g5000
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2011
- 125,228
- 68,948
- 2,605
Who says I support it, dumbass?
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Trump: TPP is a bad, bad deal
- Thread starter ScreamingEagle
- Start date
Kosh
Quick Look Over There!
This treaty has been in the works for ten years. That doesn't even approach "shoving it down our throats".I think that should tell you something. Another, you have to pass it to see what's in it.OK, how does he know what's in the treaty? He doesn't have access.
I realize the guy is flavor of the week, and he is driving moonbats apeshit (well more apeshit than they usually are), but he's not a good candidate. He's just using this issue for populartity because what little is known about the treaty isn't popular.
Even Peloosy won't play that card again. If what little is known about the treaty is unpopular, why is your president trying to shove it down our throats?
Trump is the first candidate I've seen in years that is a patriotic American.
Dems reject Obama s key trade proposal in House vote - CNNPolitics.com
Even the Democrats are against this, so does that mean the Democrats now hate Obama?
Kosh
Quick Look Over There!
Who says I support it, dumbass?No, you gave a bumper sticker answer without any substance whatsover. A throwaway phrase you are parroting, without a shred of evidence to support it.I have seen open admissions by brainless rubes they oppose the TPP just because Obama supports it.fascinating how you think all Americans have borg-like thinking..but then you are a leftie...
i for one am against multi-national corporate elites and their political comrades of either party subverting American sovereignty...
it's no wonder this deal has been carried out in secret...
I can't help noticing you have not explained why YOU oppose it.
Please take some time and explain to everyone why the TPP is so bad. Thanks ahead of time.
(replay Jeopardy! theme)
talk about brainless rubes....i just gave you one major deal-breaking reason....
And guess what? If the US willingly signs a treaty, that is not "subverting American sovereignty." Sorry about that.
Please explain what you believe undermines American sovereignty, bumper sticker boi.
You can't explain a single detail about what is wrong with it. You are a mimic. And a poor one at that.
"Because Obama".
And yet you support this (being a far left drone) because of Obama..
Oh so you must have got the update where even the Democrats are against it now.
Based on your logic that you have used they also must hate Obama..
- Banned
- #24
I think that should tell you something. Another, you have to pass it to see what's in it.
Even Peloosy won't play that card again. If what little is known about the treaty is unpopular, why is your president trying to shove it down our throats?
Trump is the first candidate I've seen in years that is a patriotic American.
For me, the jury is still out on Trump. I'll perhaps take him seriously after a few debates and see if it isn't just a publicity stunt, but as of now I'm only impressed by how insane the moonbat reaction has been. Their loathing gives him credibilty by itself.
g5000
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2011
- 125,228
- 68,948
- 2,605
I don't oppose something for hack partisan reasons. Nor do I support anything for hack partisan reasons. If you haven't figured that much out about me by now, then you are more retarded than I thought!Who says I support it, dumbass?No, you gave a bumper sticker answer without any substance whatsover. A throwaway phrase you are parroting, without a shred of evidence to support it.I have seen open admissions by brainless rubes they oppose the TPP just because Obama supports it.
I can't help noticing you have not explained why YOU oppose it.
Please take some time and explain to everyone why the TPP is so bad. Thanks ahead of time.
(replay Jeopardy! theme)
talk about brainless rubes....i just gave you one major deal-breaking reason....
And guess what? If the US willingly signs a treaty, that is not "subverting American sovereignty." Sorry about that.
Please explain what you believe undermines American sovereignty, bumper sticker boi.
You can't explain a single detail about what is wrong with it. You are a mimic. And a poor one at that.
"Because Obama".
And yet you support this (being a far left drone) because of Obama..
Oh so you must have got the update where even the Democrats are against it now.
Based on your logic that you have used they also must hate Obama..
Kosh
Quick Look Over There!
I don't oppose something for hack partisan reasons. Nor do I support anything for hack partisan reasons. If you haven't figured that much out about me by now, then you are more retarded than I thought!Who says I support it, dumbass?No, you gave a bumper sticker answer without any substance whatsover. A throwaway phrase you are parroting, without a shred of evidence to support it.talk about brainless rubes....i just gave you one major deal-breaking reason....
And guess what? If the US willingly signs a treaty, that is not "subverting American sovereignty." Sorry about that.
Please explain what you believe undermines American sovereignty, bumper sticker boi.
You can't explain a single detail about what is wrong with it. You are a mimic. And a poor one at that.
"Because Obama".
And yet you support this (being a far left drone) because of Obama..
