nature.
It's why they aren't allowed in court.
Kavenaugh is willing to testify under oath to the Senate Committee that he had nothing to do with it.

Well if Kav believes he did no wrong .. then hook his ass up to the Poly and let's see what happens!
Of course, it is possible that he and his "blackout drunk drooling" pal don't remember anything about it.

Trump: Only the BEST People!

The thing with polygraphs about things that happened that long ago is that a person can make themself believe something happened, even if it didn't.

I don't disagree with that Marty, but Dr Ford went through it and so should he. We're going to get nothing from the Senate Judiciary Committee on Monday other than a partisan shit-show. Best thing to do would be to have the FBI do the initial interviews, find potential witnesses, etc and present those findings PRIOR to the Senate hearing. It could be done in a week or less. But of course, that would have to be ordered by the president and he's not a bit interested in the truth.

 

[hadit]

Well this is interesting:

Allegations that Trump’s SCOTUS nominee Brett Kavanaugh attempted to rape a woman when he was in high school emerged this past week. Now his formerly anonymous accuser is coming forward, has identified herself, provided evidence corroborating her story, and taken a lie detector test, administrated by a former FBI agent.

....Ford took a polygraph test in early August, then decided to remain anonymous, despite the results affirming her honesty. However, her identity leaked, and reporters tried to question her. She decided she would come forward on her own terms.

Brett Kavanaugh's Accuser Offers Corroborating Data Including A Lie Detector Test

She passed a lie detector. Will Kavanaugh and Judge do the same?

A person can pass a polygraph by believing something that isn't true is true (to them)
meanwhile some people fail them even when truthful due to their own nature.
It's why they aren't allowed in court.
Kavenaugh is willing to testify under oath to the Senate Committee that he had nothing to do with it.

Well if Kav believes he did no wrong .. then hook his ass up to the Poly and let's see what happens!
Of course, it is possible that he and his "blackout drunk drooling" pal don't remember anything about it.

Trump: Only the BEST People!

The thing with polygraphs about things that happened that long ago is that a person can make themself believe something happened, even if it didn't.

I don't disagree with that Marty, but Dr Ford went through it and so should he. We're going to get nothing from the Senate Judiciary Committee on Monday other than a partisan shit-show. Best thing to do would be to have the FBI do the initial interviews, find potential witnesses, etc and present those findings PRIOR to the Senate hearing. It could be done in a week or less. But of course, that would have to be ordered by the president and he's not a bit interested in the truth.

The FBI has already passed on the opportunity to investigate. There's just not enough evidence to move on. Any investigation would just be a circus.

 

[DrLove]

Well this is interesting:

She passed a lie detector. Will Kavanaugh and Judge do the same?

A person can pass a polygraph by believing something that isn't true is true (to them)
meanwhile some people fail them even when truthful due to their own nature.
It's why they aren't allowed in court.
Kavenaugh is willing to testify under oath to the Senate Committee that he had nothing to do with it.

Well if Kav believes he did no wrong .. then hook his ass up to the Poly and let's see what happens!
Of course, it is possible that he and his "blackout drunk drooling" pal don't remember anything about it.

Trump: Only the BEST People!

The thing with polygraphs about things that happened that long ago is that a person can make themself believe something happened, even if it didn't.

I don't disagree with that Marty, but Dr Ford went through it and so should he. We're going to get nothing from the Senate Judiciary Committee on Monday other than a partisan shit-show. Best thing to do would be to have the FBI do the initial interviews, find potential witnesses, etc and present those findings PRIOR to the Senate hearing. It could be done in a week or less. But of course, that would have to be ordered by the president and he's not a bit interested in the truth.

The FBI has already passed on the opportunity to investigate. There's just not enough evidence to move on. Any investigation would just be a circus.

At whom's instruction do you suppose?

 

[hadit]

A person can pass a polygraph by believing something that isn't true is true (to them)
meanwhile some people fail them even when truthful due to their own nature.
It's why they aren't allowed in court.
Kavenaugh is willing to testify under oath to the Senate Committee that he had nothing to do with it.

Well if Kav believes he did no wrong .. then hook his ass up to the Poly and let's see what happens!
Of course, it is possible that he and his "blackout drunk drooling" pal don't remember anything about it.

Trump: Only the BEST People!

The thing with polygraphs about things that happened that long ago is that a person can make themself believe something happened, even if it didn't.

I don't disagree with that Marty, but Dr Ford went through it and so should he. We're going to get nothing from the Senate Judiciary Committee on Monday other than a partisan shit-show. Best thing to do would be to have the FBI do the initial interviews, find potential witnesses, etc and present those findings PRIOR to the Senate hearing. It could be done in a week or less. But of course, that would have to be ordered by the president and he's not a bit interested in the truth.

The FBI has already passed on the opportunity to investigate. There's just not enough evidence to move on. Any investigation would just be a circus.

At whom's instruction do you suppose?

The FBI is supposed to be independent. Are you suggesting that the president can instruct the FBI on who to go after and who to ignore?

