Trump threatens 'Saturday Night Live' with federal investigation

[Aldo Raine]

This is the reason I can not believe you. Every Repub President is treated the same way. Trump came into office with agendas he told you. He was pretty straight forward. But he also had swamp creatures even in his cabinet. I believe the GOPe wouldhave destroyed him after the primaries if he did not accept some. Trump is not a lockstep progressive socialist. Obama and all in the White House thought the same. His day was easy. He was a far left socialist who took steps to diminish the United States even more then the last few decades have. He was smart only in ideology. Behind the walls of the White House he and his cabinet were like robots. When one spoke they all spoke in unison. He destabilized the middle east. Caused tens of millions of people to migrate and more. Caused riots and violence here at home. Divided the nation like no other man when he could have been the best ever. And helped to shrink the middle class even more to working poor and poor. Now those are just the ones I though of. Trump has taken the blame for all of this.

And Obama's taken credit for all of Trump's successes.

And exactly as programmed, the Useful Idiots believe him.

tRumPutins only success has been tax cuts for the corporations and uber wealthy.

How did denuclearization of NoKo go?

I got a tax cut. I am neither a corporation nor wealthy. Have you tried maybe getting a job? They're productive and fun, and you can feel like less of a leech on society!

Trump's work with North Korea has accomplished much more than Clinton -- who stupidly gave NoKo $4 billion in exchange for empty promises to denuclearize -- and Obama, who did fuck-all when NoKo conducted the nuclear tests they were working towards when Clinton gave them a shitload of money. For the record, Bush didn't do shit about it, either.

Lol, got a job thank you for your concern. Your God/King took away all my expenditures while giving more to the uber wealthy. Maybe ewe could become more informed and less of an Orange puss drinker and ewe would actually be taken seriously!

Since you're a leftist, I know you can't possibly understand this, but I worship no man, and I have no king.

Meanwhile, you just make sure you ignore as hard as you can what Trump's predecessors did to enable North Korea's nuclear ambitions.

That would be all if them since Eisenhower. And tRumPutin got schooled by the fat kid from NoKo. Your defense of your God/King tells me different.

 

[Faun]

I think it's about time people admit Trump is a pu$$y.

Remember when you guys called this guy a pu$$y?

Obama bowed to leaders of other nations.

Has Trump bowed to anyone? No?

Well, then.

Oh, for fuck’s sake.

he only curtsies...

shoves...

kisses ass...

gropes...

salutes our enemies...

mocks disabled people...

cowers...

and tosses paper towels at flood victims...

But you’re right, he doesn’t bow.

 

[impuretrash]

Who the fuck wants to get bitten by an eagle

 

[koshergrl]

I am not a "wannabe". I have turned down numerous offers to live and work in the USA. Canada is my home, and it's been home to my family since before Wolfe defeated Montcalm on the Plains of Abraham. Your country treats corporations and rich people as those who can do no wrong, and paint everyday Americans as greedy and selfish when they ask for decent wages, and health care for all.

The USA is a once great power in decline. Brought low by the same things that destroy Rome - corruption of the ruling elite by the quest for power, the corrupting influence of lobbyists' money, and expending the treasury on armies and foreign wars. You should try ready history. In this case, the Rise and Fall of America took place in less than 100 years. The Rise and Fall of Rome took 1000 years. Did you know that Romans were also obsessed with citizenship. If you weren't born a Roman, from one of the old families, you were unlikely to be elected, and always looked down on as a "new man".

Yer a wannabe! Go club another seal.

You have no comeback for anything I post so you immediately default to insults and dismissal. When you can't refute the post, you Russians go straight to nationality. Stupid Russian trolls.

Yoiur concession is noted.

Stupid Canadian troll, go club a cute whittle baby seal so ewe can rip off his fur and sell it!

