Trump still thinks Central Park 5 are guilty

[Faun]

And according to them, they didn't do it. Then the real rapist was identified and it was not them or someone with them.

We always knew that we didn't get them all. That we found the rapist that got to leave behind dna, does not clear the rest.


That you and other liberals pretend it does, makes you rape supporters and insanely vile people.

There was zero physical evidence any of those boys were there. It's not plausible the were beating and raping a woman covered in blood and didn't get any of her blood on them. Most of them thought the attack occurred somewhere else in the park. The ground indicated one person dragged her. Their confessions differed from each other on virtually every aspect of the rape -- which one initiated the attack and knocked her down; which one ripped her clothes off; what clothes were taken off; which ones held her down; which ones raped her; what she was hit with. And much of their confessions didn't match the crime scene. Some said her legs were cut with a knife, they weren't; none said she was cut in the face, she was; none said Reyes was there, he was; none said she was gagged, she was; none said she was hit in the back of the head, she was and Reyes said that's where he struck her; none knew the spot where she was initially attacked, Reyes did. The condition Meili was found was consistent with other attacks by Reyes. I caught one of them changing his account in the middle of his confession upon being led by the detective. Wise gave a second video confession to change portions of his initial video confession. There were other boys purportedly involved who were not charged with raping her because they refused to confess. The ones who did confess were sleep deprived.

NEW YORK CITY, a stronghold of machine dems and hard core liberals in the city government and one of the most diverse and democrat populations to draw juries from in the country.



YOur assumption that they did not do their job of considering the facts of the case, is just another example of how you libs are not afraid to smear anyone and everyone, is it serves your anti-American agenda.

It had nothing to do with diversity. The prosecution lied to the jury and convinced them the CP5 were guilty.

They lied? It’s on video they did it,, they said I felt them tittys but I didn’t rape her, they took the cops to the sight and commented on the blood.. how can you be this insane? Lol is it tds?

Not only were the CP5 confessions largely inconsistent with reality, like those claiming it occurred a mile and a half away at the reservoir... or claiming they were holding down her arms when she was found with her hands tied...

Not only were the CP5 confessions inconsistent with each other, like one saying she was hit with a barehand, another saying she was hit with a rock, another saying she was hit with a lead pipe, and another saying she was hit with a break...

But some of them were inconsistent with their own accounts, like Wise at one point saying Raymond Santana was the first one to rape her -- but then later saying it was Steve Lopezwho was first.

Nearly everything they described was wrong. They said her bra was ripped off, it wasn't. They said her legs were cut with a knife, they weren't. They said they held her arms out, her hands were tied over her face. None of them mentioned she was cut in the face with something sharp, she was. None of them said she was gagged, she was. One of them mentioned two others that were there, a tall black kid and a Puerto Rican wearing a hoodie, no one else mentioned they were there.

Their accounts were so far from reality because they made them up after detectives, desperate to solve that case, convinced them and their parents others were accusing them and the best way, and quickest way, out was to accuse them back.

 

[Faun]

And according to them, they didn't do it. Then the real rapist was identified and it was not them or someone with them.

We always knew that we didn't get them all. That we found the rapist that got to leave behind dna, does not clear the rest.


That you and other liberals pretend it does, makes you rape supporters and insanely vile people.

There was zero physical evidence any of those boys were there. It's not plausible the were beating and raping a woman covered in blood and didn't get any of her blood on them. Most of them thought the attack occurred somewhere else in the park. The ground indicated one person dragged her. Their confessions differed from each other on virtually every aspect of the rape -- which one initiated the attack and knocked her down; which one ripped her clothes off; what clothes were taken off; which ones held her down; which ones raped her; what she was hit with. And much of their confessions didn't match the crime scene. Some said her legs were cut with a knife, they weren't; none said she was cut in the face, she was; none said Reyes was there, he was; none said she was gagged, she was; none said she was hit in the back of the head, she was and Reyes said that's where he struck her; none knew the spot where she was initially attacked, Reyes did. The condition Meili was found was consistent with other attacks by Reyes. I caught one of them changing his account in the middle of his confession upon being led by the detective. Wise gave a second video confession to change portions of his initial video confession. There were other boys purportedly involved who were not charged with raping her because they refused to confess. The ones who did confess were sleep deprived.

NEW YORK CITY, a stronghold of machine dems and hard core liberals in the city government and one of the most diverse and democrat populations to draw juries from in the country.



YOur assumption that they did not do their job of considering the facts of the case, is just another example of how you libs are not afraid to smear anyone and everyone, is it serves your anti-American agenda.

It had nothing to do with diversity. The prosecution lied to the jury and convinced them the CP5 were guilty.

