Trump’s lies have cost us $519 million and counting

[Fueri]

oh please, what did that sham impeachment, purely motivated by political purposeses cost in money and time. purely motivated to undercut a duly a elected president those motherfuckers rode that horse right up until it was way past dead then merrily hopped on the Corona Pony with cries of glee like kids on Christmas Day, then willfully stood aside and let the country burn so they could hang that on Trump too. If the past 4 years haven't shown people what horrific vipers those assholes are it's because they are being willfully blind.

I voted for Trump this last time purely out of pure disgust at the way those pieces of monumental shit conducted themselves for 4 solid years.

The dems can go fuck themselves after the last 4 years in terms of any sort of whining in terms of good faith political process and what any perceived deviation from that seems to have cost.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Without evidence yes it is coincidence. You have no evidence.

Yep. And a man with a gun standing over a dead body is just a coincidence too.

Coincidences matter.

No they do not they happen every day and are normal.

You have absolutely zero evidence making the whole impeachment a political circus. Revenge for Clinton.

That is fact you have NO evidence your man with a gun analogy is an idiotic false equivelance.

 

[colfax_m]

Without evidence yes it is coincidence. You have no evidence.

Yep. And a man with a gun standing over a dead body is just a coincidence too.

Coincidences matter.

No they do not they happen every day and are normal.

You have absolutely zero evidence making the whole impeachment a political circus. Revenge for Clinton.

That is fact you have NO evidence your man with a gun analogy is an idiotic false equivelance.

Nope. Guy with a gun is just a coincidence. No evidence he shot the person dying of a bullet wound. Zero. Just a coincidence. People are shot all the time. Lots of people have guns. No evidence that those two are connected.

Here’s how you know it wasn’t a coincidence. First, Trump does not ask officials to push investigations into people without the DoJ. Never happened. Second, the one time he does it happens to be one of a handful of people running against him. Not only that, he’s not just running against him, he’s winning in basically every poll.

Trump does something he never does aimed at a the one person who presents the greatest threat to his re-election.

That doesn’t happen “every day”.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Without evidence yes it is coincidence. You have no evidence.

Yep. And a man with a gun standing over a dead body is just a coincidence too.

Coincidences matter.

No they do not they happen every day and are normal.

You have absolutely zero evidence making the whole impeachment a political circus. Revenge for Clinton.

That is fact you have NO evidence your man with a gun analogy is an idiotic false equivelance.

Nope. Guy with a gun is just a coincidence. No evidence he shot the person dying of a bullet wound. Zero. Just a coincidence. People are shot all the time. Lots of people have guns. No evidence that those two are connected.

Here’s how you know it wasn’t a coincidence. First, Trump does not ask officials to push investigations into people without the DoJ. Never happened. Second, the one time he does it happens to be one of a handful of people running against him. Not only that, he’s not just running against him, he’s winning in basically every poll.

Trump does something he never does aimed at a the one person who presents the greatest threat to his re-election.

That doesn’t happen “every day”.

Bullshit.

It is a massively failed analogy and false equivelance because you have no such evidence that trumpo extorted anyone or anythibng.

NOTHING

Your claim to what you know is simply and strictlyu hyperpartisan opinion.

One more time and read slowly YOU DO NOT HAVE EVIDENCE

 

[colfax_m]

Without evidence yes it is coincidence. You have no evidence.

Yep. And a man with a gun standing over a dead body is just a coincidence too.

Coincidences matter.

No they do not they happen every day and are normal.

You have absolutely zero evidence making the whole impeachment a political circus. Revenge for Clinton.

That is fact you have NO evidence your man with a gun analogy is an idiotic false equivelance.

Nope. Guy with a gun is just a coincidence. No evidence he shot the person dying of a bullet wound. Zero. Just a coincidence. People are shot all the time. Lots of people have guns. No evidence that those two are connected.

Here’s how you know it wasn’t a coincidence. First, Trump does not ask officials to push investigations into people without the DoJ. Never happened. Second, the one time he does it happens to be one of a handful of people running against him. Not only that, he’s not just running against him, he’s winning in basically every poll.

