Trump said he might have to close Mosques :D

[protectionist]

What part of the First Amendment sails over you America-haters' heads?

Read it again:

Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.​

Where do you North Koreans get the authority to shut down a religion without a law?

There IS A LAW. In fact there are a number of them.. And YOU KNOW what they are, so stop pretending.

And what part of the Supremacy Clause and US Codes sails over you America-haters' heads?

"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding."

18 U.S. Code Chapter 115 - TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES

• 
  
  • • § 2381 - Treason
  • § 2382 - Misprision of treason
  • § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection
  • § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy
  • § 2385 - Advocating overthrow of Government
  • § 2386 - Registration of certain organizations
  • § 2387 - Activities affecting armed forces generally
  • § 2388 - Activities affecting armed forces during war
  • § 2389 - Recruiting for service against United States
  • § 2390 - Enlistment to serve against United States
  • § 2391 - Repealed. Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330004(13), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2142]

 

[protectionist]

Trump knows his supporters. He just makes stupid remarks and they support him. Sorta like they support Putin for what they consider to be tough.

Toughness is one of the primary requirements for govt leaders. Liberals have no concept of this, and they display it right here in this very thread.

 

[protectionist]

In churches across the country, pastors with political missions have been preaching hate every Sunday for many years.

— Texas minister advocates violent overthrow of government
—North Carolina Pastor argues for a gay concentration camp.
— Kansas Pastor says gays should be put to death.
— Maryland Pastor says his ‘flesh’ likes the idea of killing gays.
— Pastor advocates child abuse on gay children
— The KKK meets at protestant churches in the South

Muslim American have the right to criticize their government and express their hatred as long as they obey the law.

But isn't hate speech now not obeying the law.

As for your Christian bash list, I see no sources. No link. Also those Christian pastors (if they ever exist) haveb't been knocking down tall buildings, shooting hundreds of people, etc

 

[Pogo]

What part of the First Amendment sails over you America-haters' heads?

Read it again:

Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.​

Where do you North Koreans get the authority to shut down a religion without a law?

There IS A LAW. In fact there are a number of them.. And YOU KNOW what they are, so stop pretending.

And what part of the Supremacy Clause and US Codes sails over you America-haters' heads?

"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding."

18 U.S. Code Chapter 115 - TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES

• 
  
  • • § 2381 - Treason
  • § 2382 - Misprision of treason
  • § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection
  • § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy
  • § 2385 - Advocating overthrow of Government
  • § 2386 - Registration of certain organizations
  • § 2387 - Activities affecting armed forces generally
  • § 2388 - Activities affecting armed forces during war
  • § 2389 - Recruiting for service against United States
  • § 2390 - Enlistment to serve against United States
  • § 2391 - Repealed. Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330004(13), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2142]

Your own post just said, "This Constitution... shall be the supreme law of the land", right?

Well guess what the fuck document the First Amendment is an integral part of. Which means -- there ain't no way around it.

 

[protectionist]

Your own post just said, "This Constitution... shall be the supreme law of the land", right?

. Which means -- there ain't no way around it.

Well Guess what Islam claims it is ?? Which means -- there ain't no way around it.

 

[Slyhunter]

We can change the definition of a religion and make sure Islam doesn't fall under that definition.

Base it on current practices not historical practices and turn Islam into a terroristic doctrine it really is.

 

[Rustic]

Donald Trump: 'Strongly consider' shutting mosques - CNNPolitics.com

now we talkin'

...i'm onboard

Muslims do love to kill people they disagree with....

 

[Pogo]

We can change the definition of a religion and make sure Islam doesn't fall under that definition.

Base it on current practices not historical practices and turn Islam into a terroristic doctrine it really is.

Uh... nnnnnnnnnnnnno we can't.

Unless of course you want to simultaneously redefine Christianism, Judaism and every/any other religion in whose name violence has been committed.

Rotsa ruck on dat.

 

[protectionist]

We can change the definition of a religion and make sure Islam doesn't fall under that definition.
Base it on current practices not historical practices and turn Islam into a terroristic doctrine it really is.

No need to change the definition of a religion. The definition as it exists, can't include Islam.

A system of belief and worship, with a code of ethics. Islam has NO HOPE of ever meeting this definition, unless it reforms and removes more than half the pages of the Koran.

