Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It simple, did the money run out? yes it did. Cause all of the jobs made no investment for future money. It was spend only. when the well dries up, the jobs go away. Come on man economics 101.Take us from conjecture to certainty....well no shit sherlock. What it doesn't say is it gave recovery. all it states is that some people got jobs. Whether or not they kept them past that money is another thing altogether.The discussion is what that means. With historical lows of labor participation, it doesn't mean shit.More Bold Assertions, Kazzie?
92% of ECONOMISTS polled by the U of Chicago business school......
It convinced enough people that a job is hopeless and they should give up.
Kazzie,
You suffer all the pathologies of your crowd......you a Rush fan?More Bold Assertions, Kazzie?
92% of ECONOMISTS polled by the U of Chicago business school......
It convinced enough people that a job is hopeless and they should give up.
Kazzie,
You suffer all the pathologies of your crowd......you a Rush fan?
92% of economists from the U of Chicago business school agreed with something that isn't in contention, unemployment went down. The discussion is what that means. With historical lows of labor participation, it doesn't mean shit.
Damn you're dumb. You didn't read your own link or grasp the discussion. That is so classic you.
On the other hand, you did record your voice and play it back so you could whack off to it
This was the first statement put to them...
Because of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, the U.S. unemployment rate was lower at the end of 2010 than it would have been without the stimulus bill.
See the "BECAUSE" thingy?
With what part of it are you struggling?
Do you see ANY mention of LFPR?
With historical lows of labor participation, it doesn't mean shit.
There's a guy who calls himself Corvet (named himself after his favorite car - I kid you not.......you should seek him out.....he is all that stands between you and the honorific "The Dumbest MBA Ever"...)
Show me what makes you believe they didn't.
I'm citing what actually happened.Are you actually citing the gripes of some random idiot in Atlanta?Again, the jobs left due to obummercare, regulations, and jobs going overseas. No 1% was going to waste money on jobs. it was a no rewards economy. Fk, the entire climate fiasco fked with jobs.The rich "get rewarded" to create Jobs Booms; where have all the capital gains tax preferences gone?Well, here you go:the people of the country?
Show me.....
Meanwhile..
Let’s start with Obama’s stimulus. The standard Republican talking point is that it failed, meaning it didn’t reduce unemployment. Yet in a survey of leading economists conducted by the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business, 92 percent agreed that the stimulus succeeded in reducing the jobless rate. On the harder question of whether the benefit exceeded the cost, more than half thought it did, one in three was uncertain, and fewer than one in six disagreed.92%
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-23/the-u-s-economic-policy-debate-is-a-sham.html
Do you know how often you find that kind of consensus among economists?
Actually, now that I think of it.......
What economists think about Donald Trump’s 100-day plan
Stimulus Money for 'Shovel Ready' Projects; Where Did It Go?
"Remember when Obama got his trillion-odd dollars of "stimulus money" which he and the Democrats breathlessly said we needed for "shovel ready" jobs to re-build roads and infrastructure? Please e-mail me if anything of the sort got built in your town. Nothing got built in the cities where I spend time.
Roads are bad in Atlanta. I recently drove though Buckhead with its bone-jarring potholes. Folks have to have SUVs there to survive the roads, some with potholes so big that you can bass fish in them after a good rain.
When the stimulus bill (or as lobbyists for graft-grabbing special interests called it, "The Show") was proposed, it was made to sound urgent. Politicians said it would bring "rigor" to the economy. It turns out it also brought mortis.
So where did all that sweet stimulus money go? Of the money spent in swing state Wisconsin, 80 percent went to public sector unions-those with already locked-in jobs. In fact, right-to-work states got $266 less per person in stimulus money than heavily unionized states. Where Democrats had a vast majority of representatives, their states got $460 per person more."
Read more at Stimulus Money for 'Shovel Ready' Projects; Where Did It Go?
The distribution of household incomes has become more unequal during the post-2008 economic recovery as the effects of the recession reversed.[66][67][68] CBO reported in November 2014 that the share of pre-tax income received by the top 1% had risen from 13.3% in 2009 to 14.6% in 2011.[1] During 2012 alone, incomes of the wealthiest 1 percent rose nearly 20%, whereas the income of the remaining 99 percent rose 1% in comparison.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_inequality_in_the_United_States
With a sample of 1, what's your standard deviation?
