Intolerant
Diamond Member
- Sep 18, 2012
- 4,947
- 1,856
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't forget that this will still apply when a Democrat is in office.Supreme Court says he can....Read the whole thing.Wait, tRump takes power from the judicial branch by EO but the Democrats are the totalitarians?Piece by piece, step by step, the dimocrap scum totalitarian establishment is crumbling.
Thank you Mr President.
![]()
Wtf?
That’s the problem shit eater.Wow...................if Obama had signed an EO like this, you conservatives would be screaming your heads off saying that Obama is seeking too much power and is gonna be a dictator.
That is what you conservatives would have said if Obama did it, but somehow, Trump always seems to get a pass.
The power to breathe was too much for obama to have
Obama's bowel movements have more value and intelligence than Donald J. Trump.
FACT.
doing their jobs is suppose to be done w/o fear of being fired for NOT doing what you want. activist judges can be a pain sure. but no moreso than conservative judges to liberals. it's the entire checks and balances in action.Wow...................if Obama had signed an EO like this, you conservatives would be screaming your heads off saying that Obama is seeking too much power and is gonna be a dictator.
That is what you conservatives would have said if Obama did it, but somehow, Trump always seems to get a pass.
Restrictions on activist judges is even more important when dems are in charge. Win, Win.Don't forget that this will still apply when a Democrat is in office.Supreme Court says he can....Read the whole thing.Wait, tRump takes power from the judicial branch by EO but the Democrats are the totalitarians?Piece by piece, step by step, the dimocrap scum totalitarian establishment is crumbling.
Thank you Mr President.
![]()
Wtf?
for me - this:What is it exactly you object to? Be specificWow...................if Obama had signed an EO like this, you conservatives would be screaming your heads off saying that Obama is seeking too much power and is gonna be a dictator.
That is what you conservatives would have said if Obama did it, but somehow, Trump always seems to get a pass.
define "activist" judge? not really familiar how this is done except to say they're left leaning. at what level of judges are we also talking about? no time to read up on this right now i'll have to dig this eve.Restrictions on activist judges is even more important when dems are in charge. Win, Win.Don't forget that this will still apply when a Democrat is in office.Supreme Court says he can....Read the whole thing.Wait, tRump takes power from the judicial branch by EO but the Democrats are the totalitarians?Piece by piece, step by step, the dimocrap scum totalitarian establishment is crumbling.
Thank you Mr President.
![]()
Wtf?
Trump’s New Executive Order Gives Him More Power Over Activist Judges | Populist Brief
This is GREAT news! I love it.
Again, what is the problem with it? That he can fire employees?What is it exactly you object to? Be specificWow...................if Obama had signed an EO like this, you conservatives would be screaming your heads off saying that Obama is seeking too much power and is gonna be a dictator.
That is what you conservatives would have said if Obama did it, but somehow, Trump always seems to get a pass.
His EO that was made and signed by Trump, gives Trump more power.
certainly a move that will backfire and come back to haunt them - or at least has huge potential to. not a fan of doing anything that will mess with separation of powers. i need to understand this better but so far - don't like it.Trump’s New Executive Order Gives Him More Power Over Activist Judges | Populist Brief
This is GREAT news! I love it.
Yay, now each administration can try to load the courts with partisan hacks. That'll definitely be great for America.
I look forward to conservatives foaming at the mouth when a liberal presidents uses this in the future.
judges are exempt from such actions just so one person can't stack the courts with like minded judges. for all those liking it now - will they like it when a D comes back in and start firing all of trumps judges?Again, what is the problem with it? That he can fire employees?What is it exactly you object to? Be specificWow...................if Obama had signed an EO like this, you conservatives would be screaming your heads off saying that Obama is seeking too much power and is gonna be a dictator.
That is what you conservatives would have said if Obama did it, but somehow, Trump always seems to get a pass.
His EO that was made and signed by Trump, gives Trump more power.
This goes along with lucia vs SEC and the appointments clause of the constitution.certainly a move that will backfire and come back to haunt them - or at least has huge potential to. not a fan of doing anything that will mess with separation of powers. i need to understand this better but so far - don't like it.Trump’s New Executive Order Gives Him More Power Over Activist Judges | Populist Brief
This is GREAT news! I love it.
