Trump removed from Colorado ballot

Sound like you've done some time. What I want to see is the GA officials reception when they try and take him out of the White House. That would be fun to watch
LOL , you really have big dreams. most unlikely scenario.
 
OK, I'll bite - What's the "likely" scenario?
Biden wins , he may be old and not up to par ( just like trump ) but is a safe , reliable bet. trump is far too unpredictable and more of a threat.
 
That's interesting. Wonder why they made that distinction.
I think because it is a conspiracy statute. 18 USC 2385 is "advocating the overthrow of the gov't" and it does have disqualifying language.

IOW, if the sedition is one person, he gets charged with 2385. If there are more than one person they get charged with 2384 and 2385.

2385 is the sedition, 2384 is the enhancement.

The origin of these laws is not clear to me. I think they come from the Confiscation Acts of 1861-1862, same as the insurrection law we have been discussing.

Apparently the laws that were passed to deal with the civil war and confederacy, and which have served for 160 years, are inadequate to deal with Trump and a protest at the Capitol. At least according to the dems and their talking heads...:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Oh yeah!!!! :eusa_dance::eusa_dance::eusa_dance:




1709775319101.png
 
Biden wins , he may be old and not up to par ( just like trump ) but is a safe , reliable bet. trump is far too unpredictable and more of a threat.
GOtcha I thought I was posting with a half rational person. My bad
 
You are tiresome, The Dainty.

I don’t care if the Colorado Supreme Court finds a legal basis to decide that the matter is “justiciable.” It’s a start, but it’s not sufficient.

I also don’t care that it s highly debatable that the events of 1/6 were found by some lower court to be an “insurrection.” That itself is bullshit, but let’s play along. Say it was.

There is absolutely no legal basis to “find” that President Trump “was engaged” in that alleged “insurrection.” So, the Colorado Supreme Court decision is premised on an error. (The fact that a lower court made such a determination doesn’t support the Supreme Court’s finding that the lower court hadn’t erred.)

This is perhaps the primary basis upon which it is all but certain that the majority decision of the Colorado Supreme Court is going to have its decision shitcanned by the SCOTUS.
Hmm...

In light of the other lies Liability has told about his name changes.
 
NONE ! The truth lies somewhere in between and that makes it almost as bad , if not worse. Character used to count in this country. trump never developed any.
Character used to count in this country. trump never developed any and Trump supporters have been trained to look at character as a weakness, not a strength.

The Baby Reindeer (Liability) is lurking
 
Last edited:
You and your fellow leftists have no character therefore you need to project
The irony of a MAGA mentioning lies or character.

Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll. After Donald Trump was found liable for sexually abusing and defaming E. Jean Carroll, his legal team and his defenders lodged a frequent talking point.
 

Forum List

Back
Top