Trump Trying To Buy White House - Clinton and Sanders Funded by Public to Represent The People

[C_Clayton_Jones]

you notice they never say anything when the Unions, George Soros, Now they have another Billionaire a radical environmentalist, and Foreigners ARE buying the Democrat party and white house

It's the Queen of the failed attempt to deflect, of the irrelevant, and the non sequitur.

 

[OKTexas]

Why aren't you providing data on all the candidates instead of cherry picking, doesn't the real data support your BS? Even Trump is getting money from small donors.

so you don't deny the facts?

One of the Democrats’ major structural advantages is the size of their small-donor bases. A staggering 650,000 individuals have given Sanders money already, while nearly 400,000 have donated to Clinton, her campaign said Thursday.​

All the data on all of the candidates would not negate the facts. You evidently did NOT read the linked article

sad,you sometimes show so much promise, and then you revert back

Actually I deny the relevance, Ted Cruz raised 4 million in 8 days with donations of $100 or less. Do the math, that's more than 40,000 donors, in 8 days, not months.

Ted Cruz, the Texas Republican senator, raised nearly $4 million in the eight days after he announced his presidential campaign, according to The Wall Street Journal. What’s important about that number is that almost all of it came in amounts of less than $100.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/03/u...early-fund-raising-means-and-doesnt.html?_r=0

 

[Stephanie]

that title is a DAMN lie. don't let them get away this BS

They've claiming that lie for years. Gawd knows all the Foreigners who has bought the Democrats, Starting back with Billy Clinton. Obama is even worse

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Why aren't you providing data on all the candidates instead of cherry picking, doesn't the real data support your BS? Even Trump is getting money from small donors.

so you don't deny the facts?

One of the Democrats’ major structural advantages is the size of their small-donor bases. A staggering 650,000 individuals have given Sanders money already, while nearly 400,000 have donated to Clinton, her campaign said Thursday.​

All the data on all of the candidates would not negate the facts. You evidently did NOT read the linked article

sad,you sometimes show so much promise, and then you revert back

Actually I deny the relevance, Ted Cruz raised 4 million in 8 days with donations of $100 or less. Do the math, that's more than 40,000 donors, in 8 days, not months.

Ted Cruz, the Texas Republican senator, raised nearly $4 million in the eight days after he announced his presidential campaign, according to The Wall Street Journal. What’s important about that number is that almost all of it came in amounts of less than $100.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/03/u...early-fund-raising-means-and-doesnt.html?_r=0

APRIL 2, 2015 "And if Mr. Cruz can continue his early small-dollar success, it strengthens his argument that he represents grass-roots conservatism better than a candidate with stronger ties to the Republican establishment, like Jeb Bush, the former Florida governor." - has he?

"Other GOP candidates trail behind: Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas ($12.2 million)" - he's not raising enough money anymore

In all, six Democratic candidates reported raising $123.2 million for their campaign committees so far this year, while 15 GOP candidates pulled in $143.5 million overall.

... In campaign money race, Democrats vastly outpacing Republicans

The totals raised on each side by the candidate-aligned super PACs are unclear, because they do not have to report their fundraising until Jan. 31. But by mid-year, GOP allied groups had raised $234 million and Democratic groups had pulled in $17 million.​

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Why aren't you providing data on all the candidates instead of cherry picking, doesn't the real data support your BS? Even Trump is getting money from small donors.

so you don't deny the facts?

One of the Democrats’ major structural advantages is the size of their small-donor bases. A staggering 650,000 individuals have given Sanders money already, while nearly 400,000 have donated to Clinton, her campaign said Thursday.​

All the data on all of the candidates would not negate the facts. You evidently did NOT read the linked article

sad,you sometimes show so much promise, and then you revert back

Actually I deny the relevance, Ted Cruz raised 4 million in 8 days with donations of $100 or less. Do the math, that's more than 40,000 donors, in 8 days, not months.