I'm not trolling, I'm posting facts and you have no comeback. Just insults. Americans think that theirs is the greatest country in the world. I've visited. I was appalled at how dirty, run-down, and unkempt your country is. How deep the poverty is in your country. I've travelled across Canada from our richest cities to our poorest rural regions (but not the far north), and I have never seen the level of extreme poverty in Canada that is common is the USA.

The richest nation on earth, is now refusing to give back to the countries they milk profits from, nor do they give back to their own citizens. Every measure of liveability, including life expectancy, is declining in the USA, and instead of working on building a healthier society, you're obsessed with keeping non-white people out. What idiocy!!!!

If you go visit the First Nations, you'll see poverty -- poverty that's deliberately kept in place by your government.

Shameful.

life expectancy is declining because we're allowing too many criminals, communists, and muslims in. And because our ghetto populations are killing each other off faster than they're reproducing.

 

[McRocket]

What's wrong with a federal investigation? SNL babe Kathy Griffin would have been indicted for the severed head stunt if Hussein was president. Then again it wouldn't have happened if Hussein was president.

Exactly which part of the Constitution is SNL breaking?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Trump's work with North Korea has accomplished much more than Clinton -- who stupidly gave NoKo $4 billion in exchange for empty promises to denuclearize -- and Obama, who did fuck-all when NoKo conducted the nuclear tests they were working towards when Clinton gave them a shitload of money. For the record, Bush didn't do shit about it, either.

what has it accomplished?

a break in testing, at a point where they were ready to take that break and analyze the testing data?

Jong-un wanted to meet with Obama.

Obama played golf.

Trump met with Jong-un. Perhaps you read about it in the leftist media. They were irrationally angry about it.

Yes, the did meet. And now Jong-un has equal standing on the international stage as the US President. And he had to give up nothing to gain that.

That is an accomplishment for Jong-un, not for Trump

 

[Pogo]

Yer a wannabe! Go club another seal.

You have no comeback for anything I post so you immediately default to insults and dismissal. When you can't refute the post, you Russians go straight to nationality. Stupid Russian trolls.

Yoiur concession is noted.

Stupid Canadian troll, go club a cute whittle baby seal so ewe can rip off his fur and sell it!

I'm not trolling, I'm posting facts and you have no comeback. Just insults. Americans think that theirs is the greatest country in the world. I've visited. I was appalled at how dirty, run-down, and unkempt your country is. How deep the poverty is in your country. I've travelled across Canada from our richest cities to our poorest rural regions (but not the far north), and I have never seen the level of extreme poverty in Canada that is common is the USA.

The richest nation on earth, is now refusing to give back to the countries they milk profits from, nor do they give back to their own citizens. Every measure of liveability, including life expectancy, is declining in the USA, and instead of working on building a healthier society, you're obsessed with keeping non-white people out. What idiocy!!!!

If you go visit the First Nations, you'll see poverty -- poverty that's deliberately kept in place by your government.

Shameful.

life expectancy is declining because we're allowing too many criminals, communists, and muslims in. And because our ghetto populations are killing each other off faster than they're reproducing.

Oh BULLSHIT. Life expectancy is declining because of stuff like obesity and diabetes and Big Food's obsession with shoving sugar into everything. That, and a supporting role played by the Medicine Industry overtreating.

/offtopic

 

[Pogo]

String 'em up! How dare they mock the Crown!

Trump threatens 'Saturday Night Live' with federal investigation in Sunday morning tweet storm | Daily Mail Online

What goes around comes around.

Not under my Constitution it doesn't.

 

[Pogo]

String 'em up! How dare they mock the Crown!

Trump threatens 'Saturday Night Live' with federal investigation in Sunday morning tweet storm | Daily Mail Online

Who watches SNL anymore? Thought that turd was flushed long ago. It’s no longer satire but a propaganda tool for Democratic Party. They are so far left, and lack any satirical or entertainment value they should just be ignored. Fox needs a counter and I would be glad to help.

You do that. Your "sense of humor" would fit like a glove.

 

[McRocket]

Yer a wannabe! Go club another seal.