Trump does something he never does aimed at a the one person who presents the greatest threat to his re-election.

That doesn’t happen “every day”.

Bullshit.

It is a massively failed analogy and false equivelance because you have no such evidence that trumpo extorted anyone or anythibng.

NOTHING

Your claim to what you know is simply and strictlyu hyperpartisan opinion.

One more time and read slowly YOU DO NOT HAVE EVIDENCE

Tell me why the analogy doesn’t work and tell me why Trump’s so called coincidence isn’t evidence.

 

[rightwinger]

Without evidence yes it is coincidence. You have no evidence.

Yep. And a man with a gun standing over a dead body is just a coincidence too.

Coincidences matter.

No they do not they happen every day and are normal.

You have absolutely zero evidence making the whole impeachment a political circus. Revenge for Clinton.

That is fact you have NO evidence your man with a gun analogy is an idiotic false equivelance.

Nope. Guy with a gun is just a coincidence. No evidence he shot the person dying of a bullet wound. Zero. Just a coincidence. People are shot all the time. Lots of people have guns. No evidence that those two are connected.

Here’s how you know it wasn’t a coincidence. First, Trump does not ask officials to push investigations into people without the DoJ. Never happened. Second, the one time he does it happens to be one of a handful of people running against him. Not only that, he’s not just running against him, he’s winning in basically every poll.

Trump does something he never does aimed at a the one person who presents the greatest threat to his re-election.

That doesn’t happen “every day”.

Bullshit.

It is a massively failed analogy and false equivelance because you have no such evidence that trumpo extorted anyone or anythibng.

NOTHING

Your claim to what you know is simply and strictlyu hyperpartisan opinion.

One more time and read slowly YOU DO NOT HAVE EVIDENCE

There is evidence that Trump withheld military aid to Ukraine until they opened up an investigation of Biden = Extortion

 

[Soupnazi630]

Without evidence yes it is coincidence. You have no evidence.

Yep. And a man with a gun standing over a dead body is just a coincidence too.

Coincidences matter.

No they do not they happen every day and are normal.

You have absolutely zero evidence making the whole impeachment a political circus. Revenge for Clinton.

That is fact you have NO evidence your man with a gun analogy is an idiotic false equivelance.

Nope. Guy with a gun is just a coincidence. No evidence he shot the person dying of a bullet wound. Zero. Just a coincidence. People are shot all the time. Lots of people have guns. No evidence that those two are connected.

Here’s how you know it wasn’t a coincidence. First, Trump does not ask officials to push investigations into people without the DoJ. Never happened. Second, the one time he does it happens to be one of a handful of people running against him. Not only that, he’s not just running against him, he’s winning in basically every poll.

Trump does something he never does aimed at a the one person who presents the greatest threat to his re-election.

That doesn’t happen “every day”.

Bullshit.

It is a massively failed analogy and false equivelance because you have no such evidence that trumpo extorted anyone or anythibng.

NOTHING

Your claim to what you know is simply and strictlyu hyperpartisan opinion.

One more time and read slowly YOU DO NOT HAVE EVIDENCE

Tell me why the analogy doesn’t work and tell me why Trump’s so called coincidence isn’t evidence.

Coioncidence is not evidence and you have no evidence at all that trump coerced or extorted anythiing.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Without evidence yes it is coincidence. You have no evidence.

Yep. And a man with a gun standing over a dead body is just a coincidence too.

Coincidences matter.

No they do not they happen every day and are normal.

You have absolutely zero evidence making the whole impeachment a political circus. Revenge for Clinton.

That is fact you have NO evidence your man with a gun analogy is an idiotic false equivelance.

Nope. Guy with a gun is just a coincidence. No evidence he shot the person dying of a bullet wound. Zero. Just a coincidence. People are shot all the time. Lots of people have guns. No evidence that those two are connected.

Here’s how you know it wasn’t a coincidence. First, Trump does not ask officials to push investigations into people without the DoJ. Never happened. Second, the one time he does it happens to be one of a handful of people running against him. Not only that, he’s not just running against him, he’s winning in basically every poll.

