Trump's BS boast he created the greatest economy in history

Data shows what Trump his laid claim to started before he even showed up and as for being the 'greatest in history' again, data shows other periods were better...US economy under Trump: The greatest ever?
You and the BBC Libtrard Journos are idiots.

Trump attained the highest rate of employment, in total numbers and as a percent of the working population, with the highest GDP numbers and highest Market levels as well.

Your idiots at the BuberBunglerCrapathon were talking rate of growth, and Trump still beats any one else with unadjusted tweaked numbers.

So to summarize your post: WAAAAA WAAAAAA Trump is a Meany! ORANGE MAN BAD!
"Trump attained the highest rate of employment, in total numbers and as a percent of the working population, with the highest GDP numbers and highest Market levels as well."

What blithering idiocy.

We had a record number of employment under Obama too. We had record highs in the market under Obama too. We had a record high percentage of employment under Clinton.

And highest GDP numbers under Impeached Trump? That claim proves you're delirious. Impeached Trump never had a year above 3%. He never had a quarter above 3.5%, the only president to achieve that.

Seriously, why are you pretending to care?
I care when I see schmucks lie like that.
I presume no business wants to invest in your area.
Regions where police can do their job and not be convicted by a jury are booming.
LOL

What the fuck does that have to do with national unemployment and GDP??
I'll pretend you're not as stupid as that post.
There are locales where, due to crime and high insurance rates, no one wants to start a business and where businesses have left
Dumbfuck, we're not taking about "locales." We're taking about the nation. National employment. National GDP. If you can’t keep up, stay out.
Dumbfuck...National employment is based on totaling up locales and the most highly populated locales are where Liberal scum commit the most violent crimes.
GDP has zero to do with the individual.
GDP is a Rush Limbaugh, rolled-up statistic.
When GW, who you hated because of the letter R, was president, GDP was skyrocketing because Wall Street was off-shoring jobs.

By the way, did I mention you're a dishonest idiot?
Dumbfuck, I don't give a shit how they calculate it. No one is talking about your bumfuck locale. We're talking about national employment and national GDP.

If you wanna talk about something else, start your own thread on it and maybe someone will talk to you about it.

Why on Earth do you think your cognitive dissonance is my problem??
 
Data shows what Trump his laid claim to started before he even showed up and as for being the 'greatest in history' again, data shows other periods were better...US economy under Trump: The greatest ever?
You and the BBC Libtrard Journos are idiots.

Trump attained the highest rate of employment, in total numbers and as a percent of the working population, with the highest GDP numbers and highest Market levels as well.

Your idiots at the BuberBunglerCrapathon were talking rate of growth, and Trump still beats any one else with unadjusted tweaked numbers.

So to summarize your post: WAAAAA WAAAAAA Trump is a Meany! ORANGE MAN BAD!
"Trump attained the highest rate of employment, in total numbers and as a percent of the working population, with the highest GDP numbers and highest Market levels as well."

What blithering idiocy.

We had a record number of employment under Obama too. We had record highs in the market under Obama too. We had a record high percentage of employment under Clinton.

And highest GDP numbers under Impeached Trump? That claim proves you're delirious. Impeached Trump never had a year above 3%. He never had a quarter above 3.5%, the only president to achieve that.

Seriously, why are you pretending to care?
I care when I see schmucks lie like that.


Is there any level of economic activity, that it would cause you to support Trump, or even just admit that he did a good job?
I've already admitted he had done a good job. Unfortunately, that came to a crashing halt this year.


I am shocked to hear you say that. utterly shocked.

Well, in that case, the covid lockdowns are obviously the cause of the economic downturn. He put lives ahead of the economy.

I take it you are pushing him to end the lockdowns then?
The lock downs are far from the only cause. As far as pushing for an end to them, I'd keep them in place until either there's a vaccine or until the virus subsides on its own.


1. Agreed. The economic cycle was overdue for a down swing. But like you said, Trump had done a good job.

2. Well, the lockdowns are certainly going to inhibit any attempt at restarting the economy so, make you choice and take your lumps, but don't blame Trump if the cause is the lockdown you support.
Yes, they do inhibit the economy, but so did his stimulus, which kept people unemployed longer. So does people self-restricting going out even where there is no lock down.


So, really hard to judge his economic performance, in this period of his administration.

We can look at his earlier work, or we can look at other factors.


Giving him minuses for not having a good economy during a pandemic, seems unfair and unreasonable.


For the purposes of full disclosure, short term economic performance is not going to be a factor in my decision making.
Before the pandemic trump couldn’t hit 3% growth while running a trillion dollar deficit with really low interest rates. His performance is weak.
That's true but that's how it's been for 20 years now.
 
Data shows what Trump his laid claim to started before he even showed up and as for being the 'greatest in history' again, data shows other periods were better...US economy under Trump: The greatest ever?
You and the BBC Libtrard Journos are idiots.

Trump attained the highest rate of employment, in total numbers and as a percent of the working population, with the highest GDP numbers and highest Market levels as well.

Your idiots at the BuberBunglerCrapathon were talking rate of growth, and Trump still beats any one else with unadjusted tweaked numbers.

So to summarize your post: WAAAAA WAAAAAA Trump is a Meany! ORANGE MAN BAD!
"Trump attained the highest rate of employment, in total numbers and as a percent of the working population, with the highest GDP numbers and highest Market levels as well."

What blithering idiocy.

We had a record number of employment under Obama too. We had record highs in the market under Obama too. We had a record high percentage of employment under Clinton.

And highest GDP numbers under Impeached Trump? That claim proves you're delirious. Impeached Trump never had a year above 3%. He never had a quarter above 3.5%, the only president to achieve that.

Seriously, why are you pretending to care?
I care when I see schmucks lie like that.
I presume no business wants to invest in your area.
Regions where police can do their job and not be convicted by a jury are booming.
LOL

What the fuck does that have to do with national unemployment and GDP??
I'll pretend you're not as stupid as that post.
There are locales where, due to crime and high insurance rates, no one wants to start a business and where businesses have left
Dumbfuck, we're not taking about "locales." We're taking about the nation. National employment. National GDP. If you can’t keep up, stay out.
Dumbfuck...National employment is based on totaling up locales and the most highly populated locales are where Liberal scum commit the most violent crimes.
GDP has zero to do with the individual.
GDP is a Rush Limbaugh, rolled-up statistic.
When GW, who you hated because of the letter R, was president, GDP was skyrocketing because Wall Street was off-shoring jobs.

By the way, did I mention you're a dishonest idiot?
Dumbfuck, I don't give a shit how they calculate it. No one is talking about your bumfuck locale. We're talking about national employment and national GDP.

If you wanna talk about something else, start your own thread on it and maybe someone will talk to you about it.

