Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is your response? Really?Scientists take this into account. When they do, you morons have a fit.we don't know where the warming is coming from.
The FRAUD of Global (non) Warming is the deliberate misinterpretation of the URBAN HEAT SINK EFFECT on the SURFACE GROUND TEMPERATURE SERIES, the only series showing any warming in the RAW (unFUDGED) DATA.
As urban areas grow, they warm on the surface, as trees, grass and rocks are replaced with highways, warm buildings, factories etc.
The Urban Heat Island Effect
"The sun and the city make for dangerous heat. It's called the Urban Heat Island Effect.
It causes temperatures in the city to be 1 to 10 degrees warmer than in rural areas.
Asphalt, buildings, and the lack of trees create a hotter environment for people in urban areas."
And, so, if you just measure temps in the center of growing urban areas, you get "warming" even though the ATMOSPHERE is NOT WARMING....
Make up your mind.
No they don't..
New Evidence That Climate Change Is Altering Hurricane Season as You Know ItI don't know but in relation to the discussion here, it really doesn't matter. May they all RIP.That there was a hurricane in Galveston in 1900? I'm sorry that happened, but I still don't know your point. Katrina was a Cat #5.That's interesting. Does that make a point?
That's interesting.. You didn't know that?
Galveston killed over 6000 people.. How many did Katrina kill?
.
It's all about you saying hurricanes are getting worse
..
You forgot about that statement?
My God, you are that fucking stupid to believe Trump wants to renegotiate it when it can't be renegotiated?Which is why they don't even want to hear anything about renegotiations. Like the UN, Trump will say America will do their part, but other countries have to do theirs. We will not do their part for them, and that's something they don't even want to discuss. They just want our money with a nice name like Paris Accord attached to it.
Trump & you are too God damn stupid to know the Accord was all voluntary. If Trump is going to follow through on our commitment to lower our emissions, why pull out.
You & Trump are too God damn stupid top know that the leading country responsible for the high levels that exist today.
You & Trump are too God damn stupid top know that reducing emissions globally is better than just lowering ours ( Like the orange POS wants to lower our emissions).
Trump & you are too God damn stupid to get that providing these countries the technology & equipment is business for US corporations.
You & Trump are two of the dumbest people on the planet.
If you think we need some agreement with other countries to tell us what to do and how to do it, you're the stupid one. You want America to be like that guy with a good paying job that patrons a bar. Everybody runs up to him shaking his hand, giving him a hug, knowing he will buy them drinks all night long because he has the money.
Our country is 20 trillion dollars in debt. We are broke. Do you know what the word "broke" means? Broke means no money. Broke means in debt. Broke means failure. Why you leftists would choose failure all the time is beyond any reasonable persons ability to understand.
We can't afford to spend God knows how many billions (of money we don't have) on some stupid fairy tale like MMGW. You on the left always tell us to keep our religion in our church or at home, you should do the same with your beliefs. Don't involve our country in your stupid religion. If you want to lower your idiotic carbon footprint, buy a bike and ride it everywhere you go. Buy a windmill for your backyard. Take the bus everywhere you need to go. And in a hundred years from now, you can sit back and enjoy that .02% of cooler air.
God you people are dense.
In reality nobody is telling us anything Ray. We are the leader of this world not a dumb follower.
Taking about debt------- Since when you care about debt? Trump is wasting millions just by golfing, security and travel expenses of his family.
How about those small business that lost income every time he goes to Maralago?
Again are you saying that 7 out of 10 of Americans,CEOs, Conoco, Exxon etc etc etc blasting dumb Trump are all belong to the left are dense?
You are very wrong Ray.
Did you just get to this country or what?
Policies and politics changes with mood and vote of the people. We don't want some big-eared clown making policy that we can't get out of in the future. DumBama is gone, and Trump is trying to De-Bama the country.