Trump does something he never does aimed at a the one person who presents the greatest threat to his re-election.

That doesn’t happen “every day”.

Bullshit.

It is a massively failed analogy and false equivelance because you have no such evidence that trumpo extorted anyone or anythibng.

NOTHING

Your claim to what you know is simply and strictlyu hyperpartisan opinion.

One more time and read slowly YOU DO NOT HAVE EVIDENCE

There is evidence that Trump withheld military aid to Ukraine until they opened up an investigation of Biden = Extortion

No there is not.

That whole thing was a massive nothing burger

 

[colfax_m]

Without evidence yes it is coincidence. You have no evidence.

Yep. And a man with a gun standing over a dead body is just a coincidence too.

Coincidences matter.

No they do not they happen every day and are normal.

You have absolutely zero evidence making the whole impeachment a political circus. Revenge for Clinton.

That is fact you have NO evidence your man with a gun analogy is an idiotic false equivelance.

Nope. Guy with a gun is just a coincidence. No evidence he shot the person dying of a bullet wound. Zero. Just a coincidence. People are shot all the time. Lots of people have guns. No evidence that those two are connected.

Here’s how you know it wasn’t a coincidence. First, Trump does not ask officials to push investigations into people without the DoJ. Never happened. Second, the one time he does it happens to be one of a handful of people running against him. Not only that, he’s not just running against him, he’s winning in basically every poll.

Trump does something he never does aimed at a the one person who presents the greatest threat to his re-election.

That doesn’t happen “every day”.

Bullshit.

It is a massively failed analogy and false equivelance because you have no such evidence that trumpo extorted anyone or anythibng.

NOTHING

Your claim to what you know is simply and strictlyu hyperpartisan opinion.

One more time and read slowly YOU DO NOT HAVE EVIDENCE

Tell me why the analogy doesn’t work and tell me why Trump’s so called coincidence isn’t evidence.

Coioncidence is not evidence and you have no evidence at all that trump coerced or extorted anythiing.

The problem is that isn’t a coincidence and anyone with half a brain knows that.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Without evidence yes it is coincidence. You have no evidence.

Yep. And a man with a gun standing over a dead body is just a coincidence too.

Coincidences matter.

No they do not they happen every day and are normal.

You have absolutely zero evidence making the whole impeachment a political circus. Revenge for Clinton.

That is fact you have NO evidence your man with a gun analogy is an idiotic false equivelance.

Nope. Guy with a gun is just a coincidence. No evidence he shot the person dying of a bullet wound. Zero. Just a coincidence. People are shot all the time. Lots of people have guns. No evidence that those two are connected.

Here’s how you know it wasn’t a coincidence. First, Trump does not ask officials to push investigations into people without the DoJ. Never happened. Second, the one time he does it happens to be one of a handful of people running against him. Not only that, he’s not just running against him, he’s winning in basically every poll.

Trump does something he never does aimed at a the one person who presents the greatest threat to his re-election.

That doesn’t happen “every day”.

Bullshit.

It is a massively failed analogy and false equivelance because you have no such evidence that trumpo extorted anyone or anythibng.

NOTHING

Your claim to what you know is simply and strictlyu hyperpartisan opinion.

One more time and read slowly YOU DO NOT HAVE EVIDENCE

Tell me why the analogy doesn’t work and tell me why Trump’s so called coincidence isn’t evidence.

Coioncidence is not evidence and you have no evidence at all that trump coerced or extorted anythiing.

The problem is that isn’t a coincidence and anyone with half a brain knows that.

Wrong.

Without evidence it is coincidence and coincidence is not evidence except to conspiracy theorists who are univerally fools.

Only retards still believe the shit which no one produced evidence for

 

[BluesLegend]

Hate to break it to you OP but Dems RIGGED and CHEATED and STUFFED BALLOT BOXES they won nothing.

Hate to break it to you but this is a fallacy.

LOL brilliant argument, did you get your debating degree mail order? (blueslegend said with extreme sarcasm)

 

[colfax_m]

Without evidence yes it is coincidence. You have no evidence.

