Trump threatens 'Saturday Night Live' with federal investigation

[22lcidw]

When I see Congress, both the House and Senate I see several right wing radio and TV hosts some scribes sitting in the seats withprogressive socialists getting 95% of the rest entertainers and TV hosts sitting in the rest. So the right gets a little over 26 seats and the progressive socialists get 509 total seats. See the disparity. And I am being kind.

All I see there is incoherency. NONE of that addresses my post at all.

That post I typed hits it on the nail. The propaganda spouted everyday affects people. You speak of religion, well this is another religion.

Definitely gonna wanna go for remedial reading. I posted nothing about "religion" either.

Religion/Constitution. Know the difference.

This is related. In today's world. Much of our population gets its political education from the TV/entertainers and many college graduates are not that knowledgeable about policies. You don't have to know everything and there are people on this forum who do know a lot. But there are many who know little or nothing. Trump's policies are not complicated and benefit most all of us to degree. Imagine if a compatible extreme right wing conservative was in power to give you a taste of your own medicine.

Third post in a row rambling lost through the weeds bearing no relevance to the post quoted at all.

Time to go sleep it off. That's strike three.

You never got on the field.

 

[Edgetho]

When I see Congress, both the House and Senate I see several right wing radio and TV hosts some scribes sitting in the seats withprogressive socialists getting 95% of the rest entertainers and TV hosts sitting in the rest. So the right gets a little over 26 seats and the progressive socialists get 509 total seats. See the disparity. And I am being kind.

Whose fault is that?

If you want people to come over to side of goodness and light, you have to convince them to do so.

Maybe it's our fault that we can't convince people to leave the side of evil and darkness.

It is a well-known fact that Conservatives don't like Government and, therefore, want no part of it.

This is what happens when you neglect your Civic Duty and leave the politics to dimocrap scum.

You want your Country back? You're gonna have to work for it. If you don't, then don't complain when the scum of the Earth prevail.

You're not gong to convince any of the scumbags in here. You're wasting your time. Get out, get into the streets come election time. Convince people with kindness and charity. Leave the screaming and violence to the people who specialize in it -- dimocrap scum.

 

[Bush92]

String 'em up! How dare they mock the Crown!

Trump threatens 'Saturday Night Live' with federal investigation in Sunday morning tweet storm | Daily Mail Online

Who watches SNL anymore? Thought that turd was flushed long ago. It’s no longer satire but a propaganda tool for Democratic Party. They are so far left, and lack any satirical or entertainment value they should just be ignored. Fox needs a counter and I would be glad to help.

You do that. Your "sense of humor" would fit like a glove.

I would. Thought has crossed my mind. Just saying.

 

[g5000]

If you want people to come over to side of goodness and light, you have to convince them to do so...

...by following a serial adulterer who cheated on all THREE wives, stole the retirement nest eggs of senior citizens, bilked investors of hundreds of millions of dollars, and who can't speak more than two words without lying.

It is a well-known fact that Conservatives don't like Government and, therefore, want no part of it.

That's true. Conservatives hate big government. But pseudocons like yourself LOVE big government. That's why you elected a guy whose annual government spending is greater than any human being in history.

 

[22lcidw]

When I see Congress, both the House and Senate I see several right wing radio and TV hosts some scribes sitting in the seats withprogressive socialists getting 95% of the rest entertainers and TV hosts sitting in the rest. So the right gets a little over 26 seats and the progressive socialists get 509 total seats. See the disparity. And I am being kind.

Whose fault is that?

If you want people to come over to side of goodness and light, you have to convince them to do so.

Maybe it's our fault that we can't convince people to leave the side of evil and darkness.

It is a well-known fact that Conservatives don't like Government and, therefore, want no part of it.

This is what happens when you neglect your Civic Duty and leave the politics to dimocrap scum.

You want your Country back? You're gonna have to work for it. If you don't, then don't complain when the scum of the Earth prevail.

