Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,311
- 80,948
- 2,635
LOLOLNot so fast...
![]()
Politifarce is just as fake as CNN.
I just did a screen capture of their review page...
![1gg5yv.jpg](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fi68.tinypic.com%2F1gg5yv.jpg&hash=c5802e4ba40f167c8023c60d7b765f92)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LOLOLNot so fast...
![]()
Politifarce is just as fake as CNN.
On behalf of the International Liberal Conspiracy, I'd like to personally thank you for 1) trying to change the subject and 2) avoiding anything resembling a counter-argument to the OP's post. It warms my bleeding heart to see you fail.Obama lied about where he was conceived. Yes Obama couldn't tell the truth no matter what. Next question? Oh and Nickelodeon's ratings are better than CNN 's.Trump lies about everything. It is proof of his mental illness. He can not be honest. He must lie all the time to satisfy his illness. He must feel that he is getting over on everyone all the time. That is his identity.
The most embarrassing thing is not just to be proven wrong, but to be proven to have said the exact opposite of the truth. In short, Donald Trump said that CNN's ratings are "way down" lately," when in fact they are "way up", according to the independent fact-checking website Politifact.com:
Trump is wrong. CNN's ratings are up.
![]()
if both can be true, why is taking 1 side valid and the other side "making shit up"? that's what i don't get.Your article and the Politfact statements can both be true, because compared to CNN's ratings in past years, its viewership is way up. If your article is correct, NickAtNight has always had more viewers. So what? We have a lot of kids watching tv during primetime? CNN's viewership is up.
The President makes shit up. End of story.
LOLOLNot so fast...
![]()
Politifarce is just as fake as CNN.
I just did a screen capture of their review page...
![]()
Be careful there. The sources are what counts, not necessarily their final "judgment."The most embarrassing thing is not just to be proven wrong, but to be proven to have said the exact opposite of the truth. In short, Donald Trump said that CNN's ratings are "way down" lately," when in fact they are "way up", according to the independent fact-checking website Politifact.com:
Trump is wrong. CNN's ratings are up.
![]()
Politifact, aye? I just read something about them a couple days ago:
They're biased fuckwads.
PolitiFact Parent Tampa Bay Times Scores Pants on Fire for Partisan Bias - Media Trackers
Maybe you need to go back and read both articles? Because my point was that the two articles are comparing different things. Compared to past viewer counts of CNN, CNN is gaining viewership and has been for the past few years. The other article compares CNN's viewership to other channels. They aren't comparing the same things. So there's no reason to necessarily contradict either one.if both can be true, why is taking 1 side valid and the other side "making shit up"? that's what i don't get.Your article and the Politfact statements can both be true, because compared to CNN's ratings in past years, its viewership is way up. If your article is correct, NickAtNight has always had more viewers. So what? We have a lot of kids watching tv during primetime? CNN's viewership is up.
The President makes shit up. End of story.
i found several articles today that said CNN has gone from 6th to 13th. now i'm not going to go into splitting hairs cause i just don't care at that point but i don't understand how if you take emotions out that one side is making stuff up and the other is accurate when we have valid stories for both sides at the very minimum.
Maybe you need to go back and read both articles? Because my point was that the two articles are comparing different things. Compared to past viewer counts of CNN, CNN is gaining viewership and has been for the past few years. The other article compares CNN's viewership to other channels. They aren't comparing the same things. So there's no reason to necessarily contradict either one.if both can be true, why is taking 1 side valid and the other side "making shit up"? that's what i don't get.Your article and the Politfact statements can both be true, because compared to CNN's ratings in past years, its viewership is way up. If your article is correct, NickAtNight has always had more viewers. So what? We have a lot of kids watching tv during primetime? CNN's viewership is up.
The President makes shit up. End of story.
i found several articles today that said CNN has gone from 6th to 13th. now i'm not going to go into splitting hairs cause i just don't care at that point but i don't understand how if you take emotions out that one side is making stuff up and the other is accurate when we have valid stories for both sides at the very minimum.