Yep. And a man with a gun standing over a dead body is just a coincidence too.

Coincidences matter.

No they do not they happen every day and are normal.

You have absolutely zero evidence making the whole impeachment a political circus. Revenge for Clinton.

That is fact you have NO evidence your man with a gun analogy is an idiotic false equivelance.

Nope. Guy with a gun is just a coincidence. No evidence he shot the person dying of a bullet wound. Zero. Just a coincidence. People are shot all the time. Lots of people have guns. No evidence that those two are connected.

Here’s how you know it wasn’t a coincidence. First, Trump does not ask officials to push investigations into people without the DoJ. Never happened. Second, the one time he does it happens to be one of a handful of people running against him. Not only that, he’s not just running against him, he’s winning in basically every poll.

Trump does something he never does aimed at a the one person who presents the greatest threat to his re-election.

That doesn’t happen “every day”.

Bullshit.

It is a massively failed analogy and false equivelance because you have no such evidence that trumpo extorted anyone or anythibng.

NOTHING

Your claim to what you know is simply and strictlyu hyperpartisan opinion.

One more time and read slowly YOU DO NOT HAVE EVIDENCE

Tell me why the analogy doesn’t work and tell me why Trump’s so called coincidence isn’t evidence.

Coioncidence is not evidence and you have no evidence at all that trump coerced or extorted anythiing.

The problem is that isn’t a coincidence and anyone with half a brain knows that.

Wrong.

Without evidence it is coincidence and coincidence is not evidence except to conspiracy theorists who are univerally fools.

Only retards still believe the shit which no one produced evidence for

It is the evidence. You have to be brain dead to think it’s just a coincidence. Just like you’d have to be brain dead to think it’s a coincidence someone just happens to be standing over a dead body with a gun.

There is no rational alternative explanation.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Without evidence yes it is coincidence. You have no evidence.

Yep. And a man with a gun standing over a dead body is just a coincidence too.

Coincidences matter.

No they do not they happen every day and are normal.

You have absolutely zero evidence making the whole impeachment a political circus. Revenge for Clinton.

That is fact you have NO evidence your man with a gun analogy is an idiotic false equivelance.

Nope. Guy with a gun is just a coincidence. No evidence he shot the person dying of a bullet wound. Zero. Just a coincidence. People are shot all the time. Lots of people have guns. No evidence that those two are connected.

Here’s how you know it wasn’t a coincidence. First, Trump does not ask officials to push investigations into people without the DoJ. Never happened. Second, the one time he does it happens to be one of a handful of people running against him. Not only that, he’s not just running against him, he’s winning in basically every poll.

Trump does something he never does aimed at a the one person who presents the greatest threat to his re-election.

That doesn’t happen “every day”.

Bullshit.

It is a massively failed analogy and false equivelance because you have no such evidence that trumpo extorted anyone or anythibng.

NOTHING

Your claim to what you know is simply and strictlyu hyperpartisan opinion.

One more time and read slowly YOU DO NOT HAVE EVIDENCE

Tell me why the analogy doesn’t work and tell me why Trump’s so called coincidence isn’t evidence.

Coioncidence is not evidence and you have no evidence at all that trump coerced or extorted anythiing.

The problem is that isn’t a coincidence and anyone with half a brain knows that.

Wrong.

Without evidence it is coincidence and coincidence is not evidence except to conspiracy theorists who are univerally fools.

Only retards still believe the shit which no one produced evidence for

It is the evidence. You have to be brain dead to think it’s just a coincidence. Just like you’d have to be brain dead to think it’s a coincidence someone just happens to be standing over a dead body with a gun.

There is no rational alternative explanation.

No it is not evidence

Try argueing in court that someone is guilty due to coincidence.

You have to be a fool to claim that a coincidence which is common proves something which is exactly what you are screeching about.

This is why we use terms like reasonable doubt in court. It works, your desperate spin and grasping at straws is a failure and any reasonable thinking person knows this

 

[colfax_m]

Without evidence yes it is coincidence. You have no evidence.

Yep. And a man with a gun standing over a dead body is just a coincidence too.

