Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The EC was no quirk. It was designed so that population centers did not dominate rural areas. Given that urban centers have become the cesspools of America today, it shows magnificent foresight of the framers of the Constitution.Then they should have voted in different places to elect Hillary. They didn't, Trump won, and if you want the government shut down, deny the wall!
You finally admit Hillary got more votes, but the quirk of EC allocation was what elected Trump, not his popularity.
There are maybe 40 votes in the Senate to pull this off. LOLActually, the facts being what they are and the USA having a 20 trillion dollar national debt, it should be said that
Obama bought the country to the brink of default, and I Donald Trump an going to build a wall to keep the crack and meth out, or at least slow it so that we the USA can get on with making America Great Again.
But I'm not the Donald's speechwriter...................yet
Debt cieling is not about spending, it's about PAYING THE BILLS.
but even if it WAS about spending - Trump's wall is just another SPENDING item.
Food stamps have been costing the country 70 billion a year the past couple of years. A Trump wall cold cost anywhere from 13 to 20 billion dollars one time only.
My money says the wall is a much better investment than supporting people who don't want to work for their own food.
Food stamps and welfare fulfill a need for many Americans, granted there is abuse in the system, like all systems. Take it from me as a landlord and a small business owner in poor and minority neigborhoods. The people served by social services and EBT do need help, although yes, there is abuse, but don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. If people want to preach their religion, fine. I don't see a reason why they should get a tax kickback for it though.
States run by Republican governors have proven many people don't need food stamps. They enforced requirements such as having a job working 20 hours a week, volunteering their time 20 hours a month, or being enrolled in a vocational program to prepare for a job. Most of those hungry people decided to drop out of the food stamp program.
Besides, if we cut food stamps in half for one year, used that money to build the wall, then we can return food stamps to it's current level, we would have enough to build the highest tech wall available.
There are maybe 40 votes in the Senate to pull this off. LOLDebt cieling is not about spending, it's about PAYING THE BILLS.
but even if it WAS about spending - Trump's wall is just another SPENDING item.
Food stamps have been costing the country 70 billion a year the past couple of years. A Trump wall cold cost anywhere from 13 to 20 billion dollars one time only.
My money says the wall is a much better investment than supporting people who don't want to work for their own food.
Food stamps and welfare fulfill a need for many Americans, granted there is abuse in the system, like all systems. Take it from me as a landlord and a small business owner in poor and minority neigborhoods. The people served by social services and EBT do need help, although yes, there is abuse, but don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. If people want to preach their religion, fine. I don't see a reason why they should get a tax kickback for it though.
States run by Republican governors have proven many people don't need food stamps. They enforced requirements such as having a job working 20 hours a week, volunteering their time 20 hours a month, or being enrolled in a vocational program to prepare for a job. Most of those hungry people decided to drop out of the food stamp program.
Besides, if we cut food stamps in half for one year, used that money to build the wall, then we can return food stamps to it's current level, we would have enough to build the highest tech wall available.
Until 2018, lol. You are going to find out, that the rinos are going to get hosed in the primary election. You are also going to find out, that the NEW people, along with the Democratic seats we pick up, are going to cause you to buy a lot of Alka-Seltzer.
If you live in the 30-odd red states, what is the point of voting if you're a Democrat?Then they should have voted in different places to elect Hillary. They didn't, Trump won, and if you want the government shut down, deny the wall!
You finally admit Hillary got more votes, but the quirk of EC allocation was what elected Trump, not his popularity.
Which is leftist BS because nobody will ever know.
Because we have the College, Republicans in states that had no chance at ever getting the EC votes for a Republican contender probably didn't even bother to vote. If you live in NY or California, what's the point of voting if you're a Republican?
There are maybe 40 votes in the Senate to pull this off. LOLDebt cieling is not about spending, it's about PAYING THE BILLS.
but even if it WAS about spending - Trump's wall is just another SPENDING item.
Food stamps have been costing the country 70 billion a year the past couple of years. A Trump wall cold cost anywhere from 13 to 20 billion dollars one time only.
My money says the wall is a much better investment than supporting people who don't want to work for their own food.
Food stamps and welfare fulfill a need for many Americans, granted there is abuse in the system, like all systems. Take it from me as a landlord and a small business owner in poor and minority neigborhoods. The people served by social services and EBT do need help, although yes, there is abuse, but don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. If people want to preach their religion, fine. I don't see a reason why they should get a tax kickback for it though.
States run by Republican governors have proven many people don't need food stamps. They enforced requirements such as having a job working 20 hours a week, volunteering their time 20 hours a month, or being enrolled in a vocational program to prepare for a job. Most of those hungry people decided to drop out of the food stamp program.
Besides, if we cut food stamps in half for one year, used that money to build the wall, then we can return food stamps to it's current level, we would have enough to build the highest tech wall available.