You're not gong to convince any of the scumbags in here. You're wasting your time. Get out, get into the streets come election time. Convince people with kindness and charity. Leave the screaming and violence to the people who specialize in it -- dimocrap scum.

You are correct in what you spout. We have a fringe layer of a political spectrum that took over the national, regional and city governments. We are a high tax state with many checks sent out with benefits that is not going to rock the boat. I understand what you rant. But people are not going to stop collecting money and getting medical care and the rest as that includes a massive government which dictates more and more about what we can and can not do. The progressives know this and have played it like a fine tuned violin putting fear into the general population. This is just one mountain tha that to be conquered.

 

[daveman]

And Obama's taken credit for all of Trump's successes.

And exactly as programmed, the Useful Idiots believe him.

tRumPutins only success has been tax cuts for the corporations and uber wealthy.

How did denuclearization of NoKo go?

I got a tax cut. I am neither a corporation nor wealthy. Have you tried maybe getting a job? They're productive and fun, and you can feel like less of a leech on society!

Trump's work with North Korea has accomplished much more than Clinton -- who stupidly gave NoKo $4 billion in exchange for empty promises to denuclearize -- and Obama, who did fuck-all when NoKo conducted the nuclear tests they were working towards when Clinton gave them a shitload of money. For the record, Bush didn't do shit about it, either.

Lol, got a job thank you for your concern. Your God/King took away all my expenditures while giving more to the uber wealthy. Maybe ewe could become more informed and less of an Orange puss drinker and ewe would actually be taken seriously!

Since you're a leftist, I know you can't possibly understand this, but I worship no man, and I have no king.

Meanwhile, you just make sure you ignore as hard as you can what Trump's predecessors did to enable North Korea's nuclear ambitions.

That would be all if them since Eisenhower. And tRumPutin got schooled by the fat kid from NoKo. Your defense of your God/King tells me different.

Ooooh, careful! You almost criticized Obama! You'll burst into flames!

I knew you couldn't understand what I said. But in your defense, it's only because you're stupid.

 

[daveman]

I think it's about time people admit Trump is a pu$$y.

Remember when you guys called this guy a pu$$y?

Obama bowed to leaders of other nations.

Has Trump bowed to anyone? No?

Well, then.

Oh, for fuck’s sake.

he only curtsies...

shoves...

kisses ass...

gropes...

salutes our enemies...

mocks disabled people...

cowers...

and tosses paper towels at flood victims...

But you’re right, he doesn’t bow.

That wasn't a curtsy -- the guy put a medal around his neck, genius.

Y'know, you can't have it both ways. Either he's deferential to other leaders, or he shoves them out of the way.

Which is it?

Surprise me. Don't screech BOTH!!!

 

[daveman]

Yer a wannabe! Go club another seal.

You have no comeback for anything I post so you immediately default to insults and dismissal. When you can't refute the post, you Russians go straight to nationality. Stupid Russian trolls.

Yoiur concession is noted.

Stupid Canadian troll, go club a cute whittle baby seal so ewe can rip off his fur and sell it!

I'm not trolling, I'm posting facts and you have no comeback. Just insults. Americans think that theirs is the greatest country in the world. I've visited. I was appalled at how dirty, run-down, and unkempt your country is. How deep the poverty is in your country. I've travelled across Canada from our richest cities to our poorest rural regions (but not the far north), and I have never seen the level of extreme poverty in Canada that is common is the USA.

The richest nation on earth, is now refusing to give back to the countries they milk profits from, nor do they give back to their own citizens. Every measure of liveability, including life expectancy, is declining in the USA, and instead of working on building a healthier society, you're obsessed with keeping non-white people out. What idiocy!!!!

If you go visit the First Nations, you'll see poverty -- poverty that's deliberately kept in place by your government.

Shameful.

life expectancy is declining because we're allowing too many criminals, communists, and muslims in. And because our ghetto populations are killing each other off faster than they're reproducing.

