Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When the physicists perfect fusion power, the eco fanatics will be against that because they don't want humanity to have cheap abundant energy. That would mean we could still have cars and air conditioning, and those are evil!So Mother Nature produced and presumably retrievable via Mother Natures intentBecause it comes straight out of the ground in gas form. It isn't distilled from petroleum.Anybody know why natural gas is called "natural"
See even if we used zero petrol libs would then grab onto Natural Gas as a big no no
You aren't "we the people," fakey. You're just a dumbass internet troll.If the issue is as raw as do We the People support natural gas and renewable energy to most of the fossil fuels, why, yea, we do.
Debunking Trump's Paris Climate Accord lies:
9 Times Trump Twisted Facts In His Speech Quitting Paris Accord
A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers.
And oddly, you didn't link to this NASA study. Could it be because NASA supports the science that point to human caused climate change?
NASA has been caught red-handed doctoring the data. It has no credibility.
I'm super busy this afternoon, so I haven't got time to argue, but I'm gonna say this:you have yet to give logical reasons as to whyAbsolutely the most humiliating moment yet.
you have yet to address how this would even help our environment. Just a few percent..
What you have done is ignore reality and envelope yourself in emotion and partisan talking points.
Not to mention the accord is UNCONSTITUTIONAL that's why the supreme court put it on hold. article 2 clearly states treaties must be ratified by congress. Also, any time money is brought up, it must involve congress.
ADMIT that even if it were ratified or kissed by the SC or whatever, you STILL would hate it because you don't think it will have any effect. So don't ramble on about the legalities of a VOLUNTARY agreement which as far as I know is not the same thing as a TREATY, but I could be wrong and it doesn't matter because you wouldn't care anyway YOU WOULD STILL BE SAYING IT WAS WRONG HEADED and STUPID.
It is humiliating to be in the basket with Syria and Nicaragua while most of the educated world (and even a lot of the world that isn't very educated) recognize that if we're going to keep this planet anywhere near stable and livable in the foreseeable future, we need to use as much knowledge and foresight and brains as we can muster to do that.
Trump can revise our involvement if he doesn't want to pay big bucks. But he should still participate. We will see. I think it is money well spent, but that's not up to me to say.
And one more thing, if you don't quit with that hack insult "enveloping yourself in emotion and partisan talking points" I'm gonna actually get emotional. I don't do partisan talking points and you know it. Aping that shit like .... well never mind, just don't.
So you are another one who thinks being part of the cool crowd is cool? This is not high school.. Once more scientists like Judith Curry and her peers are part of the 97% consensus..Yet people call them a denier .. Why is that?
.
I have no idea what you're talking about. If you've got a point, try again.
How convenient.
What? Assuming she even retains any legitimacy/credibility as a scientist, to say nothing of as a climate scientist of some stripe, Judith Curry is among the 3% not the 97%. The woman has given five different years as the point at which global warming stopped.Judith Curry and her peers are part of the 97% consensus..
Debunking Trump's Paris Climate Accord lies:
9 Times Trump Twisted Facts In His Speech Quitting Paris Accord
A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers.
And oddly, you didn't link to this NASA study. Could it be because NASA supports the science that point to human caused climate change?
NASA has been caught red-handed doctoring the data. It has no credibility.
The only people with no credibility are climate deniers.
Debunking Trump's Paris Climate Accord lies:
9 Times Trump Twisted Facts In His Speech Quitting Paris Accord
A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers.
And oddly, you didn't link to this NASA study. Could it be because NASA supports the science that point to human caused climate change?
NASA has been caught red-handed doctoring the data. It has no credibility.
The only people with no credibility are climate deniers.
Debunking Trump's Paris Climate Accord lies:
9 Times Trump Twisted Facts In His Speech Quitting Paris Accord
A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers.
And oddly, you didn't link to this NASA study. Could it be because NASA supports the science that point to human caused climate change?
NASA has been caught red-handed doctoring the data. It has no credibility.
The only people with no credibility are climate deniers.
How does one deny that there is climate?
You and your friends are just lost in the big confusion of life.You aren't "we the people," fakey. You're just a dumbass internet troll.If the issue is as raw as do We the People support natural gas and renewable energy to most of the fossil fuels, why, yea, we do.
Most Americans Support Staying in the Paris Agreement
Majorities of Americans in Every State Support Participation in the Paris Agreement - Yale Program on Climate Change Communication
A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers.
And oddly, you didn't link to this NASA study. Could it be because NASA supports the science that point to human caused climate change?
NASA has been caught red-handed doctoring the data. It has no credibility.
The only people with no credibility are climate deniers.
How does one deny that there is climate?
Fox does it all the time when they conflate weather with climate change.
A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers.
And oddly, you didn't link to this NASA study. Could it be because NASA supports the science that point to human caused climate change?
NASA has been caught red-handed doctoring the data. It has no credibility.
The only people with no credibility are climate deniers.
How does one deny that there is climate?
Fox does it all the time when they conflate weather with climate change.
And oddly, you didn't link to this NASA study. Could it be because NASA supports the science that point to human caused climate change?
NASA has been caught red-handed doctoring the data. It has no credibility.
The only people with no credibility are climate deniers.
How does one deny that there is climate?
Fox does it all the time when they conflate weather with climate change.
You aren't this stupid are you? EVERY time there is a major weather event you idiots start screaming that's it's "climate change".
I believe in climateDebunking Trump's Paris Climate Accord lies:
9 Times Trump Twisted Facts In His Speech Quitting Paris Accord
A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers.
And oddly, you didn't link to this NASA study. Could it be because NASA supports the science that point to human caused climate change?
NASA has been caught red-handed doctoring the data. It has no credibility.
The only people with no credibility are climate deniers.
How does one deny that there is climate?
I've never seen them do that. However, libturds in the fake media do it all the time when they conflate "extreme weather" with global warming.A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers.
And oddly, you didn't link to this NASA study. Could it be because NASA supports the science that point to human caused climate change?
NASA has been caught red-handed doctoring the data. It has no credibility.
The only people with no credibility are climate deniers.
How does one deny that there is climate?
Fox does it all the time when they conflate weather with climate change.
My point about communism is very simple so read slow. The ideology of communism does not kill people, as the poster that I was responding to stated, the leader in charge makes that decision. Just like the old gun argument... Guns don't kill people, people kill people.
Now all the deniers are denying the Accord's agreements.
Kids, we are not going to walk away from the Accord until November 2020. Tough that you don't like it.
Because Bubba Trump says "we are done" does not make it so. First, the language of the Accord allows out in 2020. Second, persons, cities, universities, states, and business are setting up a network to interconnect with the UN on continuing fighting global warming. Neither Trump nor you can stop that.seems you are bubba. but I'm not surprised. you've been lost for quite some time.Now all the deniers are denying the Accord's agreements.
Kids, we are not going to walk away from the Accord until November 2020. Tough that you don't like it.