Oh so you must have got the update where even the Democrats are against it now.
Based on your logic that you have used they also must hate Obama..
Yes you do far left drone!
So now you going to admit that this is a bad deal?
- Banned
- #27
Dems reject Obama s key trade proposal in House vote - CNNPolitics.com
Even the Democrats are against this, so does that mean the Democrats now hate Obama?
Just the white ones.
I don't oppose something for hack partisan reasons. Nor do I support anything for hack partisan reasons. If you haven't figured that much out about me by now, then you are more retarded than I thought!Who says I support it, dumbass?No, you gave a bumper sticker answer without any substance whatsover. A throwaway phrase you are parroting, without a shred of evidence to support it.talk about brainless rubes....i just gave you one major deal-breaking reason....
And guess what? If the US willingly signs a treaty, that is not "subverting American sovereignty." Sorry about that.
Please explain what you believe undermines American sovereignty, bumper sticker boi.
You can't explain a single detail about what is wrong with it. You are a mimic. And a poor one at that.
"Because Obama".
And yet you support this (being a far left drone) because of Obama..
Oh so you must have got the update where even the Democrats are against it now.
Based on your logic that you have used they also must hate Obama..
They're 3 pages in and they still haven't said anything of actual substance.
The loss of sovereignty? ALL TREATIES involve some loss of sovereignty. That is why they are call treaties...
Under that presumption they would not have signed any of these:
- Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948)
- International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (1965)
- International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966)
- International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966)
- Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979)
- United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (1982)
- Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989)
- Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (1996)
- International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism (1999)
- Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006)
I am like g5000 waiting for our nay sayers to explain to us the advantages and dis-advantages of the TTP.
Kosh
Quick Look Over There!
I don't oppose something for hack partisan reasons. Nor do I support anything for hack partisan reasons. If you haven't figured that much out about me by now, then you are more retarded than I thought!Who says I support it, dumbass?No, you gave a bumper sticker answer without any substance whatsover. A throwaway phrase you are parroting, without a shred of evidence to support it.
And guess what? If the US willingly signs a treaty, that is not "subverting American sovereignty." Sorry about that.
Please explain what you believe undermines American sovereignty, bumper sticker boi.
You can't explain a single detail about what is wrong with it. You are a mimic. And a poor one at that.
"Because Obama".
And yet you support this (being a far left drone) because of Obama..
Oh so you must have got the update where even the Democrats are against it now.
Based on your logic that you have used they also must hate Obama..
They're 3 pages in and they still haven't said anything of actual substance.
The loss of sovereignty? ALL TREATIES involve some loss of sovereignty. That is why they are call treaties...
Under that presumption they would not have signed any of these:
Add in Human rights, Geneva convention....
- Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948)
- International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (1965)
- International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966)
- International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966)
- Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979)
- United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (1982)
- Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989)
- Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (1996)
- International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism (1999)
- Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006)
I am like g5000 waiting for our nay sayers to explain to us the advantages and dis-advantages of the TTP.
See one far left drone backing another far left drone, even though their own (the Democrats) have rejected..
I guess they all hate Obama..
Let us see if these two drones can explain why it would be good...
I don't oppose something for hack partisan reasons. Nor do I support anything for hack partisan reasons. If you haven't figured that much out about me by now, then you are more retarded than I thought!Who says I support it, dumbass?And yet you support this (being a far left drone) because of Obama..
Oh so you must have got the update where even the Democrats are against it now.
Based on your logic that you have used they also must hate Obama..
They're 3 pages in and they still haven't said anything of actual substance.
The loss of sovereignty? ALL TREATIES involve some loss of sovereignty. That is why they are call treaties...
Under that presumption they would not have signed any of these:
Add in Human rights, Geneva convention....
- Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948)
- International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (1965)
- International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966)
- International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966)
- Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979)
- United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (1982)
- Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989)
- Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (1996)
- International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism (1999)
- Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006)
I am like g5000 waiting for our nay sayers to explain to us the advantages and dis-advantages of the TTP.
See one far left drone backing another far left drone, even though their own (the Democrats) have rejected..
I guess they all hate Obama..
Let us see if these two drones can explain why it would be good...
Kosh,
We are actually trying to make this non partisan... We are asking the question what do you find specifically objectionable in the deal and what parts you like?
Please lay off the YOU ARE BLUE TEAM, WE ARE RED TEAM, RED TEAM HATES BLUE TEAM...
Kosh
Quick Look Over There!
I don't oppose something for hack partisan reasons. Nor do I support anything for hack partisan reasons. If you haven't figured that much out about me by now, then you are more retarded than I thought!Who says I support it, dumbass?