Ted Cruz, the Texas Republican senator, raised nearly $4 million in the eight days after he announced his presidential campaign, according to The Wall Street Journal. What’s important about that number is that almost all of it came in amounts of less than $100.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/03/u...early-fund-raising-means-and-doesnt.html?_r=0

APRIL 2, 2015 "And if Mr. Cruz can continue his early small-dollar success, it strengthens his argument that he represents grass-roots conservatism better than a candidate with stronger ties to the Republican establishment, like Jeb Bush, the former Florida governor." - has he?

"Other GOP candidates trail behind: Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas ($12.2 million)" - he's not raising enough money anymore

In all, six Democratic candidates reported raising $123.2 million for their campaign committees so far this year, while 15 GOP candidates pulled in $143.5 million overall.

... In campaign money race, Democrats vastly outpacing Republicans

The totals raised on each side by the candidate-aligned super PACs are unclear, because they do not have to report their fundraising until Jan. 31. But by mid-year, GOP allied groups had raised $234 million and Democratic groups had pulled in $17 million.​

 

[OKTexas]

Why aren't you providing data on all the candidates instead of cherry picking, doesn't the real data support your BS? Even Trump is getting money from small donors.

so you don't deny the facts?

One of the Democrats’ major structural advantages is the size of their small-donor bases. A staggering 650,000 individuals have given Sanders money already, while nearly 400,000 have donated to Clinton, her campaign said Thursday.​

All the data on all of the candidates would not negate the facts. You evidently did NOT read the linked article

sad,you sometimes show so much promise, and then you revert back

Actually I deny the relevance, Ted Cruz raised 4 million in 8 days with donations of $100 or less. Do the math, that's more than 40,000 donors, in 8 days, not months.

Ted Cruz, the Texas Republican senator, raised nearly $4 million in the eight days after he announced his presidential campaign, according to The Wall Street Journal. What’s important about that number is that almost all of it came in amounts of less than $100.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/03/u...early-fund-raising-means-and-doesnt.html?_r=0

APRIL 2, 2015 "And if Mr. Cruz can continue his early small-dollar success, it strengthens his argument that he represents grass-roots conservatism better than a candidate with stronger ties to the Republican establishment, like Jeb Bush, the former Florida governor." - has he?

"Other GOP candidates trail behind: Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas ($12.2 million)" - he's not raising enough money anymore

In all, six Democratic candidates reported raising $123.2 million for their campaign committees so far this year, while 15 GOP candidates pulled in $143.5 million overall.

... In campaign money race, Democrats vastly outpacing Republicans

The totals raised on each side by the candidate-aligned super PACs are unclear, because they do not have to report their fundraising until Jan. 31. But by mid-year, GOP allied groups had raised $234 million and Democratic groups had pulled in $17 million.​

So the GOP has raised more in total, it's just spread out more, kind of blows the theory that dems are out pacing the GOP doesn't it. As the field consolidates the individual candidates will increase their share. The monies originally earmarked for Perry, Walker and Jindal will go elsewhere.

Also you might note that 70% of Trumps donations are coming from small donors.

Small-dollar donors power insurgent candidates from both parties

 

[eagle1462010]

 

[eagle1462010]

Sen. Hillary Clinton: Campaign Finance/Money - Top Donors - Senator Career | OpenSecrets

The individuals donating for the Hildabeast, are just funneling her money and hiding it by saying individuals working for them aren't the same thing.

Liberals bragging about BS here.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Why aren't you providing data on all the candidates instead of cherry picking, doesn't the real data support your BS? Even Trump is getting money from small donors.

so you don't deny the facts?

One of the Democrats’ major structural advantages is the size of their small-donor bases. A staggering 650,000 individuals have given Sanders money already, while nearly 400,000 have donated to Clinton, her campaign said Thursday.​

All the data on all of the candidates would not negate the facts. You evidently did NOT read the linked article

sad,you sometimes show so much promise, and then you revert back

Actually I deny the relevance, Ted Cruz raised 4 million in 8 days with donations of $100 or less. Do the math, that's more than 40,000 donors, in 8 days, not months.