I asked a very simple question which you as a true libturd avoided answering. Nice and expected.It simple, did the money run out? yes it did. Cause all of the jobs made no investment for future money. It was spend only. when the well dries up, the jobs go away. Come on man economics 101.Take us from conjecture to certainty....well no shit sherlock. What it doesn't say is it gave recovery. all it states is that some people got jobs. Whether or not they kept them past that money is another thing altogether.The discussion is what that means. With historical lows of labor participation, it doesn't mean shit.92% of economists from the U of Chicago business school agreed with something that isn't in contention, unemployment went down. The discussion is what that means. With historical lows of labor participation, it doesn't mean shit.
Damn you're dumb. You didn't read your own link or grasp the discussion. That is so classic you.
On the other hand, you did record your voice and play it back so you could whack off to it
This was the first statement put to them...
Because of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, the U.S. unemployment rate was lower at the end of 2010 than it would have been without the stimulus bill.
See the "BECAUSE" thingy?
With what part of it are you struggling?
Do you see ANY mention of LFPR?
With historical lows of labor participation, it doesn't mean shit.
There's a guy who calls himself Corvet (named himself after his favorite car - I kid you not.......you should seek him out.....he is all that stands between you and the honorific "The Dumbest MBA Ever"...)
Show me what makes you believe they didn't.
I actually passed that course.... And several more advanced versions....
You?
So we should see net job losses after March 2010, right!
Can you count backward from 81?
Cause that is the length of the current private sector payrolls' streak.
According to the data.
No...you're not "citing" shit, except some fundie with a hair across her ass.I'm citing what actually happened.Are you actually citing the gripes of some random idiot in Atlanta?Again, the jobs left due to obummercare, regulations, and jobs going overseas. No 1% was going to waste money on jobs. it was a no rewards economy. Fk, the entire climate fiasco fked with jobs.The rich "get rewarded" to create Jobs Booms; where have all the capital gains tax preferences gone?Well, here you go:Show me.....
Meanwhile..
Let’s start with Obama’s stimulus. The standard Republican talking point is that it failed, meaning it didn’t reduce unemployment. Yet in a survey of leading economists conducted by the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business, 92 percent agreed that the stimulus succeeded in reducing the jobless rate. On the harder question of whether the benefit exceeded the cost, more than half thought it did, one in three was uncertain, and fewer than one in six disagreed.92%
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-23/the-u-s-economic-policy-debate-is-a-sham.html
Do you know how often you find that kind of consensus among economists?
Actually, now that I think of it.......
What economists think about Donald Trump’s 100-day plan
Stimulus Money for 'Shovel Ready' Projects; Where Did It Go?
"Remember when Obama got his trillion-odd dollars of "stimulus money" which he and the Democrats breathlessly said we needed for "shovel ready" jobs to re-build roads and infrastructure? Please e-mail me if anything of the sort got built in your town. Nothing got built in the cities where I spend time.
Roads are bad in Atlanta. I recently drove though Buckhead with its bone-jarring potholes. Folks have to have SUVs there to survive the roads, some with potholes so big that you can bass fish in them after a good rain.
When the stimulus bill (or as lobbyists for graft-grabbing special interests called it, "The Show") was proposed, it was made to sound urgent. Politicians said it would bring "rigor" to the economy. It turns out it also brought mortis.
So where did all that sweet stimulus money go? Of the money spent in swing state Wisconsin, 80 percent went to public sector unions-those with already locked-in jobs. In fact, right-to-work states got $266 less per person in stimulus money than heavily unionized states. Where Democrats had a vast majority of representatives, their states got $460 per person more."
Read more at Stimulus Money for 'Shovel Ready' Projects; Where Did It Go?
The distribution of household incomes has become more unequal during the post-2008 economic recovery as the effects of the recession reversed.[66][67][68] CBO reported in November 2014 that the share of pre-tax income received by the top 1% had risen from 13.3% in 2009 to 14.6% in 2011.[1] During 2012 alone, incomes of the wealthiest 1 percent rose nearly 20%, whereas the income of the remaining 99 percent rose 1% in comparison.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_inequality_in_the_United_States
With a sample of 1, what's your standard deviation?
dude this thread/ forum isn't big enough to post all of the shit that can be cited. Or, you could actually go and read up on the thingy called the internet and see where all the stimulus fail went.No...you're not "citing" shit, except some fundie with a hair across her ass.I'm citing what actually happened.Are you actually citing the gripes of some random idiot in Atlanta?Again, the jobs left due to obummercare, regulations, and jobs going overseas. No 1% was going to waste money on jobs. it was a no rewards economy. Fk, the entire climate fiasco fked with jobs.The rich "get rewarded" to create Jobs Booms; where have all the capital gains tax preferences gone?Well, here you go:
Stimulus Money for 'Shovel Ready' Projects; Where Did It Go?