Oh so you must have got the update where even the Democrats are against it now.
Based on your logic that you have used they also must hate Obama..
They're 3 pages in and they still haven't said anything of actual substance.
The loss of sovereignty? ALL TREATIES involve some loss of sovereignty. That is why they are call treaties...
Under that presumption they would not have signed any of these:
Add in Human rights, Geneva convention....
- Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948)
- International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (1965)
- International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966)
- International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966)
- Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979)
- United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (1982)
- Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989)
- Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (1996)
- International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism (1999)
- Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006)
I am like g5000 waiting for our nay sayers to explain to us the advantages and dis-advantages of the TTP.
See one far left drone backing another far left drone, even though their own (the Democrats) have rejected..
I guess they all hate Obama..
Let us see if these two drones can explain why it would be good...
Kosh,
We are actually trying to make this non partisan... We are asking the question what do you find specifically objectionable in the deal and what parts you like?
Please lay off the YOU ARE BLUE TEAM, WE ARE RED TEAM, RED TEAM HATES BLUE TEAM...
Wrong as always far left drone..
The one poster blazed in and claimed that all that were against this was because of Obama, so now that the Democrats are against so should the drones or have the updates not been sent out yet?
Still yet the far left drones could not explain why anyone should be for this..
The Irish Ram
LITTLE GIRL / Ram Tough
This has been in the works for ten years and never gained a foothold because it is bad for America, just like NAFTA was. Until Obama saw yet another way to weaken the country and redistribute our wealth elsewhere.
Gun control has been in the U.N. works for a long time too, yet no other president was willing to sign on. Until Obama saw yet another way to weaken the Constitution.
How do you know what parts you like??? You have to sign it to find out what's in it.
There is a reason for that......
Gun control has been in the U.N. works for a long time too, yet no other president was willing to sign on. Until Obama saw yet another way to weaken the Constitution.
How do you know what parts you like??? You have to sign it to find out what's in it.
There is a reason for that......
ScreamingEagle
Gold Member
- Jul 5, 2004
- 13,399
- 1,707
- 245
- Thread starter
- #33
I don't oppose something for hack partisan reasons. Nor do I support anything for hack partisan reasons. If you haven't figured that much out about me by now, then you are more retarded than I thought!Who says I support it, dumbass?No, you gave a bumper sticker answer without any substance whatsover. A throwaway phrase you are parroting, without a shred of evidence to support it.
And guess what? If the US willingly signs a treaty, that is not "subverting American sovereignty." Sorry about that.
Please explain what you believe undermines American sovereignty, bumper sticker boi.
You can't explain a single detail about what is wrong with it. You are a mimic. And a poor one at that.
"Because Obama".
And yet you support this (being a far left drone) because of Obama..
Oh so you must have got the update where even the Democrats are against it now.
Based on your logic that you have used they also must hate Obama..
They're 3 pages in and they still haven't said anything of actual substance.
The loss of sovereignty? ALL TREATIES involve some loss of sovereignty. That is why they are call treaties...
Under that presumption they would not have signed any of these:
Add in Human rights, Geneva convention....
- Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948)
- International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (1965)
- International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966)
- International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966)
- Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979)
- United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (1982)
- Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989)
- Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (1996)
- International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism (1999)
- Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006)
I am like g5000 waiting for our nay sayers to explain to us the advantages and dis-advantages of the TTP.
what good will this 'free' trade bill do for small and medium businesses in the USA....and by extension for the American people...the middle class....?
basically nothing that's what.....this deal was created by and for large multi-national corporations and for socialist politicos....crony capitalism at its finest...
Last edited:
I don't oppose something for hack partisan reasons. Nor do I support anything for hack partisan reasons. If you haven't figured that much out about me by now, then you are more retarded than I thought!Who says I support it, dumbass?And yet you support this (being a far left drone) because of Obama..
Oh so you must have got the update where even the Democrats are against it now.
Based on your logic that you have used they also must hate Obama..
They're 3 pages in and they still haven't said anything of actual substance.
The loss of sovereignty? ALL TREATIES involve some loss of sovereignty. That is why they are call treaties...
Under that presumption they would not have signed any of these:
Add in Human rights, Geneva convention....
- Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948)
- International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (1965)
- International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966)
- International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966)
- Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979)
- United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (1982)
- Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989)
- Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (1996)
- International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism (1999)
- Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006)
I am like g5000 waiting for our nay sayers to explain to us the advantages and dis-advantages of the TTP.
what good will this 'free' trade bill do for small and medium businesses in the USA....and by extension for the American people...the middle class....?
basically nothing that's what.....this deal was created by and for large multi-national corporations and for socialist politicos....crony capitalism at its finest...