You have no comeback for anything I post so you immediately default to insults and dismissal. When you can't refute the post, you Russians go straight to nationality. Stupid Russian trolls.

Yoiur concession is noted.

Stupid Canadian troll, go club a cute whittle baby seal so ewe can rip off his fur and sell it!

I'm not trolling, I'm posting facts and you have no comeback. Just insults. Americans think that theirs is the greatest country in the world. I've visited. I was appalled at how dirty, run-down, and unkempt your country is. How deep the poverty is in your country. I've travelled across Canada from our richest cities to our poorest rural regions (but not the far north), and I have never seen the level of extreme poverty in Canada that is common is the USA.

The richest nation on earth, is now refusing to give back to the countries they milk profits from, nor do they give back to their own citizens. Every measure of liveability, including life expectancy, is declining in the USA, and instead of working on building a healthier society, you're obsessed with keeping non-white people out. What idiocy!!!!

If you go visit the First Nations, you'll see poverty -- poverty that's deliberately kept in place by your government.

Shameful.

life expectancy is declining because we're allowing too many criminals, communists, and muslims in. And because our ghetto populations are killing each other off faster than they're reproducing.

Suuuuuure, that MUST be it.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Because Democrats have been getting billions of dollars of free advertising for years.

Shows Show Only the Shallow

So did Trump, but that was because the media are so much out of touch with excluded Americans that they thought he was an entertaining clown providing comic relief to dull droning hillary's in-the-bag victory.

This is interesting:

Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy released a study Wednesday comparing news coverage of Trump and Clinton during the general election, and the results show The Donald was correct to question the media’s biased reporting.

The study – gleaned from reports by ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox, the Los Angeles Times, NBC, The New York Times, USA Today, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post – showed that news coverage of Trump after the primaries was 77 percent negative and 23 percent positive. For Clinton, the figures were 36 percent positive and 64 percent negative.

...

News coverage of Trump during the primary included some positive stories about his growing momentum and rising poll numbers, but the general election was much different.

“His coverage was negative from the start, and never came close to entering positive territory. During his best weeks, the coverage ran 2-to-1 negative over positive. In his worst weeks, the ratio was more than 10-to-1. If there was a silver lining for Trump, it was that his two best weeks were the ones just preceding the November balloting,” Patterson wrote.


“Trump’s coverage was negative in all the news outlets in our study, even those that typically side with the Republican nominee. Fox provided Trump his most favorable coverage, but it was still nearly 3-to-1 negative over positive. The Wall Street Journal was his next best outlet, but its coverage ran 4-to-1 negative. The most negative coverage was carried by CBS at 9-to-1, but Trump’s coverage was nearly as negative in most other outlets.”

Such a Supremacy Document Guarantees Oligarchic Tyranny

The press, TV, and even public demonstrations have distorted the right of free expression by practically monopolizing it and intimidating others into not participating. The same goes for all other rights granted by the elitist Constitution.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Does anyone really think Trump is worried about SNL??

He sure like to a jerk a few chains with his tweets.and it seems to be working with the lefty loons on this board.

Enjoy. I will.

YES TRUMP IS WORRIED ABOUT SNL I KNOW BECAUSE SNL AND OTHER LATE NIGHT COMEDIANS TOLD ME

Isn't that right, lefties?

No, Trump told you so.

I'm not a leftist. I don't need to be handed my opinions.

You cried when Jon Stewart left the Daily Show, didn't you?

Chose Between the Roar of the Crowd and the Squeaking of Mice

Both Trump and Stewart are associated with World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. Apparently, Stewart cared more about those fans than he did about his show's goofy Liberal girlyman fanboys.

 

[McRocket]

I think it's about time people admit Trump is a pu$$y.

Remember when you guys called this guy a pu$$y?

Obama bowed to leaders of other nations.

Has Trump bowed to anyone? No?

Well, then.

Oh, for fuck’s sake.

he only curtsies...

shoves...

kisses ass...

gropes...

salutes our enemies...

mocks disabled people...

cowers...

and tosses paper towels at flood victims...