If the DA lied, what was his motive? And why was the liberal Mr. Morganthau allowed to continue to serve for so many years after the case?

Their motive was to show a crime filled city they could solve a really big case that exploded in the media.

 

[Correll]

We always knew that we didn't get them all. That we found the rapist that got to leave behind dna, does not clear the rest.


That you and other liberals pretend it does, makes you rape supporters and insanely vile people.

There was zero physical evidence any of those boys were there. It's not plausible the were beating and raping a woman covered in blood and didn't get any of her blood on them. Most of them thought the attack occurred somewhere else in the park. The ground indicated one person dragged her. Their confessions differed from each other on virtually every aspect of the rape -- which one initiated the attack and knocked her down; which one ripped her clothes off; what clothes were taken off; which ones held her down; which ones raped her; what she was hit with. And much of their confessions didn't match the crime scene. Some said her legs were cut with a knife, they weren't; none said she was cut in the face, she was; none said Reyes was there, he was; none said she was gagged, she was; none said she was hit in the back of the head, she was and Reyes said that's where he struck her; none knew the spot where she was initially attacked, Reyes did. The condition Meili was found was consistent with other attacks by Reyes. I caught one of them changing his account in the middle of his confession upon being led by the detective. Wise gave a second video confession to change portions of his initial video confession. There were other boys purportedly involved who were not charged with raping her because they refused to confess. The ones who did confess were sleep deprived.

NEW YORK CITY, a stronghold of machine dems and hard core liberals in the city government and one of the most diverse and democrat populations to draw juries from in the country.



YOur assumption that they did not do their job of considering the facts of the case, is just another example of how you libs are not afraid to smear anyone and everyone, is it serves your anti-American agenda.

It had nothing to do with diversity. The prosecution lied to the jury and convinced them the CP5 were guilty.

They lied? It’s on video they did it,, they said I felt them tittys but I didn’t rape her, they took the cops to the sight and commented on the blood.. how can you be this insane? Lol is it tds?

Not only were the CP5 confessions largely inconsistent with reality, like those claiming it occurred a mile and a half away at the reservoir... or claiming they were holding down her arms when she was found with her hands tied...

Not only were the CP5 confessions inconsistent with each other, like one saying she was hit with a barehand, another saying she was hit with a rock, another saying she was hit with a lead pipe, and another saying she was hit with a break...

But some of them were inconsistent with their own accounts, like Wise at one point saying Raymond Santana was the first one to rape her -- but then later saying it was Steve Lopezwho was first.

Nearly everything they described was wrong. They said her bra was ripped off, it wasn't. They said her legs were cut with a knife, they weren't. They said they held her arms out, her hands were tied over her face. None of them mentioned she was cut in the face with something sharp, she was. None of them said she was gagged, she was. One of them mentioned two others that were there, a tall black kid and a Puerto Rican wearing a hoodie, no one else mentioned they were there.

Their accounts were so far from reality because they made them up after detectives, desperate to solve that case, convinced them and their parents others were accusing them and the best way, and quickest way, out was to accuse them back.

How does this compare to other gang rapes, where different perspectives and the well known inability of people to remember shit in proper order, leads to imperfect match ups?

 

[Correll]

We always knew that we didn't get them all. That we found the rapist that got to leave behind dna, does not clear the rest.


That you and other liberals pretend it does, makes you rape supporters and insanely vile people.

There was zero physical evidence any of those boys were there. It's not plausible the were beating and raping a woman covered in blood and didn't get any of her blood on them. Most of them thought the attack occurred somewhere else in the park. The ground indicated one person dragged her. Their confessions differed from each other on virtually every aspect of the rape -- which one initiated the attack and knocked her down; which one ripped her clothes off; what clothes were taken off; which ones held her down; which ones raped her; what she was hit with. And much of their confessions didn't match the crime scene. Some said her legs were cut with a knife, they weren't; none said she was cut in the face, she was; none said Reyes was there, he was; none said she was gagged, she was; none said she was hit in the back of the head, she was and Reyes said that's where he struck her; none knew the spot where she was initially attacked, Reyes did. The condition Meili was found was consistent with other attacks by Reyes. I caught one of them changing his account in the middle of his confession upon being led by the detective. Wise gave a second video confession to change portions of his initial video confession. There were other boys purportedly involved who were not charged with raping her because they refused to confess. The ones who did confess were sleep deprived.

NEW YORK CITY, a stronghold of machine dems and hard core liberals in the city government and one of the most diverse and democrat populations to draw juries from in the country.



YOur assumption that they did not do their job of considering the facts of the case, is just another example of how you libs are not afraid to smear anyone and everyone, is it serves your anti-American agenda.