Specifics...
What part of the deal? Show how it benefits "socialist politicos" over "small and medium businesses "... What parts of the deal?
I could repeat that...
This deal is bad for innocent schoolgirls and good for drug dealing murders.
Republicans seem to forget that Abraham Lincoln was ardently in favor of high tariffs and the protection of American industry from foreign competition.
How on earth are American factories supposed to compete against foreign factories that pay their workers a fraction of what our workers make, that don't have to worry about health and safety standards, that get taxed at a lower corporate income tax rate, etc., etc.?
How on earth are American factories supposed to compete against foreign factories that pay their workers a fraction of what our workers make, that don't have to worry about health and safety standards, that get taxed at a lower corporate income tax rate, etc., etc.?
I don't oppose something for hack partisan reasons. Nor do I support anything for hack partisan reasons. If you haven't figured that much out about me by now, then you are more retarded than I thought!Oh so you must have got the update where even the Democrats are against it now.
Based on your logic that you have used they also must hate Obama..
They're 3 pages in and they still haven't said anything of actual substance.
The loss of sovereignty? ALL TREATIES involve some loss of sovereignty. That is why they are call treaties...
Under that presumption they would not have signed any of these:
Add in Human rights, Geneva convention....
- Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948)
- International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (1965)
- International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966)
- International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966)
- Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979)
- United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (1982)
- Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989)
- Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (1996)
- International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism (1999)
- Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006)
I am like g5000 waiting for our nay sayers to explain to us the advantages and dis-advantages of the TTP.
See one far left drone backing another far left drone, even though their own (the Democrats) have rejected..
I guess they all hate Obama..
Let us see if these two drones can explain why it would be good...
Kosh,
We are actually trying to make this non partisan... We are asking the question what do you find specifically objectionable in the deal and what parts you like?
Please lay off the YOU ARE BLUE TEAM, WE ARE RED TEAM, RED TEAM HATES BLUE TEAM...
Wrong as always far left drone..
The one poster blazed in and claimed that all that were against this was because of Obama, so now that the Democrats are against so should the drones or have the updates not been sent out yet?
Still yet the far left drones could not explain why anyone should be for this..
If you bothered to read my post you would notice that I have not even commented about the deal. But it must be noticed that a good few on this board object to Obama.
Kosh
Quick Look Over There!
I don't oppose something for hack partisan reasons. Nor do I support anything for hack partisan reasons. If you haven't figured that much out about me by now, then you are more retarded than I thought!
They're 3 pages in and they still haven't said anything of actual substance.
The loss of sovereignty? ALL TREATIES involve some loss of sovereignty. That is why they are call treaties...
Under that presumption they would not have signed any of these:
Add in Human rights, Geneva convention....
- Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948)
- International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (1965)
- International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966)
- International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966)
- Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979)
- United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (1982)
- Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989)
- Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (1996)
- International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism (1999)
- Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006)
I am like g5000 waiting for our nay sayers to explain to us the advantages and dis-advantages of the TTP.
See one far left drone backing another far left drone, even though their own (the Democrats) have rejected..
I guess they all hate Obama..
Let us see if these two drones can explain why it would be good...
Kosh,
We are actually trying to make this non partisan... We are asking the question what do you find specifically objectionable in the deal and what parts you like?
Please lay off the YOU ARE BLUE TEAM, WE ARE RED TEAM, RED TEAM HATES BLUE TEAM...
Wrong as always far left drone..
The one poster blazed in and claimed that all that were against this was because of Obama, so now that the Democrats are against so should the drones or have the updates not been sent out yet?
Still yet the far left drones could not explain why anyone should be for this..
If you bothered to read my post you would notice that I have not even commented about the deal. But it must be noticed that a good few on this board object to Obama.
Lots of far left drones still think Bush is president, but the far left will always make claims like "it is because they hate Obama".
How many of the far left hated Bush? or is that excused by the far left drones?
And many if not all of the far left hates Trump, so do you have a real point?
So is this a good deal or not?
What are the benefits? Any far left drone going to answer?
You going to back the Democrats who think this is a bad deal?
Similar threads
- Replies
- 147
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 65
- Views
- 750
- Replies
- 69
- Views
- 797
- Replies
- 15
- Views
- 210
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 3
- Views
- 8
- Replies
- 10
- Views
- 21
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8505
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 483
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-