REALITY IS RACISS

 

[daveman]

Trump's work with North Korea has accomplished much more than Clinton -- who stupidly gave NoKo $4 billion in exchange for empty promises to denuclearize -- and Obama, who did fuck-all when NoKo conducted the nuclear tests they were working towards when Clinton gave them a shitload of money. For the record, Bush didn't do shit about it, either.

what has it accomplished?

a break in testing, at a point where they were ready to take that break and analyze the testing data?

Jong-un wanted to meet with Obama.

Obama played golf.

Trump met with Jong-un. Perhaps you read about it in the leftist media. They were irrationally angry about it.

Yes, the did meet. And now Jong-un has equal standing on the international stage as the US President. And he had to give up nothing to gain that.

That is an accomplishment for Jong-un, not for Trump

So you're saying Clinton, Bush, and Obama were such pussies, they couldn't even do what Trump did.

 

[daveman]

Because Democrats have been getting billions of dollars of free advertising for years.

Shows Show Only the Shallow

So did Trump, but that was because the media are so much out of touch with excluded Americans that they thought he was an entertaining clown providing comic relief to dull droning hillary's in-the-bag victory.

This is interesting:

Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy released a study Wednesday comparing news coverage of Trump and Clinton during the general election, and the results show The Donald was correct to question the media’s biased reporting.

The study – gleaned from reports by ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox, the Los Angeles Times, NBC, The New York Times, USA Today, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post – showed that news coverage of Trump after the primaries was 77 percent negative and 23 percent positive. For Clinton, the figures were 36 percent positive and 64 percent negative.

...

News coverage of Trump during the primary included some positive stories about his growing momentum and rising poll numbers, but the general election was much different.

“His coverage was negative from the start, and never came close to entering positive territory. During his best weeks, the coverage ran 2-to-1 negative over positive. In his worst weeks, the ratio was more than 10-to-1. If there was a silver lining for Trump, it was that his two best weeks were the ones just preceding the November balloting,” Patterson wrote.


“Trump’s coverage was negative in all the news outlets in our study, even those that typically side with the Republican nominee. Fox provided Trump his most favorable coverage, but it was still nearly 3-to-1 negative over positive. The Wall Street Journal was his next best outlet, but its coverage ran 4-to-1 negative. The most negative coverage was carried by CBS at 9-to-1, but Trump’s coverage was nearly as negative in most other outlets.”

Such a Supremacy Document Guarantees Oligarchic Tyranny

The press, TV, and even public demonstrations have distorted the right of free expression by practically monopolizing it and intimidating others into not participating. The same goes for all other rights granted by the elitist Constitution.

The press, TV, and public demonstrations are dominated by the left.

There's nothing wrong with the Constitution -- except too many people are ignorant of what it says.

 

[daveman]

If you want people to come over to side of goodness and light, you have to convince them to do so...

...by following a serial adulterer who cheated on all THREE wives, stole the retirement nest eggs of senior citizens, bilked investors of hundreds of millions of dollars, and who can't speak more than two words without lying.

It is a well-known fact that Conservatives don't like Government and, therefore, want no part of it.

That's true. Conservatives hate big government. But pseudocons like yourself LOVE big government. That's why you elected a guy whose annual government spending is greater than any human being in history.

Remember, kids: The alternatives, Clinton or Sanders, were absolute MODELS of fiscal restraint.

 

[Aldo Raine]

tRumPutins only success has been tax cuts for the corporations and uber wealthy.

How did denuclearization of NoKo go?

I got a tax cut. I am neither a corporation nor wealthy. Have you tried maybe getting a job? They're productive and fun, and you can feel like less of a leech on society!

Trump's work with North Korea has accomplished much more than Clinton -- who stupidly gave NoKo $4 billion in exchange for empty promises to denuclearize -- and Obama, who did fuck-all when NoKo conducted the nuclear tests they were working towards when Clinton gave them a shitload of money. For the record, Bush didn't do shit about it, either.