Ted Cruz, the Texas Republican senator, raised nearly $4 million in the eight days after he announced his presidential campaign, according to The Wall Street Journal. What’s important about that number is that almost all of it came in amounts of less than $100.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/03/u...early-fund-raising-means-and-doesnt.html?_r=0

APRIL 2, 2015 "And if Mr. Cruz can continue his early small-dollar success, it strengthens his argument that he represents grass-roots conservatism better than a candidate with stronger ties to the Republican establishment, like Jeb Bush, the former Florida governor." - has he?

"Other GOP candidates trail behind: Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas ($12.2 million)" - he's not raising enough money anymore

In all, six Democratic candidates reported raising $123.2 million for their campaign committees so far this year, while 15 GOP candidates pulled in $143.5 million overall.

... In campaign money race, Democrats vastly outpacing Republicans

The totals raised on each side by the candidate-aligned super PACs are unclear, because they do not have to report their fundraising until Jan. 31. But by mid-year, GOP allied groups had raised $234 million and Democratic groups had pulled in $17 million.​

So the GOP has raised more in total, it's just spread out more, kind of blows the theory that dems are out pacing the GOP doesn't it. As the field consolidates the individual candidates will increase their share. The monies originally earmarked for Perry, Walker and Jindal will go elsewhere.

Also you might note that 70% of Trumps donations are coming from small donors.

Small-dollar donors power insurgent candidates from both parties

Very first paragraph of the article you did not read

The Democratic presidential contenders dramatically outpaced their Republican counterparts in the race for campaign cash last quarter, spotlighting how the parties are taking divergent paths in their pursuit of 2016 funding.​

 

[eagle1462010]

Sunlight Foundation

A joint analysis released today by the Sunlight Foundation and the Center for Responsive Politics found that in the 2014 elections, 31,976 people — the one percent of the one percent of the American population — accounted for $1.18 billion in disclosed federal political contributions.

Of those 31,976, a small subset — barely five dozen — earned the (even more) rarefied distinction of giving more than $1 million each. And just three individuals contributed more than $10 million apiece.

“Once again, the data show that just a fraction of people wield a disproportionate amount of influence in our elections,” said Sunlight Foundation President Chris Gates. “That the one percent of the one percent of Americans are contributing $1.18 billion in campaigns is staggering, and it’s only the tip of the iceberg. There is even more money changing hands during the election that is not disclosed to the public.”

The one percent of the one percent accounted for more than $1 out of every $4 contributed to PACs, super PACs, parties and candidates. Members of the group contributed at least $8,800, a bit less than in prior cycles. The median contribution was $14,750, while the biggest donor — San Francisco hedge fund manager and environmental advocate Tom Steyer — gave more than $73 million.

Other top donors include Fred Eychaner, Sheldon Adelson and Charles Koch. Contributions from the top 10 donors totaled more than $161 million. They’re among the 63 donors who gave more than $1 million individually.

"As an elite group of political benefactors – many of them from the financial sector – provides a larger share of the funds, we have to ask ourselves whether their return on investment is also growing, and what that means," said Center for Responsive Politics Executive Director Sheila Krumholz. "Do we have a system that represents all constituents equally or one that favors those picking up the tab?"

Using CRP data, the Sunlight Foundation first reported on the influence of the one percent of the one percent in the 2010 election cycle, and followed up with further analysis after the 2012 presidential election cycle. During the 2012 election, 31,385 made up the one percent of the one percent.

Among the new names this past cycle is Jeremy Grantham, a Boston investor and philanthropist known for his support of environmental causes, who donated $1.65 million to the League of Conservation Voters super PAC. The contribution puts him at No. 33 of the 31,976.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Sunlight Foundation

...

please stop hijacking this thread.

 

[eagle1462010]

ignore the rants of a pride wounded eagle troll

Don't like the data do you.......................