But you’re right, he doesn’t bow.

Man...what a loser he is.

And I had never seen that Ivanka clip...yuch, why doesn't he just get it over with and try to feel her up...he clearly is dying to.

What a pig AND a loser.

Anyone that looks up to Trump...I feel SO sorry for.

 

[Pogo]

Because Democrats have been getting billions of dollars of free advertising for years.

Shows Show Only the Shallow

So did Trump, but that was because the media are so much out of touch with excluded Americans that they thought he was an entertaining clown providing comic relief to dull droning hillary's in-the-bag victory.

This is interesting:

Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy released a study Wednesday comparing news coverage of Trump and Clinton during the general election, and the results show The Donald was correct to question the media’s biased reporting.

The study – gleaned from reports by ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox, the Los Angeles Times, NBC, The New York Times, USA Today, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post – showed that news coverage of Trump after the primaries was 77 percent negative and 23 percent positive. For Clinton, the figures were 36 percent positive and 64 percent negative.

...

News coverage of Trump during the primary included some positive stories about his growing momentum and rising poll numbers, but the general election was much different.

“His coverage was negative from the start, and never came close to entering positive territory. During his best weeks, the coverage ran 2-to-1 negative over positive. In his worst weeks, the ratio was more than 10-to-1. If there was a silver lining for Trump, it was that his two best weeks were the ones just preceding the November balloting,” Patterson wrote.


“Trump’s coverage was negative in all the news outlets in our study, even those that typically side with the Republican nominee. Fox provided Trump his most favorable coverage, but it was still nearly 3-to-1 negative over positive. The Wall Street Journal was his next best outlet, but its coverage ran 4-to-1 negative. The most negative coverage was carried by CBS at 9-to-1, but Trump’s coverage was nearly as negative in most other outlets.”

Such a Supremacy Document Guarantees Oligarchic Tyranny

The press, TV, and even public demonstrations have distorted the right of free expression by practically monopolizing it and intimidating others into not participating. The same goes for all other rights granted by the elitist Constitution.

Absolute bullshit. There ain't nothing "elitist" about a Constitution founded on the principle "all men are created equal". That is the literal OPPOSITE of elitist.

Nobody is excluded from free speech per the 1A. And further, the Constitution doesn't "grant" rights; it restricts the government from ungranting rights which are held to be pre-existing conditions. Which is exactly why the elitist Orange Asshole *cannot* do anything about satire, despite however much diaper rash he spews in his infantile tantrums.

 

[22lcidw]

Because Democrats have been getting billions of dollars of free advertising for years.

Shows Show Only the Shallow

So did Trump, but that was because the media are so much out of touch with excluded Americans that they thought he was an entertaining clown providing comic relief to dull droning hillary's in-the-bag victory.

This is interesting:

Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy released a study Wednesday comparing news coverage of Trump and Clinton during the general election, and the results show The Donald was correct to question the media’s biased reporting.

The study – gleaned from reports by ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox, the Los Angeles Times, NBC, The New York Times, USA Today, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post – showed that news coverage of Trump after the primaries was 77 percent negative and 23 percent positive. For Clinton, the figures were 36 percent positive and 64 percent negative.

...

News coverage of Trump during the primary included some positive stories about his growing momentum and rising poll numbers, but the general election was much different.

“His coverage was negative from the start, and never came close to entering positive territory. During his best weeks, the coverage ran 2-to-1 negative over positive. In his worst weeks, the ratio was more than 10-to-1. If there was a silver lining for Trump, it was that his two best weeks were the ones just preceding the November balloting,” Patterson wrote.


“Trump’s coverage was negative in all the news outlets in our study, even those that typically side with the Republican nominee. Fox provided Trump his most favorable coverage, but it was still nearly 3-to-1 negative over positive. The Wall Street Journal was his next best outlet, but its coverage ran 4-to-1 negative. The most negative coverage was carried by CBS at 9-to-1, but Trump’s coverage was nearly as negative in most other outlets.”