It had nothing to do with diversity. The prosecution lied to the jury and convinced them the CP5 were guilty.

If the DA lied, what was his motive? And why was the liberal Mr. Morganthau allowed to continue to serve for so many years after the case?

Their motive was to show a crime filled city they could solve a really big case that exploded in the media.

Why could they not have just solved it normally? Why not wait a day or two for the police to find the "real rapists"? lol!!!!!

 

[Jitss617]

We always knew that we didn't get them all. That we found the rapist that got to leave behind dna, does not clear the rest.


That you and other liberals pretend it does, makes you rape supporters and insanely vile people.

There was zero physical evidence any of those boys were there. It's not plausible the were beating and raping a woman covered in blood and didn't get any of her blood on them. Most of them thought the attack occurred somewhere else in the park. The ground indicated one person dragged her. Their confessions differed from each other on virtually every aspect of the rape -- which one initiated the attack and knocked her down; which one ripped her clothes off; what clothes were taken off; which ones held her down; which ones raped her; what she was hit with. And much of their confessions didn't match the crime scene. Some said her legs were cut with a knife, they weren't; none said she was cut in the face, she was; none said Reyes was there, he was; none said she was gagged, she was; none said she was hit in the back of the head, she was and Reyes said that's where he struck her; none knew the spot where she was initially attacked, Reyes did. The condition Meili was found was consistent with other attacks by Reyes. I caught one of them changing his account in the middle of his confession upon being led by the detective. Wise gave a second video confession to change portions of his initial video confession. There were other boys purportedly involved who were not charged with raping her because they refused to confess. The ones who did confess were sleep deprived.

NEW YORK CITY, a stronghold of machine dems and hard core liberals in the city government and one of the most diverse and democrat populations to draw juries from in the country.



YOur assumption that they did not do their job of considering the facts of the case, is just another example of how you libs are not afraid to smear anyone and everyone, is it serves your anti-American agenda.

It had nothing to do with diversity. The prosecution lied to the jury and convinced them the CP5 were guilty.

They lied? It’s on video they did it,, they said I felt them tittys but I didn’t rape her, they took the cops to the sight and commented on the blood.. how can you be this insane? Lol is it tds?

Not only were the CP5 confessions largely inconsistent with reality, like those claiming it occurred a mile and a half away at the reservoir... or claiming they were holding down her arms when she was found with her hands tied...

Not only were the CP5 confessions inconsistent with each other, like one saying she was hit with a barehand, another saying she was hit with a rock, another saying she was hit with a lead pipe, and another saying she was hit with a break...

But some of them were inconsistent with their own accounts, like Wise at one point saying Raymond Santana was the first one to rape her -- but then later saying it was Steve Lopezwho was first.

Nearly everything they described was wrong. They said her bra was ripped off, it wasn't. They said her legs were cut with a knife, they weren't. They said they held her arms out, her hands were tied over her face. None of them mentioned she was cut in the face with something sharp, she was. None of them said she was gagged, she was. One of them mentioned two others that were there, a tall black kid and a Puerto Rican wearing a hoodie, no one else mentioned they were there.

Their accounts were so far from reality because they made them up after detectives, desperate to solve that case, convinced them and their parents others were accusing them and the best way, and quickest way, out was to accuse them back.

There was 30 people you idiot ,, you think they left all at the same time?

 

[Faun]

You're on the side of incarcerating innocent people.

Your justification for believing the rapist, is that he is a rapist.


That is what you base his credibility on.


ON.

Imbecile, I believe him because I know he was there. The CP5 were not as evidenced in post #419

"Being there" is not a sane reason to find someone credible.


There is no evidence that the 5 rapists were NOT there. YOu are delusional if you think there is.

There is plenty of evidence that there were a lot of Bad Actors in CP that evening. The liberal myth that just one person, Señor Reyes, was responsible for the crime wave on 4/19/89 just isn't realistic.

Agreed. Their stated position is that Reyes is credible, because he was there.


It is literally insane of them. They are delusional, crazy people.

What's insane is

You're on the side of incarcerating innocent people.

Your justification for believing the rapist, is that he is a rapist.


That is what you base his credibility on.


ON.

Imbecile, I believe him because I know he was there. The CP5 were not as evidenced in post #419

"Being there" is not a sane reason to find someone credible.


There is no evidence that the 5 rapists were NOT there. YOu are delusional if you think there is.

There is plenty of evidence that there were a lot of Bad Actors in CP that evening. The liberal myth that just one person, Señor Reyes, was responsible for the crime wave on 4/19/89 just isn't realistic.

Agreed. Their stated position is that Reyes is credible, because he was there.


It is literally insane of them. They are delusional, crazy people.

