Trump teases very major tax cut for middle income people before midterms

[RealDave]

Remember when they passed this last tax cut. They had to end some of the tax cuts or else the bill would add too much to the debt & they could not do it under the rules where filibusters in the Senate are not permitted.

So they ended some of these cuts, passed the bill without a filibuster.

Now they are going back & putting in those tax cuts they had to omit last time.

Circumventing the rules to get what they want. They did it with Garland, now with another tax cut bill.

This one is expected to add 3.5 trillion to the debt over the next ten years.

No rules were broken with Garland.

The CONSTITUTION says otherwise.

Not the US Constitution. Are you using the Soviet constitution?

The Senate has a duty to confirm or not. It does not say if the Senate feels like it, they should confirm.

Did they consider Garland??

Or do you like being of a party that cheats the Constitution?

 

[Avatar4321]

It does sound responsible. Unfortunately most of us know democrat BS when we see it.

Yes like we know repub BS. See our deficits.

Guess you haven’t gotten the memo. Donald Trump is President now, so republicans have decided it’s a good time to keep their promises.

I know. Shocked me too

They promised to increase deficits in a strong economy?

No they promised to decrease deficits. That’s why they’re starting to do it now.

They had fucking months, when do you think they will start?

It takes time to correct a big ship

 

[Avatar4321]

Remember when they passed this last tax cut. They had to end some of the tax cuts or else the bill would add too much to the debt & they could not do it under the rules where filibusters in the Senate are not permitted.

So they ended some of these cuts, passed the bill without a filibuster.

Now they are going back & putting in those tax cuts they had to omit last time.

Circumventing the rules to get what they want. They did it with Garland, now with another tax cut bill.

This one is expected to add 3.5 trillion to the debt over the next ten years.

No rules were broken with Garland.

The CONSTITUTION says otherwise.

Not the US Constitution. Are you using the Soviet constitution?

The Senate has a duty to confirm or not. It does not say if the Senate feels like it, they should confirm.

Did they consider Garland??

Or do you like being of a party that cheats the Constitution?

And they chose not to. Not sure why this is so difficult for you to understand

 

[RealDave]

Remember when they passed this last tax cut. They had to end some of the tax cuts or else the bill would add too much to the debt & they could not do it under the rules where filibusters in the Senate are not permitted.

So they ended some of these cuts, passed the bill without a filibuster.

Now they are going back & putting in those tax cuts they had to omit last time.

Circumventing the rules to get what they want. They did it with Garland, now with another tax cut bill.

This one is expected to add 3.5 trillion to the debt over the next ten years.

No rules were broken with Garland.

The CONSTITUTION says otherwise.

Not the US Constitution. Are you using the Soviet constitution?

The Republicans have been running the pyurse strings since 2011.

Both houses since 2015.

When the fuck are they going to start?????

 

[RealDave]

Remember when they passed this last tax cut. They had to end some of the tax cuts or else the bill would add too much to the debt & they could not do it under the rules where filibusters in the Senate are not permitted.

So they ended some of these cuts, passed the bill without a filibuster.

Now they are going back & putting in those tax cuts they had to omit last time.

Circumventing the rules to get what they want. They did it with Garland, now with another tax cut bill.

This one is expected to add 3.5 trillion to the debt over the next ten years.

No rules were broken with Garland.

The CONSTITUTION says otherwise.

Not the US Constitution. Are you using the Soviet constitution?

The Senate has a duty to confirm or not. It does not say if the Senate feels like it, they should confirm.

Did they consider Garland??

Or do you like being of a party that cheats the Constitution?

And they chose not to. Not sure why this is so difficult for you to understand

So they pissed on their Constitutional duties because they never brought him up for confirmation.

 

[Brain357]

So cutting spending before tax cuts doesn’t sound responsible? Our trillion deficits say cutting taxes before spending sure isn’t.

It does sound responsible. Unfortunately most of us know democrat BS when we see it.