Such a Supremacy Document Guarantees Oligarchic Tyranny

The press, TV, and even public demonstrations have distorted the right of free expression by practically monopolizing it and intimidating others into not participating. The same goes for all other rights granted by the elitist Constitution.

Absolute bullshit. There ain't nothing "elitist" about a Constitution founded on the principle "all men are created equal". That is the literal OPPOSITE of elitist.

Nobody is excluded from free speech per the 1A. And further, the Constitution doesn't "grant" rights; it restricts the government from ungranting rights which are held to be pre-existing conditions. Which is exactly why the elitist Orange Asshole *cannot* do anything about satire, despite however much diaper rash he spews in his infantile tantrums.

When I see Congress, both the House and Senate I see several right wing radio and TV hosts some scribes sitting in the seats withprogressive socialists getting 95% of the rest entertainers and TV hosts sitting in the rest. So the right gets a little over 26 seats and the progressive socialists get 509 total seats. See the disparity. And I am being kind.

 

[Pogo]

Because Democrats have been getting billions of dollars of free advertising for years.

Shows Show Only the Shallow

So did Trump, but that was because the media are so much out of touch with excluded Americans that they thought he was an entertaining clown providing comic relief to dull droning hillary's in-the-bag victory.

This is interesting:

Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy released a study Wednesday comparing news coverage of Trump and Clinton during the general election, and the results show The Donald was correct to question the media’s biased reporting.

The study – gleaned from reports by ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox, the Los Angeles Times, NBC, The New York Times, USA Today, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post – showed that news coverage of Trump after the primaries was 77 percent negative and 23 percent positive. For Clinton, the figures were 36 percent positive and 64 percent negative.

...

News coverage of Trump during the primary included some positive stories about his growing momentum and rising poll numbers, but the general election was much different.

“His coverage was negative from the start, and never came close to entering positive territory. During his best weeks, the coverage ran 2-to-1 negative over positive. In his worst weeks, the ratio was more than 10-to-1. If there was a silver lining for Trump, it was that his two best weeks were the ones just preceding the November balloting,” Patterson wrote.


“Trump’s coverage was negative in all the news outlets in our study, even those that typically side with the Republican nominee. Fox provided Trump his most favorable coverage, but it was still nearly 3-to-1 negative over positive. The Wall Street Journal was his next best outlet, but its coverage ran 4-to-1 negative. The most negative coverage was carried by CBS at 9-to-1, but Trump’s coverage was nearly as negative in most other outlets.”

Such a Supremacy Document Guarantees Oligarchic Tyranny

The press, TV, and even public demonstrations have distorted the right of free expression by practically monopolizing it and intimidating others into not participating. The same goes for all other rights granted by the elitist Constitution.

Absolute bullshit. There ain't nothing "elitist" about a Constitution founded on the principle "all men are created equal". That is the literal OPPOSITE of elitist.

Nobody is excluded from free speech per the 1A. And further, the Constitution doesn't "grant" rights; it restricts the government from ungranting rights which are held to be pre-existing conditions. Which is exactly why the elitist Orange Asshole *cannot* do anything about satire, despite however much diaper rash he spews in his infantile tantrums.

When I see Congress, both the House and Senate I see several right wing radio and TV hosts some scribes sitting in the seats withprogressive socialists getting 95% of the rest entertainers and TV hosts sitting in the rest. So the right gets a little over 26 seats and the progressive socialists get 509 total seats. See the disparity. And I am being kind.

All I see there is incoherency. NONE of that addresses my post at all.

 

[22lcidw]

Shows Show Only the Shallow

So did Trump, but that was because the media are so much out of touch with excluded Americans that they thought he was an entertaining clown providing comic relief to dull droning hillary's in-the-bag victory.

This is interesting:

Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy released a study Wednesday comparing news coverage of Trump and Clinton during the general election, and the results show The Donald was correct to question the media’s biased reporting.