No one is saying Reyes was responsible for all the crime in the park that night. No one is saying Reyes was responsible for any if the crime beyond that rape. No one is saying the gang of 30 odd kids wasn't responsible for the crime other than the rape.

 

[Jitss617]

Your justification for believing the rapist, is that he is a rapist.


That is what you base his credibility on.


ON.

Imbecile, I believe him because I know he was there. The CP5 were not as evidenced in post #419

"Being there" is not a sane reason to find someone credible.


There is no evidence that the 5 rapists were NOT there. YOu are delusional if you think there is.

There is plenty of evidence that there were a lot of Bad Actors in CP that evening. The liberal myth that just one person, Señor Reyes, was responsible for the crime wave on 4/19/89 just isn't realistic.

Agreed. Their stated position is that Reyes is credible, because he was there.


It is literally insane of them. They are delusional, crazy people.

What's insane is

Your justification for believing the rapist, is that he is a rapist.


That is what you base his credibility on.


ON.

Imbecile, I believe him because I know he was there. The CP5 were not as evidenced in post #419

"Being there" is not a sane reason to find someone credible.


There is no evidence that the 5 rapists were NOT there. YOu are delusional if you think there is.

There is plenty of evidence that there were a lot of Bad Actors in CP that evening. The liberal myth that just one person, Señor Reyes, was responsible for the crime wave on 4/19/89 just isn't realistic.

Agreed. Their stated position is that Reyes is credible, because he was there.


It is literally insane of them. They are delusional, crazy people.

No one is saying Reyes was responsible for all the crime in the park that night. No one is saying Reyes was responsible for any if the crime beyond that rape. No one is saying the gang of 30 odd kids wasn't responsible for the crime other than the rape.

Lol cooo kooo

 

[Polishprince]

There was zero physical evidence any of those boys were there. It's not plausible the were beating and raping a woman covered in blood and didn't get any of her blood on them. Most of them thought the attack occurred somewhere else in the park. The ground indicated one person dragged her. Their confessions differed from each other on virtually every aspect of the rape -- which one initiated the attack and knocked her down; which one ripped her clothes off; what clothes were taken off; which ones held her down; which ones raped her; what she was hit with. And much of their confessions didn't match the crime scene. Some said her legs were cut with a knife, they weren't; none said she was cut in the face, she was; none said Reyes was there, he was; none said she was gagged, she was; none said she was hit in the back of the head, she was and Reyes said that's where he struck her; none knew the spot where she was initially attacked, Reyes did. The condition Meili was found was consistent with other attacks by Reyes. I caught one of them changing his account in the middle of his confession upon being led by the detective. Wise gave a second video confession to change portions of his initial video confession. There were other boys purportedly involved who were not charged with raping her because they refused to confess. The ones who did confess were sleep deprived.

NEW YORK CITY, a stronghold of machine dems and hard core liberals in the city government and one of the most diverse and democrat populations to draw juries from in the country.



YOur assumption that they did not do their job of considering the facts of the case, is just another example of how you libs are not afraid to smear anyone and everyone, is it serves your anti-American agenda.

It had nothing to do with diversity. The prosecution lied to the jury and convinced them the CP5 were guilty.

They lied? It’s on video they did it,, they said I felt them tittys but I didn’t rape her, they took the cops to the sight and commented on the blood.. how can you be this insane? Lol is it tds?

Not only were the CP5 confessions largely inconsistent with reality, like those claiming it occurred a mile and a half away at the reservoir... or claiming they were holding down her arms when she was found with her hands tied...

Not only were the CP5 confessions inconsistent with each other, like one saying she was hit with a barehand, another saying she was hit with a rock, another saying she was hit with a lead pipe, and another saying she was hit with a break...

But some of them were inconsistent with their own accounts, like Wise at one point saying Raymond Santana was the first one to rape her -- but then later saying it was Steve Lopezwho was first.

Nearly everything they described was wrong. They said her bra was ripped off, it wasn't. They said her legs were cut with a knife, they weren't. They said they held her arms out, her hands were tied over her face. None of them mentioned she was cut in the face with something sharp, she was. None of them said she was gagged, she was. One of them mentioned two others that were there, a tall black kid and a Puerto Rican wearing a hoodie, no one else mentioned they were there.

Their accounts were so far from reality because they made them up after detectives, desperate to solve that case, convinced them and their parents others were accusing them and the best way, and quickest way, out was to accuse them back.

How does this compare to other gang rapes, where different perspectives and the well known inability of people to remember shit in proper order, leads to imperfect match ups?

In the Kavanaugh gang rape case, none of Kav's DNA was found on Ford or the other accusers, yet it was still enough for libs to condemn him

 

[Correll]

Your justification for believing the rapist, is that he is a rapist.