Yes like we know repub BS. See our deficits.

Why, I see Democrat debt.

Repubs control the government. And you blame Dems? You are that dumb...

Damn, we accrued that much debt in the last few of years?

Deficits have increased drastically. Are you dumb or dishonest?

 

[RealDave]

Yes like we know repub BS. See our deficits.

Guess you haven’t gotten the memo. Donald Trump is President now, so republicans have decided it’s a good time to keep their promises.

I know. Shocked me too

They promised to increase deficits in a strong economy?

No they promised to decrease deficits. That’s why they’re starting to do it now.

They had fucking months, when do you think they will start?

It takes time to correct a big ship

But they managred to increase the deficits. It didn't take long.

 

[my2¢]

Needs to make the death tax repeal permanent.

I was dead set against that until I read sometime within the last year that only 13,000 paid it in a year.

Highly doubt this would be the middle class tax cut Trump was referring to. I'm also not insinuating that it was what you were referring to either in terms of the middle class tax cut.

First thing my thought turns to regarding a middle class tax cut is getting rid of tariffs.

 

[Avatar4321]

Remember when they passed this last tax cut. They had to end some of the tax cuts or else the bill would add too much to the debt & they could not do it under the rules where filibusters in the Senate are not permitted.

So they ended some of these cuts, passed the bill without a filibuster.

Now they are going back & putting in those tax cuts they had to omit last time.

Circumventing the rules to get what they want. They did it with Garland, now with another tax cut bill.

This one is expected to add 3.5 trillion to the debt over the next ten years.

No rules were broken with Garland.

The CONSTITUTION says otherwise.

Not the US Constitution. Are you using the Soviet constitution?

The Republicans have been running the pyurse strings since 2011.

Both houses since 2015.

When the fuck are they going to start?????

They’ve been decreasing the deficit since they got the House.

Unfortunately as long as the senate filibuster exists, Democrats can limit how much can actually be done.

With Republicans gaining seats in the Senate next month we will be able to do even more. Maybe even actual cuts

 

[Avatar4321]

No rules were broken with Garland.

The CONSTITUTION says otherwise.

Not the US Constitution. Are you using the Soviet constitution?

The Senate has a duty to confirm or not. It does not say if the Senate feels like it, they should confirm.

Did they consider Garland??

Or do you like being of a party that cheats the Constitution?

And they chose not to. Not sure why this is so difficult for you to understand

So they pissed on their Constitutional duties because they never brought him up for confirmation.

Their constitutional duty doesn’t require them to bring him up to confirmation.

They said no. They advised the President.

 

[Oddball]

Needs to make the death tax repeal permanent.

I was dead set against that until I read sometime within the last year that only 13,000 paid it in a year.

Highly doubt this would be the middle class tax cut Trump was referring to. I'm also not insinuating that it was what you were referring to either in terms of the middle class tax cut.

First thing my thought turns to regarding a middle class tax cut is getting rid of tariffs.

So your only objection to grave robbing is that only a relative few are being sacked?...Wow.

 

[Brain357]

Remember when they passed this last tax cut. They had to end some of the tax cuts or else the bill would add too much to the debt & they could not do it under the rules where filibusters in the Senate are not permitted.

So they ended some of these cuts, passed the bill without a filibuster.

Now they are going back & putting in those tax cuts they had to omit last time.

Circumventing the rules to get what they want. They did it with Garland, now with another tax cut bill.

This one is expected to add 3.5 trillion to the debt over the next ten years.

No rules were broken with Garland.

The CONSTITUTION says otherwise.

Not the US Constitution. Are you using the Soviet constitution?

The Republicans have been running the pyurse strings since 2011.

Both houses since 2015.

When the fuck are they going to start?????

They’ve been decreasing the deficit since they got the House.

Unfortunately as long as the senate filibuster exists, Democrats can limit how much can actually be done.

With Republicans gaining seats in the Senate next month we will be able to do even more. Maybe even actual cuts

Deficits are increasing rapidly...

