- Thread starter
- #81
and can you tell us one thing that Trump hasn't lied about in this primary?... Hillary scares me less
Since she lies about everything name one thing she said you actually believe.
Or Hillary ...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
and can you tell us one thing that Trump hasn't lied about in this primary?... Hillary scares me less
Since she lies about everything name one thing she said you actually believe.
Clinton blasts Wall Street, but still draws millions in contributionsit's not really deluding them... she and other democrats over the decades have only received token amounts from them.... Wall Street's money on a 10 to 1 basis, in elections, goes to Republicans running.I don't know about that...she may take Soros money but what has she done as Senator or SOS? Have not seen or found in my search a quid pro quo, a tit for tat connection with Wall Street....whereas with most if not all of Republicans taking the majority of Wall Street's money, do show a tit for tat.
Having worked on Wall Street and GE and corporate America my whole career, one thing I can tell you is if she's taking their money, they are getting something. Your view that she's somehow deluding them then doing nothing for them is laughably naive. Oh, but she's going to nail them to the wall, right? They just don't realize it? They don't get the news like the rest of us? You're delusional. She's owned by corporate America
As far as a neo con.... nahhh, if the Clintons were Neocons, they would have taken the New American Century's letter seriously and done something in the 90's and if you read what the Hill said on the Senate floor during the Iraq resolution debate, she was ''right'' in her thinking, just wrong about believing the President of the USA, GWB, wouldn't lie to Congress and not follow thru with what he said he'd do before as a last resort, going to war.
You don't know what a neocon is. Hillary, Obama and W are all neocons
How long was Jebb Bush in the primary race? Like a nano second.... up until the point he dropped out, Jebb and PACS received something like $116 million from wall street and she and PACS may have barely reached 25 million without Soros, and when you add in the 45 million for Rubio and $40 million for Cruz and I believe $15 million for Carson and all the other presidential candidates from Wall street you can see who the Wall Street Party is....
And I am not saying Hillary is a Liberal, she is more of a centrist.... but no quid pro quo, that I could find with Wall Street.
The contributions helped Clinton reach a fundraising milestone: By the end of 2015, she had brought in more money from the financial sector during her four federal campaigns than her husband did during his quarter-century political career.
In all, donors from Wall Street and other financial services firms have given $44.1 million to support Hillary Clinton’s campaigns and allied super PACs, compared with $39.7 million in backing that former president Bill Clinton received from the industry, according to campaign finance records dating back to 1974 that have been compiled by The Post.
Nearly half of the financialsector donations made to support Hillary Clinton’s current presidential run have come from just two wealthy financiers: billionaire investor George Soros, who gave $7 million last year to the pro-Clinton super PAC Priorities USA Action, and hedge-fund manager S. Donald Sussman, who gave the group $2.5 million.
And here is a little glimpse down memory lane :
Clinton rakes in Wall Street cash amid tough talk
Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley and Bank of America Merrill Lynch—gave about $290,000 to Clinton's campaign committee through June 30, according to a MapLight analysis of Federal Election Commission data. While it makes up less than 1 percent of the roughly $47 million raised by Clinton's committee this cycle, it follows a precedent set in her 2008 presidential campaign, when the firms' employees were among her biggest donors.
![]()
She is pro-wall street and big business just like most of the right. At least non-insane right! I like the business sector as long as they pay their taxes for the resources that they use.
Our 'big business' sector is not worried at all about American national social justice and social policy. Especially since the advent of globalism. What they are interested in, is what they politically need to conduct business in a global economy, and that means the American workers wants and needs are not a priority.
It's called corporate fascism 2.0, as this time it's globally based...........(ieno borders, everyone is a world citizen, etc., etc). And, it fits well into the current day mantra of both progressive liberal elitists and RINO elitists, whom make glorious profits that do not trickle down.
Donald Trump ripped your pussy apart.... Hillary scares me less
30 years of GOP conspiracies and she's come out on top every time.... Hillary scares me less
No family has been more scrutinized by a political party in the history of the country than the Clintons. Republicans even attack their daughter.
And she's repeatedly failed that scrutiny and been protected by the leftist media. That's not what I'm talking about
kaz,
Now a little perspective...
