Trump Presidency - Failure

Trump's long list of presidency fails:
Trade with China: FAIL
Build Wall at Mexico border: FAIL
Mexico to pay for that wall: FAIL
Repeal Obamacare: FAIL
NAFTA 2.0: FAIL
Peace with N. Korea: FAIL
What did Trump do then? He decreased taxes for the rich to the point that now 60 supersize corporations pay ZERO TAXES, including Amazon, IBM, GE, and Netflix by ballooning Federal Debt to bankruptcy levels. Well, Trump did bankrupt a $3 billion dollar casino, so I guess bankrupting America is next.
Such a failure and his gang of people are still supporting him? Why? Because he's racist?
View attachment 264499 View attachment 264500
LOL

Brain-dead cultist... so what?

Obama started in a month which was in recession, saw 783,000 jobs lost, 7.8% unemployment and growing...

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

... while trump started in a month with no recession, saw 252,000 jobs added, 4.7% unemployment and shrinking.
 
Cracks me up how you boast about the unemployment rate without giving Obama any credit.


Like I implied... it's beyond stupidconservative to give credit to trump only for a low unemployment rate. Your video does nothing to alter that.

2dm7c6p.jpg
 
Last edited:
Trump's long list of presidency fails:
Trade with China: FAIL
Build Wall at Mexico border: FAIL
Mexico to pay for that wall: FAIL
Repeal Obamacare: FAIL
NAFTA 2.0: FAIL
Peace with N. Korea: FAIL
What did Trump do then? He decreased taxes for the rich to the point that now 60 supersize corporations pay ZERO TAXES, including Amazon, IBM, GE, and Netflix by ballooning Federal Debt to bankruptcy levels. Well, Trump did bankrupt a $3 billion dollar casino, so I guess bankrupting America is next.
Such a failure and his gang of people are still supporting him? Why? Because he's racist?
What Trump has managed to do is give poor white trashies someone to rally on their behalf. In their minds, leadership has always been about women and minorities, never about the poor white guy and his burdens in life. Trump saw that void at this pre election rallies and has rode that dead horse ever since. The irony, is that most of his policies, have kicked them in the nuts more often than not...but there's nothing more sick, than a white man that feels left behind, just as a old German.
 
Trump is trailing Biden in TEXAS!
Trump is trailing Biden in Pa. by double digits. This one term president had better start lining up some lawyers for the day he becomes a private citizen.
Poll shows Biden beating Trump in Texas
PoliticsPA
The following are not the results of polling data - which 2016 proved can be terribly wrong - but rather models based on real life factors. Note that they were reported by the NYTimes and at least one of the three modelers worked for Obama:

3 modelers predict Trump reelection: report
Three modelers are predicting President Trump will win reelection in 2020 based on a combination of economic data and incumbent advantages, according to a column in The New York Times.

Steven Rattner wrote that Ray Fair of Yale favors Trump to win based on a model that combines incumbency and gross domestic product growth rates.

The model predicted Barack Obama’s 2008 popular vote margin within a fraction of a percentage point and got within two-tenths of a point for his 2012 vote share, Rattner, who served as a counselor to the Treasury secretary during the Obama administration, added.
 
What Trump has managed to do is give poor white trashies someone to rally on their behalf. In their minds, leadership has always been about women and minorities, never about the poor white guy and his burdens in life. Trump saw that void at this pre election rallies and has rode that dead horse ever since. The irony, is that most of his policies, have kicked them in the nuts more often than not...but there's nothing more sick, than a white man that feels left behind, just as a old German.
"An old German" ya semiliterate bigot. :D
 
Last edited:
I'm far from a Trump fan, but last I checked he's only been in office for a couple years. :dunno:
He's an illegal president who shouldn't be there at all.

What's illegal about going up against a shit candidate? :dunno:
When the real 'shit candidate" pays off porn stars and doesn't report the payments. That's cheating "me" the voter out of a free and fair election.

When the real "shit candidate" hires folks like Kris Kobach to illegally purge millions of voters, that cheats those people out of voting; The Election Was Stolen - Here’s How... - Greg Palast

 
Cracks me up how you boast about the unemployment rate without giving Obama any credit.


Like I implied... it's beyond stupidconservative to give credit to trump only for a low unemployment rate. Your video does nothing to alter that.

2dm7c6p.jpg

It's typically leftarded to deny Trump's part in our economic success and prosperity the last 2 years.

Great, show where I've done that....
 
Cracks me up how you boast about the unemployment rate without giving Obama any credit.


Like I implied... it's beyond stupidconservative to give credit to trump only for a low unemployment rate. Your video does nothing to alter that.

2dm7c6p.jpg

It's typically leftarded to deny Trump's part in our economic success and prosperity the last 2 years.