Lol, got a job thank you for your concern. Your God/King took away all my expenditures while giving more to the uber wealthy. Maybe ewe could become more informed and less of an Orange puss drinker and ewe would actually be taken seriously!

Since you're a leftist, I know you can't possibly understand this, but I worship no man, and I have no king.

Meanwhile, you just make sure you ignore as hard as you can what Trump's predecessors did to enable North Korea's nuclear ambitions.

That would be all if them since Eisenhower. And tRumPutin got schooled by the fat kid from NoKo. Your defense of your God/King tells me different.

Ooooh, careful! You almost criticized Obama! You'll burst into flames!

I knew you couldn't understand what I said. But in your defense, it's only because you're stupid.

Obama was a turd, Dotard is a disaster if ewe weren't an imbecile ewe would know that. Now please finish your prayers to your God/King!

 

[daveman]

I got a tax cut. I am neither a corporation nor wealthy. Have you tried maybe getting a job? They're productive and fun, and you can feel like less of a leech on society!

Trump's work with North Korea has accomplished much more than Clinton -- who stupidly gave NoKo $4 billion in exchange for empty promises to denuclearize -- and Obama, who did fuck-all when NoKo conducted the nuclear tests they were working towards when Clinton gave them a shitload of money. For the record, Bush didn't do shit about it, either.

Lol, got a job thank you for your concern. Your God/King took away all my expenditures while giving more to the uber wealthy. Maybe ewe could become more informed and less of an Orange puss drinker and ewe would actually be taken seriously!

Since you're a leftist, I know you can't possibly understand this, but I worship no man, and I have no king.

Meanwhile, you just make sure you ignore as hard as you can what Trump's predecessors did to enable North Korea's nuclear ambitions.

That would be all if them since Eisenhower. And tRumPutin got schooled by the fat kid from NoKo. Your defense of your God/King tells me different.

Ooooh, careful! You almost criticized Obama! You'll burst into flames!

I knew you couldn't understand what I said. But in your defense, it's only because you're stupid.

Obama was a turd, Dotard is a disaster if ewe weren't an imbecile ewe would know that. Now please finish your prayers to your God/King!

Is...this supposed to be a refutation of the claim that you're stupid?

Because it's not.

 

[Aldo Raine]

Lol, got a job thank you for your concern. Your God/King took away all my expenditures while giving more to the uber wealthy. Maybe ewe could become more informed and less of an Orange puss drinker and ewe would actually be taken seriously!

Since you're a leftist, I know you can't possibly understand this, but I worship no man, and I have no king.

Meanwhile, you just make sure you ignore as hard as you can what Trump's predecessors did to enable North Korea's nuclear ambitions.

That would be all if them since Eisenhower. And tRumPutin got schooled by the fat kid from NoKo. Your defense of your God/King tells me different.

Ooooh, careful! You almost criticized Obama! You'll burst into flames!

I knew you couldn't understand what I said. But in your defense, it's only because you're stupid.

Obama was a turd, Dotard is a disaster if ewe weren't an imbecile ewe would know that. Now please finish your prayers to your God/King!

Is...this supposed to be a refutation of the claim that you're stupid?

Because it's not.

I try not to argue with a maroon such as ewe. Because ewe will drag me down to your level and beat me with experience. Have ewe prayed to your God/King 6 times today yet?

 

[beautress]

Because Democrats have been getting billions of dollars of free advertising for years.

Shows Show Only the Shallow

So did Trump, but that was because the media are so much out of touch with excluded Americans that they thought he was an entertaining clown providing comic relief to dull droning hillary's in-the-bag victory.

This is interesting:

Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy released a study Wednesday comparing news coverage of Trump and Clinton during the general election, and the results show The Donald was correct to question the media’s biased reporting.