Yay, now each administration can try to load the courts with partisan hacks. That'll definitely be great for America.
I look forward to conservatives foaming at the mouth when a liberal presidents uses this in the future.
Trump’s executive order will allow more leeway for agency leaders to find potential appointees without being held back by competitive examination and competitive service selection procedures.Trump’s New Executive Order Gives Him More Power Over Activist Judges | Populist Brief
This is GREAT news! I love it.
a lot more to understand here but at first glance i don't like it. we tell the liberals they set stupid precedents and here trump goes off and does one. if *he* can fire a judge then the next president can - that's how this works and the (R)s can't bitch WHEN that happens.This goes along with lucia vs SEC and the appointments clause of the constitution.certainly a move that will backfire and come back to haunt them - or at least has huge potential to. not a fan of doing anything that will mess with separation of powers. i need to understand this better but so far - don't like it.Trump’s New Executive Order Gives Him More Power Over Activist Judges | Populist Brief
This is GREAT news! I love it.
Yay, now each administration can try to load the courts with partisan hacks. That'll definitely be great for America.
I look forward to conservatives foaming at the mouth when a liberal presidents uses this in the future.
I mean, are bureaucrats part of the "separation of powers?"
They are not in the judiciary. They have no say over life liberty or property. They are executive branch. Of course trump has power over themcertainly a move that will backfire and come back to haunt them - or at least has huge potential to. not a fan of doing anything that will mess with separation of powers. i need to understand this better but so far - don't like it.Trump’s New Executive Order Gives Him More Power Over Activist Judges | Populist Brief
This is GREAT news! I love it.
Yay, now each administration can try to load the courts with partisan hacks. That'll definitely be great for America.
I look forward to conservatives foaming at the mouth when a liberal presidents uses this in the future.
They arent even judges in the sense you are thinking about.a lot more to understand here but at first glance i don't like it. we tell the liberals they set stupid precedents and here trump goes off and does one. if *he* can fire a judge then the next president can - that's how this works and the (R)s can't bitch WHEN that happens.This goes along with lucia vs SEC and the appointments clause of the constitution.certainly a move that will backfire and come back to haunt them - or at least has huge potential to. not a fan of doing anything that will mess with separation of powers. i need to understand this better but so far - don't like it.Trump’s New Executive Order Gives Him More Power Over Activist Judges | Populist Brief
This is GREAT news! I love it.
Yay, now each administration can try to load the courts with partisan hacks. That'll definitely be great for America.
I look forward to conservatives foaming at the mouth when a liberal presidents uses this in the future.
I mean, are bureaucrats part of the "separation of powers?"
but they will. this is somehow *different*.
How can members of the executive branch not be under trump? You think they are unaccountable?a lot more to understand here but at first glance i don't like it. we tell the liberals they set stupid precedents and here trump goes off and does one. if *he* can fire a judge then the next president can - that's how this works and the (R)s can't bitch WHEN that happens.This goes along with lucia vs SEC and the appointments clause of the constitution.certainly a move that will backfire and come back to haunt them - or at least has huge potential to. not a fan of doing anything that will mess with separation of powers. i need to understand this better but so far - don't like it.Trump’s New Executive Order Gives Him More Power Over Activist Judges | Populist Brief
This is GREAT news! I love it.
Yay, now each administration can try to load the courts with partisan hacks. That'll definitely be great for America.
I look forward to conservatives foaming at the mouth when a liberal presidents uses this in the future.
I mean, are bureaucrats part of the "separation of powers?"
but they will. this is somehow *different*.
i also don't trust this article because it's written to slanted to be PRO TRUMP so they're going to put things in a way that makes it sound good, not honest.
They arent judicialTrump’s New Executive Order Gives Him More Power Over Activist Judges | Populist Brief
This is GREAT news! I love it.
Yay, now each administration can try to load the courts with partisan hacks. That'll definitely be great for America.
I look forward to conservatives foaming at the mouth when a liberal presidents uses this in the future.