Why on Earth do you think your cognitive dissonance is my problem??
Pathetic response, dishonest idiot.
If you don't want to be bitch slapped by facts that prove you're a dishonest idiot, don't post your usual stupidity.
 
Data shows what Trump his laid claim to started before he even showed up and as for being the 'greatest in history' again, data shows other periods were better...US economy under Trump: The greatest ever?
10% unemployment is not great.
Just ignore the pandemic, and just ignore the shut down of the economy that your ilk wanted, and yes it's at 10%, It is coming down nucely now
that the economy opened up. Get rid of the unemployment incentive and it will drop like a rock.

Nobody wanted a shut down dumb ass. It was required.

So if a shutdown was required, how do you blame Trump for the economic decline? Oh, that’s right.... you people are too busy blaming Trump for COVID-19 while giving China and the WHO a pass.

Well no. With a competent president, we would have had the proper PPE, and the shut down would have been effective and mostly over. Our half assed shutdown, and restarting too soon caused thousands of deaths that did not have to happen.
/----/ Yeah, we see how democRATs handle proper PPE:

On March 26, The Daily Wire published an article centering on the Obama administration’s role in using and allegedly failing to replenish the federal stockpile of N95 masks.

“The Obama administration significantly depleted the federal stockpile of N95 respirator masks to deal with the H1N1 influenza outbreak in 2009 and never rebuilt the stockpile despite calls to do so,” the piece begins.
And Trump was informed of the shortage at inauguration, and he didn't do anything about it.

Another leftist hypocrite who'd fine with Obama's shortfall but blames Trump for not fixing it.

And they talked about PPE's at the inauguration? WTF?
Trump had three years to replenish it. instead...


Another lie. The CDC budget went up every year under Trump. Next ...
He sure likes to spend. You seen that deficit?
Nancy bitches because it's not enough.
Trump even does handouts by executive order now.
Yeah, because it's not a big enough handout for Nan, and Chuckles.
So many bailouts. Remember the farmer bailout?
/---/ I remember democRATs lining up t vote d=for that spending pork barrel.
Trump signs them all. And when congress not spending enough he executive orders more.
/-----/ If Trump signs the DemocRAT spending bill - Orange Man Bad
If Trump vetoes the democRAT spening bill - Orange Man Bad
View attachment 377885
I bet you were one of them fraud tea party people. Deficits only bad when you can blame dems right?
Unless you want a nation to fall into the stone age, deficits are necessary.
The issue is people earning money and international trade.
I have a mortgage and lease a car, therefore I am running a deficit,
Oh that's funny. 8 years complaining about deficits, and now trump beats out Obama and they are good now. The dishonesty on the right is amazing.
 
Data shows what Trump his laid claim to started before he even showed up and as for being the 'greatest in history' again, data shows other periods were better...US economy under Trump: The greatest ever?
You and the BBC Libtrard Journos are idiots.

Trump attained the highest rate of employment, in total numbers and as a percent of the working population, with the highest GDP numbers and highest Market levels as well.

Your idiots at the BuberBunglerCrapathon were talking rate of growth, and Trump still beats any one else with unadjusted tweaked numbers.

So to summarize your post: WAAAAA WAAAAAA Trump is a Meany! ORANGE MAN BAD!
"Trump attained the highest rate of employment, in total numbers and as a percent of the working population, with the highest GDP numbers and highest Market levels as well."

What blithering idiocy.

We had a record number of employment under Obama too. We had record highs in the market under Obama too. We had a record high percentage of employment under Clinton.

And highest GDP numbers under Impeached Trump? That claim proves you're delirious. Impeached Trump never had a year above 3%. He never had a quarter above 3.5%, the only president to achieve that.

Seriously, why are you pretending to care?
I care when I see schmucks lie like that.


Is there any level of economic activity, that it would cause you to support Trump, or even just admit that he did a good job?
I've already admitted he had done a good job. Unfortunately, that came to a crashing halt this year.


I am shocked to hear you say that. utterly shocked.

Well, in that case, the covid lockdowns are obviously the cause of the economic downturn. He put lives ahead of the economy.

I take it you are pushing him to end the lockdowns then?
The lock downs are far from the only cause. As far as pushing for an end to them, I'd keep them in place until either there's a vaccine or until the virus subsides on its own.


1. Agreed. The economic cycle was overdue for a down swing. But like you said, Trump had done a good job.

2. Well, the lockdowns are certainly going to inhibit any attempt at restarting the economy so, make you choice and take your lumps, but don't blame Trump if the cause is the lockdown you support.
Yes, they do inhibit the economy, but so did his stimulus, which kept people unemployed longer. So does people self-restricting going out even where there is no lock down.


So, really hard to judge his economic performance, in this period of his administration.

We can look at his earlier work, or we can look at other factors.


Giving him minuses for not having a good economy during a pandemic, seems unfair and unreasonable.


For the purposes of full disclosure, short term economic performance is not going to be a factor in my decision making.
There are many reasons beyond just the economy for making a decision. But speaking of the economy, he's a large part of why we're where we are. That's on him, even though he embarrassingly denies any responsibility.


I don't see how. He inherited an aging upswing and managed to reinvigorate it, and extend it. That is about as much as could be expected of whom ever was in office.

imo, the rise in lower end wages, was very exciting. I hope to see what happens with that, once the convid passes.
The rise in lower wages was from min wage hikes. Not trump policy.
Wage hikes from dropping Trespassers and hiring Americans.
 
Data shows what Trump his laid claim to started before he even showed up and as for being the 'greatest in history' again, data shows other periods were better...US economy under Trump: The greatest ever?
You and the BBC Libtrard Journos are idiots.

Trump attained the highest rate of employment, in total numbers and as a percent of the working population, with the highest GDP numbers and highest Market levels as well.

Your idiots at the BuberBunglerCrapathon were talking rate of growth, and Trump still beats any one else with unadjusted tweaked numbers.

So to summarize your post: WAAAAA WAAAAAA Trump is a Meany! ORANGE MAN BAD!
"Trump attained the highest rate of employment, in total numbers and as a percent of the working population, with the highest GDP numbers and highest Market levels as well."

What blithering idiocy.

We had a record number of employment under Obama too. We had record highs in the market under Obama too. We had a record high percentage of employment under Clinton.

And highest GDP numbers under Impeached Trump? That claim proves you're delirious. Impeached Trump never had a year above 3%. He never had a quarter above 3.5%, the only president to achieve that.

Seriously, why are you pretending to care?
I care when I see schmucks lie like that.


Is there any level of economic activity, that it would cause you to support Trump, or even just admit that he did a good job?
I've already admitted he had done a good job. Unfortunately, that came to a crashing halt this year.


I am shocked to hear you say that. utterly shocked.

Well, in that case, the covid lockdowns are obviously the cause of the economic downturn. He put lives ahead of the economy.

I take it you are pushing him to end the lockdowns then?
The lock downs are far from the only cause. As far as pushing for an end to them, I'd keep them in place until either there's a vaccine or until the virus subsides on its own.