The study – gleaned from reports by ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox, the Los Angeles Times, NBC, The New York Times, USA Today, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post – showed that news coverage of Trump after the primaries was 77 percent negative and 23 percent positive. For Clinton, the figures were 36 percent positive and 64 percent negative.

...

News coverage of Trump during the primary included some positive stories about his growing momentum and rising poll numbers, but the general election was much different.

“His coverage was negative from the start, and never came close to entering positive territory. During his best weeks, the coverage ran 2-to-1 negative over positive. In his worst weeks, the ratio was more than 10-to-1. If there was a silver lining for Trump, it was that his two best weeks were the ones just preceding the November balloting,” Patterson wrote.


“Trump’s coverage was negative in all the news outlets in our study, even those that typically side with the Republican nominee. Fox provided Trump his most favorable coverage, but it was still nearly 3-to-1 negative over positive. The Wall Street Journal was his next best outlet, but its coverage ran 4-to-1 negative. The most negative coverage was carried by CBS at 9-to-1, but Trump’s coverage was nearly as negative in most other outlets.”

Such a Supremacy Document Guarantees Oligarchic Tyranny

The press, TV, and even public demonstrations have distorted the right of free expression by practically monopolizing it and intimidating others into not participating. The same goes for all other rights granted by the elitist Constitution.

The press plays favorites with the lying, cheating, stealing left and think they've pulled a fast one. The harassment committee learned it from Maxine Waters and performs for the press who just happens to be there with the latest equipment deftly handled to make them look like movie stars and their opponents like knuckleheads due to dogma.

 

[Pogo]

Because Democrats have been getting billions of dollars of free advertising for years.

Shows Show Only the Shallow

So did Trump, but that was because the media are so much out of touch with excluded Americans that they thought he was an entertaining clown providing comic relief to dull droning hillary's in-the-bag victory.

This is interesting:

Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy released a study Wednesday comparing news coverage of Trump and Clinton during the general election, and the results show The Donald was correct to question the media’s biased reporting.

The study – gleaned from reports by ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox, the Los Angeles Times, NBC, The New York Times, USA Today, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post – showed that news coverage of Trump after the primaries was 77 percent negative and 23 percent positive. For Clinton, the figures were 36 percent positive and 64 percent negative.

...

News coverage of Trump during the primary included some positive stories about his growing momentum and rising poll numbers, but the general election was much different.

“His coverage was negative from the start, and never came close to entering positive territory. During his best weeks, the coverage ran 2-to-1 negative over positive. In his worst weeks, the ratio was more than 10-to-1. If there was a silver lining for Trump, it was that his two best weeks were the ones just preceding the November balloting,” Patterson wrote.


“Trump’s coverage was negative in all the news outlets in our study, even those that typically side with the Republican nominee. Fox provided Trump his most favorable coverage, but it was still nearly 3-to-1 negative over positive. The Wall Street Journal was his next best outlet, but its coverage ran 4-to-1 negative. The most negative coverage was carried by CBS at 9-to-1, but Trump’s coverage was nearly as negative in most other outlets.”

Such a Supremacy Document Guarantees Oligarchic Tyranny

The press, TV, and even public demonstrations have distorted the right of free expression by practically monopolizing it and intimidating others into not participating. The same goes for all other rights granted by the elitist Constitution.

The press plays favorites with the lying, cheating, stealing left and think they've pulled a fast one. The harassment committee learned it from Maxine Waters and performs for the press who just happens to be there with the latest equipment deftly handled to make them look like movie stars and their opponents like knuckleheads due to dogma.

STILL irrelevant here. A comedy show is not "the press". It's comedy.

 

[beautress]

Because Democrats have been getting billions of dollars of free advertising for years.

Shows Show Only the Shallow

So did Trump, but that was because the media are so much out of touch with excluded Americans that they thought he was an entertaining clown providing comic relief to dull droning hillary's in-the-bag victory.