Until 2018, lol. You are going to find out, that the rinos are going to get hosed in the primary election. .
Hillary only won 15% of the counties in THE US.
I have a great job, tard.Why don't you just get a fucking job?!Food stamps and TANF would continue during a shutdown. They were not affected during the 1996 shutdown.Oh, man. How hard did you have to hit yourself in the head with a sledgehammer to think a wall will keep out drugs? And how many times?
Drug dealers aren't as stupid as you are, unfortunately.
Ultralight aircraft being used to transport drugs
How does Trump plan to stop welfare payments? What welfare payments?
Trump and his parroting Chumps are talking out of their collective asses.
Medicare payments, however, could be affected if a shutdown lasts more than a couple weeks.
Trump would have every senior in America pissed at him. So he's got that going for him.
Why do you tards so consistently make the stupidest assumptions?
You really need to have a long sit down with the voices in your head and explain to them you are tired of publicly making an ass of yourself because of them.
So you just keep on wishing I would go away, mm-kay? It amuses me.
Trump's stupidity is contagious. Haven't you noticed how much ridiculous the RW'ers on this forum have gotten since Trump was elected?
When's the last time you saw one even attempt to make an intelligent argument?
There are maybe 40 votes in the Senate to pull this off. LOLFood stamps have been costing the country 70 billion a year the past couple of years. A Trump wall cold cost anywhere from 13 to 20 billion dollars one time only.
My money says the wall is a much better investment than supporting people who don't want to work for their own food.
Food stamps and welfare fulfill a need for many Americans, granted there is abuse in the system, like all systems. Take it from me as a landlord and a small business owner in poor and minority neigborhoods. The people served by social services and EBT do need help, although yes, there is abuse, but don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. If people want to preach their religion, fine. I don't see a reason why they should get a tax kickback for it though.
States run by Republican governors have proven many people don't need food stamps. They enforced requirements such as having a job working 20 hours a week, volunteering their time 20 hours a month, or being enrolled in a vocational program to prepare for a job. Most of those hungry people decided to drop out of the food stamp program.
Besides, if we cut food stamps in half for one year, used that money to build the wall, then we can return food stamps to it's current level, we would have enough to build the highest tech wall available.
Until 2018, lol. You are going to find out, that the rinos are going to get hosed in the primary election. You are also going to find out, that the NEW people, along with the Democratic seats we pick up, are going to cause you to buy a lot of Alka-Seltzer.
LOL the Dopocrats have not won a special election since Trump won..................
I have a great job, tard.Why don't you just get a fucking job?!Food stamps and TANF would continue during a shutdown. They were not affected during the 1996 shutdown.How does Trump plan to stop welfare payments? What welfare payments?
Trump and his parroting Chumps are talking out of their collective asses.
Medicare payments, however, could be affected if a shutdown lasts more than a couple weeks.
Trump would have every senior in America pissed at him. So he's got that going for him.
Why do you tards so consistently make the stupidest assumptions?
You really need to have a long sit down with the voices in your head and explain to them you are tired of publicly making an ass of yourself because of them.
So you just keep on wishing I would go away, mm-kay? It amuses me.
Trump's stupidity is contagious. Haven't you noticed how much ridiculous the RW'ers on this forum have gotten since Trump was elected?
When's the last time you saw one even attempt to make an intelligent argument?
Says the person with nothing between his ears but antlers, lol! He wouldn't know a cogent debate point if it came up and took his rent controlled housing away from his liberal derriere!
THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE IS.Hillary only won 15% of the counties in THE US.
Elections aren't based on acreage.
If you live in the 30-odd red states, what is the point of voting if you're a Democrat?Then they should have voted in different places to elect Hillary. They didn't, Trump won, and if you want the government shut down, deny the wall!
You finally admit Hillary got more votes, but the quirk of EC allocation was what elected Trump, not his popularity.
Which is leftist BS because nobody will ever know.
Because we have the College, Republicans in states that had no chance at ever getting the EC votes for a Republican contender probably didn't even bother to vote. If you live in NY or California, what's the point of voting if you're a Republican?
I kind of like that one. Especially since he was Yanking Lefty's Chain.
If the election was decided by the popular vote, both candidates would have campaigned differently.If you live in the 30-odd red states, what is the point of voting if you're a Democrat?Then they should have voted in different places to elect Hillary. They didn't, Trump won, and if you want the government shut down, deny the wall!
You finally admit Hillary got more votes, but the quirk of EC allocation was what elected Trump, not his popularity.
Which is leftist BS because nobody will ever know.
Because we have the College, Republicans in states that had no chance at ever getting the EC votes for a Republican contender probably didn't even bother to vote. If you live in NY or California, what's the point of voting if you're a Republican?
Exactly. That's why it's stupid to use the popular vote for any argument; nobody was trying to get the most votes Both contenders were trying to get the most electoral votes. Two totally different games.
