bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,166
- 47,312
Yes, one time I said on trivial thing wrong. I'm sure you will remind me of it at least 1000 times more. You, on the other hand, say a dozen huge things wrong every day. You also keep saying them no matter how many times you are proven beyond all doubt to be dead wrong.Only morons require links for everything. Skylar posted the law in question. It says nothing about it being necessary for Hillary to know what she did is illegal.If Skylar was lying, you would have produced links countering his. You didn't. Which only proves you are the liar. "Abundant precedent"? Where? Show us liar?Comey concluded that, and he lied. There is abundant precedent.The text of the law doesn't support your claim, dingbat.
The FBI concluded that no prosecutor would bring any charges against Hillary given the circumstances. Nor was there precedent within the FBI for anyone being charged with crimes given the same circumstances.
With the IG finding that the FBI's conclusions were reasonable, based on law and precedent. With no evidence that political bias affected any investigative decisions.
So the IG is in on it too?
You keep repeating the same old lies. You're a shameless douchebag.
The IG is a spineless establishment idiot.
You make nonsense up constantly, Brit. Remember when you said that Cohen wasn't sworn in for his plea deal? You made that up whole.
With you routinely making shit up, of course we're going to ask for factual verification.
You're simply unreliable.
You quote the actual statute, yet you continue refusing to show where it says what you claim.