 

[Unkotare]

We can change the definition of a religion and make sure Islam doesn't fall under that definition.

You're not required to be stupid, so stop anytime.

 

[Slyhunter]

We can change the definition of a religion and make sure Islam doesn't fall under that definition.

Base it on current practices not historical practices and turn Islam into a terroristic doctrine it really is.

Uh... nnnnnnnnnnnnno we can't.

Unless of course you want to simultaneously redefine Christianism, Judaism and every/any other religion in whose name violence has been committed.

Rotsa ruck on dat.

What part of ignore ancient history and apply modern history ONLY didn't you understand.

 

[Pogo]

We can change the definition of a religion and make sure Islam doesn't fall under that definition.

Base it on current practices not historical practices and turn Islam into a terroristic doctrine it really is.

Uh... nnnnnnnnnnnnno we can't.

Unless of course you want to simultaneously redefine Christianism, Judaism and every/any other religion in whose name violence has been committed.

Rotsa ruck on dat.

What part of ignore ancient history and apply modern history ONLY didn't you understand.

None of it. That wouldn't work.

See, "modern history" isn't what appears on the blog pages of TROP and JihadWatch. It's like, actual stuff.

 

[Unkotare]

We can change the definition of a religion and make sure Islam doesn't fall under that definition.
Base it on current practices not historical practices and turn Islam into a terroristic doctrine it really is.

No need to change the definition of a religion. The definition as it exists, can't include Islam.

A system of belief and worship, with a code of ethics. Islam has NO HOPE of ever meeting this definition, unless it reforms and removes more than half the pages of the Koran.

Your cowardly idiocy has nothing to do with constitutional law, dropout.

 

[Vandalshandle]

The fact that Trump is actually running on a platform of defying the Constitution, and is being cheered on by the nut jobs for his promises to do so, says a whole lot about his base.

There is no way that this man will ever be president of the USA. Granted, there are tens of thousands of nuts out there, but they could not possible steal an election from the sane.

Wait until he wins.

I'll wait until the sun freezes and the earth burns.

 

[Vandalshandle]

We can change the definition of a religion and make sure Islam doesn't fall under that definition.
Base it on current practices not historical practices and turn Islam into a terroristic doctrine it really is.

No need to change the definition of a religion. The definition as it exists, can't include Islam.

A system of belief and worship, with a code of ethics. Islam has NO HOPE of ever meeting this definition, unless it reforms and removes more than half the pages of the Koran.

I have often wondered just where you get your information. I mean, your posts are all so surreal, like a Salvador Dali painting....

 

[Billy000]

FDR locked up Japanese Americans after Pearl Harbor and the supreme court at the time authorized it. All Trump is saying is that we need to consider how muslem Mosques are promoting jihad.

You people are such goddamn hypocrites.

 

[Billy000]

Donald Trump: 'Strongly consider' shutting mosques - CNNPolitics.com

now we talkin'

...i'm onboard

Republicans only like he freedom of speech and religion that applies to them.

 

[Vandalshandle]

FDR locked up Japanese Americans after Pearl Harbor and the supreme court at the time authorized it. All Trump is saying is that we need to consider how muslem Mosques are promoting jihad.

You people are such goddamn hypocrites.

Incidentally, to my knowledge, the Supreme Court did NOT authorize it. I would have to see a link about that.

 

[Flopper]

The fact that Trump is actually running on a platform of defying the Constitution, and is being cheered on by the nut jobs for his promises to do so, says a whole lot about his base.

There is no way that this man will ever be president of the USA. Granted, there are tens of thousands of nuts out there, but they could not possible steal an election from the sane.

If Trump were nominated, he would lose by a landslide. There is no other candidate that could unite Democrats more and at the same time garner half-hearted support from his own party.

 

[Wolfstrike]

The fact that Trump is actually running on a platform of defying the Constitution, and is being cheered on by the nut jobs for his promises to do so, says a whole lot about his base.

There is no way that this man will ever be president of the USA. Granted, there are tens of thousands of nuts out there, but they could not possible steal an election from the sane.

If Trump were nominated, he would lose by a landslide. There is no other candidate that could unite Democrats more and at the same time garner half-hearted support from his own party.

Democrats don't have to be united, they'll just rig the elections like they always do