 

[Brain357]

Needs to make the death tax repeal permanent.

I was dead set against that until I read sometime within the last year that only 13,000 paid it in a year.

Highly doubt this would be the middle class tax cut Trump was referring to. I'm also not insinuating that it was what you were referring to either in terms of the middle class tax cut.

First thing my thought turns to regarding a middle class tax cut is getting rid of tariffs.

So your only objection to grave robbing is that only a relative few are being sacked?...Wow.

Gee after a lifetime of avoiding taxes they get a small hit in death. Who cares?

 

[Oddball]

Gee after a lifetime of avoiding taxes they get a small hit in death. Who cares?

Never figured you for a moral relativist...But oh well.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

They’ve been decreasing the deficit since they got the House.

False. They did exactly nothing to reduce deficits, as they fought and lost for tax cuts that were let to expire and thus reduced the deficit.

Furthermore, once they were able to get a president that would sign their tax cuts, they ballooned the deficit, as we are seeing right now.

So you really couldn't be more wrong. You demonstrate the power of propaganda and wishful thinking .

 

[debbiedowner]

Dupes and suckers believe in Trump even when he lies and throws out red meat bait to them.

 

[RealDave]

The CONSTITUTION says otherwise.

Not the US Constitution. Are you using the Soviet constitution?

The Senate has a duty to confirm or not. It does not say if the Senate feels like it, they should confirm.

Did they consider Garland??

Or do you like being of a party that cheats the Constitution?

And they chose not to. Not sure why this is so difficult for you to understand

So they pissed on their Constitutional duties because they never brought him up for confirmation.

Their constitutional duty doesn’t require them to bring him up to confirmation.

They said no. They advised the President.

So, the Senate voted?

 

[Avatar4321]

Z

Not the US Constitution. Are you using the Soviet constitution?

The Senate has a duty to confirm or not. It does not say if the Senate feels like it, they should confirm.

Did they consider Garland??

Or do you like being of a party that cheats the Constitution?

And they chose not to. Not sure why this is so difficult for you to understand

So they pissed on their Constitutional duties because they never brought him up for confirmation.

Their constitutional duty doesn’t require them to bring him up to confirmation.

They said no. They advised the President.

So, the Senate voted?

The constitution doesn’t require the Senate to vote.

 

[RealDave]

Remember when they passed this last tax cut. They had to end some of the tax cuts or else the bill would add too much to the debt & they could not do it under the rules where filibusters in the Senate are not permitted.

So they ended some of these cuts, passed the bill without a filibuster.

Now they are going back & putting in those tax cuts they had to omit last time.

Circumventing the rules to get what they want. They did it with Garland, now with another tax cut bill.

This one is expected to add 3.5 trillion to the debt over the next ten years.

No rules were broken with Garland.

The CONSTITUTION says otherwise.

Not the US Constitution. Are you using the Soviet constitution?

The Republicans have been running the pyurse strings since 2011.

Both houses since 2015.

When the fuck are they going to start?????

They’ve been decreasing the deficit since they got the House.

Unfortunately as long as the senate filibuster exists, Democrats can limit how much can actually be done.

With Republicans gaining seats in the Senate next month we will be able to do even more. Maybe even actual cuts

So why are they higher in FY 2018 & FY 2017?

Where the fuck have you been????

There is no filibuster on budgetary items.

So how did your party manage to increase the deficits but not have time to reduce them?

 

[RealDave]

Z

The Senate has a duty to confirm or not. It does not say if the Senate feels like it, they should confirm.

Did they consider Garland??

Or do you like being of a party that cheats the Constitution?

And they chose not to. Not sure why this is so difficult for you to understand

So they pissed on their Constitutional duties because they never brought him up for confirmation.

Their constitutional duty doesn’t require them to bring him up to confirmation.

They said no. They advised the President.

So, the Senate voted?

The constitution doesn’t require the Senate to vote.

So the Senate leader decides?