This is interesting:

Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy released a study Wednesday comparing news coverage of Trump and Clinton during the general election, and the results show The Donald was correct to question the media’s biased reporting.

The study – gleaned from reports by ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox, the Los Angeles Times, NBC, The New York Times, USA Today, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post – showed that news coverage of Trump after the primaries was 77 percent negative and 23 percent positive. For Clinton, the figures were 36 percent positive and 64 percent negative.

...

News coverage of Trump during the primary included some positive stories about his growing momentum and rising poll numbers, but the general election was much different.

“His coverage was negative from the start, and never came close to entering positive territory. During his best weeks, the coverage ran 2-to-1 negative over positive. In his worst weeks, the ratio was more than 10-to-1. If there was a silver lining for Trump, it was that his two best weeks were the ones just preceding the November balloting,” Patterson wrote.


“Trump’s coverage was negative in all the news outlets in our study, even those that typically side with the Republican nominee. Fox provided Trump his most favorable coverage, but it was still nearly 3-to-1 negative over positive. The Wall Street Journal was his next best outlet, but its coverage ran 4-to-1 negative. The most negative coverage was carried by CBS at 9-to-1, but Trump’s coverage was nearly as negative in most other outlets.”

Such a Supremacy Document Guarantees Oligarchic Tyranny

The press, TV, and even public demonstrations have distorted the right of free expression by practically monopolizing it and intimidating others into not participating. The same goes for all other rights granted by the elitist Constitution.

The press plays favorites with the lying, cheating, stealing left and think they've pulled a fast one. The harassment committee learned it from Maxine Waters and performs for the press who just happens to be there with the latest equipment deftly handled to make them look like movie stars and their opponents like knuckleheads due to dogma.

STILL irrelevant here. A comedy show is not "the press". It's comedy.

Well, their "comedy" shows up when the news used to.

 

[Pogo]

Shows Show Only the Shallow

So did Trump, but that was because the media are so much out of touch with excluded Americans that they thought he was an entertaining clown providing comic relief to dull droning hillary's in-the-bag victory.

This is interesting:

Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy released a study Wednesday comparing news coverage of Trump and Clinton during the general election, and the results show The Donald was correct to question the media’s biased reporting.

The study – gleaned from reports by ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox, the Los Angeles Times, NBC, The New York Times, USA Today, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post – showed that news coverage of Trump after the primaries was 77 percent negative and 23 percent positive. For Clinton, the figures were 36 percent positive and 64 percent negative.

...

News coverage of Trump during the primary included some positive stories about his growing momentum and rising poll numbers, but the general election was much different.

“His coverage was negative from the start, and never came close to entering positive territory. During his best weeks, the coverage ran 2-to-1 negative over positive. In his worst weeks, the ratio was more than 10-to-1. If there was a silver lining for Trump, it was that his two best weeks were the ones just preceding the November balloting,” Patterson wrote.


“Trump’s coverage was negative in all the news outlets in our study, even those that typically side with the Republican nominee. Fox provided Trump his most favorable coverage, but it was still nearly 3-to-1 negative over positive. The Wall Street Journal was his next best outlet, but its coverage ran 4-to-1 negative. The most negative coverage was carried by CBS at 9-to-1, but Trump’s coverage was nearly as negative in most other outlets.”

Such a Supremacy Document Guarantees Oligarchic Tyranny

The press, TV, and even public demonstrations have distorted the right of free expression by practically monopolizing it and intimidating others into not participating. The same goes for all other rights granted by the elitist Constitution.

The press plays favorites with the lying, cheating, stealing left and think they've pulled a fast one. The harassment committee learned it from Maxine Waters and performs for the press who just happens to be there with the latest equipment deftly handled to make them look like movie stars and their opponents like knuckleheads due to dogma.

STILL irrelevant here. A comedy show is not "the press". It's comedy.

Well, their "comedy" shows up when the news used to.