"Remember when Obama got his trillion-odd dollars of "stimulus money" which he and the Democrats breathlessly said we needed for "shovel ready" jobs to re-build roads and infrastructure? Please e-mail me if anything of the sort got built in your town. Nothing got built in the cities where I spend time.
Roads are bad in Atlanta. I recently drove though Buckhead with its bone-jarring potholes. Folks have to have SUVs there to survive the roads, some with potholes so big that you can bass fish in them after a good rain.
When the stimulus bill (or as lobbyists for graft-grabbing special interests called it, "The Show") was proposed, it was made to sound urgent. Politicians said it would bring "rigor" to the economy. It turns out it also brought mortis.
So where did all that sweet stimulus money go? Of the money spent in swing state Wisconsin, 80 percent went to public sector unions-those with already locked-in jobs. In fact, right-to-work states got $266 less per person in stimulus money than heavily unionized states. Where Democrats had a vast majority of representatives, their states got $460 per person more."
Read more at Stimulus Money for 'Shovel Ready' Projects; Where Did It Go?
The distribution of household incomes has become more unequal during the post-2008 economic recovery as the effects of the recession reversed.[66][67][68] CBO reported in November 2014 that the share of pre-tax income received by the top 1% had risen from 13.3% in 2009 to 14.6% in 2011.[1] During 2012 alone, incomes of the wealthiest 1 percent rose nearly 20%, whereas the income of the remaining 99 percent rose 1% in comparison.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_inequality_in_the_United_States
With a sample of 1, what's your standard deviation?
Bradenton.com opinion?I asked a very simple question which you as a true libturd avoided answering. Nice and expected.It simple, did the money run out? yes it did. Cause all of the jobs made no investment for future money. It was spend only. when the well dries up, the jobs go away. Come on man economics 101.Take us from conjecture to certainty....well no shit sherlock. What it doesn't say is it gave recovery. all it states is that some people got jobs. Whether or not they kept them past that money is another thing altogether.The discussion is what that means. With historical lows of labor participation, it doesn't mean shit.
This was the first statement put to them...
Because of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, the U.S. unemployment rate was lower at the end of 2010 than it would have been without the stimulus bill.
See the "BECAUSE" thingy?
With what part of it are you struggling?
Do you see ANY mention of LFPR?
With historical lows of labor participation, it doesn't mean shit.
There's a guy who calls himself Corvet (named himself after his favorite car - I kid you not.......you should seek him out.....he is all that stands between you and the honorific "The Dumbest MBA Ever"...)
Show me what makes you believe they didn't.
I actually passed that course.... And several more advanced versions....
You?
So we should see net job losses after March 2010, right!
Can you count backward from 81?
Cause that is the length of the current private sector payrolls' streak.
According to the data.
So again, did the money run out since there was no investment made with it?
What happened to that company Solydra? How profitable did that company get after it received it's subsidy? Oh yeah went out of business. Can't make this shit up. These dufus's wish to continue to challenge and lose. There is nothing on their side of success. It's why the congress went up in count of conservatives the last three elections. And these stupid fks still don't get it.
"2011 —Solyndra, squandered government subsidy; 2012 — Benghazi; Obama lied about terrorist attack; 2012 — Sebelius violated Hatch Act; 2012 — Government hacked Sharyl Attkisson’s computer; 2012 – Obama used alias email ID to communicate with Hillary on her illegal server; 2013 — IRS targeted conservative charities; 2014 — VA corruption and mismanagement; 2015 — Falsified/altered border security data; 2016 — Iran ransom; 2009-16 — Taxpayers paid over $44.35 million for Obama and family vacations; etc. 2012 was an exceptional year for screw-ups.
Read more here: Obama’s term filled with scandals
"Solyndra Scandal
Key coverage of the investigation into Solyndra, the Silicon Valley startup that collapsed, leaving taxpayers liable for $535 million in federal guarantees .
