Trump lashes out at ‘Jewish leaders’ for ‘lack of loyalty’ to him: ‘They should be ashamed of themselves’

This is not Iran or an Arab country or N. Korea, it’s a free country here and we live by the Bill of Rights and the Constitution. Or maybe you don’t even know what they are. Govt. cannot step in and threaten private entities to censor and suppress news. That is criminal and anathema to what this country is all about, and will be prosecuted and investigated when the GOP takes over the House.

Of course.. you can say whatever you like, but don't expect someone else to pay for it.
 
Nope. That's an ignorant lie. The US had nothing to do with the Arab Spring. The status quo suited us just fine.

The only way to keep Gaddafi in power would take a huge occupation force.. same with Egypt.
Your knowledge of history is selective or deficient. Obama and the Left in the US are the creators of the disastrous Arab Spring.
 
Of course.. you can say whatever you like, but don't expect someone else to pay for it.
nonsense answers with no relevance to what we’re talking about, which is the govt forcing private companies to censor negative news and ban opposing views and people. Try to keep up, will ya?
 
Your knowledge of history is selective or deficient. Obama and the Left in the US are the creators of the disastrous Arab Spring.

Nope. They had nothing to do with the Arab Spring. If you knew anything at all about Libya, Egypt or Syria, you wouldn't say such a stupid thing. The Libyans hated gadaffi for 40 years.. Egypt's Mubarak was a grasping, greedy monster. Syria has always had religious strife .. add to that a five year drought.
 
nonsense answers with no relevance to what we’re talking about, which is the govt forcing private companies to censor negative news and ban opposing views and people. Try to keep up, will ya?

There's your lie. Most Americans don't worship Trump.
 
So you don’t think the Biden and the FBI stepping in to threaten a private company to suppress a story damaging to Democrats, delete tweets and news, and ban people for no legitimate reason other than censoring is okay.

That is exactly how third world banana republic fascist dictators behave.

As we can see, Democrats and their followers - who are mostly undereducated ignoramuses with very little knowledge of history, no longer want to live in a free country that abides by rule of law and the Constitution. They are just cultists blabbering words like democracy or freedom of speech as if they care or know what they actually mean.
You keep flip flopping on whether Twitter is the victim or run by evil liberals. Which is it you Dipshit? If Twitter is the victim and Biden threatened and forced them to cooperate and delete stories how come that's not at all what the emails show? The emails show that Twitter employees actively engaged with the both administrations to moderate what they all thought was disinformation. They did so willingly. The emails and their own statements don't have them being a victim at all.
 
You keep flip flopping on whether Twitter is the victim or run by evil liberals. Which is it you Dipshit? If Twitter is the victim and Biden threatened and forced them to cooperate and delete stories how come that's not at all what the emails show? The emails show that Twitter employees actively engaged with the both administrations to moderate what they all thought was disinformation. They did so willingly. The emails and their own statements don't have them being a victim at all.
Doesn't matter if Twitter was a victim or willing, at no time can the government coerce and / or threaten a private entity to censor or suppress free speech. It is unconditional, criminal, and considered election interference. As usual, it is the Democrats themselves that are a threat to our Democracy and engaging in election interference.
 
Doesn't matter if Twitter was a victim or willing, at no time can the government coerce and / or threaten a private entity to censor or suppress free speech. It is unconditional, criminal, and considered election interference. As usual, it is the Democrats themselves that are a threat to our Democracy and engaging in election interference.

The American people don't agree with the lies and propaganda. That's why Trump lost. There was no election interference. Obviously you have freedom of speech.
 
Doesn't matter if Twitter was a victim or willing, at no time can the government coerce and / or threaten a private entity to censor or suppress free speech. It is unconditional, criminal, and considered election interference. As usual, it is the Democrats themselves that are a threat to our Democracy and engaging in election interference.
It absolutely does matter. If they were willing then they weren't coerced you moron.
 

How to avoid accidentally supping with a Nazi.



  1. Are any of your dinner guests old enough to have an SS, SA, or Wermacht service record or to have been members of the Nazi party? If the answer to this question is yes, you will want to verify nationality. If the dinner guest in question is German, a full background check is definitely required. If the dinner guest is from a country occupied by Germany during the war, verifying that the guest was not part of any collaborationist force is best practice.