Republicans in states that had no chance at ever getting the EC votes for a Republican contender probably didn't even bother to vote. If you live in NY or California, what's the point of voting if you're a Republican?
I have a great job, tard.Why don't you just get a fucking job?!Food stamps and TANF would continue during a shutdown. They were not affected during the 1996 shutdown.
Trump and his parroting Chumps are talking out of their collective asses.
Medicare payments, however, could be affected if a shutdown lasts more than a couple weeks.
Trump would have every senior in America pissed at him. So he's got that going for him.
Why do you tards so consistently make the stupidest assumptions?
You really need to have a long sit down with the voices in your head and explain to them you are tired of publicly making an ass of yourself because of them.
So you just keep on wishing I would go away, mm-kay? It amuses me.
Trump's stupidity is contagious. Haven't you noticed how much ridiculous the RW'ers on this forum have gotten since Trump was elected?
When's the last time you saw one even attempt to make an intelligent argument?
Says the person with nothing between his ears but antlers, lol! He wouldn't know a cogent debate point if it came up and took his rent controlled housing away from his liberal derriere!
Link us to one of your intelligent arguments.
There are maybe 40 votes in the Senate to pull this off. LOLFood stamps and welfare fulfill a need for many Americans, granted there is abuse in the system, like all systems. Take it from me as a landlord and a small business owner in poor and minority neigborhoods. The people served by social services and EBT do need help, although yes, there is abuse, but don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. If people want to preach their religion, fine. I don't see a reason why they should get a tax kickback for it though.
States run by Republican governors have proven many people don't need food stamps. They enforced requirements such as having a job working 20 hours a week, volunteering their time 20 hours a month, or being enrolled in a vocational program to prepare for a job. Most of those hungry people decided to drop out of the food stamp program.
Besides, if we cut food stamps in half for one year, used that money to build the wall, then we can return food stamps to it's current level, we would have enough to build the highest tech wall available.
Until 2018, lol. You are going to find out, that the rinos are going to get hosed in the primary election. You are also going to find out, that the NEW people, along with the Democratic seats we pick up, are going to cause you to buy a lot of Alka-Seltzer.
LOL the Dopocrats have not won a special election since Trump won..................
Actually they have. They won in California and have won several state legislative special elections.
You are comically ignorant of the facts.
I have a great job, tard.Why don't you just get a fucking job?!Food stamps and TANF would continue during a shutdown. They were not affected during the 1996 shutdown.
Trump and his parroting Chumps are talking out of their collective asses.
Medicare payments, however, could be affected if a shutdown lasts more than a couple weeks.
Trump would have every senior in America pissed at him. So he's got that going for him.
Why do you tards so consistently make the stupidest assumptions?
You really need to have a long sit down with the voices in your head and explain to them you are tired of publicly making an ass of yourself because of them.
So you just keep on wishing I would go away, mm-kay? It amuses me.
Trump's stupidity is contagious. Haven't you noticed how much ridiculous the RW'ers on this forum have gotten since Trump was elected?
When's the last time you saw one even attempt to make an intelligent argument?
Says the person with nothing between his ears but antlers, lol! He wouldn't know a cogent debate point if it came up and took his rent controlled housing away from his liberal derriere!
Link us to one of your intelligent arguments.
If the election was decided by the popular vote, both candidates would have campaigned differently.If you live in the 30-odd red states, what is the point of voting if you're a Democrat?Then they should have voted in different places to elect Hillary. They didn't, Trump won, and if you want the government shut down, deny the wall!
You finally admit Hillary got more votes, but the quirk of EC allocation was what elected Trump, not his popularity.
Which is leftist BS because nobody will ever know.
Because we have the College, Republicans in states that had no chance at ever getting the EC votes for a Republican contender probably didn't even bother to vote. If you live in NY or California, what's the point of voting if you're a Republican?
Exactly. That's why it's stupid to use the popular vote for any argument; nobody was trying to get the most votes Both contenders were trying to get the most electoral votes. Two totally different games.
And for the record, I am a big supporter of the electoral college.
Trump isn't. He believes it is a disaster for democracy.
.
I have a great job, tard.Why don't you just get a fucking job?!
Why do you tards so consistently make the stupidest assumptions?
You really need to have a long sit down with the voices in your head and explain to them you are tired of publicly making an ass of yourself because of them.
So you just keep on wishing I would go away, mm-kay? It amuses me.
Trump's stupidity is contagious. Haven't you noticed how much ridiculous the RW'ers on this forum have gotten since Trump was elected?
When's the last time you saw one even attempt to make an intelligent argument?
Says the person with nothing between his ears but antlers, lol! He wouldn't know a cogent debate point if it came up and took his rent controlled housing away from his liberal derriere!
Link us to one of your intelligent arguments.
109 THOUSAND posts, and you NEVER made a point yet, lol.