The individuals funding are nothing more than the companies funding their favorite candidate anyway. Done so by the individuals working for them via proxy. Your thread is a JOKE. Trump BUYING THE WH..................LOL..................The Media is eating his speeches up for ratings and he's hardly spent any money.

Bragging about how INDIVIDUALS are donating Liberal is a JOKE as well. They are the companies..............one in the same..............

Your thread is

 

[eagle1462010]

Sunlight Foundation

...

please stop hijacking this thread.

In other words, stop reporting campaign financing data..............It makes my thread suck.

 

[OKTexas]

Why aren't you providing data on all the candidates instead of cherry picking, doesn't the real data support your BS? Even Trump is getting money from small donors.

so you don't deny the facts?

One of the Democrats’ major structural advantages is the size of their small-donor bases. A staggering 650,000 individuals have given Sanders money already, while nearly 400,000 have donated to Clinton, her campaign said Thursday.​

All the data on all of the candidates would not negate the facts. You evidently did NOT read the linked article

sad,you sometimes show so much promise, and then you revert back

Actually I deny the relevance, Ted Cruz raised 4 million in 8 days with donations of $100 or less. Do the math, that's more than 40,000 donors, in 8 days, not months.

Ted Cruz, the Texas Republican senator, raised nearly $4 million in the eight days after he announced his presidential campaign, according to The Wall Street Journal. What’s important about that number is that almost all of it came in amounts of less than $100.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/03/u...early-fund-raising-means-and-doesnt.html?_r=0

APRIL 2, 2015 "And if Mr. Cruz can continue his early small-dollar success, it strengthens his argument that he represents grass-roots conservatism better than a candidate with stronger ties to the Republican establishment, like Jeb Bush, the former Florida governor." - has he?

"Other GOP candidates trail behind: Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas ($12.2 million)" - he's not raising enough money anymore

In all, six Democratic candidates reported raising $123.2 million for their campaign committees so far this year, while 15 GOP candidates pulled in $143.5 million overall.

... In campaign money race, Democrats vastly outpacing Republicans

The totals raised on each side by the candidate-aligned super PACs are unclear, because they do not have to report their fundraising until Jan. 31. But by mid-year, GOP allied groups had raised $234 million and Democratic groups had pulled in $17 million.​

So the GOP has raised more in total, it's just spread out more, kind of blows the theory that dems are out pacing the GOP doesn't it. As the field consolidates the individual candidates will increase their share. The monies originally earmarked for Perry, Walker and Jindal will go elsewhere.

Also you might note that 70% of Trumps donations are coming from small donors.

Small-dollar donors power insurgent candidates from both parties

Very first paragraph of the article you did not read

The Democratic presidential contenders dramatically outpaced their Republican counterparts in the race for campaign cash last quarter, spotlighting how the parties are taking divergent paths in their pursuit of 2016 funding.​

Of course the regressivecrats are doing better per candidate, there's fewer of them. Can the hildabeast say 70% of her donations come from small donors like Trump?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

so you don't deny the facts?

One of the Democrats’ major structural advantages is the size of their small-donor bases. A staggering 650,000 individuals have given Sanders money already, while nearly 400,000 have donated to Clinton, her campaign said Thursday.​

All the data on all of the candidates would not negate the facts. You evidently did NOT read the linked article

sad,you sometimes show so much promise, and then you revert back

Actually I deny the relevance, Ted Cruz raised 4 million in 8 days with donations of $100 or less. Do the math, that's more than 40,000 donors, in 8 days, not months.

Ted Cruz, the Texas Republican senator, raised nearly $4 million in the eight days after he announced his presidential campaign, according to The Wall Street Journal. What’s important about that number is that almost all of it came in amounts of less than $100.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/03/u...early-fund-raising-means-and-doesnt.html?_r=0

APRIL 2, 2015 "And if Mr. Cruz can continue his early small-dollar success, it strengthens his argument that he represents grass-roots conservatism better than a candidate with stronger ties to the Republican establishment, like Jeb Bush, the former Florida governor." - has he?