1. Agreed. The economic cycle was overdue for a down swing. But like you said, Trump had done a good job.

2. Well, the lockdowns are certainly going to inhibit any attempt at restarting the economy so, make you choice and take your lumps, but don't blame Trump if the cause is the lockdown you support.
Yes, they do inhibit the economy, but so did his stimulus, which kept people unemployed longer. So does people self-restricting going out even where there is no lock down.


So, really hard to judge his economic performance, in this period of his administration.

We can look at his earlier work, or we can look at other factors.


Giving him minuses for not having a good economy during a pandemic, seems unfair and unreasonable.


For the purposes of full disclosure, short term economic performance is not going to be a factor in my decision making.
Before the pandemic trump couldn’t hit 3% growth while running a trillion dollar deficit with really low interest rates. His performance is weak.
He had America working, that goes a long ways. Less Welfare, Unemployment, and Food Stamps.
Hell, you and your ilk were saying he'll destroy the economy, HE didn't
Larry Kudlow said Trump would destroy the US economy.
Months into Trump's administration and economic policies Larry Kudlow said Trump would destroy the US economy.
Now Kudlow works for Trump and praises Trump every chance he gets,
Yeah we have a tv economist and everything is going awful.
 
Data shows what Trump his laid claim to started before he even showed up and as for being the 'greatest in history' again, data shows other periods were better...US economy under Trump: The greatest ever?
10% unemployment is not great.
Just ignore the pandemic, and just ignore the shut down of the economy that your ilk wanted, and yes it's at 10%, It is coming down nucely now
that the economy opened up. Get rid of the unemployment incentive and it will drop like a rock.

Nobody wanted a shut down dumb ass. It was required.

So if a shutdown was required, how do you blame Trump for the economic decline? Oh, that’s right.... you people are too busy blaming Trump for COVID-19 while giving China and the WHO a pass.

Well no. With a competent president, we would have had the proper PPE, and the shut down would have been effective and mostly over. Our half assed shutdown, and restarting too soon caused thousands of deaths that did not have to happen.
/----/ Yeah, we see how democRATs handle proper PPE:

On March 26, The Daily Wire published an article centering on the Obama administration’s role in using and allegedly failing to replenish the federal stockpile of N95 masks.

“The Obama administration significantly depleted the federal stockpile of N95 respirator masks to deal with the H1N1 influenza outbreak in 2009 and never rebuilt the stockpile despite calls to do so,” the piece begins.
And Trump was informed of the shortage at inauguration, and he didn't do anything about it.

Another leftist hypocrite who'd fine with Obama's shortfall but blames Trump for not fixing it.

And they talked about PPE's at the inauguration? WTF?
Trump had three years to replenish it. instead...


Another lie. The CDC budget went up every year under Trump. Next ...
He sure likes to spend. You seen that deficit?
Nancy bitches because it's not enough.
Trump even does handouts by executive order now.
Yeah, because it's not a big enough handout for Nan, and Chuckles.
So many bailouts. Remember the farmer bailout?
/---/ I remember democRATs lining up t vote d=for that spending pork barrel.
Trump signs them all. And when congress not spending enough he executive orders more.
/-----/ If Trump signs the DemocRAT spending bill - Orange Man Bad
If Trump vetoes the democRAT spening bill - Orange Man Bad
View attachment 377885
I bet you were one of them fraud tea party people. Deficits only bad when you can blame dems right?
Unless you want a nation to fall into the stone age, deficits are necessary.
The issue is people earning money and international trade.
I have a mortgage and lease a car, therefore I am running a deficit,
Oh that's funny. 8 years complaining about deficits, and now trump beats out Obama and they are good now. The dishonesty on the right is amazing.
I never complained about deficits, I complained about Americans being replaced in the workforce and our workforce being off-shored.
But you already knew that from me posting that 1,000 times.
 
Data shows what Trump his laid claim to started before he even showed up and as for being the 'greatest in history' again, data shows other periods were better...US economy under Trump: The greatest ever?
You and the BBC Libtrard Journos are idiots.

Trump attained the highest rate of employment, in total numbers and as a percent of the working population, with the highest GDP numbers and highest Market levels as well.

Your idiots at the BuberBunglerCrapathon were talking rate of growth, and Trump still beats any one else with unadjusted tweaked numbers.

So to summarize your post: WAAAAA WAAAAAA Trump is a Meany! ORANGE MAN BAD!
"Trump attained the highest rate of employment, in total numbers and as a percent of the working population, with the highest GDP numbers and highest Market levels as well."

What blithering idiocy.

We had a record number of employment under Obama too. We had record highs in the market under Obama too. We had a record high percentage of employment under Clinton.

And highest GDP numbers under Impeached Trump? That claim proves you're delirious. Impeached Trump never had a year above 3%. He never had a quarter above 3.5%, the only president to achieve that.

Seriously, why are you pretending to care?
I care when I see schmucks lie like that.


Is there any level of economic activity, that it would cause you to support Trump, or even just admit that he did a good job?
I've already admitted he had done a good job. Unfortunately, that came to a crashing halt this year.


I am shocked to hear you say that. utterly shocked.

Well, in that case, the covid lockdowns are obviously the cause of the economic downturn. He put lives ahead of the economy.

I take it you are pushing him to end the lockdowns then?
The lock downs are far from the only cause. As far as pushing for an end to them, I'd keep them in place until either there's a vaccine or until the virus subsides on its own.


1. Agreed. The economic cycle was overdue for a down swing. But like you said, Trump had done a good job.

2. Well, the lockdowns are certainly going to inhibit any attempt at restarting the economy so, make you choice and take your lumps, but don't blame Trump if the cause is the lockdown you support.
Yes, they do inhibit the economy, but so did his stimulus, which kept people unemployed longer. So does people self-restricting going out even where there is no lock down.


So, really hard to judge his economic performance, in this period of his administration.

We can look at his earlier work, or we can look at other factors.


Giving him minuses for not having a good economy during a pandemic, seems unfair and unreasonable.


For the purposes of full disclosure, short term economic performance is not going to be a factor in my decision making.
There are many reasons beyond just the economy for making a decision. But speaking of the economy, he's a large part of why we're where we are. That's on him, even though he embarrassingly denies any responsibility.


I don't see how. He inherited an aging upswing and managed to reinvigorate it, and extend it. That is about as much as could be expected of whom ever was in office.

imo, the rise in lower end wages, was very exciting. I hope to see what happens with that, once the convid passes.
The rise in lower wages was from min wage hikes. Not trump policy.
Wage hikes from dropping Trespassers and hiring Americans.
Nope, lots of min wage increases.
 
Data shows what Trump his laid claim to started before he even showed up and as for being the 'greatest in history' again, data shows other periods were better...US economy under Trump: The greatest ever?
You and the BBC Libtrard Journos are idiots.