CNN's ratings aren't way down compared to past years. They are improving. So the President's statement is inaccurate.
okay, MerlinMaybe you need to go back and read both articles? Because my point was that the two articles are comparing different things. Compared to past viewer counts of CNN, CNN is gaining viewership and has been for the past few years. The other article compares CNN's viewership to other channels. They aren't comparing the same things. So there's no reason to necessarily contradict either one.if both can be true, why is taking 1 side valid and the other side "making shit up"? that's what i don't get.Your article and the Politfact statements can both be true, because compared to CNN's ratings in past years, its viewership is way up. If your article is correct, NickAtNight has always had more viewers. So what? We have a lot of kids watching tv during primetime? CNN's viewership is up.
The President makes shit up. End of story.
i found several articles today that said CNN has gone from 6th to 13th. now i'm not going to go into splitting hairs cause i just don't care at that point but i don't understand how if you take emotions out that one side is making stuff up and the other is accurate when we have valid stories for both sides at the very minimum.
CNN's ratings aren't way down compared to past years. They are improving. So the President's statement is inaccurate.
CNN is done within 2 years.
not gonna go back and read much of anything to be honest. i query on CNN RATINGS in google and headline after headline say DOWN.Maybe you need to go back and read both articles? Because my point was that the two articles are comparing different things. Compared to past viewer counts of CNN, CNN is gaining viewership and has been for the past few years. The other article compares CNN's viewership to other channels. They aren't comparing the same things. So there's no reason to necessarily contradict either one.if both can be true, why is taking 1 side valid and the other side "making shit up"? that's what i don't get.Your article and the Politfact statements can both be true, because compared to CNN's ratings in past years, its viewership is way up. If your article is correct, NickAtNight has always had more viewers. So what? We have a lot of kids watching tv during primetime? CNN's viewership is up.
The President makes shit up. End of story.
i found several articles today that said CNN has gone from 6th to 13th. now i'm not going to go into splitting hairs cause i just don't care at that point but i don't understand how if you take emotions out that one side is making stuff up and the other is accurate when we have valid stories for both sides at the very minimum.
CNN's ratings aren't way down compared to past years. They are improving. So the President's statement is inaccurate.
Who fucking cares...The most embarrassing thing is not just to be proven wrong, but to be proven to have said the exact opposite of the truth. In short, Donald Trump said that CNN's ratings are "way down" lately," when in fact they are "way up", according to the independent fact-checking website Politifact.com:
Trump is wrong. CNN's ratings are up.
![]()
Nah, cleaning up rightwingnut garbage is not fake.LOLOLNot so fast...
![]()
Politifarce is just as fake as CNN.
I just did a screen capture of their review page...
![]()
Fake news corporation has a fake reviews page, what a surprise.
No one saw this coming. Now politifarce can show us the official truth - CNN ratings are the same as ever!
Nah, cleaning up rightwingnut garbage is not fake.LOLOLNot so fast...
![]()
Politifarce is just as fake as CNN.
I just did a screen capture of their review page...
![]()
Fake news corporation has a fake reviews page, what a surprise.
No one saw this coming. Now politifarce can show us the official truth - CNN ratings are the same as ever!
Nah, cleaning up rightwingnut garbage is not fake.LOLOLNot so fast...
![]()
Politifarce is just as fake as CNN.
I just did a screen capture of their review page...
![]()
Fake news corporation has a fake reviews page, what a surprise.
No one saw this coming. Now politifarce can show us the official truth - CNN ratings are the same as ever!
Thanks for posting something which has absolutely nothing to do with what I posted.Nah, cleaning up rightwingnut garbage is not fake.LOLOLNot so fast...
![]()
Politifarce is just as fake as CNN.
I just did a screen capture of their review page...
![]()
Fake news corporation has a fake reviews page, what a surprise.
No one saw this coming. Now politifarce can show us the official truth - CNN ratings are the same as ever!
CNN’s ratings take a nosedive amid month of retractions, scandals and blunders
Report: CNN Tanks to Just 10th in Primetime TV Ratings
So now trying to manipulate reality is "free expression?"Nah, cleaning up rightwingnut garbage is not fake.LOLOLNot so fast...
![]()
Politifarce is just as fake as CNN.
I just did a screen capture of their review page...
![]()
Fake news corporation has a fake reviews page, what a surprise.
No one saw this coming. Now politifarce can show us the official truth - CNN ratings are the same as ever!
We know you stand firmly against free expression as you are a far left CNN drone.
Blackmailing should be the standard way to deal with those expressing themselves freely.