Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are correct, they did not authorize it but they did not overturn Roosevelt's executive order, Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214. The court's decision was to defer to congress and the military authorities in light of Pearl Harbor and the declaration of war. It was a terrible cop-out by the court but America was fighting for it's survival with hundreds of thousands or Americans dying in battle.You people are such goddamn hypocrites.FDR locked up Japanese Americans after Pearl Harbor and the supreme court at the time authorized it. All Trump is saying is that we need to consider how muslem Mosques are promoting jihad.
Incidentally, to my knowledge, the Supreme Court did NOT authorize it. I would have to see a link about that.
If Trump doesn't do a better job of getting endorsements from his party, instead of alienating them, it really want matter how well the Democrats are united. Where other Republicans candidates have the support of dozens of house members, senators, and governors, Trump has yet to get a single endorsement of a party official, governor, or US Senator. In the House he has only one representative endorsing him while other candidates have dozens of endorsements. I guess the most notable Trump endorsement beside his ex-wife is Clint Eastwood. That should please the Dirty Harry fans.If Trump were nominated, he would lose by a landslide. There is no other candidate that could unite Democrats more and at the same time garner half-hearted support from his own party.The fact that Trump is actually running on a platform of defying the Constitution, and is being cheered on by the nut jobs for his promises to do so, says a whole lot about his base.
There is no way that this man will ever be president of the USA. Granted, there are tens of thousands of nuts out there, but they could not possible steal an election from the sane.
Democrats don't have to be united, they'll just rig the elections like they always do
If Trump were nominated, he would lose by a landslide. There is no other candidate that could unite Democrats more and at the same time garner half-hearted support from his own party.The fact that Trump is actually running on a platform of defying the Constitution, and is being cheered on by the nut jobs for his promises to do so, says a whole lot about his base.
There is no way that this man will ever be president of the USA. Granted, there are tens of thousands of nuts out there, but they could not possible steal an election from the sane.
Democrats don't have to be united, they'll just rig the elections like they always do
In other words, you're saying NOTHING at all.I'm saying there's no such thing as a schnozberry, no matter how desperately you try to dream one up.
Even the Democrats will vote for Trump.If Trump were nominated, he would lose by a landslide. There is no other candidate that could unite Democrats more and at the same time garner half-hearted support from his own party.The fact that Trump is actually running on a platform of defying the Constitution, and is being cheered on by the nut jobs for his promises to do so, says a whole lot about his base.
There is no way that this man will ever be president of the USA. Granted, there are tens of thousands of nuts out there, but they could not possible steal an election from the sane.
Trump is like daddy making everything alright, but most of us know he can't. He plays on our frustrations and our childishness, and you got to admit it's appealing. His evidence of his leadership is that he parlayed bankruptcies into more wealth. This is what Germany must have felt like in the twenties, looking for a strong leader. The question is really has America had enough democracy since 1789 to ignore the siren call?
Trump is like daddy making everything alright, but most of us know he can't. He plays on our frustrations and our childishness, and you got to admit it's appealing. His evidence of his leadership is that he parlayed bankruptcies into more wealth. This is what Germany must have felt like in the twenties, looking for a strong leader. The question is really has America had enough democracy since 1789 to ignore the siren call?
Appealing? I consider him to have the worst personna of anyone to run for office in my lifetime. Even Palin's screeching was not as bad as Trump's bombosaty. He makes Nixon seem warm and cuddly, by comparison.
That's an interesting point. Maybe our democratic form of government isn't good enough for those who seek to make America great again.Trump is like daddy making everything alright, but most of us know he can't. He plays on our frustrations and our childishness, and you got to admit it's appealing. His evidence of his leadership is that he parlayed bankruptcies into more wealth. This is what Germany must have felt like in the twenties, looking for a strong leader. The question is really has America had enough democracy since 1789 to ignore the siren call?
That's an interesting point. Maybe our democratic form of government isn't good enough for those who seek to make America great again.Trump is like daddy making everything alright, but most of us know he can't. He plays on our frustrations and our childishness, and you got to admit it's appealing. His evidence of his leadership is that he parlayed bankruptcies into more wealth. This is what Germany must have felt like in the twenties, looking for a strong leader. The question is really has America had enough democracy since 1789 to ignore the siren call?
Judging from the support that Trump is receiving, it seems many Americans are ready for a leader that will act unilaterally without concern for congressional approval or judicial oversight, a leader that will not be bound by international agreements, laws, or courts that are keeping American from being great again.
Obama doesn't even come close to what Trump has proposed, closing mosques, breaking trade agreements, bombing Iraqi oil fields, breaking economic ties to our largest trading partners,, insulting our allies, ethnic cleansing.....That's an interesting point. Maybe our democratic form of government isn't good enough for those who seek to make America great again.Trump is like daddy making everything alright, but most of us know he can't. He plays on our frustrations and our childishness, and you got to admit it's appealing. His evidence of his leadership is that he parlayed bankruptcies into more wealth. This is what Germany must have felt like in the twenties, looking for a strong leader. The question is really has America had enough democracy since 1789 to ignore the siren call?
Judging from the support that Trump is receiving, it seems many Americans are ready for a leader that will act unilaterally without concern for congressional approval or judicial oversight, a leader that will not be bound by international agreements, laws, or courts that are keeping American from being great again.
We already have a POTUS like that. His name is His Highness Barrack Hussein.
You are completely, 100% wrong. Islam cannot be and will mot be outlawed in the united states, and no portion of the constitution allows for it.Not only CAN you do that, but by law, you are required to do that, as was explained in Post # 8. No need to explain it again. And NO, the Constitution does NOT protect the right to the free exercise of one's religion, IF/WHENEVER that religion is a supremacism (which is outlawed by the Constitution) > Article 6, Section 2, and in the case of Islam, is also in violation of US Code 18, Section 2384 & 2385.The Constitution protects the right to the free exercise of one's religion. The Supremacy Clause makes that protection the supreme law of the land.
You cannot constitutionally single out Muslims for discriminatory treatment solely on the basis of their religion.
Republicans only like he freedom of speech and religion that applies to them.
If Trump were nominated, he would lose by a landslide. There is no other candidate that could unite Democrats more and at the same time garner half-hearted support from his own party.The fact that Trump is actually running on a platform of defying the Constitution, and is being cheered on by the nut jobs for his promises to do so, says a whole lot about his base.
There is no way that this man will ever be president of the USA. Granted, there are tens of thousands of nuts out there, but they could not possible steal an election from the sane.
Democrats don't have to be united, they'll just rig the elections like they always do
But, apparently, we were out to lunch when Bush was elected by the supreme Court.
And yet here they are defending it.Republicans only like he freedom of speech and religion that applies to them.
And democrats NEVER like freedom of speech or religion.
And yet here they are defending it.Republicans only like he freedom of speech and religion that applies to them.
And democrats NEVER like freedom of speech or religion.
Democrats only have a problem with religion when crazy RWs say stuff like "this nation is a Christian nation!". It's Rightwingers who have no concept of separation of church and state.And yet here they are defending it.Republicans only like he freedom of speech and religion that applies to them.
And democrats NEVER like freedom of speech or religion.
No, they're not. They are just playing partisan games as usual for the sake of same. democrats are hostile to religion and have NEVER been fond of freedom for anyone but the chosen few at the head of their politburo...I mean party.