That is what you base his credibility on.


ON.

Imbecile, I believe him because I know he was there. The CP5 were not as evidenced in post #419

"Being there" is not a sane reason to find someone credible.


There is no evidence that the 5 rapists were NOT there. YOu are delusional if you think there is.

There is plenty of evidence that there were a lot of Bad Actors in CP that evening. The liberal myth that just one person, Señor Reyes, was responsible for the crime wave on 4/19/89 just isn't realistic.

Agreed. Their stated position is that Reyes is credible, because he was there.


It is literally insane of them. They are delusional, crazy people.

What's insane is

Your justification for believing the rapist, is that he is a rapist.


That is what you base his credibility on.


ON.

Imbecile, I believe him because I know he was there. The CP5 were not as evidenced in post #419

"Being there" is not a sane reason to find someone credible.


There is no evidence that the 5 rapists were NOT there. YOu are delusional if you think there is.

There is plenty of evidence that there were a lot of Bad Actors in CP that evening. The liberal myth that just one person, Señor Reyes, was responsible for the crime wave on 4/19/89 just isn't realistic.

Agreed. Their stated position is that Reyes is credible, because he was there.


It is literally insane of them. They are delusional, crazy people.

No one is saying Reyes was responsible for all the crime in the park that night. No one is saying Reyes was responsible for any if the crime beyond that rape. No one is saying the gang of 30 odd kids wasn't responsible for the crime other than the rape.

Your attempt at creating confusing is noted as a dishonest attempt at defending your position.


THe sole excuse you liberals have, for your defense and release of the Central Park 5, is Reyes' claim that he was the only one that raped the victim.


There is no reason to find him credible. When challenged on why you libs find him credible, you get evasive.


YOu let the Central Park 5 go, because you are desperate for examples to support your position that America is a racist nation.


That you have to invent examples like this one, where you have to declare rapists "innocent" and let them go, even paying them millions in tax payer money,


shows how little real evidence there is of your anti-American beliefs.


This was a propaganda exercise designed to give you people an excuse to spew anti-American, race baiting bullshit against your enemies.



That you can do so, when the people involved are all from a dem stronghold like New fucking York City, just shows how even you, don't have any respect for the shit you spew.

 

[Correll]

NEW YORK CITY, a stronghold of machine dems and hard core liberals in the city government and one of the most diverse and democrat populations to draw juries from in the country.



YOur assumption that they did not do their job of considering the facts of the case, is just another example of how you libs are not afraid to smear anyone and everyone, is it serves your anti-American agenda.

It had nothing to do with diversity. The prosecution lied to the jury and convinced them the CP5 were guilty.

They lied? It’s on video they did it,, they said I felt them tittys but I didn’t rape her, they took the cops to the sight and commented on the blood.. how can you be this insane? Lol is it tds?

Not only were the CP5 confessions largely inconsistent with reality, like those claiming it occurred a mile and a half away at the reservoir... or claiming they were holding down her arms when she was found with her hands tied...

Not only were the CP5 confessions inconsistent with each other, like one saying she was hit with a barehand, another saying she was hit with a rock, another saying she was hit with a lead pipe, and another saying she was hit with a break...

But some of them were inconsistent with their own accounts, like Wise at one point saying Raymond Santana was the first one to rape her -- but then later saying it was Steve Lopezwho was first.

Nearly everything they described was wrong. They said her bra was ripped off, it wasn't. They said her legs were cut with a knife, they weren't. They said they held her arms out, her hands were tied over her face. None of them mentioned she was cut in the face with something sharp, she was. None of them said she was gagged, she was. One of them mentioned two others that were there, a tall black kid and a Puerto Rican wearing a hoodie, no one else mentioned they were there.

Their accounts were so far from reality because they made them up after detectives, desperate to solve that case, convinced them and their parents others were accusing them and the best way, and quickest way, out was to accuse them back.

How does this compare to other gang rapes, where different perspectives and the well known inability of people to remember shit in proper order, leads to imperfect match ups?

In the Kavanaugh gang rape case, none of Kav's DNA was found on Ford or the other accusers, yet it was still enough for libs to condemn him

If it weren't for double standards, libs would have no standards at all.

 

[JoeB131]

What I think that a lot of people don't realize about April 19,1989 is that this gal wasn't the only victim in that night of chaos. She was the most severely injured individual that evening, but there were a number of other victims who were assaulted and robbed by a rowdy gang of youths that evening.

And there were a number of other perpetrators besides the 5 charged.

Exactly who did what, we'll never know for sure.

In our system of justice, if you don't know who did what, then everyone goes free. It's only what you can PROVE that matters.

Maybe some of them confessed to this, because it was a cover for one of the other crimes committed that evening?