Trump attained the highest rate of employment, in total numbers and as a percent of the working population, with the highest GDP numbers and highest Market levels as well.

Your idiots at the BuberBunglerCrapathon were talking rate of growth, and Trump still beats any one else with unadjusted tweaked numbers.

So to summarize your post: WAAAAA WAAAAAA Trump is a Meany! ORANGE MAN BAD!
"Trump attained the highest rate of employment, in total numbers and as a percent of the working population, with the highest GDP numbers and highest Market levels as well."

What blithering idiocy.

We had a record number of employment under Obama too. We had record highs in the market under Obama too. We had a record high percentage of employment under Clinton.

And highest GDP numbers under Impeached Trump? That claim proves you're delirious. Impeached Trump never had a year above 3%. He never had a quarter above 3.5%, the only president to achieve that.

Seriously, why are you pretending to care?
I care when I see schmucks lie like that.


Is there any level of economic activity, that it would cause you to support Trump, or even just admit that he did a good job?
I've already admitted he had done a good job. Unfortunately, that came to a crashing halt this year.


I am shocked to hear you say that. utterly shocked.

Well, in that case, the covid lockdowns are obviously the cause of the economic downturn. He put lives ahead of the economy.

I take it you are pushing him to end the lockdowns then?
The lock downs are far from the only cause. As far as pushing for an end to them, I'd keep them in place until either there's a vaccine or until the virus subsides on its own.


1. Agreed. The economic cycle was overdue for a down swing. But like you said, Trump had done a good job.

2. Well, the lockdowns are certainly going to inhibit any attempt at restarting the economy so, make you choice and take your lumps, but don't blame Trump if the cause is the lockdown you support.
Yes, they do inhibit the economy, but so did his stimulus, which kept people unemployed longer. So does people self-restricting going out even where there is no lock down.


So, really hard to judge his economic performance, in this period of his administration.

We can look at his earlier work, or we can look at other factors.


Giving him minuses for not having a good economy during a pandemic, seems unfair and unreasonable.


For the purposes of full disclosure, short term economic performance is not going to be a factor in my decision making.
Before the pandemic trump couldn’t hit 3% growth while running a trillion dollar deficit with really low interest rates. His performance is weak.
He had America working, that goes a long ways. Less Welfare, Unemployment, and Food Stamps.
Hell, you and your ilk were saying he'll destroy the economy, HE didn't
Larry Kudlow said Trump would destroy the US economy.
Months into Trump's administration and economic policies Larry Kudlow said Trump would destroy the US economy.
Now Kudlow works for Trump and praises Trump every chance he gets,
Yeah we have a tv economist and everything is going awful.
Tel us again the crime ridden slum you live in; but you won't.
The worst areas in Nassau County are booming because nobody will convict a cop.
 
Data shows what Trump his laid claim to started before he even showed up and as for being the 'greatest in history' again, data shows other periods were better...US economy under Trump: The greatest ever?
You and the BBC Libtrard Journos are idiots.

Trump attained the highest rate of employment, in total numbers and as a percent of the working population, with the highest GDP numbers and highest Market levels as well.

Your idiots at the BuberBunglerCrapathon were talking rate of growth, and Trump still beats any one else with unadjusted tweaked numbers.

So to summarize your post: WAAAAA WAAAAAA Trump is a Meany! ORANGE MAN BAD!
"Trump attained the highest rate of employment, in total numbers and as a percent of the working population, with the highest GDP numbers and highest Market levels as well."

What blithering idiocy.

We had a record number of employment under Obama too. We had record highs in the market under Obama too. We had a record high percentage of employment under Clinton.

And highest GDP numbers under Impeached Trump? That claim proves you're delirious. Impeached Trump never had a year above 3%. He never had a quarter above 3.5%, the only president to achieve that.

Seriously, why are you pretending to care?
I care when I see schmucks lie like that.


Is there any level of economic activity, that it would cause you to support Trump, or even just admit that he did a good job?
I've already admitted he had done a good job. Unfortunately, that came to a crashing halt this year.


I am shocked to hear you say that. utterly shocked.

Well, in that case, the covid lockdowns are obviously the cause of the economic downturn. He put lives ahead of the economy.

I take it you are pushing him to end the lockdowns then?
The lock downs are far from the only cause. As far as pushing for an end to them, I'd keep them in place until either there's a vaccine or until the virus subsides on its own.


1. Agreed. The economic cycle was overdue for a down swing. But like you said, Trump had done a good job.

2. Well, the lockdowns are certainly going to inhibit any attempt at restarting the economy so, make you choice and take your lumps, but don't blame Trump if the cause is the lockdown you support.
Yes, they do inhibit the economy, but so did his stimulus, which kept people unemployed longer. So does people self-restricting going out even where there is no lock down.


So, really hard to judge his economic performance, in this period of his administration.

We can look at his earlier work, or we can look at other factors.


Giving him minuses for not having a good economy during a pandemic, seems unfair and unreasonable.


For the purposes of full disclosure, short term economic performance is not going to be a factor in my decision making.
There are many reasons beyond just the economy for making a decision. But speaking of the economy, he's a large part of why we're where we are. That's on him, even though he embarrassingly denies any responsibility.


I don't see how. He inherited an aging upswing and managed to reinvigorate it, and extend it. That is about as much as could be expected of whom ever was in office.

imo, the rise in lower end wages, was very exciting. I hope to see what happens with that, once the convid passes.
The rise in lower wages was from min wage hikes. Not trump policy.
Wage hikes from dropping Trespassers and hiring Americans.
Nope, lots of min wage increases.
I'm sure you know this by talking to people and seeing a change in who's now in the workforce.
You're so full of shit.
 
Data shows what Trump his laid claim to started before he even showed up and as for being the 'greatest in history' again, data shows other periods were better...US economy under Trump: The greatest ever?
10% unemployment is not great.
Just ignore the pandemic, and just ignore the shut down of the economy that your ilk wanted, and yes it's at 10%, It is coming down nucely now
that the economy opened up. Get rid of the unemployment incentive and it will drop like a rock.

Nobody wanted a shut down dumb ass. It was required.

So if a shutdown was required, how do you blame Trump for the economic decline? Oh, that’s right.... you people are too busy blaming Trump for COVID-19 while giving China and the WHO a pass.

Well no. With a competent president, we would have had the proper PPE, and the shut down would have been effective and mostly over. Our half assed shutdown, and restarting too soon caused thousands of deaths that did not have to happen.
/----/ Yeah, we see how democRATs handle proper PPE:

On March 26, The Daily Wire published an article centering on the Obama administration’s role in using and allegedly failing to replenish the federal stockpile of N95 masks.