Documents show politics infused Obama ‘green’ programs
Joe Stephens and Carol D. Leonnig DEC 25, 2011
Since the failure of solar-panel company Solyndra, President Obama’s $80 billion clean-technology program has begun to look like a political liability."
Solyndra Scandal | Full Coverage of Failed Solar Startup - The Washington Post
Bradenton.com opinion?I asked a very simple question which you as a true libturd avoided answering. Nice and expected.It simple, did the money run out? yes it did. Cause all of the jobs made no investment for future money. It was spend only. when the well dries up, the jobs go away. Come on man economics 101.Take us from conjecture to certainty....well no shit sherlock. What it doesn't say is it gave recovery. all it states is that some people got jobs. Whether or not they kept them past that money is another thing altogether.
Show me what makes you believe they didn't.
I actually passed that course.... And several more advanced versions....
You?
So we should see net job losses after March 2010, right!
Can you count backward from 81?
Cause that is the length of the current private sector payrolls' streak.
According to the data.
So again, did the money run out since there was no investment made with it?
What happened to that company Solydra? How profitable did that company get after it received it's subsidy? Oh yeah went out of business. Can't make this shit up. These dufus's wish to continue to challenge and lose. There is nothing on their side of success. It's why the congress went up in count of conservatives the last three elections. And these stupid fks still don't get it.
"2011 —Solyndra, squandered government subsidy; 2012 — Benghazi; Obama lied about terrorist attack; 2012 — Sebelius violated Hatch Act; 2012 — Government hacked Sharyl Attkisson’s computer; 2012 – Obama used alias email ID to communicate with Hillary on her illegal server; 2013 — IRS targeted conservative charities; 2014 — VA corruption and mismanagement; 2015 — Falsified/altered border security data; 2016 — Iran ransom; 2009-16 — Taxpayers paid over $44.35 million for Obama and family vacations; etc. 2012 was an exceptional year for screw-ups.
Read more here: Obama’s term filled with scandals
"Solyndra Scandal
Key coverage of the investigation into Solyndra, the Silicon Valley startup that collapsed, leaving taxpayers liable for $535 million in federal guarantees .
Documents show politics infused Obama ‘green’ programs
Joe Stephens and Carol D. Leonnig DEC 25, 2011
Since the failure of solar-panel company Solyndra, President Obama’s $80 billion clean-technology program has begun to look like a political liability."
Solyndra Scandal | Full Coverage of Failed Solar Startup - The Washington Post
You're a moron....
and here is a Solyndra update...
Exclusive: Controversial U.S. energy loan program has wiped out losses
I recently cited the consensus of economists surveyed by the Booth School of Business.......which is unusually strong on this question....dude this thread/ forum isn't big enough to post all of the shit that can be cited. Or, you could actually go and read up on the thingy called the internet and see where all the stimulus fail went.No...you're not "citing" shit, except some fundie with a hair across her ass.I'm citing what actually happened.Are you actually citing the gripes of some random idiot in Atlanta?Again, the jobs left due to obummercare, regulations, and jobs going overseas. No 1% was going to waste money on jobs. it was a no rewards economy. Fk, the entire climate fiasco fked with jobs.The rich "get rewarded" to create Jobs Booms; where have all the capital gains tax preferences gone?
With a sample of 1, what's your standard deviation?
"In February it approved $6.5 billion in loan guarantees to build two nuclear reactors in Georgia"Bradenton.com opinion?I asked a very simple question which you as a true libturd avoided answering. Nice and expected.It simple, did the money run out? yes it did. Cause all of the jobs made no investment for future money. It was spend only. when the well dries up, the jobs go away. Come on man economics 101.Take us from conjecture to certainty....well no shit sherlock. What it doesn't say is it gave recovery. all it states is that some people got jobs. Whether or not they kept them past that money is another thing altogether.
Show me what makes you believe they didn't.
I actually passed that course.... And several more advanced versions....
You?
So we should see net job losses after March 2010, right!
Can you count backward from 81?
Cause that is the length of the current private sector payrolls' streak.
According to the data.
So again, did the money run out since there was no investment made with it?
What happened to that company Solydra? How profitable did that company get after it received it's subsidy? Oh yeah went out of business. Can't make this shit up. These dufus's wish to continue to challenge and lose. There is nothing on their side of success. It's why the congress went up in count of conservatives the last three elections. And these stupid fks still don't get it.