This is your claim, they confessed to a major felony so they wouldn't get charged with misdemeanors?

The CP5 sued the city and state of New York in 2002. Little Mike Bloomberg held off for a dozen years, figuring the city could win the case. The Fake Italian , Warren Wilhelm, settled right away as soon as he seized power as mayor. The State of New York under Fredo followed after Trump declared his Presidential candidacy and they figured they could blame him.

Here's the reality. They realized that if this got in front of a jury, with lying racist cops vs. innocent kids who spent years in prison. the City was going to pay out a lot more than what they paid.

 

[JoeB131]

The only reason the fingerprints were determined not to be a match was the fact technology improved.

How does a witness determine someone's height to within "several inches," however much that is?

You haven't posted the evidence against him.

The only evidence was her Identification in a lineup...

Ford would have picked out Kavanaugh in a lineup... off to prison he goes.

 

[Polishprince]

Here's the reality. They realized that if this got in front of a jury, with lying racist cops vs. innocent kids who spent years in prison. the City was going to pay out a lot more than what they paid.

I think that's a load of shit, Joe.

Little Mikey Bloomberg reigned over New York for a dozen years, refusing to make a payment to the CP5, figuring that he could win a lawsuit.

Bloomberg may be a doofus and the reincarnation of Raymond Cocteau, but he knows money and he's an incredibly wealthy dude. Mikey is no skinflint either, he's paid $200 Million out of his own walking around money for campaign commercials.

It took the radical anti-cop administration of Fake-Italian Warren Wilhelm to cut a check, they were making a political point.

 

[Faun]

There was zero physical evidence any of those boys were there. It's not plausible the were beating and raping a woman covered in blood and didn't get any of her blood on them. Most of them thought the attack occurred somewhere else in the park. The ground indicated one person dragged her. Their confessions differed from each other on virtually every aspect of the rape -- which one initiated the attack and knocked her down; which one ripped her clothes off; what clothes were taken off; which ones held her down; which ones raped her; what she was hit with. And much of their confessions didn't match the crime scene. Some said her legs were cut with a knife, they weren't; none said she was cut in the face, she was; none said Reyes was there, he was; none said she was gagged, she was; none said she was hit in the back of the head, she was and Reyes said that's where he struck her; none knew the spot where she was initially attacked, Reyes did. The condition Meili was found was consistent with other attacks by Reyes. I caught one of them changing his account in the middle of his confession upon being led by the detective. Wise gave a second video confession to change portions of his initial video confession. There were other boys purportedly involved who were not charged with raping her because they refused to confess. The ones who did confess were sleep deprived.

NEW YORK CITY, a stronghold of machine dems and hard core liberals in the city government and one of the most diverse and democrat populations to draw juries from in the country.



YOur assumption that they did not do their job of considering the facts of the case, is just another example of how you libs are not afraid to smear anyone and everyone, is it serves your anti-American agenda.

It had nothing to do with diversity. The prosecution lied to the jury and convinced them the CP5 were guilty.

They lied? It’s on video they did it,, they said I felt them tittys but I didn’t rape her, they took the cops to the sight and commented on the blood.. how can you be this insane? Lol is it tds?

Not only were the CP5 confessions largely inconsistent with reality, like those claiming it occurred a mile and a half away at the reservoir... or claiming they were holding down her arms when she was found with her hands tied...

Not only were the CP5 confessions inconsistent with each other, like one saying she was hit with a barehand, another saying she was hit with a rock, another saying she was hit with a lead pipe, and another saying she was hit with a break...

But some of them were inconsistent with their own accounts, like Wise at one point saying Raymond Santana was the first one to rape her -- but then later saying it was Steve Lopezwho was first.

Nearly everything they described was wrong. They said her bra was ripped off, it wasn't. They said her legs were cut with a knife, they weren't. They said they held her arms out, her hands were tied over her face. None of them mentioned she was cut in the face with something sharp, she was. None of them said she was gagged, she was. One of them mentioned two others that were there, a tall black kid and a Puerto Rican wearing a hoodie, no one else mentioned they were there.

Their accounts were so far from reality because they made them up after detectives, desperate to solve that case, convinced them and their parents others were accusing them and the best way, and quickest way, out was to accuse them back.

There was 30 people you idiot ,, you think they left all at the same time?

 

[Faun]

NEW YORK CITY, a stronghold of machine dems and hard core liberals in the city government and one of the most diverse and democrat populations to draw juries from in the country.



YOur assumption that they did not do their job of considering the facts of the case, is just another example of how you libs are not afraid to smear anyone and everyone, is it serves your anti-American agenda.

It had nothing to do with diversity. The prosecution lied to the jury and convinced them the CP5 were guilty.