Coincidences matter.

No they do not they happen every day and are normal.

You have absolutely zero evidence making the whole impeachment a political circus. Revenge for Clinton.

That is fact you have NO evidence your man with a gun analogy is an idiotic false equivelance.

Nope. Guy with a gun is just a coincidence. No evidence he shot the person dying of a bullet wound. Zero. Just a coincidence. People are shot all the time. Lots of people have guns. No evidence that those two are connected.

Here’s how you know it wasn’t a coincidence. First, Trump does not ask officials to push investigations into people without the DoJ. Never happened. Second, the one time he does it happens to be one of a handful of people running against him. Not only that, he’s not just running against him, he’s winning in basically every poll.

Trump does something he never does aimed at a the one person who presents the greatest threat to his re-election.

That doesn’t happen “every day”.

Bullshit.

It is a massively failed analogy and false equivelance because you have no such evidence that trumpo extorted anyone or anythibng.

NOTHING

Your claim to what you know is simply and strictlyu hyperpartisan opinion.

One more time and read slowly YOU DO NOT HAVE EVIDENCE

Tell me why the analogy doesn’t work and tell me why Trump’s so called coincidence isn’t evidence.

Coioncidence is not evidence and you have no evidence at all that trump coerced or extorted anythiing.

The problem is that isn’t a coincidence and anyone with half a brain knows that.

Wrong.

Without evidence it is coincidence and coincidence is not evidence except to conspiracy theorists who are univerally fools.

Only retards still believe the shit which no one produced evidence for

It is the evidence. You have to be brain dead to think it’s just a coincidence. Just like you’d have to be brain dead to think it’s a coincidence someone just happens to be standing over a dead body with a gun.

There is no rational alternative explanation.

No it is not evidence

Try argueing in court that someone is guilty due to coincidence.

You have to be a fool to claim that a coincidence which is common proves something which is exactly what you are screeching about.

This is why we use terms like reasonable doubt in court. It works, your desperate spin and grasping at straws is a failure and any reasonable thinking person knows this

I’ll argue in court someone is guilty because they were found standing over a dead body with a gun because there is no reasonable alternative explanation and no one will bat an eye.

I’ll also argue that Trump going solo after the one person who presents the greatest political threat to him is political because there is no reasonable alternate explanation.

 

[Desperado]

Without evidence yes it is coincidence. You have no evidence.

Yep. And a man with a gun standing over a dead body is just a coincidence too.

Coincidences matter.

No they do not they happen every day and are normal.

You have absolutely zero evidence making the whole impeachment a political circus. Revenge for Clinton.

That is fact you have NO evidence your man with a gun analogy is an idiotic false equivelance.

Nope. Guy with a gun is just a coincidence. No evidence he shot the person dying of a bullet wound. Zero. Just a coincidence. People are shot all the time. Lots of people have guns. No evidence that those two are connected.

Here’s how you know it wasn’t a coincidence. First, Trump does not ask officials to push investigations into people without the DoJ. Never happened. Second, the one time he does it happens to be one of a handful of people running against him. Not only that, he’s not just running against him, he’s winning in basically every poll.

Trump does something he never does aimed at a the one person who presents the greatest threat to his re-election.

That doesn’t happen “every day”.

Bullshit.

It is a massively failed analogy and false equivelance because you have no such evidence that trumpo extorted anyone or anythibng.

NOTHING

Your claim to what you know is simply and strictlyu hyperpartisan opinion.

One more time and read slowly YOU DO NOT HAVE EVIDENCE

There is evidence that Trump withheld military aid to Ukraine until they opened up an investigation of Biden = Extortion

You have no proof of that except for that lying Major that his allegiance was to the Ukraine yet we have Biden on video doing his quid pro quo stunt

 

[Soupnazi630]

Without evidence yes it is coincidence. You have no evidence.

Yep. And a man with a gun standing over a dead body is just a coincidence too.

Coincidences matter.

No they do not they happen every day and are normal.

You have absolutely zero evidence making the whole impeachment a political circus. Revenge for Clinton.