“The Obama administration significantly depleted the federal stockpile of N95 respirator masks to deal with the H1N1 influenza outbreak in 2009 and never rebuilt the stockpile despite calls to do so,” the piece begins.
And Trump was informed of the shortage at inauguration, and he didn't do anything about it.

Another leftist hypocrite who'd fine with Obama's shortfall but blames Trump for not fixing it.

And they talked about PPE's at the inauguration? WTF?
Trump had three years to replenish it. instead...


Another lie. The CDC budget went up every year under Trump. Next ...
He sure likes to spend. You seen that deficit?
Nancy bitches because it's not enough.
Trump even does handouts by executive order now.
Yeah, because it's not a big enough handout for Nan, and Chuckles.
So many bailouts. Remember the farmer bailout?
/---/ I remember democRATs lining up t vote d=for that spending pork barrel.
Trump signs them all. And when congress not spending enough he executive orders more.
/-----/ If Trump signs the DemocRAT spending bill - Orange Man Bad
If Trump vetoes the democRAT spening bill - Orange Man Bad
View attachment 377885
I bet you were one of them fraud tea party people. Deficits only bad when you can blame dems right?
Unless you want a nation to fall into the stone age, deficits are necessary.
The issue is people earning money and international trade.
I have a mortgage and lease a car, therefore I am running a deficit,
Oh that's funny. 8 years complaining about deficits, and now trump beats out Obama and they are good now. The dishonesty on the right is amazing.
I never complained about deficits, I complained about Americans being replaced in the workforce and our workforce being off-shored.
But you already knew that from me posting that 1,000 times.
That hasn't changed....
 
Data shows what Trump his laid claim to started before he even showed up and as for being the 'greatest in history' again, data shows other periods were better...US economy under Trump: The greatest ever?
You and the BBC Libtrard Journos are idiots.

Trump attained the highest rate of employment, in total numbers and as a percent of the working population, with the highest GDP numbers and highest Market levels as well.

Your idiots at the BuberBunglerCrapathon were talking rate of growth, and Trump still beats any one else with unadjusted tweaked numbers.

So to summarize your post: WAAAAA WAAAAAA Trump is a Meany! ORANGE MAN BAD!
"Trump attained the highest rate of employment, in total numbers and as a percent of the working population, with the highest GDP numbers and highest Market levels as well."

What blithering idiocy.

We had a record number of employment under Obama too. We had record highs in the market under Obama too. We had a record high percentage of employment under Clinton.

And highest GDP numbers under Impeached Trump? That claim proves you're delirious. Impeached Trump never had a year above 3%. He never had a quarter above 3.5%, the only president to achieve that.

Seriously, why are you pretending to care?
I care when I see schmucks lie like that.


Is there any level of economic activity, that it would cause you to support Trump, or even just admit that he did a good job?
I've already admitted he had done a good job. Unfortunately, that came to a crashing halt this year.


I am shocked to hear you say that. utterly shocked.

Well, in that case, the covid lockdowns are obviously the cause of the economic downturn. He put lives ahead of the economy.

I take it you are pushing him to end the lockdowns then?
The lock downs are far from the only cause. As far as pushing for an end to them, I'd keep them in place until either there's a vaccine or until the virus subsides on its own.


1. Agreed. The economic cycle was overdue for a down swing. But like you said, Trump had done a good job.

2. Well, the lockdowns are certainly going to inhibit any attempt at restarting the economy so, make you choice and take your lumps, but don't blame Trump if the cause is the lockdown you support.
Yes, they do inhibit the economy, but so did his stimulus, which kept people unemployed longer. So does people self-restricting going out even where there is no lock down.


So, really hard to judge his economic performance, in this period of his administration.

We can look at his earlier work, or we can look at other factors.


Giving him minuses for not having a good economy during a pandemic, seems unfair and unreasonable.


For the purposes of full disclosure, short term economic performance is not going to be a factor in my decision making.
There are many reasons beyond just the economy for making a decision. But speaking of the economy, he's a large part of why we're where we are. That's on him, even though he embarrassingly denies any responsibility.


I don't see how. He inherited an aging upswing and managed to reinvigorate it, and extend it. That is about as much as could be expected of whom ever was in office.

imo, the rise in lower end wages, was very exciting. I hope to see what happens with that, once the convid passes.
The rise in lower wages was from min wage hikes. Not trump policy.
Wage hikes from dropping Trespassers and hiring Americans.
Nope, lots of min wage increases.
When min wage goes up, they all go up.
It would be pretty sad if a noobie got the min wage and was making more than an employee of two years.
 
Data shows what Trump his laid claim to started before he even showed up and as for being the 'greatest in history' again, data shows other periods were better...US economy under Trump: The greatest ever?
10% unemployment is not great.
Just ignore the pandemic, and just ignore the shut down of the economy that your ilk wanted, and yes it's at 10%, It is coming down nucely now
that the economy opened up. Get rid of the unemployment incentive and it will drop like a rock.

Nobody wanted a shut down dumb ass. It was required.

So if a shutdown was required, how do you blame Trump for the economic decline? Oh, that’s right.... you people are too busy blaming Trump for COVID-19 while giving China and the WHO a pass.

Well no. With a competent president, we would have had the proper PPE, and the shut down would have been effective and mostly over. Our half assed shutdown, and restarting too soon caused thousands of deaths that did not have to happen.
/----/ Yeah, we see how democRATs handle proper PPE:

On March 26, The Daily Wire published an article centering on the Obama administration’s role in using and allegedly failing to replenish the federal stockpile of N95 masks.

“The Obama administration significantly depleted the federal stockpile of N95 respirator masks to deal with the H1N1 influenza outbreak in 2009 and never rebuilt the stockpile despite calls to do so,” the piece begins.
And Trump was informed of the shortage at inauguration, and he didn't do anything about it.

Another leftist hypocrite who'd fine with Obama's shortfall but blames Trump for not fixing it.

And they talked about PPE's at the inauguration? WTF?
Trump had three years to replenish it. instead...


Another lie. The CDC budget went up every year under Trump. Next ...
He sure likes to spend. You seen that deficit?
Nancy bitches because it's not enough.
Trump even does handouts by executive order now.
Yeah, because it's not a big enough handout for Nan, and Chuckles.
So many bailouts. Remember the farmer bailout?
/---/ I remember democRATs lining up t vote d=for that spending pork barrel.
Trump signs them all. And when congress not spending enough he executive orders more.
/-----/ If Trump signs the DemocRAT spending bill - Orange Man Bad
If Trump vetoes the democRAT spening bill - Orange Man Bad
View attachment 377885
I bet you were one of them fraud tea party people. Deficits only bad when you can blame dems right?
Unless you want a nation to fall into the stone age, deficits are necessary.
The issue is people earning money and international trade.
I have a mortgage and lease a car, therefore I am running a deficit,
Oh that's funny. 8 years complaining about deficits, and now trump beats out Obama and they are good now. The dishonesty on the right is amazing.
I never complained about deficits, I complained about Americans being replaced in the workforce and our workforce being off-shored.
But you already knew that from me posting that 1,000 times.
That hasn't changed....
Where do you live?
Or are you too much of a liar and p*ssy to tell us what slum you live in.
 