 

[martybegan]

Well this is interesting:

Allegations that Trump’s SCOTUS nominee Brett Kavanaugh attempted to rape a woman when he was in high school emerged this past week. Now his formerly anonymous accuser is coming forward, has identified herself, provided evidence corroborating her story, and taken a lie detector test, administrated by a former FBI agent.

....Ford took a polygraph test in early August, then decided to remain anonymous, despite the results affirming her honesty. However, her identity leaked, and reporters tried to question her. She decided she would come forward on her own terms.

Brett Kavanaugh's Accuser Offers Corroborating Data Including A Lie Detector Test

She passed a lie detector. Will Kavanaugh and Judge do the same?

A person can pass a polygraph by believing something that isn't true is true (to them)
meanwhile some people fail them even when truthful due to their own nature.
It's why they aren't allowed in court.
Kavenaugh is willing to testify under oath to the Senate Committee that he had nothing to do with it.

Well if Kav believes he did no wrong .. then hook his ass up to the Poly and let's see what happens!
Of course, it is possible that he and his "blackout drunk drooling" pal don't remember anything about it.

Trump: Only the BEST People!

The thing with polygraphs about things that happened that long ago is that a person can make themself believe something happened, even if it didn't.

I don't disagree with that Marty, but Dr Ford went through it and so should he. We're going to get nothing from the Senate Judiciary Committee on Monday other than a partisan shit-show. Best thing to do would be to have the FBI do the initial interviews, find potential witnesses, etc and present those findings PRIOR to the Senate hearing. It could be done in a week or less. But of course, that would have to be ordered by the president and he's not a bit interested in the truth.

or maybe Feinstien could have released this shit months ago instead of being a political hack-twat.

 

[DrLove]

Well if Kav believes he did no wrong .. then hook his ass up to the Poly and let's see what happens!
Of course, it is possible that he and his "blackout drunk drooling" pal don't remember anything about it.

Trump: Only the BEST People!

The thing with polygraphs about things that happened that long ago is that a person can make themself believe something happened, even if it didn't.

I don't disagree with that Marty, but Dr Ford went through it and so should he. We're going to get nothing from the Senate Judiciary Committee on Monday other than a partisan shit-show. Best thing to do would be to have the FBI do the initial interviews, find potential witnesses, etc and present those findings PRIOR to the Senate hearing. It could be done in a week or less. But of course, that would have to be ordered by the president and he's not a bit interested in the truth.

The FBI has already passed on the opportunity to investigate. There's just not enough evidence to move on. Any investigation would just be a circus.

At whom's instruction do you suppose?

The FBI is supposed to be independent. Are you suggesting that the president can instruct the FBI on who to go after and who to ignore?

They are supposed to be, but they aren't. The FBI didn't lift a single finger to make so much as a phone call - so how would they know there isn't any evidence.
In this case, Trump would issue that instruction - You weren't familiar with that?

Terms of Service Violation

 

[DrLove]

Well this is interesting:

She passed a lie detector. Will Kavanaugh and Judge do the same?

A person can pass a polygraph by believing something that isn't true is true (to them)
meanwhile some people fail them even when truthful due to their own nature.
It's why they aren't allowed in court.
Kavenaugh is willing to testify under oath to the Senate Committee that he had nothing to do with it.

Well if Kav believes he did no wrong .. then hook his ass up to the Poly and let's see what happens!
Of course, it is possible that he and his "blackout drunk drooling" pal don't remember anything about it.

Trump: Only the BEST People!

The thing with polygraphs about things that happened that long ago is that a person can make themself believe something happened, even if it didn't.

I don't disagree with that Marty, but Dr Ford went through it and so should he. We're going to get nothing from the Senate Judiciary Committee on Monday other than a partisan shit-show. Best thing to do would be to have the FBI do the initial interviews, find potential witnesses, etc and present those findings PRIOR to the Senate hearing. It could be done in a week or less. But of course, that would have to be ordered by the president and he's not a bit interested in the truth.

or maybe Feinstien could have released this shit months ago instead of being a political hack-twat.

Sorry, not the way it went. She was asked to keep the letter confidential. So respecting this lady, she sat on it. Several other people saw it and the existence of the letter made it's way to WaPo. Dr Ford then started getting phone calls and various RW trolls on her tracks and decided to get out in front of it. Feinstein did nothing wrong.

 

[martybegan]

A person can pass a polygraph by believing something that isn't true is true (to them)
meanwhile some people fail them even when truthful due to their own nature.
It's why they aren't allowed in court.
Kavenaugh is willing to testify under oath to the Senate Committee that he had nothing to do with it.

Well if Kav believes he did no wrong .. then hook his ass up to the Poly and let's see what happens!
Of course, it is possible that he and his "blackout drunk drooling" pal don't remember anything about it.

Trump: Only the BEST People!

The thing with polygraphs about things that happened that long ago is that a person can make themself believe something happened, even if it didn't.