The only economic success, was from the Obama stimulus package that keeps unemployment down. And neither Obama nor Trump increased wages, which was what Republicans complained about while Obama was in office. Trump has managed to totally screw the tax payer on Tariffs. We pay the farmers to survive now through Trump's Socialism program. We pay for the rich to be richer while increasing the debt. That's not economic success in any country. Prices for goods and services have gone up. Trump is gutting HC, which people are struggling with and costing more. Republicans blamed Obama when gas prices went up, but they don't do it with Trump. You people are fos. You live in fantasy land.
 
SAYIT, post: 22525639
It's typically leftarded to deny Trump's part in our economic success and prosperity the last 2 years.

I’m not denying TrumpO’s part in our economic success and prosperity.

I am pointing out the truth that our current economic success and prosperity is identical so far in terms of GDP and the rate of Job Growth to what it has been for the past nine years.

TrumpO has only been President for two years.

TrumpO didn’t come in and suddenly turn a bad economy into a good one.

He has continued what will soon be the longest stretch of economic growth in US history.

TrumpO has done nothing more remarkable than Obama on the economy.

Just want TrumoOroids to admit that reality.
 
Cracks me up how you boast about the unemployment rate without giving Obama any credit.


Like I implied... it's beyond stupidconservative to give credit to trump only for a low unemployment rate. Your video does nothing to alter that.

2dm7c6p.jpg

It's typically leftarded to deny Trump's part in our economic success and prosperity the last 2 years.

Great, show where I've done that....

Just as soon as you show where I said you did.
 
Once again tell the economy or the man on the street it ended in 2009 faggot.



.
LOL

You poor thing. Still fantasizing about straight men having gay sex. <smh>

That aside, the recession ended in June, 2009, I don't care what delusions you suffer from. After that, GDP was growing. Shortly after that, we entered what is now the longest streak of job growth of 123 consecutive months (including today's job numbers) in the private sector.

You know, what you idiotically call a "recession."

1348488761322-smiley_rofl.gif



I think the problem with conservatives is that they don't know the real honest definition of a recession.

The real definition of recession is 2 consecutive quarters of negative growth. The negative growth can go on for more than 2 quarters but recession starts at 2 consecutive quarters of negative growth,.

And yes, by the middle of 2009, we stopped having quarters of negative growth.

None of these far right wing radical extremists have taken even one quarter of an economics class. Most of them probably only went to high school and nothing more.

Which is why they are so down right stupid about economics.

What you just posted is novice econ....probably pulled off the internet in your case



Actually it's from. Econ 101. I was required to take the course when I was in college getting my degree in accounting and finance. At least one quarter a year of Econ was required at the time for my degree.

What I posted is what every student who has sat through the first couple weeks of an Econ 101 class.

From your post I can see you never took an Econ class.

My major was economics, moron

Economics B.A. from Indiana University. Sit down, novice




If you actually had those credentials then you never would have made the first reply.

You would know what I posted was true.

Two consecutive quarters of negative growth is the true definition of recession.

Yet you made a snide remark.

Only a person who doesn't know much about economics would have posted such a ridiculous remark.

Which I don't believe much of anything you or any far right wing radical extremist like you posts.
 
LOL

You poor thing. Still fantasizing about straight men having gay sex. <smh>

That aside, the recession ended in June, 2009, I don't care what delusions you suffer from. After that, GDP was growing. Shortly after that, we entered what is now the longest streak of job growth of 123 consecutive months (including today's job numbers) in the private sector.

You know, what you idiotically call a "recession."

1348488761322-smiley_rofl.gif



I think the problem with conservatives is that they don't know the real honest definition of a recession.

The real definition of recession is 2 consecutive quarters of negative growth. The negative growth can go on for more than 2 quarters but recession starts at 2 consecutive quarters of negative growth,.

And yes, by the middle of 2009, we stopped having quarters of negative growth.

None of these far right wing radical extremists have taken even one quarter of an economics class. Most of them probably only went to high school and nothing more.

Which is why they are so down right stupid about economics.

What you just posted is novice econ....probably pulled off the internet in your case



Actually it's from. Econ 101. I was required to take the course when I was in college getting my degree in accounting and finance. At least one quarter a year of Econ was required at the time for my degree.

What I posted is what every student who has sat through the first couple weeks of an Econ 101 class.

From your post I can see you never took an Econ class.

My major was economics, moron

Economics B.A. from Indiana University. Sit down, novice




If you actually had those credentials then you never would have made the first reply.

You would know what I posted was true.

Two consecutive quarters of negative growth is the true definition of recession.

Yet you made a snide remark.

Only a person who doesn't know much about economics would have posted such a ridiculous remark.

Which I don't believe much of anything you or any far right wing radical extremist like you posts.

Bish sit down. I've forgot more about economics then you'll ever learn.

You posted Econ 101 shit and somehow think I'm impressed with something a high school student should know from econ class

You even admitted you didn't learn it until college. My 15 year old twins knew it.....novice
 

Forum List

Back
Top