Data shows what Trump his laid claim to started before he even showed up and as for being the 'greatest in history' again, data shows other periods were better...US economy under Trump: The greatest ever?
You and the BBC Libtrard Journos are idiots.

Trump attained the highest rate of employment, in total numbers and as a percent of the working population, with the highest GDP numbers and highest Market levels as well.

Your idiots at the BuberBunglerCrapathon were talking rate of growth, and Trump still beats any one else with unadjusted tweaked numbers.

So to summarize your post: WAAAAA WAAAAAA Trump is a Meany! ORANGE MAN BAD!
"Trump attained the highest rate of employment, in total numbers and as a percent of the working population, with the highest GDP numbers and highest Market levels as well."

What blithering idiocy.

We had a record number of employment under Obama too. We had record highs in the market under Obama too. We had a record high percentage of employment under Clinton.

And highest GDP numbers under Impeached Trump? That claim proves you're delirious. Impeached Trump never had a year above 3%. He never had a quarter above 3.5%, the only president to achieve that.

Seriously, why are you pretending to care?
I care when I see schmucks lie like that.


Is there any level of economic activity, that it would cause you to support Trump, or even just admit that he did a good job?
I've already admitted he had done a good job. Unfortunately, that came to a crashing halt this year.


I am shocked to hear you say that. utterly shocked.

Well, in that case, the covid lockdowns are obviously the cause of the economic downturn. He put lives ahead of the economy.

I take it you are pushing him to end the lockdowns then?
The lock downs are far from the only cause. As far as pushing for an end to them, I'd keep them in place until either there's a vaccine or until the virus subsides on its own.


1. Agreed. The economic cycle was overdue for a down swing. But like you said, Trump had done a good job.

2. Well, the lockdowns are certainly going to inhibit any attempt at restarting the economy so, make you choice and take your lumps, but don't blame Trump if the cause is the lockdown you support.
Yes, they do inhibit the economy, but so did his stimulus, which kept people unemployed longer. So does people self-restricting going out even where there is no lock down.


So, really hard to judge his economic performance, in this period of his administration.

We can look at his earlier work, or we can look at other factors.


Giving him minuses for not having a good economy during a pandemic, seems unfair and unreasonable.


For the purposes of full disclosure, short term economic performance is not going to be a factor in my decision making.
There are many reasons beyond just the economy for making a decision. But speaking of the economy, he's a large part of why we're where we are. That's on him, even though he embarrassingly denies any responsibility.


I don't see how. He inherited an aging upswing and managed to reinvigorate it, and extend it. That is about as much as could be expected of whom ever was in office.

imo, the rise in lower end wages, was very exciting. I hope to see what happens with that, once the convid passes.
The rise in lower wages was from min wage hikes. Not trump policy.
Wage hikes from dropping Trespassers and hiring Americans.
Nope, lots of min wage increases.
When min wage goes up, they all go up.
It would be pretty sad if a noobie got the min wage and was making more than an employee of two years.
Brain is as dishonest as they come.
 
Data shows what Trump his laid claim to started before he even showed up and as for being the 'greatest in history' again, data shows other periods were better...US economy under Trump: The greatest ever?
You and the BBC Libtrard Journos are idiots.

Trump attained the highest rate of employment, in total numbers and as a percent of the working population, with the highest GDP numbers and highest Market levels as well.

Your idiots at the BuberBunglerCrapathon were talking rate of growth, and Trump still beats any one else with unadjusted tweaked numbers.

So to summarize your post: WAAAAA WAAAAAA Trump is a Meany! ORANGE MAN BAD!
"Trump attained the highest rate of employment, in total numbers and as a percent of the working population, with the highest GDP numbers and highest Market levels as well."

What blithering idiocy.

We had a record number of employment under Obama too. We had record highs in the market under Obama too. We had a record high percentage of employment under Clinton.

And highest GDP numbers under Impeached Trump? That claim proves you're delirious. Impeached Trump never had a year above 3%. He never had a quarter above 3.5%, the only president to achieve that.

Seriously, why are you pretending to care?
I care when I see schmucks lie like that.


Is there any level of economic activity, that it would cause you to support Trump, or even just admit that he did a good job?
I've already admitted he had done a good job. Unfortunately, that came to a crashing halt this year.


I am shocked to hear you say that. utterly shocked.

Well, in that case, the covid lockdowns are obviously the cause of the economic downturn. He put lives ahead of the economy.

I take it you are pushing him to end the lockdowns then?
The lock downs are far from the only cause. As far as pushing for an end to them, I'd keep them in place until either there's a vaccine or until the virus subsides on its own.


1. Agreed. The economic cycle was overdue for a down swing. But like you said, Trump had done a good job.

2. Well, the lockdowns are certainly going to inhibit any attempt at restarting the economy so, make you choice and take your lumps, but don't blame Trump if the cause is the lockdown you support.
Yes, they do inhibit the economy, but so did his stimulus, which kept people unemployed longer. So does people self-restricting going out even where there is no lock down.


So, really hard to judge his economic performance, in this period of his administration.

We can look at his earlier work, or we can look at other factors.


Giving him minuses for not having a good economy during a pandemic, seems unfair and unreasonable.


For the purposes of full disclosure, short term economic performance is not going to be a factor in my decision making.
There are many reasons beyond just the economy for making a decision. But speaking of the economy, he's a large part of why we're where we are. That's on him, even though he embarrassingly denies any responsibility.


I don't see how. He inherited an aging upswing and managed to reinvigorate it, and extend it. That is about as much as could be expected of whom ever was in office.

imo, the rise in lower end wages, was very exciting. I hope to see what happens with that, once the convid passes.
The rise in lower wages was from min wage hikes. Not trump policy.
Wage hikes from dropping Trespassers and hiring Americans.
Nope, lots of min wage increases.
I'm sure you know this by talking to people and seeing a change in who's now in the workforce.
You're so full of shit.
It's common sense....
 
Data shows what Trump his laid claim to started before he even showed up and as for being the 'greatest in history' again, data shows other periods were better...US economy under Trump: The greatest ever?
You and the BBC Libtrard Journos are idiots.

Trump attained the highest rate of employment, in total numbers and as a percent of the working population, with the highest GDP numbers and highest Market levels as well.

Your idiots at the BuberBunglerCrapathon were talking rate of growth, and Trump still beats any one else with unadjusted tweaked numbers.

So to summarize your post: WAAAAA WAAAAAA Trump is a Meany! ORANGE MAN BAD!
"Trump attained the highest rate of employment, in total numbers and as a percent of the working population, with the highest GDP numbers and highest Market levels as well."