The email scandal eventually boiled down to next to nothing... Comney read the emails(or his staff did) and it now turns out that the State Dept. makes mistakes in classification 70% of the time...
One example that was give, a phone call to a Mali foreign minister to congratulate her on her appointment was deemed classified.
The country has serious problems, is this one of them... Hillary will run a presidency with 90% of the DNA of Bill's... You might question their marriage but the political bond is unbreakable.
That is what you would hope to get... Republican Congress with a Democrat President... It yielded good results before...
Clinton blasts Wall Street, but still draws millions in contributionsit's not really deluding them... she and other democrats over the decades have only received token amounts from them.... Wall Street's money on a 10 to 1 basis, in elections, goes to Republicans running.Having worked on Wall Street and GE and corporate America my whole career, one thing I can tell you is if she's taking their money, they are getting something. Your view that she's somehow deluding them then doing nothing for them is laughably naive. Oh, but she's going to nail them to the wall, right? They just don't realize it? They don't get the news like the rest of us? You're delusional. She's owned by corporate America
You don't know what a neocon is. Hillary, Obama and W are all neocons
How long was Jebb Bush in the primary race? Like a nano second.... up until the point he dropped out, Jebb and PACS received something like $116 million from wall street and she and PACS may have barely reached 25 million without Soros, and when you add in the 45 million for Rubio and $40 million for Cruz and I believe $15 million for Carson and all the other presidential candidates from Wall street you can see who the Wall Street Party is....
And I am not saying Hillary is a Liberal, she is more of a centrist.... but no quid pro quo, that I could find with Wall Street.
The contributions helped Clinton reach a fundraising milestone: By the end of 2015, she had brought in more money from the financial sector during her four federal campaigns than her husband did during his quarter-century political career.
In all, donors from Wall Street and other financial services firms have given $44.1 million to support Hillary Clinton’s campaigns and allied super PACs, compared with $39.7 million in backing that former president Bill Clinton received from the industry, according to campaign finance records dating back to 1974 that have been compiled by The Post.
Nearly half of the financialsector donations made to support Hillary Clinton’s current presidential run have come from just two wealthy financiers: billionaire investor George Soros, who gave $7 million last year to the pro-Clinton super PAC Priorities USA Action, and hedge-fund manager S. Donald Sussman, who gave the group $2.5 million.
And here is a little glimpse down memory lane :
Clinton rakes in Wall Street cash amid tough talk
Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley and Bank of America Merrill Lynch—gave about $290,000 to Clinton's campaign committee through June 30, according to a MapLight analysis of Federal Election Commission data. While it makes up less than 1 percent of the roughly $47 million raised by Clinton's committee this cycle, it follows a precedent set in her 2008 presidential campaign, when the firms' employees were among her biggest donors.
![]()
She is pro-wall street and big business just like most of the right. At least non-insane right! I like the business sector as long as they pay their taxes for the resources that they use.
Our 'big business' sector is not worried at all about American national social justice and social policy. Especially since the advent of globalism. What they are interested in, is what they politically need to conduct business in a global economy, and that means the American workers wants and needs are not a priority.
It's called corporate fascism 2.0, as this time it's globally based...........(ieno borders, everyone is a world citizen, etc., etc). And, it fits well into the current day mantra of both progressive liberal elitists and RINO elitists, whom make glorious profits that do not trickle down.
From the guy who's going to go vote for the Corporate bitch, Hillary ...
![]()
From the guy who's going to go vote for the Corporate bitch, Hillary ...Clinton blasts Wall Street, but still draws millions in contributionsit's not really deluding them... she and other democrats over the decades have only received token amounts from them.... Wall Street's money on a 10 to 1 basis, in elections, goes to Republicans running.
How long was Jebb Bush in the primary race? Like a nano second.... up until the point he dropped out, Jebb and PACS received something like $116 million from wall street and she and PACS may have barely reached 25 million without Soros, and when you add in the 45 million for Rubio and $40 million for Cruz and I believe $15 million for Carson and all the other presidential candidates from Wall street you can see who the Wall Street Party is....
And I am not saying Hillary is a Liberal, she is more of a centrist.... but no quid pro quo, that I could find with Wall Street.
