I'm always amazed how when it comes to Trump, no imagination is allowed, but if it's about Hillary/Obama, any wild suppositions go.Wasn't it the obama State Dept. that let her in in the first place. After she had been denied entry on a prior attempt?
Here's more detail:
How did Russian lawyer Veselnitskaya get into U.S. for Trump Tower...
Yes. It seems more and more that an obama acolyte sent her in as a plant.
Uhmmm, a rather simplistic manner of interpreting the totality of my link. But you know, there was also Preet Bharara who Rump had asked to stay on and then summarily crap-canned when he found out Preet was looking into himself, Natalia and Russia.![]()
We don't know why trump removed preet. All we have are what the media chooses to tell us and as we have seen their reporting has been less than accurate.
Interesting how that works.
Oh, I find it quite the opposite. ANY ridiculous claim can be made about trump, but you had better not go after hillary for doing the same things that trump is accused of. And provably so. The cognitive dissonance is on the progressive side. I know trump is a liar. However, his lies only seem to hurt him. obummer told lie after lie after lie. But his lies HURT real people. You all ignore his lies, and instead go after trump.
I won't even begin to mention the lies of hillary. They are so numerous as to be astonishing in both their scope, and their harm to this country.