pknopp
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2019
- 71,981
- 27,941
The facts are you can argue this all day but no one is going to build a new nuclear plant. Too expensive, too much risk and no one wants one near them.
And so you concede the debate. It's not about global warming at all. We're good
A solution that is not a solution is not a solution. I could agree with you all day on nuclear and it matters none. You argue nuclear because you know it isn't going to happen. You think it's a "gotcha" when in reality your solution is not a solution. It's not going to happen. We will continue forward with renewable sources.
You don't actually care about global warming other than the opportunity to get socialism. Typical Democrat. I gave you a shot and you couldn't go beyond other Democrats on that.
Is Tesla an example of this Socialism?
I'm not the pie in the sky guy, you are. You're going to go with a solution that won't be viable for a century or more and pass on two straight forward solutions we could do today. Democrat Party runs on the allure of free stuff
We can't do your solution. No one wants to do it. For some odd reason you continue to ignore that.
Ignoring it? WTF. That's my POINT.
Nuclear is the ONLY large scale zero emissions energy production solution that we have, and Democrats oppose it. That's exactly what I'm saying. You are NOT environmentalists. You're environmental opportunists using a catastrophe you don't believe will happen to get socialism.
Note you stopped responding to fracking for natural gas, which is also a huge environmentalist solution for an environmentalist who means it solution as well. There are may coal plants we could shut down across the globe and replace them with natural gas and greatly reduce emissions
Build one. I won't stop you.