The study – gleaned from reports by ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox, the Los Angeles Times, NBC, The New York Times, USA Today, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post – showed that news coverage of Trump after the primaries was 77 percent negative and 23 percent positive. For Clinton, the figures were 36 percent positive and 64 percent negative.

...

News coverage of Trump during the primary included some positive stories about his growing momentum and rising poll numbers, but the general election was much different.

“His coverage was negative from the start, and never came close to entering positive territory. During his best weeks, the coverage ran 2-to-1 negative over positive. In his worst weeks, the ratio was more than 10-to-1. If there was a silver lining for Trump, it was that his two best weeks were the ones just preceding the November balloting,” Patterson wrote.


“Trump’s coverage was negative in all the news outlets in our study, even those that typically side with the Republican nominee. Fox provided Trump his most favorable coverage, but it was still nearly 3-to-1 negative over positive. The Wall Street Journal was his next best outlet, but its coverage ran 4-to-1 negative. The most negative coverage was carried by CBS at 9-to-1, but Trump’s coverage was nearly as negative in most other outlets.”

Such a Supremacy Document Guarantees Oligarchic Tyranny

The press, TV, and even public demonstrations have distorted the right of free expression by practically monopolizing it and intimidating others into not participating. The same goes for all other rights granted by the elitist Constitution.

Absolute bullshit. There ain't nothing "elitist" about a Constitution founded on the principle "all men are created equal". That is the literal OPPOSITE of elitist.

Nobody is excluded from free speech per the 1A. And further, the Constitution doesn't "grant" rights; it restricts the government from ungranting rights which are held to be pre-existing conditions. Which is exactly why the elitist Orange Asshole *cannot* do anything about satire, despite however much diaper rash he spews in his infantile tantrums.

When I see Congress, both the House and Senate I see several right wing radio and TV hosts some scribes sitting in the seats withprogressive socialists getting 95% of the rest entertainers and TV hosts sitting in the rest. So the right gets a little over 26 seats and the progressive socialists get 509 total seats. See the disparity. And I am being kind.

All I see there is incoherency. NONE of that addresses my post at all.

That post I typed hits it on the nail. The propaganda spouted everyday affects people. You speak of religion, well this is another religion.

 

[Pogo]

This is interesting:

Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy released a study Wednesday comparing news coverage of Trump and Clinton during the general election, and the results show The Donald was correct to question the media’s biased reporting.

The study – gleaned from reports by ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox, the Los Angeles Times, NBC, The New York Times, USA Today, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post – showed that news coverage of Trump after the primaries was 77 percent negative and 23 percent positive. For Clinton, the figures were 36 percent positive and 64 percent negative.

...

News coverage of Trump during the primary included some positive stories about his growing momentum and rising poll numbers, but the general election was much different.

“His coverage was negative from the start, and never came close to entering positive territory. During his best weeks, the coverage ran 2-to-1 negative over positive. In his worst weeks, the ratio was more than 10-to-1. If there was a silver lining for Trump, it was that his two best weeks were the ones just preceding the November balloting,” Patterson wrote.


“Trump’s coverage was negative in all the news outlets in our study, even those that typically side with the Republican nominee. Fox provided Trump his most favorable coverage, but it was still nearly 3-to-1 negative over positive. The Wall Street Journal was his next best outlet, but its coverage ran 4-to-1 negative. The most negative coverage was carried by CBS at 9-to-1, but Trump’s coverage was nearly as negative in most other outlets.”

Such a Supremacy Document Guarantees Oligarchic Tyranny

The press, TV, and even public demonstrations have distorted the right of free expression by practically monopolizing it and intimidating others into not participating. The same goes for all other rights granted by the elitist Constitution.

Absolute bullshit. There ain't nothing "elitist" about a Constitution founded on the principle "all men are created equal". That is the literal OPPOSITE of elitist.