The contributions helped Clinton reach a fundraising milestone: By the end of 2015, she had brought in more money from the financial sector during her four federal campaigns than her husband did during his quarter-century political career.
In all, donors from Wall Street and other financial services firms have given $44.1 million to support Hillary Clinton’s campaigns and allied super PACs, compared with $39.7 million in backing that former president Bill Clinton received from the industry, according to campaign finance records dating back to 1974 that have been compiled by The Post.
Nearly half of the financialsector donations made to support Hillary Clinton’s current presidential run have come from just two wealthy financiers: billionaire investor George Soros, who gave $7 million last year to the pro-Clinton super PAC Priorities USA Action, and hedge-fund manager S. Donald Sussman, who gave the group $2.5 million.
And here is a little glimpse down memory lane :
Clinton rakes in Wall Street cash amid tough talk
Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley and Bank of America Merrill Lynch—gave about $290,000 to Clinton's campaign committee through June 30, according to a MapLight analysis of Federal Election Commission data. While it makes up less than 1 percent of the roughly $47 million raised by Clinton's committee this cycle, it follows a precedent set in her 2008 presidential campaign, when the firms' employees were among her biggest donors.
![]()
She is pro-wall street and big business just like most of the right. At least non-insane right! I like the business sector as long as they pay their taxes for the resources that they use.
Our 'big business' sector is not worried at all about American national social justice and social policy. Especially since the advent of globalism. What they are interested in, is what they politically need to conduct business in a global economy, and that means the American workers wants and needs are not a priority.
It's called corporate fascism 2.0, as this time it's globally based...........(ieno borders, everyone is a world citizen, etc., etc). And, it fits well into the current day mantra of both progressive liberal elitists and RINO elitists, whom make glorious profits that do not trickle down.
From the guy who's going to go vote for the Corporate bitch, Hillary ...
![]()
Please stand down, Krazy Kaz..........
All the brain dead liberals agree........ Hillary scares me less
All the brain dead liberals agree........ Hillary scares me less
Because she takes money for speeches and from enlightened employees...with no effect on her lib policies.From the guy who's going to go vote for the Corporate bitch, Hillary ...Clinton blasts Wall Street, but still draws millions in contributions
The contributions helped Clinton reach a fundraising milestone: By the end of 2015, she had brought in more money from the financial sector during her four federal campaigns than her husband did during his quarter-century political career.
In all, donors from Wall Street and other financial services firms have given $44.1 million to support Hillary Clinton’s campaigns and allied super PACs, compared with $39.7 million in backing that former president Bill Clinton received from the industry, according to campaign finance records dating back to 1974 that have been compiled by The Post.
Nearly half of the financialsector donations made to support Hillary Clinton’s current presidential run have come from just two wealthy financiers: billionaire investor George Soros, who gave $7 million last year to the pro-Clinton super PAC Priorities USA Action, and hedge-fund manager S. Donald Sussman, who gave the group $2.5 million.
And here is a little glimpse down memory lane :
Clinton rakes in Wall Street cash amid tough talk
Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley and Bank of America Merrill Lynch—gave about $290,000 to Clinton's campaign committee through June 30, according to a MapLight analysis of Federal Election Commission data. While it makes up less than 1 percent of the roughly $47 million raised by Clinton's committee this cycle, it follows a precedent set in her 2008 presidential campaign, when the firms' employees were among her biggest donors.
![]()
She is pro-wall street and big business just like most of the right. At least non-insane right! I like the business sector as long as they pay their taxes for the resources that they use.
Our 'big business' sector is not worried at all about American national social justice and social policy. Especially since the advent of globalism. What they are interested in, is what they politically need to conduct business in a global economy, and that means the American workers wants and needs are not a priority.
It's called corporate fascism 2.0, as this time it's globally based...........(ieno borders, everyone is a world citizen, etc., etc). And, it fits well into the current day mantra of both progressive liberal elitists and RINO elitists, whom make glorious profits that do not trickle down.
From the guy who's going to go vote for the Corporate bitch, Hillary ...
![]()
Please stand down, Krazy Kaz..........