  2. Have any of your dinner guests recently become famous for having given antisemitic speeches or public statements or for public advocacy of a hierarchy of the races? Have any of them used nuclear warfare metaphors to describe what they are going to do to Jews? If yes, formal membership in a Nazi organization may not be required for infamy to ensue. Proceed with extreme caution, particularly with respect to Question 5.
  3. Are any of your guests known to have endorsed the Führerprinzip, referred to any leader unironically as “Il Duce,” or used terms like “lebensraum” to refer to sovereign nations in Eastern Europe? If so, consider canceling the dinner.
  4. Have any of your guests discussed head measurements with you at any time? Do any of them carry a calipers?
  5. Are your guests bringing guests of their own? This is a particularly tricky area. One doesn’t want to be rude, after all. But many accidental Nazi dining incidents seem to happen not as a result of the primary dinner invitations but because of the secondary invitations, the guests bringing surprise guests of their own. You will want to verify that all of your guests have applied this checklist to each of their own guests. If they have not, you will want to do so yourself.
  6. Have any members of Congress been stripped of their committee assignments for associating with your guest? If yes, you will want to verify that this unfortunate legislative de-platforming took place for some reason other than that your guest is a Nazi.
  7. Does your guest do any of the following things with respect to the Holocaust: (1) deny that it took place? (2) endorse it? (3) acknowledge that something took place but argue about how many people were really killed? (4) argue about the means by which those people were really killed? (5) All of the above?
  8. Has your guest ever broached the subject of a “white homeland” or “white genocide” with you?
  9. Does your guest refer to individual non-Jews as “goyim” betraying no understanding that the term is a plural—and, specifically, a plural noun? In particular, does your guest use the word “goyim” as evidence of some insider awareness of Jewish racism? This is not necessarily evidence of Naziism, but it is almost always evidence of gross antisemitism. Consider the yellow light flashing on dinner.
  10. And finally, let’s not forget the obvious: Has your guest given a speech praising Adolph Hitler or Nazism? If so, you will want to check the text of the speech, of course to make sure that the praise is not a Big Lebowski-style back-handed drive-by, but it will likely be disqualifying.

 
Ah yes, an IslamoNazi supporter preaching to us about Nazis.
1671671259149.jpeg
 
Here’s your IslamoNazi Founding Father of the “Palestine”.


Recent work by historians and apologists has revealed that an influential, international religious leader was also an ardent supporter of Adolf Hitler. His name was not Pope Pius XII but Hajj Amin al-Husseini. This Grand Mufti of Jerusalem recruited whole divisions of fanatics to fight and kill in the name of extremism.

Once in power in Jerusalem, al-Husseini was appointed by the British to head the newly established Supreme Muslim Council, created to prepare the way for Arab self-governance in Palestine. Al-Husseini took the chance given to him by the appeasement-minded British to call for the deaths of Jews and set out on a campaign of terror against the Jews in Palestine. In subsequent years, al-Husseini was involved in plots to massacre Jews, among them 60 Jewish immigrants in Hebron and 45 more in Safad in 1929.

Over the next few days, al-Husseini drafted a proposed statement of an Arab-Axis cooperative effort by which the Axis powers would recognize the right of the Arabs to deal with Jewish elements in Palestine and in the other Arab countries according to their own interests. The declaration was approved by Mussolini and sent to the German embassy in Rome. Pleased with the declaration, al-Husseini was invited to Berlin as an honored and useful guest of the Nazi regime. He arrived in Berlin on November 6 and met with Ernst von Weizsäcker, German secretary of state under Nazi Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop. Two weeks later, he met with von Ribbentrop himself, a prelude to his triumphant reception on November 28, 1941, with Adolf Hitler.