I don't disagree with that Marty, but Dr Ford went through it and so should he. We're going to get nothing from the Senate Judiciary Committee on Monday other than a partisan shit-show. Best thing to do would be to have the FBI do the initial interviews, find potential witnesses, etc and present those findings PRIOR to the Senate hearing. It could be done in a week or less. But of course, that would have to be ordered by the president and he's not a bit interested in the truth.

or maybe Feinstien could have released this shit months ago instead of being a political hack-twat.

Sorry, not the way it went. She was asked to keep the letter confidential. So respecting this lady, she sat on it. Several other people saw it and the existence of the letter made it's way to WaPo. Dr Ford then started getting phone calls and various RW trolls on her tracks and decided to get out in front of it. Feinstein did nothing wrong.

Bullshit.

Then she should have kept sitting on it.

 

[DrLove]

Well if Kav believes he did no wrong .. then hook his ass up to the Poly and let's see what happens!
Of course, it is possible that he and his "blackout drunk drooling" pal don't remember anything about it.

Trump: Only the BEST People!

The thing with polygraphs about things that happened that long ago is that a person can make themself believe something happened, even if it didn't.

I don't disagree with that Marty, but Dr Ford went through it and so should he. We're going to get nothing from the Senate Judiciary Committee on Monday other than a partisan shit-show. Best thing to do would be to have the FBI do the initial interviews, find potential witnesses, etc and present those findings PRIOR to the Senate hearing. It could be done in a week or less. But of course, that would have to be ordered by the president and he's not a bit interested in the truth.

or maybe Feinstien could have released this shit months ago instead of being a political hack-twat.

Sorry, not the way it went. She was asked to keep the letter confidential. So respecting this lady, she sat on it. Several other people saw it and the existence of the letter made it's way to WaPo. Dr Ford then started getting phone calls and various RW trolls on her tracks and decided to get out in front of it. Feinstein did nothing wrong.

Bullshit.

Then she should have kept sitting on it.

Sorry, not if she promised confidentiality.

 

[martybegan]

The thing with polygraphs about things that happened that long ago is that a person can make themself believe something happened, even if it didn't.

I don't disagree with that Marty, but Dr Ford went through it and so should he. We're going to get nothing from the Senate Judiciary Committee on Monday other than a partisan shit-show. Best thing to do would be to have the FBI do the initial interviews, find potential witnesses, etc and present those findings PRIOR to the Senate hearing. It could be done in a week or less. But of course, that would have to be ordered by the president and he's not a bit interested in the truth.

or maybe Feinstien could have released this shit months ago instead of being a political hack-twat.

Sorry, not the way it went. She was asked to keep the letter confidential. So respecting this lady, she sat on it. Several other people saw it and the existence of the letter made it's way to WaPo. Dr Ford then started getting phone calls and various RW trolls on her tracks and decided to get out in front of it. Feinstein did nothing wrong.

Bullshit.

Then she should have kept sitting on it.

Sorry, not if she promised confidentiality.

Well then she broke her promise, and did it at a time most politically expedient for her own party.

 

[DrLove]

I don't disagree with that Marty, but Dr Ford went through it and so should he. We're going to get nothing from the Senate Judiciary Committee on Monday other than a partisan shit-show. Best thing to do would be to have the FBI do the initial interviews, find potential witnesses, etc and present those findings PRIOR to the Senate hearing. It could be done in a week or less. But of course, that would have to be ordered by the president and he's not a bit interested in the truth.

or maybe Feinstien could have released this shit months ago instead of being a political hack-twat.

Sorry, not the way it went. She was asked to keep the letter confidential. So respecting this lady, she sat on it. Several other people saw it and the existence of the letter made it's way to WaPo. Dr Ford then started getting phone calls and various RW trolls on her tracks and decided to get out in front of it. Feinstein did nothing wrong.

Bullshit.

Then she should have kept sitting on it.

Sorry, not if she promised confidentiality.

Well then she broke her promise, and did it at a time most politically expedient for her own party.

Sorry, that isn't the way it happened. But I'm certain it's the way you'd LIKE it to have happened.

 

[martybegan]

or maybe Feinstien could have released this shit months ago instead of being a political hack-twat.

Sorry, not the way it went. She was asked to keep the letter confidential. So respecting this lady, she sat on it. Several other people saw it and the existence of the letter made it's way to WaPo. Dr Ford then started getting phone calls and various RW trolls on her tracks and decided to get out in front of it. Feinstein did nothing wrong.

Bullshit.

Then she should have kept sitting on it.

Sorry, not if she promised confidentiality.

Well then she broke her promise, and did it at a time most politically expedient for her own party.

Sorry, that isn't the way it happened. But I'm certain it's the way you'd LIKE it to have happened.

Actually it was the way it happened, waiting until the last minute to release the information.

 

[BookShaka]

One would think that with the Manafort flip and Mueller noose tightening, Guido would keep his damn mouth shut. Guess the apple doesn't fall far from the tree. Sad

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/articl...mp-jr-instagram-post-mocked-kavanaugh-accuser

“Mueller noose tightening”?