What blithering idiocy.

We had a record number of employment under Obama too. We had record highs in the market under Obama too. We had a record high percentage of employment under Clinton.

And highest GDP numbers under Impeached Trump? That claim proves you're delirious. Impeached Trump never had a year above 3%. He never had a quarter above 3.5%, the only president to achieve that.

Seriously, why are you pretending to care?
I care when I see schmucks lie like that.


Is there any level of economic activity, that it would cause you to support Trump, or even just admit that he did a good job?
I've already admitted he had done a good job. Unfortunately, that came to a crashing halt this year.


I am shocked to hear you say that. utterly shocked.

Well, in that case, the covid lockdowns are obviously the cause of the economic downturn. He put lives ahead of the economy.

I take it you are pushing him to end the lockdowns then?
The lock downs are far from the only cause. As far as pushing for an end to them, I'd keep them in place until either there's a vaccine or until the virus subsides on its own.


1. Agreed. The economic cycle was overdue for a down swing. But like you said, Trump had done a good job.

2. Well, the lockdowns are certainly going to inhibit any attempt at restarting the economy so, make you choice and take your lumps, but don't blame Trump if the cause is the lockdown you support.
Yes, they do inhibit the economy, but so did his stimulus, which kept people unemployed longer. So does people self-restricting going out even where there is no lock down.


So, really hard to judge his economic performance, in this period of his administration.

We can look at his earlier work, or we can look at other factors.


Giving him minuses for not having a good economy during a pandemic, seems unfair and unreasonable.


For the purposes of full disclosure, short term economic performance is not going to be a factor in my decision making.
There are many reasons beyond just the economy for making a decision. But speaking of the economy, he's a large part of why we're where we are. That's on him, even though he embarrassingly denies any responsibility.


I don't see how. He inherited an aging upswing and managed to reinvigorate it, and extend it. That is about as much as could be expected of whom ever was in office.

imo, the rise in lower end wages, was very exciting. I hope to see what happens with that, once the convid passes.
The rise in lower wages was from min wage hikes. Not trump policy.
Wage hikes from dropping Trespassers and hiring Americans.
Nope, lots of min wage increases.
I'm sure you know this by talking to people and seeing a change in who's now in the workforce.
You're so full of shit.
It's common sense....
Oh!
NPR!
Of course!
It must be true!
What slum do you live in where the Trespassers got raises?
 
Data shows what Trump his laid claim to started before he even showed up and as for being the 'greatest in history' again, data shows other periods were better...US economy under Trump: The greatest ever?
10% unemployment is not great.
Just ignore the pandemic, and just ignore the shut down of the economy that your ilk wanted, and yes it's at 10%, It is coming down nucely now
that the economy opened up. Get rid of the unemployment incentive and it will drop like a rock.

Nobody wanted a shut down dumb ass. It was required.

So if a shutdown was required, how do you blame Trump for the economic decline? Oh, that’s right.... you people are too busy blaming Trump for COVID-19 while giving China and the WHO a pass.

Well no. With a competent president, we would have had the proper PPE, and the shut down would have been effective and mostly over. Our half assed shutdown, and restarting too soon caused thousands of deaths that did not have to happen.
/----/ Yeah, we see how democRATs handle proper PPE:

On March 26, The Daily Wire published an article centering on the Obama administration’s role in using and allegedly failing to replenish the federal stockpile of N95 masks.

“The Obama administration significantly depleted the federal stockpile of N95 respirator masks to deal with the H1N1 influenza outbreak in 2009 and never rebuilt the stockpile despite calls to do so,” the piece begins.
And Trump was informed of the shortage at inauguration, and he didn't do anything about it.

Another leftist hypocrite who'd fine with Obama's shortfall but blames Trump for not fixing it.

And they talked about PPE's at the inauguration? WTF?
Trump had three years to replenish it. instead...


Another lie. The CDC budget went up every year under Trump. Next ...
He sure likes to spend. You seen that deficit?
Nancy bitches because it's not enough.
Trump even does handouts by executive order now.
Yeah, because it's not a big enough handout for Nan, and Chuckles.
So many bailouts. Remember the farmer bailout?
/---/ I remember democRATs lining up t vote d=for that spending pork barrel.
Trump signs them all. And when congress not spending enough he executive orders more.
/-----/ If Trump signs the DemocRAT spending bill - Orange Man Bad
If Trump vetoes the democRAT spening bill - Orange Man Bad
View attachment 377885
I bet you were one of them fraud tea party people. Deficits only bad when you can blame dems right?
Unless you want a nation to fall into the stone age, deficits are necessary.
The issue is people earning money and international trade.
I have a mortgage and lease a car, therefore I am running a deficit,
Oh that's funny. 8 years complaining about deficits, and now trump beats out Obama and they are good now. The dishonesty on the right is amazing.
I never complained about deficits, I complained about Americans being replaced in the workforce and our workforce being off-shored.
But you already knew that from me posting that 1,000 times.
That hasn't changed....
Where do you live?
Or are you too much of a liar and p*ssy to tell us what slum you live in.
I'm not interested in your usual made up BS. Either you can support you wild claims or you can't. Share a link.
 
Data shows what Trump his laid claim to started before he even showed up and as for being the 'greatest in history' again, data shows other periods were better...US economy under Trump: The greatest ever?
You and the BBC Libtrard Journos are idiots.

Trump attained the highest rate of employment, in total numbers and as a percent of the working population, with the highest GDP numbers and highest Market levels as well.

Your idiots at the BuberBunglerCrapathon were talking rate of growth, and Trump still beats any one else with unadjusted tweaked numbers.

So to summarize your post: WAAAAA WAAAAAA Trump is a Meany! ORANGE MAN BAD!
"Trump attained the highest rate of employment, in total numbers and as a percent of the working population, with the highest GDP numbers and highest Market levels as well."

What blithering idiocy.

We had a record number of employment under Obama too. We had record highs in the market under Obama too. We had a record high percentage of employment under Clinton.

And highest GDP numbers under Impeached Trump? That claim proves you're delirious. Impeached Trump never had a year above 3%. He never had a quarter above 3.5%, the only president to achieve that.

Seriously, why are you pretending to care?
I care when I see schmucks lie like that.
I presume no business wants to invest in your area.
Regions where police can do their job and not be convicted by a jury are booming.
LOL

What the fuck does that have to do with national unemployment and GDP??
I'll pretend you're not as stupid as that post.
There are locales where, due to crime and high insurance rates, no one wants to start a business and where businesses have left
Dumbfuck, we're not taking about "locales." We're taking about the nation. National employment. National GDP. If you can’t keep up, stay out.
Dumbfuck...National employment is based on totaling up locales and the most highly populated locales are where Liberal scum commit the most violent crimes.
GDP has zero to do with the individual.
GDP is a Rush Limbaugh, rolled-up statistic.
When GW, who you hated because of the letter R, was president, GDP was skyrocketing because Wall Street was off-shoring jobs.

