Synthaholic
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #181
Then your argument is against the existence of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. At least as written. And that's fine. I think everyone is frustrated by its lack of clear-cut definition.Yeah, I know. Judges do this sort of thing...judge someone’s worthiness--usually without such fanfare. Didn’t that whack job who cleaned screens during the election in Detroit who Rudy had to shush during a hearing get kicked off a ballot? Yeah; this is what they do.
Now...if Trump is convicted of something and state law says that the conviction is a bar against holding office...that is different. Trump hasn’t been convicted. This is a judge and a court making a ruling.
My issue is that the voters should always be the decider of if they want to vote for someone or not. If they want to elect a slime ball; they can elect a slime ball.
But that's another fight, not the one we have right now. If we get a big enough majority we can Federally codify it before Biden finishes his second term, thwarting any of these revenge actions by butthurt Red States.