“Our fundamental condition for cooperating with Germany was a free hand to eradicate every last Jew from Palestine and the Arab world. I asked Hitler for an explicit undertaking to allow us to solve the Jewish people in a manner befitting our national and racial aspirations and according to the scientific methods innovated by Germany in the handling of its Jews. The answer I got was: “The Jews are yours.” (Ami Isseroff and Peter FitzGerald-Morris, “The Iraq Coup Attempt of 1941, the Mufti, and the Farhud”)”

Scholars have long studied how actively engaged al-Husseini was in the implementation of the Holocaust. There is no question that he supported the aims of the Nazis in perpetrating genocide and believed perversely that all Arabs should join that cause. He declared on German radio on March 1, 1944: “Arabs, rise as one man and fight for your sacred rights. Kill the Jews wherever you find them. This pleases God, history, and religion. This saves your honor. God is with you” (qtd. in Norman Stillman, “Jews of the Arab World between European Colonialism, Zionism, and Arab Nationalism” in Judaism and Islam: Boundaries, Communications, and Interaction: Essays in Honor of William M. Brinner)
 

Recent work by historians and apologists has revealed that an influential, international religious leader was also an ardent supporter of Adolf Hitler. His name was not Pope Pius XII but Hajj Amin al-Husseini. This Grand Mufti of Jerusalem recruited whole divisions of fanatics to fight and kill in the name of extremism.

Once in power in Jerusalem, al-Husseini was appointed by the British to head the newly established Supreme Muslim Council, created to prepare the way for Arab self-governance in Palestine. Al-Husseini took the chance given to him by the appeasement-minded British to call for the deaths of Jews and set out on a campaign of terror against the Jews in Palestine. In subsequent years, al-Husseini was involved in plots to massacre Jews, among them 60 Jewish immigrants in Hebron and 45 more in Safad in 1929.

Over the next few days, al-Husseini drafted a proposed statement of an Arab-Axis cooperative effort by which the Axis powers would recognize the right of the Arabs to deal with Jewish elements in Palestine and in the other Arab countries according to their own interests. The declaration was approved by Mussolini and sent to the German embassy in Rome. Pleased with the declaration, al-Husseini was invited to Berlin as an honored and useful guest of the Nazi regime. He arrived in Berlin on November 6 and met with Ernst von Weizsäcker, German secretary of state under Nazi Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop. Two weeks later, he met with von Ribbentrop himself, a prelude to his triumphant reception on November 28, 1941, with Adolf Hitler.

“Our fundamental condition for cooperating with Germany was a free hand to eradicate every last Jew from Palestine and the Arab world. I asked Hitler for an explicit undertaking to allow us to solve the Jewish people in a manner befitting our national and racial aspirations and according to the scientific methods innovated by Germany in the handling of its Jews. The answer I got was: “The Jews are yours.” (Ami Isseroff and Peter FitzGerald-Morris, “The Iraq Coup Attempt of 1941, the Mufti, and the Farhud”)”

Scholars have long studied how actively engaged al-Husseini was in the implementation of the Holocaust. There is no question that he supported the aims of the Nazis in perpetrating genocide and believed perversely that all Arabs should join that cause. He declared on German radio on March 1, 1944: “Arabs, rise as one man and fight for your sacred rights. Kill the Jews wherever you find them. This pleases God, history, and religion. This saves your honor. God is with you” (qtd. in Norman Stillman, “Jews of the Arab World between European Colonialism, Zionism, and Arab Nationalism” in Judaism and Islam: Boundaries, Communications, and Interaction: Essays in Honor of William M. Brinner)

Recent work by historians and apologists has revealed that an influential, international religious leader was also an ardent supporter of Adolf Hitler. His name was not Pope Pius XII but Hajj Amin al-Husseini. This Grand Mufti of Jerusalem recruited whole divisions of fanatics to fight and kill in the name of extremism.

Once in power in Jerusalem, al-Husseini was appointed by the British to head the newly established Supreme Muslim Council, created to prepare the way for Arab self-governance in Palestine. Al-Husseini took the chance given to him by the appeasement-minded British to call for the deaths of Jews and set out on a campaign of terror against the Jews in Palestine. In subsequent years, al-Husseini was involved in plots to massacre Jews, among them 60 Jewish immigrants in Hebron and 45 more in Safad in 1929.