They lied? It’s on video they did it,, they said I felt them tittys but I didn’t rape her, they took the cops to the sight and commented on the blood.. how can you be this insane? Lol is it tds?

Not only were the CP5 confessions largely inconsistent with reality, like those claiming it occurred a mile and a half away at the reservoir... or claiming they were holding down her arms when she was found with her hands tied...

Not only were the CP5 confessions inconsistent with each other, like one saying she was hit with a barehand, another saying she was hit with a rock, another saying she was hit with a lead pipe, and another saying she was hit with a break...

But some of them were inconsistent with their own accounts, like Wise at one point saying Raymond Santana was the first one to rape her -- but then later saying it was Steve Lopezwho was first.

Nearly everything they described was wrong. They said her bra was ripped off, it wasn't. They said her legs were cut with a knife, they weren't. They said they held her arms out, her hands were tied over her face. None of them mentioned she was cut in the face with something sharp, she was. None of them said she was gagged, she was. One of them mentioned two others that were there, a tall black kid and a Puerto Rican wearing a hoodie, no one else mentioned they were there.

Their accounts were so far from reality because they made them up after detectives, desperate to solve that case, convinced them and their parents others were accusing them and the best way, and quickest way, out was to accuse them back.

How does this compare to other gang rapes, where different perspectives and the well known inability of people to remember shit in proper order, leads to imperfect match ups?

In the Kavanaugh gang rape case, none of Kav's DNA was found on Ford or the other accusers, yet it was still enough for libs to condemn him

Great example... I never said I believed her because there was no proof to back her claims.

 

[Jitss617]

NEW YORK CITY, a stronghold of machine dems and hard core liberals in the city government and one of the most diverse and democrat populations to draw juries from in the country.



YOur assumption that they did not do their job of considering the facts of the case, is just another example of how you libs are not afraid to smear anyone and everyone, is it serves your anti-American agenda.

It had nothing to do with diversity. The prosecution lied to the jury and convinced them the CP5 were guilty.

They lied? It’s on video they did it,, they said I felt them tittys but I didn’t rape her, they took the cops to the sight and commented on the blood.. how can you be this insane? Lol is it tds?

Not only were the CP5 confessions largely inconsistent with reality, like those claiming it occurred a mile and a half away at the reservoir... or claiming they were holding down her arms when she was found with her hands tied...

Not only were the CP5 confessions inconsistent with each other, like one saying she was hit with a barehand, another saying she was hit with a rock, another saying she was hit with a lead pipe, and another saying she was hit with a break...

But some of them were inconsistent with their own accounts, like Wise at one point saying Raymond Santana was the first one to rape her -- but then later saying it was Steve Lopezwho was first.

Nearly everything they described was wrong. They said her bra was ripped off, it wasn't. They said her legs were cut with a knife, they weren't. They said they held her arms out, her hands were tied over her face. None of them mentioned she was cut in the face with something sharp, she was. None of them said she was gagged, she was. One of them mentioned two others that were there, a tall black kid and a Puerto Rican wearing a hoodie, no one else mentioned they were there.

Their accounts were so far from reality because they made them up after detectives, desperate to solve that case, convinced them and their parents others were accusing them and the best way, and quickest way, out was to accuse them back.

There was 30 people you idiot ,, you think they left all at the same time?

Yes finally the projecting lol

 

[Jitss617]

It had nothing to do with diversity. The prosecution lied to the jury and convinced them the CP5 were guilty.

They lied? It’s on video they did it,, they said I felt them tittys but I didn’t rape her, they took the cops to the sight and commented on the blood.. how can you be this insane? Lol is it tds?

Not only were the CP5 confessions largely inconsistent with reality, like those claiming it occurred a mile and a half away at the reservoir... or claiming they were holding down her arms when she was found with her hands tied...

Not only were the CP5 confessions inconsistent with each other, like one saying she was hit with a barehand, another saying she was hit with a rock, another saying she was hit with a lead pipe, and another saying she was hit with a break...

But some of them were inconsistent with their own accounts, like Wise at one point saying Raymond Santana was the first one to rape her -- but then later saying it was Steve Lopezwho was first.

Nearly everything they described was wrong. They said her bra was ripped off, it wasn't. They said her legs were cut with a knife, they weren't. They said they held her arms out, her hands were tied over her face. None of them mentioned she was cut in the face with something sharp, she was. None of them said she was gagged, she was. One of them mentioned two others that were there, a tall black kid and a Puerto Rican wearing a hoodie, no one else mentioned they were there.

Their accounts were so far from reality because they made them up after detectives, desperate to solve that case, convinced them and their parents others were accusing them and the best way, and quickest way, out was to accuse them back.