"Other GOP candidates trail behind: Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas ($12.2 million)" - he's not raising enough money anymore

In all, six Democratic candidates reported raising $123.2 million for their campaign committees so far this year, while 15 GOP candidates pulled in $143.5 million overall.

... In campaign money race, Democrats vastly outpacing Republicans

The totals raised on each side by the candidate-aligned super PACs are unclear, because they do not have to report their fundraising until Jan. 31. But by mid-year, GOP allied groups had raised $234 million and Democratic groups had pulled in $17 million.​

So the GOP has raised more in total, it's just spread out more, kind of blows the theory that dems are out pacing the GOP doesn't it. As the field consolidates the individual candidates will increase their share. The monies originally earmarked for Perry, Walker and Jindal will go elsewhere.

Also you might note that 70% of Trumps donations are coming from small donors.

Small-dollar donors power insurgent candidates from both parties

Very first paragraph of the article you did not read

The Democratic presidential contenders dramatically outpaced their Republican counterparts in the race for campaign cash last quarter, spotlighting how the parties are taking divergent paths in their pursuit of 2016 funding.​

Of course the regressivecrats are doing better per candidate, there's fewer of them. Can the hildabeast say 70% of her donations come from small donors like Trump?

now we're back to childish name calling?

ok

 

[Stephanie]

Sorry Jim, it was only Hillary and Sanders trying to buy the white house.

snip:
Jim Webb: CNN Debate Was ‘Rigged’ For Clinton And Sanders [VIDEO]


all of it here:
dailycaller.com ...

 

[Kosh]

Trump Trying To Buy White House - Clinton and Sanders Funded by Public to Represent The People

Trump Trying To Buy White House: It's Not For Sale and You Can't Make A Deal

In campaign money race, Democrats vastly outpacing Republicans

One of the Democrats’ major structural advantages is the size of their small-donor bases. A staggering 650,000 individuals have given Sanders money already, while nearly 400,000 have donated to Clinton, her campaign said Thursday.

In campaign money race, Democrats vastly outpacing Republicans​

Oh my these irony impaired far left drones and their comments!

Let us see Trump uses his own money and the far left uses other peoples money..

Average Net Worth: $32,015,004* of Hilary Clinton who the far left supports!

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

BoT

Trump Trying To Buy White House - Clinton and Sanders Funded by Public to Represent The People

Trump Trying To Buy White House: It's Not For Sale and You Can't Make A Deal

In campaign money race, Democrats vastly outpacing Republicans

One of the Democrats’ major structural advantages is the size of their small-donor bases. A staggering 650,000 individuals have given Sanders money already, while nearly 400,000 have donated to Clinton, her campaign said Thursday.

In campaign money race, Democrats vastly outpacing Republicans​

 

[eagle1462010]

BoT

Trump Trying To Buy White House - Clinton and Sanders Funded by Public to Represent The People

Trump Trying To Buy White House: It's Not For Sale and You Can't Make A Deal

In campaign money race, Democrats vastly outpacing Republicans

One of the Democrats’ major structural advantages is the size of their small-donor bases. A staggering 650,000 individuals have given Sanders money already, while nearly 400,000 have donated to Clinton, her campaign said Thursday.

In campaign money race, Democrats vastly outpacing Republicans​

aka It's only on topic if you agree with Dante.....................LOL

I've posted data.............your thread is Horse Hockey................and you can't refute the data I've posted...........

BOT...............

 

[Kosh]

BoT

Trump Trying To Buy White House - Clinton and Sanders Funded by Public to Represent The People

Trump Trying To Buy White House: It's Not For Sale and You Can't Make A Deal

In campaign money race, Democrats vastly outpacing Republicans

One of the Democrats’ major structural advantages is the size of their small-donor bases. A staggering 650,000 individuals have given Sanders money already, while nearly 400,000 have donated to Clinton, her campaign said Thursday.

In campaign money race, Democrats vastly outpacing Republicans​

Yes a far left drone believing a far left drone blog site..