Trump pulling out of Paris Climate Accord

The Paris Accord committed the US to nothing.
Trump doesn't even understand how it works.
No surprise there of course.
so what was the point?
Sorry...you're right...that was a bit complicated....that means "difficult"...damn...I mean "hard"...shit...ummmm..."duuuu-uuuuhh".
They tried to explain it to him but he just didn't get. Trump has not filled the position of Science and Technology Adviser to the President and is not likely to. After all he knows all he needs to know about science. He saw Star Wars and said it was a terrible movie.
Why do you need a science czar?
 
.


The funniest thing about it the left can't blame it on big oil like ExxonMobil, they are against Trump pulling out


Lmfao




.
Nope. The only person to blame is Trump himself. What an ignorant old man he is turning out to be.
---------------------------------------------- Trump is an independent President that believes in American Sovereinty and he is also keeping his campaign promises to ME and his supporters OldLady !!
 
The Climate accord is a fucking joke...
It would kill small business.

I am having a hard time understanding this Rustic.
I've been asking this question since yesterday.

What businesses or benefits do we lost from being part of the climate accord?

Anyone?
globalization
The only thing worse than nationalism is globalism
 
The far and alt rights are terrified now that they realize their goals can all slip away.
 
The Climate accord is a fucking joke...
It would kill small business.

I am having a hard time understanding this Rustic.
I've been asking this question since yesterday.

What businesses or benefits do we lost from being part of the climate accord?

Anyone?
--------------------------------------------------- i hear that complying would cost the USA billions and would give massive leeway to pollute to 'china' and other third world countries Charwin .
 
Last edited:
Every foreign leader attacking Pres Trump over Paris -further proves the deal was one sided and better for foreigners than US
No.....it proves the rest of the countries are willing to sacrifice for the good of the planet and the U.S. Only cares about itself

It does? Then why are we spending 42 billion in foreign aid this year that we don't have? What other country does this besides the US?

Today, the U.S. manages foreign assistance programs in more than 100 countries around the world through the efforts of over 20 different U.S. government agencies. These investments further America's foreign policy interests on issues ranging from expanding free markets, combating extremism, ensuring stable democracies, and addressing the root causes of poverty, while simultaneously fostering global good will.

ForeignAssistance.gov

These aid has nothing to do with the Climate Change.
 
Every foreign leader attacking Pres Trump over Paris -further proves the deal was one sided and better for foreigners than US
No.....it proves the rest of the countries are willing to sacrifice for the good of the planet and the U.S. Only cares about itself

It does? Then why are we spending 42 billion in foreign aid this year that we don't have? What other country does this besides the US?

Today, the U.S. manages foreign assistance programs in more than 100 countries around the world through the efforts of over 20 different U.S. government agencies. These investments further America's foreign policy interests on issues ranging from expanding free markets, combating extremism, ensuring stable democracies, and addressing the root causes of poverty, while simultaneously fostering global good will.

ForeignAssistance.gov

These aid has nothing to do with the Climate Change.

Yeah, explain that one to the "scientists".
 
Yeah, we would've had to pay upfront while everyone else pays nothing... fuck globalism
 
.


The funniest thing about it the left can't blame it on big oil like ExxonMobil, they are against Trump pulling out


Lmfao




.
Nope. The only person to blame is Trump himself. What an ignorant old man he is turning out to be.
what is the plan to stop the earth from warming? got anything? If you got nothing, then that is the reason.

The Earth has been warming and cooling for 4.5 Billion years......it is a pretty established plan. What in God's name is your fucking point?

Wrong Buuuud. This doesn't exist 5 years ago. So you're telling us that this is a hoax?

View attachment 130486


Your posting pictures of fog now?


OK how about this picture idiot of South Carolina



394351_10150533175979464_1637147504_n.jpg
 
You didn't read the report on lost jobs, and 3 trillion dollars of economic loss, this accord would have set is back?

Consequences of Paris Protocol: Devastating Economic Costs, Essentially Zero Environmental Benefits

$3 trillions? Really? Coming from heritage.org? You've got to be kidding me. Did you really read your link or you just cherry pick? An ultra right wing hard right media also an anti Obama which is about worthless. Give me something else.

Literally what you are saying that ALL the CEOs, businesses, 195 countries including China the worst polluters are wrong? But ignorant Trump is correct.

Give me an exact example of ------- Devastating Economic Cost and Lost --------- Like what? Like what business?
Hey, I'll beleive Heritage ahead of ANY source you'll produce. If don't wish to believe, that is your problem, not mine. The facts remain, this Paris thing was NEVER about climate but about the transfer of American wealth to a world organization along with our giving up sovereignty.

I support what Trump did for this and other reasons. I don't actually have to justify them to you.

You did not even answer any of my questions. Why?

Meaning your link is nothing but anti Obama.
What is that supposed to represent? but bogus and full of crap.

I don't have to produce anything. You have to prove why you think pulling out from this climate accord is good for America? Not me.
I have the CEOs, businesses and around the globe that supports me. The whole world is furious and kicking our ass because of your god.

And YES you need to justify what you are talking about because followers like you don't even know what these means to the whole world.
Go read it. It is NOT anti-Obama, it is a group of people who follow a conservative philosophy. Your answers are in their report and it explains pretty closely why I think its a good thing to pull out of the Paris accords. As for what it means to the whole world, why should their greed affect Me?

1. You did not answer any of my questions. If you don't mind can you answer my questions?
2. It's been proven that climate change is real.
3. What greed are you talking about?
4. You are telling me that 195 countries, scientist, businesses, CEOs ------- and the rest of the world is wrong. That Trump is right? NO Trump is very wrong. He think this is a hoax.
Bottom line he did this unthinkable, unimaginable and dumb move because of dying industry----- the coal.