"2011 —Solyndra, squandered government subsidy; 2012 — Benghazi; Obama lied about terrorist attack; 2012 — Sebelius violated Hatch Act; 2012 — Government hacked Sharyl Attkisson’s computer; 2012 – Obama used alias email ID to communicate with Hillary on her illegal server; 2013 — IRS targeted conservative charities; 2014 — VA corruption and mismanagement; 2015 — Falsified/altered border security data; 2016 — Iran ransom; 2009-16 — Taxpayers paid over $44.35 million for Obama and family vacations; etc. 2012 was an exceptional year for screw-ups.
Read more here: Obama’s term filled with scandals
"Solyndra Scandal
Key coverage of the investigation into Solyndra, the Silicon Valley startup that collapsed, leaving taxpayers liable for $535 million in federal guarantees .
Documents show politics infused Obama ‘green’ programs
Joe Stephens and Carol D. Leonnig DEC 25, 2011
Since the failure of solar-panel company Solyndra, President Obama’s $80 billion clean-technology program has begun to look like a political liability."
Solyndra Scandal | Full Coverage of Failed Solar Startup - The Washington Post
You're a moron....
and here is a Solyndra update...
Exclusive: Controversial U.S. energy loan program has wiped out losses
dude this thread/ forum isn't big enough to post all of the shit that can be cited.dude this thread/ forum isn't big enough to post all of the shit that can be cited. Or, you could actually go and read up on the thingy called the internet and see where all the stimulus fail went.No...you're not "citing" shit, except some fundie with a hair across her ass.I'm citing what actually happened.Are you actually citing the gripes of some random idiot in Atlanta?Again, the jobs left due to obummercare, regulations, and jobs going overseas. No 1% was going to waste money on jobs. it was a no rewards economy. Fk, the entire climate fiasco fked with jobs.The rich "get rewarded" to create Jobs Booms; where have all the capital gains tax preferences gone?
With a sample of 1, what's your standard deviation?
from your linkBradenton.com opinion?I asked a very simple question which you as a true libturd avoided answering. Nice and expected.It simple, did the money run out? yes it did. Cause all of the jobs made no investment for future money. It was spend only. when the well dries up, the jobs go away. Come on man economics 101.Take us from conjecture to certainty....well no shit sherlock. What it doesn't say is it gave recovery. all it states is that some people got jobs. Whether or not they kept them past that money is another thing altogether.
Show me what makes you believe they didn't.
I actually passed that course.... And several more advanced versions....
You?
So we should see net job losses after March 2010, right!
Can you count backward from 81?
Cause that is the length of the current private sector payrolls' streak.
According to the data.
So again, did the money run out since there was no investment made with it?
What happened to that company Solydra? How profitable did that company get after it received it's subsidy? Oh yeah went out of business. Can't make this shit up. These dufus's wish to continue to challenge and lose. There is nothing on their side of success. It's why the congress went up in count of conservatives the last three elections. And these stupid fks still don't get it.
"2011 —Solyndra, squandered government subsidy; 2012 — Benghazi; Obama lied about terrorist attack; 2012 — Sebelius violated Hatch Act; 2012 — Government hacked Sharyl Attkisson’s computer; 2012 – Obama used alias email ID to communicate with Hillary on her illegal server; 2013 — IRS targeted conservative charities; 2014 — VA corruption and mismanagement; 2015 — Falsified/altered border security data; 2016 — Iran ransom; 2009-16 — Taxpayers paid over $44.35 million for Obama and family vacations; etc. 2012 was an exceptional year for screw-ups.
Read more here: Obama’s term filled with scandals
"Solyndra Scandal
Key coverage of the investigation into Solyndra, the Silicon Valley startup that collapsed, leaving taxpayers liable for $535 million in federal guarantees .
Documents show politics infused Obama ‘green’ programs
Joe Stephens and Carol D. Leonnig DEC 25, 2011
Since the failure of solar-panel company Solyndra, President Obama’s $80 billion clean-technology program has begun to look like a political liability."
Solyndra Scandal | Full Coverage of Failed Solar Startup - The Washington Post
You're a moron....
and here is a Solyndra update...