When we voted the last several elections, we voted for change; not just change of the players, but change in the politics as well. We gave Republicans leadership of the Congress. We gave Republicans leadership of the Senate. We recently gave Republicans the White House. Why? Because we don't want Democrat policies anymore, and Democrat policies should not continue we we vote in Republican leadership.
Signing on to this Paris Accord gives Democrats the power over our environment no matter who is in leadership in the future. Trump rightfully stopped that. If the country wants change (as we do now) then we should not be bound by some stupid agreement that stops such change.
Yes, we are the leader of the world, and our leader is saying we act independently on this issue.
I get it. When Obama was President you had a freaking fit when he used EOs or negotiated agreements & here you re cheering when El Dumpster does it.
How much shit has your orange hero done against popular opinion & on his own.
What is El Cheeto's polling? How many people agree with his shit?
According to you, he shoulds not do any of this shit.
He lost the popular vote so most Americans don't want his fat ass anywhere near the White House.
New Evidence That Climate Change Is Altering Hurricane Season as You Know ItI don't know but in relation to the discussion here, it really doesn't matter. May they all RIP.That there was a hurricane in Galveston in 1900? I'm sorry that happened, but I still don't know your point. Katrina was a Cat #5.That's interesting.. You didn't know that?
Galveston killed over 6000 people.. How many did Katrina kill?
.
It's all about you saying hurricanes are getting worse
..
You forgot about that statement?
Again you are slapped down.
Bear, it's an average over time.I don't know but in relation to the discussion here, it really doesn't matter. May they all RIP.That there was a hurricane in Galveston in 1900? I'm sorry that happened, but I still don't know your point. Katrina was a Cat #5.That's interesting. Does that make a point?
That's interesting.. You didn't know that?
Galveston killed over 6000 people.. How many did Katrina kill?
.
It's all about you saying hurricanes are getting worse
..
You forgot about that statement?
Weather Questions & AnswersBear, it's an average over time.I don't know but in relation to the discussion here, it really doesn't matter. May they all RIP.That there was a hurricane in Galveston in 1900? I'm sorry that happened, but I still don't know your point. Katrina was a Cat #5.That's interesting.. You didn't know that?
Galveston killed over 6000 people.. How many did Katrina kill?
.
It's all about you saying hurricanes are getting worse
..
You forgot about that statement?
Thanks, but I have a question: Why are so many of the weather reporting articles from 2014 based on 2013 data and prior? I noticed that, too, when I was looking at articles. Does it really take that long to compile data?Weather Questions & AnswersBear, it's an average over time.I don't know but in relation to the discussion here, it really doesn't matter. May they all RIP.That there was a hurricane in Galveston in 1900? I'm sorry that happened, but I still don't know your point. Katrina was a Cat #5.
Galveston killed over 6000 people.. How many did Katrina kill?
.
It's all about you saying hurricanes are getting worse
..
You forgot about that statement?
Bear, it's an average over time.I don't know but in relation to the discussion here, it really doesn't matter. May they all RIP.That there was a hurricane in Galveston in 1900? I'm sorry that happened, but I still don't know your point. Katrina was a Cat #5.That's interesting.. You didn't know that?
Galveston killed over 6000 people.. How many did Katrina kill?
.
It's all about you saying hurricanes are getting worse
..
You forgot about that statement?
dunno. i just like to look up blanket statements and see how valid they may or may not be. i hear storms are getting worse and maybe they are. but i've seen horrible storms a lot through life and not just recently.Thanks, but I have a question: Why are so many of the weather reporting articles from 2014 based on 2013 data and prior? I noticed that, too, when I was looking at articles. Does it really take that long to compile data?Weather Questions & AnswersBear, it's an average over time.I don't know but in relation to the discussion here, it really doesn't matter. May they all RIP.Galveston killed over 6000 people.. How many did Katrina kill?
.
It's all about you saying hurricanes are getting worse
..
You forgot about that statement?
Its been several years since we had a cat 3.Hurricanes are increasing in intensity although there may be fewer.