Over the next few days, al-Husseini drafted a proposed statement of an Arab-Axis cooperative effort by which the Axis powers would recognize the right of the Arabs to deal with Jewish elements in Palestine and in the other Arab countries according to their own interests. The declaration was approved by Mussolini and sent to the German embassy in Rome. Pleased with the declaration, al-Husseini was invited to Berlin as an honored and useful guest of the Nazi regime. He arrived in Berlin on November 6 and met with Ernst von Weizsäcker, German secretary of state under Nazi Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop. Two weeks later, he met with von Ribbentrop himself, a prelude to his triumphant reception on November 28, 1941, with Adolf Hitler.

“Our fundamental condition for cooperating with Germany was a free hand to eradicate every last Jew from Palestine and the Arab world. I asked Hitler for an explicit undertaking to allow us to solve the Jewish people in a manner befitting our national and racial aspirations and according to the scientific methods innovated by Germany in the handling of its Jews. The answer I got was: “The Jews are yours.” (Ami Isseroff and Peter FitzGerald-Morris, “The Iraq Coup Attempt of 1941, the Mufti, and the Farhud”)”

Scholars have long studied how actively engaged al-Husseini was in the implementation of the Holocaust. There is no question that he supported the aims of the Nazis in perpetrating genocide and believed perversely that all Arabs should join that cause. He declared on German radio on March 1, 1944: “Arabs, rise as one man and fight for your sacred rights. Kill the Jews wherever you find them. This pleases God, history, and religion. This saves your honor. God is with you” (qtd. in Norman Stillman, “Jews of the Arab World between European Colonialism, Zionism, and Arab Nationalism” in Judaism and Islam: Boundaries, Communications, and Interaction: Essays in Honor of William M. Brinner)

The mufti secured safe passage to Spain.

By 1939 every Arab state signed on with the allies.
 
Nope. They had nothing to do with the Arab Spring. If you knew anything at all about Libya, Egypt or Syria, you wouldn't say such a stupid thing. The Libyans hated gadaffi for 40 years.. Egypt's Mubarak was a grasping, greedy monster. Syria has always had religious strife .. add to that a five year drought.
You're supremely naïve if you believe that.
 
The mufti secured safe passage to Spain.

By 1939 every Arab state signed on with the allies.
The Mufti was this:

To assist the practical slaughter of Jews and Christians, al-Husseini built an army of Muslim volunteer units for the Waffen-SS (the combat units of the dread SS) to operate for the Nazi cause in the Balkans. While the appeal for volunteers from among Muslims always struggled to meet the demands for new recruits, al-Husseini was able to organize three divisions of Bosnian Muslims who were then trained as elements of the Waffen-SS. The largest radical Muslim unit was the 13th Waffen-SS Handzar (“Dagger”) division that boasted over 21,000 men. They were joined by the Bosnian 23rd Waffen-SS Kama Division and the Albanian Skanderbeg 21st Waffen-SS Division. The Muslim Waffen-SS forces fought across the Balkans against Communist partisans and then assisted in the genocide of Yugoslavian Jews and in the persecution and slaughter of Gypsies and Christian Serbs in 1944 and 1945. The brutality extended to Catholics as well, for the Muslim Waffen-SS cut a path of destruction across the Balkans that encompassed a large number of Catholic parishes, churches, and shrines and resulted in the deaths of thousands of Catholics. By the end of the war, al-Husseini’s fanatical soldiers had killed over 90 percent of the Jews in Bosnia.
 
The mufti secured safe passage to Spain.

By 1939 every Arab state signed on with the allies.
Hajj Amin al-Husseini’s legacy was to inspire generations of terrorists, Islamic jihadists, and such dictators as Saddam Hussein of Iraq. The foremost exemplar of his influence was a young terrorist and distant relative who became one of his most ardent students: Yasser Arafat, the future leader of the Palestinian Liberation Organization. Rabbi David Dalin—one of Pope Pius XII’s greatest defenders—offers a fitting final word:

The “most dangerous” cleric in modern history, to use John Cornwell’s phrase, was not Pope Pius XII but Hajj Amin al-Husseini, whose anti-Jewish Islamic fundamentalism was as dangerous in World War II as it is today . . . The grand mufti was the Nazi collaborator par excellence. “Hitler’s mufti” is truth. “Hitler’s pope” is myth. (The Myth of Hitler’s Pope, 137)
 

Forum List

Back
Top