![]()
... Hillary scares me less
From the guy who's going to go vote for the Corporate bitch, Hillary ...Clinton blasts Wall Street, but still draws millions in contributions
The contributions helped Clinton reach a fundraising milestone: By the end of 2015, she had brought in more money from the financial sector during her four federal campaigns than her husband did during his quarter-century political career.
In all, donors from Wall Street and other financial services firms have given $44.1 million to support Hillary Clinton’s campaigns and allied super PACs, compared with $39.7 million in backing that former president Bill Clinton received from the industry, according to campaign finance records dating back to 1974 that have been compiled by The Post.
Nearly half of the financialsector donations made to support Hillary Clinton’s current presidential run have come from just two wealthy financiers: billionaire investor George Soros, who gave $7 million last year to the pro-Clinton super PAC Priorities USA Action, and hedge-fund manager S. Donald Sussman, who gave the group $2.5 million.
And here is a little glimpse down memory lane :
Clinton rakes in Wall Street cash amid tough talk
Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley and Bank of America Merrill Lynch—gave about $290,000 to Clinton's campaign committee through June 30, according to a MapLight analysis of Federal Election Commission data. While it makes up less than 1 percent of the roughly $47 million raised by Clinton's committee this cycle, it follows a precedent set in her 2008 presidential campaign, when the firms' employees were among her biggest donors.
![]()
She is pro-wall street and big business just like most of the right. At least non-insane right! I like the business sector as long as they pay their taxes for the resources that they use.
Our 'big business' sector is not worried at all about American national social justice and social policy. Especially since the advent of globalism. What they are interested in, is what they politically need to conduct business in a global economy, and that means the American workers wants and needs are not a priority.
It's called corporate fascism 2.0, as this time it's globally based...........(ieno borders, everyone is a world citizen, etc., etc). And, it fits well into the current day mantra of both progressive liberal elitists and RINO elitists, whom make glorious profits that do not trickle down.
From the guy who's going to go vote for the Corporate bitch, Hillary ...
![]()
Please stand down, Krazy Kaz..........
![]()
The super far right economic liberaterians would of course think anyone that believes in some government is liberal. lol
I ran that through a google alcohol filter and it still doesn't make sense.
Ginsberg on the other hand has reminded me of the evil that is Ginsberg and any nomination that Hillary might make.... Hillary scares me less
Corporations must pay tax just like any other individuals. NO question.From the guy who's going to go vote for the Corporate bitch, Hillary ...She is pro-wall street and big business just like most of the right. At least non-insane right! I like the business sector as long as they pay their taxes for the resources that they use.
Our 'big business' sector is not worried at all about American national social justice and social policy. Especially since the advent of globalism. What they are interested in, is what they politically need to conduct business in a global economy, and that means the American workers wants and needs are not a priority.
It's called corporate fascism 2.0, as this time it's globally based...........(ieno borders, everyone is a world citizen, etc., etc). And, it fits well into the current day mantra of both progressive liberal elitists and RINO elitists, whom make glorious profits that do not trickle down.
From the guy who's going to go vote for the Corporate bitch, Hillary ...
![]()
Please stand down, Krazy Kaz..........
![]()
What's funny is people like you want the corporations to pay little or no taxes for the resources that they use, but you call her a bitch for speaking in front of them? lol You do realize that republicans also speak in front of private corporations?
I know.Clinton believes that the Supremes have got it all wrong on the Second. You support Hillary then you support gun control.
... Hillary scares me less
What's funny is people like you want the corporations to pay little or no taxes for the resources that they use, but you call her a bitch for speaking in front of them? lol You do realize that republicans also speak in front of private corporations?
And if she goes off the rails she can be limited to one term.
If Trump goes off the rails the military may have to step in.
You're a thinking man.Then you are mentally retarded.
The same? ok. But less? Get real bro.
Besides, what do supporters have to do with anything? Are you voting for voters, or for candidates?
Mostly they are the same, I agree. But she scares me less for two reasons:
1) She isn't going to unravel trade deals and send us back to the stone age
2) She isn't going to get what Trump will. I voted for Harry Browne in 2000 and his being a great libertarian I would do it again. But I'd at this point have preferred Gore to W because Gore would never have gotten the spending orgy that W did. Republicans will fight Hillary. Trump they'll roll over for