Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 101,088
- 81,428
- 3,645
Lie.And the lawsuits since then are showing otherwise.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lie.And the lawsuits since then are showing otherwise.
still a question in my mind How illegal is it to challenge the reliability ofHe did challenge them. He challenged them 67 times and he lost every one of the challenges.
Once he had lost everyone of the challenges, everything he did there after was both indefensible and illegal.
While my standards and expectations for him are now completely gone, I'm still a little shocked he said this. He can't possibly be this.... well.....Well he is admitting to illegal acts.
Simple. That depends on if you use illegal means instead of legal means.still a question in my mind How illegal is it to challenge the reliability of
a COUNTRY WIDE VOTE?
still a question in my mind How illegal is it to challenge the reliability of
a COUNTRY WIDE VOTE?
OK---what illegal means did HE use. For the record--I do notSimple. That depends on if you use illegal means instead of legal means.
Was that a trick question?
And the countrywide vote didn't decide the election anyway.
Go read the indictment.OK---what illegal means did HE use.
no---I is old----consider my failing eyesightGo read the indictment.
You are expected to be informed of the basic facts of the discussion before participating.
No? Don't you think that's reasonable?
Then answering your question on the forum for you to read would be pointless.no---I is old----consider my failing eyesight
The scary thing in all of this is that the Supreme Court has basically said he can do anything that he wants as long as he "claims" it was an official duty. As if no other criminal EVER has not used pretext as justification for their actions, in an attempt to circumvent a particular law. And while this position can be fought in court, just think about all the damage that can be done during the time that the case makes its way through the court system.So he’s saying that if in his fucked up opinion things were not as they should have been, he can do any illegal act to “remedy” that regardless of court rulings
Well he is admitting to illegal acts. Just trying to justify them. Prisons are full of people making that argument
God help the Fed employees who have come after him for yearsThe scary thing in all of this is that the Supreme Court has basically said he can do anything that he wants as long as he "claims" it was an official duty. As if no other criminal EVER has not used pretext as justification for their actions, in an attempt to circumvent a particular law. And while this position can be fought in court, just think about all the damage that can be done during the time that the case makes its way through the court system.
This is why I found it very disturbing that not only did SCOTUS rule that he has "presumptive" immunity, but additionally, his motivation for performing any particular act "cannot be questioned".
God help us if Trump ever makes his way back into office.
God help the Fed employees who have come after him for years
Your FIRED BITCHESWhy so shy?
Spell out your wittle threats.
Let's hear it.
for the record----Trump is disabled by HOOF IN MOUTH disease which isYour FIRED BITCHES
So.for the record----Trump is disabled by HOOF IN MOUTH disease which is
a form of dysphasia
Fired? Hahaha, that's the big revenge?Your FIRED BITCHES
This is one of my favorite cult apologist lines.for the record----Trump is disabled by HOOF IN MOUTH disease which is
a form of dysphasia
I never BLAME a neurological disorder on the AFFLICTED THEREOFSo.
Night and day better than the Whore.
Don't be an ASS
VOTE TRUMP
Show me the convictionHe is a traitor.
I don't think you got that right
And the lawsuits since then are showing otherwise.
92% voted MY ASS.