Increasing in intensity does not always mean a much of category 5s. It also means what would have been a tropical storm becoming a category 1.
Last year there were 4 major hurricanes.
Hurricanes are increasing in intensity although there may be fewer.
Increasing in intensity does not always mean a much of category 5s. It also means what would have been a tropical storm becoming a category 1.
Last year there were 4 major hurricanes.
Well, when it takes them three years and running to compile their data, I guess we'll all be running on "old news." You are too bright to believe that because there have been horrible storms in the past it somehow argues that climate change may bring about fewer but more intense storms. You know it is an average over years. You know that averages include minor and major storms. You KNOW that, so why are you arguing such a goof ball third grade statement from Bear?dunno. i just like to look up blanket statements and see how valid they may or may not be. i hear storms are getting worse and maybe they are. but i've seen horrible storms a lot through life and not just recently.Thanks, but I have a question: Why are so many of the weather reporting articles from 2014 based on 2013 data and prior? I noticed that, too, when I was looking at articles. Does it really take that long to compile data?Weather Questions & AnswersBear, it's an average over time.I don't know but in relation to the discussion here, it really doesn't matter. May they all RIP.
It's all about you saying hurricanes are getting worse
..
You forgot about that statement?
i've also seen not long ago the left and science say a mini ice age is coming. oops.
it's hard to believe someone and take them seriously when they rage to a point and then keep changing the name of it to fit another potential possibility.
Did you catch those cyclones on the other side of the world last year though? A couple of them were really intense. Do they not count because they didn't happen in the US?Its been several years since we had a cat 3.Hurricanes are increasing in intensity although there may be fewer.
Increasing in intensity does not always mean a much of category 5s. It also means what would have been a tropical storm becoming a category 1.
Last year there were 4 major hurricanes.
Try again.
it came up in the 70s.Well, when it takes them three years and running to compile their data, I guess we'll all be running on "old news." You are too bright to believe that because there have been horrible storms in the past it somehow argues that climate change may bring about fewer but more intense storms. You know it is an average over years. You know that averages include minor and major storms. You KNOW that, so why are you arguing such a goof ball third grade statement from Bear?dunno. i just like to look up blanket statements and see how valid they may or may not be. i hear storms are getting worse and maybe they are. but i've seen horrible storms a lot through life and not just recently.Thanks, but I have a question: Why are so many of the weather reporting articles from 2014 based on 2013 data and prior? I noticed that, too, when I was looking at articles. Does it really take that long to compile data?Weather Questions & AnswersBear, it's an average over time.It's all about you saying hurricanes are getting worse
..
You forgot about that statement?
i've also seen not long ago the left and science say a mini ice age is coming. oops.
it's hard to believe someone and take them seriously when they rage to a point and then keep changing the name of it to fit another potential possibility.
I don't remember the mini ice age thing--I remember something about everyone getting cancer from a hole in the ozone and then we stopped selling aerosols for the most part. Predictions and the "latest" scientific theories are frequently proved wrong over time; that is true. We can't deny the climate is changing. We can't deny we are pumping much, much more C02 in the atmosphere than we were 300 years ago. We can't deny C02 increases temps on Earth. So we can reasonably deny what?
- That we can do anything about it
- How much we should pay/sacrifice/contribute toward an attempted solution
Those are the only real bones of contention I see available.
We can't deny the climate is changingWell, when it takes them three years and running to compile their data, I guess we'll all be running on "old news." You are too bright to believe that because there have been horrible storms in the past it somehow argues that climate change may bring about fewer but more intense storms. You know it is an average over years. You know that averages include minor and major storms. You KNOW that, so why are you arguing such a goof ball third grade statement from Bear?dunno. i just like to look up blanket statements and see how valid they may or may not be. i hear storms are getting worse and maybe they are. but i've seen horrible storms a lot through life and not just recently.Thanks, but I have a question: Why are so many of the weather reporting articles from 2014 based on 2013 data and prior? I noticed that, too, when I was looking at articles. Does it really take that long to compile data?Weather Questions & AnswersBear, it's an average over time.It's all about you saying hurricanes are getting worse
..