I don't believe news has ever been broadcast at 11:30 on a Saturday night by NBC or by any of the alphabets.

STILL irrelevant --- the fact remains, comedy is not "the press". Doesn't even matter what "used to" be there, it just isn't.

The post you're quoting has already been discredited for other parts of its content, specifically the "elitist Constitution" oxymoron.

 

[daveman]

Since you're a leftist, I know you can't possibly understand this, but I worship no man, and I have no king.

Meanwhile, you just make sure you ignore as hard as you can what Trump's predecessors did to enable North Korea's nuclear ambitions.

That would be all if them since Eisenhower. And tRumPutin got schooled by the fat kid from NoKo. Your defense of your God/King tells me different.

Ooooh, careful! You almost criticized Obama! You'll burst into flames!

I knew you couldn't understand what I said. But in your defense, it's only because you're stupid.

Obama was a turd, Dotard is a disaster if ewe weren't an imbecile ewe would know that. Now please finish your prayers to your God/King!

Is...this supposed to be a refutation of the claim that you're stupid?

Because it's not.

I try not to argue with a maroon such as ewe. Because ewe will drag me down to your level and beat me with experience. Have ewe prayed to your God/King 6 times today yet?

I am not a leftist; I don't pray to men.

Now, predictably, stupidly, and boringly, you will still insist I see Trump as a god. That's because you're a leftist, and you worship leftist leaders.

How terrible it must be to be a leftist!

 

[22lcidw]

Because Democrats have been getting billions of dollars of free advertising for years.

Shows Show Only the Shallow

So did Trump, but that was because the media are so much out of touch with excluded Americans that they thought he was an entertaining clown providing comic relief to dull droning hillary's in-the-bag victory.

This is interesting:

Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy released a study Wednesday comparing news coverage of Trump and Clinton during the general election, and the results show The Donald was correct to question the media’s biased reporting.

The study – gleaned from reports by ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox, the Los Angeles Times, NBC, The New York Times, USA Today, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post – showed that news coverage of Trump after the primaries was 77 percent negative and 23 percent positive. For Clinton, the figures were 36 percent positive and 64 percent negative.

...

News coverage of Trump during the primary included some positive stories about his growing momentum and rising poll numbers, but the general election was much different.

“His coverage was negative from the start, and never came close to entering positive territory. During his best weeks, the coverage ran 2-to-1 negative over positive. In his worst weeks, the ratio was more than 10-to-1. If there was a silver lining for Trump, it was that his two best weeks were the ones just preceding the November balloting,” Patterson wrote.


“Trump’s coverage was negative in all the news outlets in our study, even those that typically side with the Republican nominee. Fox provided Trump his most favorable coverage, but it was still nearly 3-to-1 negative over positive. The Wall Street Journal was his next best outlet, but its coverage ran 4-to-1 negative. The most negative coverage was carried by CBS at 9-to-1, but Trump’s coverage was nearly as negative in most other outlets.”

Such a Supremacy Document Guarantees Oligarchic Tyranny

The press, TV, and even public demonstrations have distorted the right of free expression by practically monopolizing it and intimidating others into not participating. The same goes for all other rights granted by the elitist Constitution.

The press plays favorites with the lying, cheating, stealing left and think they've pulled a fast one. The harassment committee learned it from Maxine Waters and performs for the press who just happens to be there with the latest equipment deftly handled to make them look like movie stars and their opponents like knuckleheads due to dogma.

STILL irrelevant here. A comedy show is not "the press". It's comedy.

Funny, but it seems Colbert, Kimmel, Conan, Samantha Bee and Fallon just to start are sitting in the congress. Then you get Ellen, and the women of the View and other shows that are of the same tripe. Then we get the massive amount of people who are on the fake progressive news stations. Lots of people sitting in the congress. We can go on from there. Samuel Jackson got infuriated that he is worth 170 million dollars and he will not pay but we must pay as peons to erase the hate.