Exclusive: Controversial U.S. energy loan program has wiped out losses
Again, post after post I shut you down. Why not actually post something of value.dude this thread/ forum isn't big enough to post all of the shit that can be cited.dude this thread/ forum isn't big enough to post all of the shit that can be cited. Or, you could actually go and read up on the thingy called the internet and see where all the stimulus fail went.No...you're not "citing" shit, except some fundie with a hair across her ass.I'm citing what actually happened.Are you actually citing the gripes of some random idiot in Atlanta?Again, the jobs left due to obummercare, regulations, and jobs going overseas. No 1% was going to waste money on jobs. it was a no rewards economy. Fk, the entire climate fiasco fked with jobs.
With a sample of 1, what's your standard deviation?
Will it be downhill from the Atlanta hausfrau? I assume that you led with "strength".....
GAO: Cost of DOE loans to be $2.1 BILLION to taxpayers.Bradenton.com opinion?I asked a very simple question which you as a true libturd avoided answering. Nice and expected.It simple, did the money run out? yes it did. Cause all of the jobs made no investment for future money. It was spend only. when the well dries up, the jobs go away. Come on man economics 101.Take us from conjecture to certainty....well no shit sherlock. What it doesn't say is it gave recovery. all it states is that some people got jobs. Whether or not they kept them past that money is another thing altogether.
Show me what makes you believe they didn't.
I actually passed that course.... And several more advanced versions....
You?
So we should see net job losses after March 2010, right!
Can you count backward from 81?
Cause that is the length of the current private sector payrolls' streak.
According to the data.
So again, did the money run out since there was no investment made with it?
What happened to that company Solydra? How profitable did that company get after it received it's subsidy? Oh yeah went out of business. Can't make this shit up. These dufus's wish to continue to challenge and lose. There is nothing on their side of success. It's why the congress went up in count of conservatives the last three elections. And these stupid fks still don't get it.
"2011 —Solyndra, squandered government subsidy; 2012 — Benghazi; Obama lied about terrorist attack; 2012 — Sebelius violated Hatch Act; 2012 — Government hacked Sharyl Attkisson’s computer; 2012 – Obama used alias email ID to communicate with Hillary on her illegal server; 2013 — IRS targeted conservative charities; 2014 — VA corruption and mismanagement; 2015 — Falsified/altered border security data; 2016 — Iran ransom; 2009-16 — Taxpayers paid over $44.35 million for Obama and family vacations; etc. 2012 was an exceptional year for screw-ups.
Read more here: Obama’s term filled with scandals
"Solyndra Scandal
Key coverage of the investigation into Solyndra, the Silicon Valley startup that collapsed, leaving taxpayers liable for $535 million in federal guarantees .
Documents show politics infused Obama ‘green’ programs
Joe Stephens and Carol D. Leonnig DEC 25, 2011
Since the failure of solar-panel company Solyndra, President Obama’s $80 billion clean-technology program has begun to look like a political liability."
Solyndra Scandal | Full Coverage of Failed Solar Startup - The Washington Post
You're a moron....
and here is a Solyndra update...
Exclusive: Controversial U.S. energy loan program has wiped out losses
what kind of jobs though! full time jobs? Ones with benefits? non government jobs? please that is too simplistic of a response not to go into detail about the sectors that gained and the value of the jobs created.I recently cited the consensus of economists surveyed by the Booth School of Business.......which is unusually strong on this question....dude this thread/ forum isn't big enough to post all of the shit that can be cited. Or, you could actually go and read up on the thingy called the internet and see where all the stimulus fail went.No...you're not "citing" shit, except some fundie with a hair across her ass.I'm citing what actually happened.Are you actually citing the gripes of some random idiot in Atlanta?Again, the jobs left due to obummercare, regulations, and jobs going overseas. No 1% was going to waste money on jobs. it was a no rewards economy. Fk, the entire climate fiasco fked with jobs.
With a sample of 1, what's your standard deviation?
You've dribbled random claptrap from your lip.
Since March 2010, the economy has added more than 15 million net new jobs.........THAT is a FACT.......
Ivanpah is still cranking.....from your linkBradenton.com opinion?I asked a very simple question which you as a true libturd avoided answering. Nice and expected.It simple, did the money run out? yes it did. Cause all of the jobs made no investment for future money. It was spend only. when the well dries up, the jobs go away. Come on man economics 101.Take us from conjecture to certainty....
Show me what makes you believe they didn't.
I actually passed that course.... And several more advanced versions....
You?
So we should see net job losses after March 2010, right!
Can you count backward from 81?
Cause that is the length of the current private sector payrolls' streak.
According to the data.
So again, did the money run out since there was no investment made with it?