You forgot about that statement?
i've also seen not long ago the left and science say a mini ice age is coming. oops.
it's hard to believe someone and take them seriously when they rage to a point and then keep changing the name of it to fit another potential possibility.
I don't remember the mini ice age thing--I remember something about everyone getting cancer from a hole in the ozone and then we stopped selling aerosols for the most part. Predictions and the "latest" scientific theories are frequently proved wrong over time; that is true. We can't deny the climate is changing. We can't deny we are pumping much, much more C02 in the atmosphere than we were 300 years ago. We can't deny C02 increases temps on Earth. So we can reasonably deny what?
- That we can do anything about it
- How much we should pay/sacrifice/contribute toward an attempted solution
Those are the only real bones of contention I see available.
They do. I was just thinking US. That's my fault. He didn't even imply that.Did you catch those cyclones on the other side of the world last year though? A couple of them were really intense. Do they not count because they didn't happen in the US?Its been several years since we had a cat 3.Hurricanes are increasing in intensity although there may be fewer.
Increasing in intensity does not always mean a much of category 5s. It also means what would have been a tropical storm becoming a category 1.
Last year there were 4 major hurricanes.
Try again.
Ahhhh, the 70's. That would explain why....it came up in the 70s.Well, when it takes them three years and running to compile their data, I guess we'll all be running on "old news." You are too bright to believe that because there have been horrible storms in the past it somehow argues that climate change may bring about fewer but more intense storms. You know it is an average over years. You know that averages include minor and major storms. You KNOW that, so why are you arguing such a goof ball third grade statement from Bear?dunno. i just like to look up blanket statements and see how valid they may or may not be. i hear storms are getting worse and maybe they are. but i've seen horrible storms a lot through life and not just recently.Thanks, but I have a question: Why are so many of the weather reporting articles from 2014 based on 2013 data and prior? I noticed that, too, when I was looking at articles. Does it really take that long to compile data?Weather Questions & AnswersBear, it's an average over time.
i've also seen not long ago the left and science say a mini ice age is coming. oops.
it's hard to believe someone and take them seriously when they rage to a point and then keep changing the name of it to fit another potential possibility.
I don't remember the mini ice age thing--I remember something about everyone getting cancer from a hole in the ozone and then we stopped selling aerosols for the most part. Predictions and the "latest" scientific theories are frequently proved wrong over time; that is true. We can't deny the climate is changing. We can't deny we are pumping much, much more C02 in the atmosphere than we were 300 years ago. We can't deny C02 increases temps on Earth. So we can reasonably deny what?
- That we can do anything about it
- How much we should pay/sacrifice/contribute toward an attempted solution
Those are the only real bones of contention I see available.
it's back.
mini ice age prediction - Google Search
No, I don't. What some climatologists are predicting is less frequent but more intense hurricanes. I don't think any of them are actually saying climate change has reached the point to affect that, or that we are anywhere near collecting data to see if that is true or not. Maybe in twenty or thirty years? A bunch more Katrinas and Sandys aren't exactly my hope, either, TN.They do. I was just thinking US. That's my fault. He didn't even imply that.Did you catch those cyclones on the other side of the world last year though? A couple of them were really intense. Do they not count because they didn't happen in the US?Its been several years since we had a cat 3.Hurricanes are increasing in intensity although there may be fewer.
Increasing in intensity does not always mean a much of category 5s. It also means what would have been a tropical storm becoming a category 1.
Last year there were 4 major hurricanes.
Try again.
Yes, there were a couple cat 4s and one or two cat 3s.
There was 3 major hurricanes in 1959
In 1969 there were 5. Even had a cat 5
In 1975 there were 7.
YOU believe we have a new hurricane problem.