That is fact you have NO evidence your man with a gun analogy is an idiotic false equivelance.

Nope. Guy with a gun is just a coincidence. No evidence he shot the person dying of a bullet wound. Zero. Just a coincidence. People are shot all the time. Lots of people have guns. No evidence that those two are connected.

Here’s how you know it wasn’t a coincidence. First, Trump does not ask officials to push investigations into people without the DoJ. Never happened. Second, the one time he does it happens to be one of a handful of people running against him. Not only that, he’s not just running against him, he’s winning in basically every poll.

Trump does something he never does aimed at a the one person who presents the greatest threat to his re-election.

That doesn’t happen “every day”.

Bullshit.

It is a massively failed analogy and false equivelance because you have no such evidence that trumpo extorted anyone or anythibng.

NOTHING

Your claim to what you know is simply and strictlyu hyperpartisan opinion.

One more time and read slowly YOU DO NOT HAVE EVIDENCE

Tell me why the analogy doesn’t work and tell me why Trump’s so called coincidence isn’t evidence.

Coioncidence is not evidence and you have no evidence at all that trump coerced or extorted anythiing.

The problem is that isn’t a coincidence and anyone with half a brain knows that.

Wrong.

Without evidence it is coincidence and coincidence is not evidence except to conspiracy theorists who are univerally fools.

Only retards still believe the shit which no one produced evidence for

It is the evidence. You have to be brain dead to think it’s just a coincidence. Just like you’d have to be brain dead to think it’s a coincidence someone just happens to be standing over a dead body with a gun.

There is no rational alternative explanation.

No it is not evidence

Try argueing in court that someone is guilty due to coincidence.

You have to be a fool to claim that a coincidence which is common proves something which is exactly what you are screeching about.

This is why we use terms like reasonable doubt in court. It works, your desperate spin and grasping at straws is a failure and any reasonable thinking person knows this

I’ll argue in court someone is guilty because they were found standing over a dead body with a gun because there is no reasonable alternative explanation and no one will bat an eye.

I’ll also argue that Trump going solo after the one person who presents the greatest political threat to him is political because there is no reasonable alternate explanation.

There is no comparison between a man standing over a dead bodyu with a gun and trump.
\
Your analogy is a proven false equivelance.

 

[colfax_m]

Without evidence yes it is coincidence. You have no evidence.

Yep. And a man with a gun standing over a dead body is just a coincidence too.

Coincidences matter.

No they do not they happen every day and are normal.

You have absolutely zero evidence making the whole impeachment a political circus. Revenge for Clinton.

That is fact you have NO evidence your man with a gun analogy is an idiotic false equivelance.

Nope. Guy with a gun is just a coincidence. No evidence he shot the person dying of a bullet wound. Zero. Just a coincidence. People are shot all the time. Lots of people have guns. No evidence that those two are connected.

Here’s how you know it wasn’t a coincidence. First, Trump does not ask officials to push investigations into people without the DoJ. Never happened. Second, the one time he does it happens to be one of a handful of people running against him. Not only that, he’s not just running against him, he’s winning in basically every poll.

Trump does something he never does aimed at a the one person who presents the greatest threat to his re-election.

That doesn’t happen “every day”.

Bullshit.

It is a massively failed analogy and false equivelance because you have no such evidence that trumpo extorted anyone or anythibng.

NOTHING

Your claim to what you know is simply and strictlyu hyperpartisan opinion.

One more time and read slowly YOU DO NOT HAVE EVIDENCE

Tell me why the analogy doesn’t work and tell me why Trump’s so called coincidence isn’t evidence.

Coioncidence is not evidence and you have no evidence at all that trump coerced or extorted anythiing.

The problem is that isn’t a coincidence and anyone with half a brain knows that.

Wrong.

Without evidence it is coincidence and coincidence is not evidence except to conspiracy theorists who are univerally fools.

Only retards still believe the shit which no one produced evidence for

It is the evidence. You have to be brain dead to think it’s just a coincidence. Just like you’d have to be brain dead to think it’s a coincidence someone just happens to be standing over a dead body with a gun.

There is no rational alternative explanation.