What happened to that company Solydra? How profitable did that company get after it received it's subsidy? Oh yeah went out of business. Can't make this shit up. These dufus's wish to continue to challenge and lose. There is nothing on their side of success. It's why the congress went up in count of conservatives the last three elections. And these stupid fks still don't get it.
"2011 —Solyndra, squandered government subsidy; 2012 — Benghazi; Obama lied about terrorist attack; 2012 — Sebelius violated Hatch Act; 2012 — Government hacked Sharyl Attkisson’s computer; 2012 – Obama used alias email ID to communicate with Hillary on her illegal server; 2013 — IRS targeted conservative charities; 2014 — VA corruption and mismanagement; 2015 — Falsified/altered border security data; 2016 — Iran ransom; 2009-16 — Taxpayers paid over $44.35 million for Obama and family vacations; etc. 2012 was an exceptional year for screw-ups.
Read more here: Obama’s term filled with scandals
"Solyndra Scandal
Key coverage of the investigation into Solyndra, the Silicon Valley startup that collapsed, leaving taxpayers liable for $535 million in federal guarantees .
Documents show politics infused Obama ‘green’ programs
Joe Stephens and Carol D. Leonnig DEC 25, 2011
Since the failure of solar-panel company Solyndra, President Obama’s $80 billion clean-technology program has begun to look like a political liability."
Solyndra Scandal | Full Coverage of Failed Solar Startup - The Washington Post
You're a moron....
and here is a Solyndra update...
Exclusive: Controversial U.S. energy loan program has wiped out losses
"That is because most of the projects that received government loans are large power plants that are now feeding electricity into the grid, Davidson said. They include massive photovoltaic solar and solar thermal power plants in California and Arizona, wind farms and geothermal energy facilities."
Let's see how true those two sentences really are:
Ivanpah Solar Plant May Be Forced to Shut Down
"Ivanpah Solar Plant May Be Forced to Shut Down
Federally backed project asks California regulators for more time to sort out its problems
By
Cassandra Sweet
March 16, 2016 7:27 p.m. ET
A federally backed, $2.2 billion solar project in the California desert isn’t producing the electricity it is contractually required to deliver to PG&E Corp., which says the solar plant may be forced to shut down if it doesn’t receive a break Thursday from state regulators."
is it producing the electricity its required to produce? Post up some fking links pup. Why you always hanging out in the shadows?Ivanpah is still cranking.....from your linkBradenton.com opinion?I asked a very simple question which you as a true libturd avoided answering. Nice and expected.It simple, did the money run out? yes it did. Cause all of the jobs made no investment for future money. It was spend only. when the well dries up, the jobs go away. Come on man economics 101.
I actually passed that course.... And several more advanced versions....
You?
So we should see net job losses after March 2010, right!
Can you count backward from 81?
Cause that is the length of the current private sector payrolls' streak.
According to the data.
So again, did the money run out since there was no investment made with it?
What happened to that company Solydra? How profitable did that company get after it received it's subsidy? Oh yeah went out of business. Can't make this shit up. These dufus's wish to continue to challenge and lose. There is nothing on their side of success. It's why the congress went up in count of conservatives the last three elections. And these stupid fks still don't get it.
"2011 —Solyndra, squandered government subsidy; 2012 — Benghazi; Obama lied about terrorist attack; 2012 — Sebelius violated Hatch Act; 2012 — Government hacked Sharyl Attkisson’s computer; 2012 – Obama used alias email ID to communicate with Hillary on her illegal server; 2013 — IRS targeted conservative charities; 2014 — VA corruption and mismanagement; 2015 — Falsified/altered border security data; 2016 — Iran ransom; 2009-16 — Taxpayers paid over $44.35 million for Obama and family vacations; etc. 2012 was an exceptional year for screw-ups.
Read more here: Obama’s term filled with scandals
"Solyndra Scandal
Key coverage of the investigation into Solyndra, the Silicon Valley startup that collapsed, leaving taxpayers liable for $535 million in federal guarantees .
Documents show politics infused Obama ‘green’ programs
Joe Stephens and Carol D. Leonnig DEC 25, 2011
Since the failure of solar-panel company Solyndra, President Obama’s $80 billion clean-technology program has begun to look like a political liability."
Solyndra Scandal | Full Coverage of Failed Solar Startup - The Washington Post
You're a moron....
and here is a Solyndra update...