How does this compare to other gang rapes, where different perspectives and the well known inability of people to remember shit in proper order, leads to imperfect match ups?

In the Kavanaugh gang rape case, none of Kav's DNA was found on Ford or the other accusers, yet it was still enough for libs to condemn him

Great example... I never said I believed her because there was no proof to back her claims.

Victim blaming I’m not surprised

 

[Faun]

Imbecile, I believe him because I know he was there. The CP5 were not as evidenced in post #419

"Being there" is not a sane reason to find someone credible.


There is no evidence that the 5 rapists were NOT there. YOu are delusional if you think there is.

There is plenty of evidence that there were a lot of Bad Actors in CP that evening. The liberal myth that just one person, Señor Reyes, was responsible for the crime wave on 4/19/89 just isn't realistic.

Agreed. Their stated position is that Reyes is credible, because he was there.


It is literally insane of them. They are delusional, crazy people.

What's insane is

Imbecile, I believe him because I know he was there. The CP5 were not as evidenced in post #419

"Being there" is not a sane reason to find someone credible.


There is no evidence that the 5 rapists were NOT there. YOu are delusional if you think there is.

There is plenty of evidence that there were a lot of Bad Actors in CP that evening. The liberal myth that just one person, Señor Reyes, was responsible for the crime wave on 4/19/89 just isn't realistic.

Agreed. Their stated position is that Reyes is credible, because he was there.


It is literally insane of them. They are delusional, crazy people.

No one is saying Reyes was responsible for all the crime in the park that night. No one is saying Reyes was responsible for any if the crime beyond that rape. No one is saying the gang of 30 odd kids wasn't responsible for the crime other than the rape.

Your attempt at creating confusing is noted as a dishonest attempt at defending your position.


THe sole excuse you liberals have, for your defense and release of the Central Park 5, is Reyes' claim that he was the only one that raped the victim.


There is no reason to find him credible. When challenged on why you libs find him credible, you get evasive.


YOu let the Central Park 5 go, because you are desperate for examples to support your position that America is a racist nation.


That you have to invent examples like this one, where you have to declare rapists "innocent" and let them go, even paying them millions in tax payer money,


shows how little real evidence there is of your anti-American beliefs.


This was a propaganda exercise designed to give you people an excuse to spew anti-American, race baiting bullshit against your enemies.



That you can do so, when the people involved are all from a dem stronghold like New fucking York City, just shows how even you, don't have any respect for the shit you spew.

You're an idiot. I can't help you there.

I never once said I believe Reyes acted alone because he said he did. I said I believe he acted alone because there's no proof the CP5 were involved in the rape. Based on their confessions, I don't believe they were telling the truth. There's very little consistency between them and I believe the police fed them information. That's evident in one of the confession videos where the detective leads Wise to change his story that Meili was being slapped barehanded to she was being hit with a rock.

 

[Faun]

They lied? It’s on video they did it,, they said I felt them tittys but I didn’t rape her, they took the cops to the sight and commented on the blood.. how can you be this insane? Lol is it tds?

Not only were the CP5 confessions largely inconsistent with reality, like those claiming it occurred a mile and a half away at the reservoir... or claiming they were holding down her arms when she was found with her hands tied...

Not only were the CP5 confessions inconsistent with each other, like one saying she was hit with a barehand, another saying she was hit with a rock, another saying she was hit with a lead pipe, and another saying she was hit with a break...

But some of them were inconsistent with their own accounts, like Wise at one point saying Raymond Santana was the first one to rape her -- but then later saying it was Steve Lopezwho was first.

Nearly everything they described was wrong. They said her bra was ripped off, it wasn't. They said her legs were cut with a knife, they weren't. They said they held her arms out, her hands were tied over her face. None of them mentioned she was cut in the face with something sharp, she was. None of them said she was gagged, she was. One of them mentioned two others that were there, a tall black kid and a Puerto Rican wearing a hoodie, no one else mentioned they were there.

Their accounts were so far from reality because they made them up after detectives, desperate to solve that case, convinced them and their parents others were accusing them and the best way, and quickest way, out was to accuse them back.

How does this compare to other gang rapes, where different perspectives and the well known inability of people to remember shit in proper order, leads to imperfect match ups?

In the Kavanaugh gang rape case, none of Kav's DNA was found on Ford or the other accusers, yet it was still enough for libs to condemn him

Great example... I never said I believed her because there was no proof to back her claims.

Victim blaming I’m not surprised

Oh, what victim did I blame?

 

[Polishprince]

Great example... I never said I believed her because there was no proof to back her claims.

I did not realize that you were a big Kavanaugh backer and a supporter of these superb Supreme Court justice