🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Trump says no welfare checks if the brder wall is not approved

The EC was no quirk. It was designed so that population centers did not dominate rural areas. Given that urban centers have become the cesspools of America today, it shows magnificent foresight of the framers of the Constitution.

WRONG.

https://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/colorado


Hillary Clinton Dem. 1,338,870 48.2%

Donald J. Trump Rep. 1,202,484 43.3

Where did Clinton win by 130,000 votes?

Vote by county Clinton Trump
Denver 244,551 62,690
Wrong? WTF are you talking about?
 
Now that will wake up the protesters living off solely of their Soros protest income.




You can see that she is suffering from the effects of GMO"s that is one of Soros products. That it is causing people to be so over weight and lazy. That stuff is intoxicating the body, that is creating a drunken behavior in people.Just imagine in a few years from now, that everyone that consumes that stuff will be so hopeless. But Soros making sure that nobody will stop his cash crop. He made sure in the past to put those whom he wanted in office.

GMOs Impact on Gut and Mental Health GMOs Impact on Gut and Mental Health | School Food, GMOs and CAFOs
 
You pussy Republicans don't have the balls to end welfare. You needed Clinton to do it

Clinton? As in Bill Clinton? The same Bill Clinton that vetoed THE REPUBLICAN WELFARE REFORM BILL twice?
He vetoed till they got it right. I don't see any reforms happening now..

Bull. He vetoed it until just before he started his reelection campaign. Then the Republicans stuck the bill in front of him again and said "Veto it now MFr!" That's the only reason he signed it.
sure, and repubs are working on reforms now.
 
Then they should have voted in different places to elect Hillary. They didn't, Trump won, and if you want the government shut down, deny the wall!

You finally admit Hillary got more votes, but the quirk of EC allocation was what elected Trump, not his popularity.

Which is leftist BS because nobody will ever know.

Because we have the College, Republicans in states that had no chance at ever getting the EC votes for a Republican contender probably didn't even bother to vote. If you live in NY or California, what's the point of voting if you're a Republican?
The point of voting is to be part of the democratic process, even if you live (like I do) where your vote wont get your choice elected.
 
Trump has both hands on the shovel and is furiously digging a hole that Republicans know they can't climb out of. And they're watching him do it.

Dig baby, don't stop.


This guy believes Propaganda. You know what that means---------->they are to dumb to realize that we are winning, and they are on the verge of becoming even more irrelevant than they already are-)

Yes tell us of the demographics in the country that make that possible oh Scholar of the Rhodes. You rely on fake emotion drilled into your head by Fish Dimbaugh and Faux News. Their business is to make money off of easily manipulated rubes.
 
Wrong? WTF are you talking about?

You claimed - The EC was no quirk. It was designed so that population centers did not dominate rural areas.

In colorado the population centers dominate the rural areas.

You confuse domination of one state over another, not by voters within the same state.
 
Actually this is what Trump sais:

"I will bring this country to a brink of default and total disaster unless you give me what I want."
Actually, the facts being what they are and the USA having a 20 trillion dollar national debt, it should be said that

Obama bought the country to the brink of default, and I Donald Trump an going to build a wall to keep the crack and meth out, or at least slow it so that we the USA can get on with making America Great Again.

But I'm not the Donald's speechwriter...................yet

Debt cieling is not about spending, it's about PAYING THE BILLS.

but even if it WAS about spending - Trump's wall is just another SPENDING item.


Food stamps have been costing the country 70 billion a year the past couple of years. A Trump wall cold cost anywhere from 13 to 20 billion dollars one time only.

My money says the wall is a much better investment than supporting people who don't want to work for their own food.

Food stamps and welfare fulfill a need for many Americans, granted there is abuse in the system, like all systems. Take it from me as a landlord and a small business owner in poor and minority neigborhoods. The people served by social services and EBT do need help, although yes, there is abuse, but don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. If people want to preach their religion, fine. I don't see a reason why they should get a tax kickback for it though.

States run by Republican governors have proven many people don't need food stamps. They enforced requirements such as having a job working 20 hours a week, volunteering their time 20 hours a month, or being enrolled in a vocational program to prepare for a job. Most of those hungry people decided to drop out of the food stamp program.

Besides, if we cut food stamps in half for one year, used that money to build the wall, then we can return food stamps to it's current level, we would have enough to build the highest tech wall available.


Darn, and I was so sure Mexico was paying for this grand, amazing, beautiful wall! Can we have a moat with I'll tempered bass with Lazer beams on their heads?
 
Wrong? WTF are you talking about?

You claimed - The EC was no quirk. It was designed so that population centers did not dominate rural areas.

In colorado the population centers dominate the rural areas.

You confuse domination of one state over another, not by voters within the same state.
In many states with large urban centers that's true. But rural states are given more power relative to their populations. It was no quirk.
 
Actually this is what Trump sais:

"I will bring this country to a brink of default and total disaster unless you give me what I want."

Trump will lose this just like Republicans do every time they attempt this nonsense.
When did he say that?
 
But rural states are given more power relative to their populations. It was no quirk.

Bingo !!!

The small rural states (read slave states) were given ,more power relative to their populations, for a reason. They were also given 3/5ths extra representation on top of the EC advantage.

And why was that? Why were slave states given such an advantage against the majority?

.
 
Actually this is what Trump sais:

"I will bring this country to a brink of default and total disaster unless you give me what I want."

Trump will lose this just like Republicans do every time they attempt this nonsense.
When did he say that?

Wall Street falls as Trump threatens government shutdown -
threat from President Donald Trump to shut down the government if Congress fails to fund a Mexico border wall.

Trump to Congress: Fund the Wall or I'll Shut the Government
President Trump threatened to shut down the government to fund a wall along the entire border between the United States and Mexico.

Trump threatens government shutdown over border wall funding
Trump said he would let the government shut down without appropriations for a border wall.




 
But rural states are given more power relative to their populations. It was no quirk.

Bingo !!!

The small rural states (read slave states) were given ,more power relative to their populations, for a reason. They were also given 3/5ths extra representation on top of the EC advantage.

And why was that? Why were slave states given such an advantage against the majority?

.
I think you may be a bit ignorant of facts. We are the United States, which actually meant something. States had to agree to enter the union, both slave and non-slave. The EC was created so that lightly populated territories would acquiesce to joining the union and not be dominated by NY, PA, VA and MA.

You need historical perspective to understand.
 
It was no "mistake" the ACA didn't get repealed, it won't be a "mistake" that the Tax Bill will not get through and it won't be a "mistake" that there will be no Wall.
 
But rural states are given more power relative to their populations. It was no quirk.

Bingo !!!

The small rural states (read slave states) were given ,more power relative to their populations, for a reason. They were also given 3/5ths extra representation on top of the EC advantage.

And why was that? Why were slave states given such an advantage against the majority?

.

Tell me, what was representation based on?
 
I think you may be a bit ignorant of facts. We are the United States, which actually meant something. States had to agree to enter the union, both slave and non-slave. The EC was created so that lightly populated territories would acquiesce to joining the union and not be dominated by NY, PA, VA and MA..

VIrginia was a slave state. Where Robert E. Lee came from. Along with most of the early presidents.
 

Forum List

Back
Top