Exclusive: Controversial U.S. energy loan program has wiped out losses
"That is because most of the projects that received government loans are large power plants that are now feeding electricity into the grid, Davidson said. They include massive photovoltaic solar and solar thermal power plants in California and Arizona, wind farms and geothermal energy facilities."
Let's see how true those two sentences really are:
Ivanpah Solar Plant May Be Forced to Shut Down
"Ivanpah Solar Plant May Be Forced to Shut Down
Federally backed project asks California regulators for more time to sort out its problems
By
Cassandra Sweet
March 16, 2016 7:27 p.m. ET
A federally backed, $2.2 billion solar project in the California desert isn’t producing the electricity it is contractually required to deliver to PG&E Corp., which says the solar plant may be forced to shut down if it doesn’t receive a break Thursday from state regulators."
Yes, your eight year old insults backed up with contentless bluster would certainly do well in an insult contest ... if you're up against a seven year old ...Kazzing again, Kazzie?Well, since you were trained to pump financial products and you use that to free the elderly from big chunks of their retirement in exchange for self interested mediocre investment advice, one is better off not listening to you, either
Insult me all you want, but come up with your own material. You will go on ignore for circle jerking with Faun, Syriusly and Dot Com
Well, since you were trained to pump financial products and you use that to free the elderly from big chunks of their retirement in exchange for self interested mediocre investment advice, one is better off not listening to you, either
Kazzie,
If you wanna go The Dozens, don't start crying when you're the one left bleeding.....
You're really the very worst kind of mewling pussy, you know that?
Yes, your eight year old insults backed up with contentless bluster would certainly do well in an insult contest ... if you're up against a seven year old ...
I'm sure this SEEMED really clever when you first thought of it....like much of what you bleat, it contains the seed of its own invalidation.....
Jobs have no responsibility to "explain: why Trump received 2.9 million FEWER votes than the other candidate....what kind of jobs though! full time jobs? Ones with benefits? non government jobs? please that is too simplistic of a response not to go into detail about the sectors that gained and the value of the jobs created.I recently cited the consensus of economists surveyed by the Booth School of Business.......which is unusually strong on this question....dude this thread/ forum isn't big enough to post all of the shit that can be cited. Or, you could actually go and read up on the thingy called the internet and see where all the stimulus fail went.No...you're not "citing" shit, except some fundie with a hair across her ass.I'm citing what actually happened.Are you actually citing the gripes of some random idiot in Atlanta?
With a sample of 1, what's your standard deviation?
You've dribbled random claptrap from your lip.
Since March 2010, the economy has added more than 15 million net new jobs.........THAT is a FACT.......
And it doesn't explain the election results. so!
Yes, your eight year old insults backed up with contentless bluster would certainly do well in an insult contest ... if you're up against a seven year old ...Kazzing again, Kazzie?
Insult me all you want, but come up with your own material. You will go on ignore for circle jerking with Faun, Syriusly and Dot Com
Well, since you were trained to pump financial products and you use that to free the elderly from big chunks of their retirement in exchange for self interested mediocre investment advice, one is better off not listening to you, either
Kazzie,
If you wanna go The Dozens, don't start crying when you're the one left bleeding.....
You're really the very worst kind of mewling pussy, you know that?
Yes, your eight year old insults backed up with contentless bluster would certainly do well in an insult contest ... if you're up against a seven year old ...
I'm sure this SEEMED really clever when you first thought of it....like much of what you bleat, it contains the seed of its own invalidation.....
It was pretty clever.
Yes, your eight year old insults backed up with contentless bluster would certainly do well in an insult contest ... if you're up against a seven year old ...Kazzing again, Kazzie?
Insult me all you want, but come up with your own material. You will go on ignore for circle jerking with Faun, Syriusly and Dot Com
Well, since you were trained to pump financial products and you use that to free the elderly from big chunks of their retirement in exchange for self interested mediocre investment advice, one is better off not listening to you, either
Kazzie,
If you wanna go The Dozens, don't start crying when you're the one left bleeding.....
You're really the very worst kind of mewling pussy, you know that?
Yes, your eight year old insults backed up with contentless bluster would certainly do well in an insult contest ... if you're up against a seven year old ...
I'm sure this SEEMED really clever when you first thought of it....like much of what you bleat, it contains the seed of its own invalidation.....
You're just in love with the sound of your own voice. You'd hate The Dozens, it requires you to listen to someone else half the time