Trump and your explanation from pulling out of the accord is NOT acceptable.
"2. It's been proven that climate change is real."

Natural variation and thus natural climate change is very real. It's the made up man induced crap that is not.. Now if you were legitimately wanting to talk about mans influence, as of the state of known quantifiable and empirically based science today, mans impact can not be discerned from noise in our climatic system.

"3. What greed are you talking about?"

Ottamar Edenhoffer said it best..
If you needed any more evidence that the entire theory of manmade global warming was a scheme to redistribute wealth you got it Sunday when a leading member of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change told a German news outlet, "[W]e redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy."

Such was originally published by Germany's NZZ Online Sunday, and reprinted in English by the Global Warming Policy Foundation moments ago:

(NZZ AM SONNTAG): The new thing about your proposal for a Global Deal is the stress on the importance of development policy for climate policy. Until now, many think of aid when they hear development policies.

(OTTMAR EDENHOFER, UN IPCC OFFICIAL): That will change immediately if global emission rights are distributed. If this happens, on a per capita basis, then Africa will be the big winner, and huge amounts of money will flow there. This will have enormous implications for development policy. And it will raise the question if these countries can deal responsibly with so much money at all.

(NZZ): That does not sound anymore like the climate policy that we know.

(EDENHOFER): Basically it's a big mistake to discuss climate policy separately from the major themes of globalization. The climate summit in Cancun at the end of the month is not a climate conference, but one of the largest economic conferences since the Second World War. Why? Because we have 11,000 gigatons of carbon in the coal reserves in the soil under our feet - and we must emit only 400 gigatons in the atmosphere if we want to keep the 2-degree target. 11 000 to 400 - there is no getting around the fact that most of the fossil reserves must remain in the soil.

(NZZ): De facto, this means an expropriation of the countries with natural resources. This leads to a very different development from that which has been triggered by development policy.

(EDENHOFER): First of all, developed countries have basically expropriated the atmosphere of the world community. But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy. Obviously, the owners of coal and oil will not be enthusiastic about this. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore, with problems such as deforestation or the ozone hole.

For the record, Edenhofer was co-chair of the IPCC's Working Group III, and was a lead author of the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report released in 2007 which controversially concluded, "Most of the observed increase in global average temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations."

As such, this man is a huge player in advancing this theory, and he has now made it quite clear - as folks on the realist side of this debate have been saying for years - that this is actually an international economic scheme designed to redistribute wealth.
UN IPCC Official Admits 'We Redistribute World's Wealth By Climate Policy'


"4. You are telling me that 195 countries, scientist, businesses, CEOs ------- and the rest of the world is wrong. "

I prefer the words "useful idiots". Socialism and the scam to take peoples freedoms from them was taken hook, line, and sinker... My answer to your previous question answers this one too...


Where is your quantifiable, repeatable, verifiable science with empirical evidence to support your man made global warming? Still haven't seen it anywhere..Still asking for the evidence.
 
The far and alt rights are terrified now that they realize their goals can all slip away.
---------------------------------------------- and mrobama and YOU the left is seeing that actual SLIPPING away as i type Sur !!
 
The Climate accord is a fucking joke...
It would kill small business.

I am having a hard time understanding this Rustic.
I've been asking this question since yesterday.

What businesses or benefits do we lost from being part of the climate accord?

Anyone?


Youre so used to paying high taxes you don't even care in Seattle..

You can't comprehend the good life.


.
 
.


The funniest thing about it the left can't blame it on big oil like ExxonMobil, they are against Trump pulling out


Lmfao




.
Nope. The only person to blame is Trump himself. What an ignorant old man he is turning out to be.
what is the plan to stop the earth from warming? got anything? If you got nothing, then that is the reason.

The Earth has been warming and cooling for 4.5 Billion years......it is a pretty established plan. What in God's name is your fucking point?

Wrong Buuuud. This doesn't exist 5 years ago. So you're telling us that this is a hoax?

View attachment 130486


Your posting pictures of fog now?


OK how about this picture idiot of South Carolina



View attachment 130487
------------------------------------------------------------- and Charwin oughta see the natural beauty of the Upper Peninsula of Michigan Bear.
 
i;m agaist mrobamas deal because its his deal and mostly because it reduces American Sovereignty over America policy !!
 
The Climate accord is a fucking joke...
It would kill small business.

I am having a hard time understanding this Rustic.
I've been asking this question since yesterday.

What businesses or benefits do we lost from being part of the climate accord?

Anyone?

Evidently a lot of jobs that required anything close to understanding English.
 
Trump sends a message to the world

While the rest of the world is willing to sacrifice for the good of the planet......America says...Fuck you, every man for himself!

So you admit that the US doesn't benefit economically from this treaty.

That is the way ecology works

It is cheaper to dump your shit into the rivers and air. You just don't do it because it is damaging in the long run

Then why are all the douche bags who support the treaty acting like we're missing out on something by rejecting it?
We are missing out on being respected by the rest of the world

The global warming douche bags claim we would benefit economically from the treaty. Which is it? Do we benefit or not?

It's not a treaty. Yes we benefit from the climate accord. Look around the progress we have accomplished in last 5 years.
 
The Paris Accord committed the US to nothing.
Trump doesn't even understand how it works.
No surprise there of course.
so what was the point?
Sorry...you're right...that was a bit complicated....that means "difficult"...damn...I mean "hard"...shit...ummmm..."duuuu-uuuuhh".
They tried to explain it to him but he just didn't get. Trump has not filled the position of Science and Technology Adviser to the President and is not likely to. After all he knows all he needs to know about science. He saw Star Wars and said it was a terrible movie.
And he's smarter than the generals
 

Forum List

Back
Top