No it is not evidence

Try argueing in court that someone is guilty due to coincidence.

You have to be a fool to claim that a coincidence which is common proves something which is exactly what you are screeching about.

This is why we use terms like reasonable doubt in court. It works, your desperate spin and grasping at straws is a failure and any reasonable thinking person knows this

I’ll argue in court someone is guilty because they were found standing over a dead body with a gun because there is no reasonable alternative explanation and no one will bat an eye.

I’ll also argue that Trump going solo after the one person who presents the greatest political threat to him is political because there is no reasonable alternate explanation.

There is no comparison between a man standing over a dead bodyu with a gun and trump.
\
Your analogy is a proven false equivelance.

Why? Why is it false?

 

[Soupnazi630]

Without evidence yes it is coincidence. You have no evidence.

Yep. And a man with a gun standing over a dead body is just a coincidence too.

Coincidences matter.

No they do not they happen every day and are normal.

You have absolutely zero evidence making the whole impeachment a political circus. Revenge for Clinton.

That is fact you have NO evidence your man with a gun analogy is an idiotic false equivelance.

Nope. Guy with a gun is just a coincidence. No evidence he shot the person dying of a bullet wound. Zero. Just a coincidence. People are shot all the time. Lots of people have guns. No evidence that those two are connected.

Here’s how you know it wasn’t a coincidence. First, Trump does not ask officials to push investigations into people without the DoJ. Never happened. Second, the one time he does it happens to be one of a handful of people running against him. Not only that, he’s not just running against him, he’s winning in basically every poll.

Trump does something he never does aimed at a the one person who presents the greatest threat to his re-election.

That doesn’t happen “every day”.

Bullshit.

It is a massively failed analogy and false equivelance because you have no such evidence that trumpo extorted anyone or anythibng.

NOTHING

Your claim to what you know is simply and strictlyu hyperpartisan opinion.

One more time and read slowly YOU DO NOT HAVE EVIDENCE

Tell me why the analogy doesn’t work and tell me why Trump’s so called coincidence isn’t evidence.

Coioncidence is not evidence and you have no evidence at all that trump coerced or extorted anythiing.

The problem is that isn’t a coincidence and anyone with half a brain knows that.

Wrong.

Without evidence it is coincidence and coincidence is not evidence except to conspiracy theorists who are univerally fools.

Only retards still believe the shit which no one produced evidence for

It is the evidence. You have to be brain dead to think it’s just a coincidence. Just like you’d have to be brain dead to think it’s a coincidence someone just happens to be standing over a dead body with a gun.

There is no rational alternative explanation.

No it is not evidence

Try argueing in court that someone is guilty due to coincidence.

You have to be a fool to claim that a coincidence which is common proves something which is exactly what you are screeching about.

This is why we use terms like reasonable doubt in court. It works, your desperate spin and grasping at straws is a failure and any reasonable thinking person knows this

I’ll argue in court someone is guilty because they were found standing over a dead body with a gun because there is no reasonable alternative explanation and no one will bat an eye.

I’ll also argue that Trump going solo after the one person who presents the greatest political threat to him is political because there is no reasonable alternate explanation.

There is no comparison between a man standing over a dead bodyu with a gun and trump.
\
Your analogy is a proven false equivelance.

Why? Why is it false?

Because you have no evidence.

There is no equivelance to standing over a dead body with a gun. You have no such example from Trump.

Now you are schooled

 

[Oldestyle]

If you liberals hadn't passed voting laws that made the results questionable then we wouldn't have people doubting the results like they are!

You doubt the results because you were told to doubt the results. The reason you were told to doubt the results is because Trump is a spoiled snowflake who cannot be told he failed at anything ever.

Oh, bullshit! You could see this coming a mile off and you know it! Mailing out ballots to addresses that haven't requested them is almost begging someone to commit voter fraud. You've got no idea at all where those ballots are going and who is really using them to vote! Nobody had to TELL me that...it was obvious from the moment I heard about it!

 

[EvilCat Breath]

The communists are just going to continue to scream that the election wasn't stolen and no one but communists will believe it.