Nobody is excluded from free speech per the 1A. And further, the Constitution doesn't "grant" rights; it restricts the government from ungranting rights which are held to be pre-existing conditions. Which is exactly why the elitist Orange Asshole *cannot* do anything about satire, despite however much diaper rash he spews in his infantile tantrums.

When I see Congress, both the House and Senate I see several right wing radio and TV hosts some scribes sitting in the seats withprogressive socialists getting 95% of the rest entertainers and TV hosts sitting in the rest. So the right gets a little over 26 seats and the progressive socialists get 509 total seats. See the disparity. And I am being kind.

All I see there is incoherency. NONE of that addresses my post at all.

That post I typed hits it on the nail. The propaganda spouted everyday affects people. You speak of religion, well this is another religion.

Definitely gonna wanna go for remedial reading. I posted nothing about "religion" either.

Religion/Constitution. Know the difference.

 

[22lcidw]

Such a Supremacy Document Guarantees Oligarchic Tyranny

The press, TV, and even public demonstrations have distorted the right of free expression by practically monopolizing it and intimidating others into not participating. The same goes for all other rights granted by the elitist Constitution.

Absolute bullshit. There ain't nothing "elitist" about a Constitution founded on the principle "all men are created equal". That is the literal OPPOSITE of elitist.

Nobody is excluded from free speech per the 1A. And further, the Constitution doesn't "grant" rights; it restricts the government from ungranting rights which are held to be pre-existing conditions. Which is exactly why the elitist Orange Asshole *cannot* do anything about satire, despite however much diaper rash he spews in his infantile tantrums.

When I see Congress, both the House and Senate I see several right wing radio and TV hosts some scribes sitting in the seats withprogressive socialists getting 95% of the rest entertainers and TV hosts sitting in the rest. So the right gets a little over 26 seats and the progressive socialists get 509 total seats. See the disparity. And I am being kind.

All I see there is incoherency. NONE of that addresses my post at all.

That post I typed hits it on the nail. The propaganda spouted everyday affects people. You speak of religion, well this is another religion.

Definitely gonna wanna go for remedial reading. I posted nothing about "religion" either.

Religion/Constitution. Know the difference.

This is related. In today's world. Much of our population gets its political education from the TV/entertainers and many college graduates are not that knowledgeable about policies. You don't have to know everything and there are people on this forum who do know a lot. But there are many who know little or nothing. Trump's policies are not complicated and benefit most all of us to degree. Imagine if a compatible extreme right wing conservative was in power to give you a taste of your own medicine.

 

[Pogo]

Absolute bullshit. There ain't nothing "elitist" about a Constitution founded on the principle "all men are created equal". That is the literal OPPOSITE of elitist.

Nobody is excluded from free speech per the 1A. And further, the Constitution doesn't "grant" rights; it restricts the government from ungranting rights which are held to be pre-existing conditions. Which is exactly why the elitist Orange Asshole *cannot* do anything about satire, despite however much diaper rash he spews in his infantile tantrums.

When I see Congress, both the House and Senate I see several right wing radio and TV hosts some scribes sitting in the seats withprogressive socialists getting 95% of the rest entertainers and TV hosts sitting in the rest. So the right gets a little over 26 seats and the progressive socialists get 509 total seats. See the disparity. And I am being kind.

All I see there is incoherency. NONE of that addresses my post at all.

That post I typed hits it on the nail. The propaganda spouted everyday affects people. You speak of religion, well this is another religion.

Definitely gonna wanna go for remedial reading. I posted nothing about "religion" either.

Religion/Constitution. Know the difference.

This is related. In today's world. Much of our population gets its political education from the TV/entertainers and many college graduates are not that knowledgeable about policies. You don't have to know everything and there are people on this forum who do know a lot. But there are many who know little or nothing. Trump's policies are not complicated and benefit most all of us to degree. Imagine if a compatible extreme right wing conservative was in power to give you a taste of your own medicine.

Third post in a row rambling lost through the weeds bearing no relevance to the post quoted at all.

Time to go sleep it off. That's strike three.