By the way, did I mention you're a dishonest idiot?
Dumbfuck, I don't give a shit how they calculate it. No one is talking about your bumfuck locale. We're talking about national employment and national GDP.

If you wanna talk about something else, start your own thread on it and maybe someone will talk to you about it.

Why on Earth do you think your cognitive dissonance is my problem??
Pathetic response, dishonest idiot.
If you don't want to be bitch slapped by facts that prove you're a dishonest idiot, don't post your usual stupidity.
So you can't help yourself to stop trying to divert the thread, can you?
 
Data shows what Trump his laid claim to started before he even showed up and as for being the 'greatest in history' again, data shows other periods were better...US economy under Trump: The greatest ever?
You and the BBC Libtrard Journos are idiots.

Trump attained the highest rate of employment, in total numbers and as a percent of the working population, with the highest GDP numbers and highest Market levels as well.

Your idiots at the BuberBunglerCrapathon were talking rate of growth, and Trump still beats any one else with unadjusted tweaked numbers.

So to summarize your post: WAAAAA WAAAAAA Trump is a Meany! ORANGE MAN BAD!
"Trump attained the highest rate of employment, in total numbers and as a percent of the working population, with the highest GDP numbers and highest Market levels as well."

What blithering idiocy.

We had a record number of employment under Obama too. We had record highs in the market under Obama too. We had a record high percentage of employment under Clinton.

And highest GDP numbers under Impeached Trump? That claim proves you're delirious. Impeached Trump never had a year above 3%. He never had a quarter above 3.5%, the only president to achieve that.

Seriously, why are you pretending to care?
I care when I see schmucks lie like that.


Is there any level of economic activity, that it would cause you to support Trump, or even just admit that he did a good job?
I've already admitted he had done a good job. Unfortunately, that came to a crashing halt this year.


I am shocked to hear you say that. utterly shocked.

Well, in that case, the covid lockdowns are obviously the cause of the economic downturn. He put lives ahead of the economy.

I take it you are pushing him to end the lockdowns then?
The lock downs are far from the only cause. As far as pushing for an end to them, I'd keep them in place until either there's a vaccine or until the virus subsides on its own.


1. Agreed. The economic cycle was overdue for a down swing. But like you said, Trump had done a good job.

2. Well, the lockdowns are certainly going to inhibit any attempt at restarting the economy so, make you choice and take your lumps, but don't blame Trump if the cause is the lockdown you support.
Yes, they do inhibit the economy, but so did his stimulus, which kept people unemployed longer. So does people self-restricting going out even where there is no lock down.


So, really hard to judge his economic performance, in this period of his administration.

We can look at his earlier work, or we can look at other factors.


Giving him minuses for not having a good economy during a pandemic, seems unfair and unreasonable.


For the purposes of full disclosure, short term economic performance is not going to be a factor in my decision making.
There are many reasons beyond just the economy for making a decision. But speaking of the economy, he's a large part of why we're where we are. That's on him, even though he embarrassingly denies any responsibility.


I don't see how. He inherited an aging upswing and managed to reinvigorate it, and extend it. That is about as much as could be expected of whom ever was in office.

imo, the rise in lower end wages, was very exciting. I hope to see what happens with that, once the convid passes.
The rise in lower wages was from min wage hikes. Not trump policy.
Wage hikes from dropping Trespassers and hiring Americans.
Nope, lots of min wage increases.
I'm sure you know this by talking to people and seeing a change in who's now in the workforce.
You're so full of shit.
It's common sense....
Oh!
NPR!
Of course!
It must be true!
What slum do you live in where the Trespassers got raises?
Yeah cause increasing min wage doesn't increase wages for the lowest paid. How stupid are you?
 
Data shows what Trump his laid claim to started before he even showed up and as for being the 'greatest in history' again, data shows other periods were better...US economy under Trump: The greatest ever?
You and the BBC Libtrard Journos are idiots.

Trump attained the highest rate of employment, in total numbers and as a percent of the working population, with the highest GDP numbers and highest Market levels as well.

Your idiots at the BuberBunglerCrapathon were talking rate of growth, and Trump still beats any one else with unadjusted tweaked numbers.

So to summarize your post: WAAAAA WAAAAAA Trump is a Meany! ORANGE MAN BAD!
"Trump attained the highest rate of employment, in total numbers and as a percent of the working population, with the highest GDP numbers and highest Market levels as well."

What blithering idiocy.

We had a record number of employment under Obama too. We had record highs in the market under Obama too. We had a record high percentage of employment under Clinton.

And highest GDP numbers under Impeached Trump? That claim proves you're delirious. Impeached Trump never had a year above 3%. He never had a quarter above 3.5%, the only president to achieve that.

Seriously, why are you pretending to care?
I care when I see schmucks lie like that.


Is there any level of economic activity, that it would cause you to support Trump, or even just admit that he did a good job?
I've already admitted he had done a good job. Unfortunately, that came to a crashing halt this year.


I am shocked to hear you say that. utterly shocked.

Well, in that case, the covid lockdowns are obviously the cause of the economic downturn. He put lives ahead of the economy.

I take it you are pushing him to end the lockdowns then?
The lock downs are far from the only cause. As far as pushing for an end to them, I'd keep them in place until either there's a vaccine or until the virus subsides on its own.


1. Agreed. The economic cycle was overdue for a down swing. But like you said, Trump had done a good job.

2. Well, the lockdowns are certainly going to inhibit any attempt at restarting the economy so, make you choice and take your lumps, but don't blame Trump if the cause is the lockdown you support.
Yes, they do inhibit the economy, but so did his stimulus, which kept people unemployed longer. So does people self-restricting going out even where there is no lock down.


So, really hard to judge his economic performance, in this period of his administration.

We can look at his earlier work, or we can look at other factors.


Giving him minuses for not having a good economy during a pandemic, seems unfair and unreasonable.


For the purposes of full disclosure, short term economic performance is not going to be a factor in my decision making.
There are many reasons beyond just the economy for making a decision. But speaking of the economy, he's a large part of why we're where we are. That's on him, even though he embarrassingly denies any responsibility.


I don't see how. He inherited an aging upswing and managed to reinvigorate it, and extend it. That is about as much as could be expected of whom ever was in office.

imo, the rise in lower end wages, was very exciting. I hope to see what happens with that, once the convid passes.
The rise in lower wages was from min wage hikes. Not trump policy.
Wage hikes from dropping Trespassers and hiring Americans.
Nope, lots of min wage increases.
I'm sure you know this by talking to people and seeing a change in who's now in the workforce.
You're so full of shit.
It's common sense....
Do you know where you live when you make $7.25 an hour...in a slum.
Do you make $7.25 an hour?
 

Forum List

Back
Top