Trump’s Voter-Intimidation Commission a Failure

[2aguy]

No voter fraud? Then why are Dems so determined to fight being able to know for sure? Methinks where there is smoke there's fire. Trying to track voter fraud is reprehensible but covering it up isn't?

Dems control 41 states?

You meant the FBI under Comey, who admitted he participated in helping hilary cover up her felonies? That he leaked information to the press...which he stated under oath....

Or how about the Deputy Director of the FBI, McCabe....who is now under 3 investigations of his own...including violations of the Hatch act, sexual discrimination and going after Flynn because Flynn supported the accuser......

You mean that FBI?

 

[Wry Catcher]

Forty-one states have refused the Trump administration's request for certain voter information, according to a CNN inquiry to all 50 states.
[…]
When states began to express concerns about the legality of his administration's efforts to investigate voter fraud, Trump called them out on Twitter on Saturday, questioning whether they were hiding something.

41 states refuse request for voter information, including Montana

Trump is as reprehensible as he is wrong – there was no ‘voter fraud,’ it’s a ridiculous lie contrive by Trump and others of the dishonest right.

/---- No voter fraud???? Then what are the Blue States hiding?

No Russian collusion??? Then what is Trump&Co hiding?

Consider, if voter fraud existed, is there any proof it changed an election? The same cannot be said/written about the efforts by Russia to influence election here and around the globe, unless the investigation move forward. If Trump manages to curtail the investigation, he as much as admits guilt.

 

[miketx]

Forty-one states have refused the Trump administration's request for certain voter information, according to a CNN inquiry to all 50 states.
[…]
When states began to express concerns about the legality of his administration's efforts to investigate voter fraud, Trump called them out on Twitter on Saturday, questioning whether they were hiding something.

41 states refuse request for voter information, including Montana

Trump is as reprehensible as he is wrong – there was no ‘voter fraud,’ it’s a ridiculous lie contrive by Trump and others of the dishonest right.

CNN printed it, then I think it's questionable at best. I'd really say it's not that many, but the battle isn't over yet.

 

[2aguy]

Forty-one states have refused the Trump administration's request for certain voter information, according to a CNN inquiry to all 50 states.
[…]
When states began to express concerns about the legality of his administration's efforts to investigate voter fraud, Trump called them out on Twitter on Saturday, questioning whether they were hiding something.

41 states refuse request for voter information, including Montana

Trump is as reprehensible as he is wrong – there was no ‘voter fraud,’ it’s a ridiculous lie contrive by Trump and others of the dishonest right.

/---- No voter fraud???? Then what are the Blue States hiding?

No Russian collusion??? Then what is Trump&Co hiding?

Consider, if voter fraud existed, is there any proof it changed an election? The same cannot be said/written about the efforts by Russia to influence election here and around the globe, unless the investigation move forward. If Trump manages to curtail the investigation, he as much as admits guilt.

They aren't hiding anything.......they have been looking for 10 months now, and have nothing.....and Comey stated Trump told him to go after anyone who might have broken the law.....

Do you simply refuse to understand the facts, the truth and reality?

 

[2aguy]

This is another fake news story and those states not helping....have no leg to stand on.....

this thread was started by someone who didn't do their research....which is not a surprise....

44 states won't give some voter info to panel - CNNPolitics.com

The vice chairman's letter twice requests only "public" voter information, and Kobach clarified the specifics of his request Friday: "Every state receives the same letter, but we're not asking for it if it's not publicly available," he told The Kansas City Star.

Kobach also told CNN's Anderson Cooper last week, "Whatever a person on the street can walk in and get, that's what we would like."

 

[BlackFlag]

No voter fraud? Then why are Dems so determined to fight being able to know for sure? Methinks where there is smoke there's fire. Trying to track voter fraud is reprehensible but covering it up isn't?

Dems control 41 states?

You meant the FBI under Comey, who admitted he participated in helping hilary cover up her felonies? That he leaked information to the press...which he stated under oath....

Or how about the Deputy Director of the FBI, McCabe....who is now under 3 investigations of his own...including violations of the Hatch act, sexual discrimination and going after Flynn because Flynn supported the accuser......

You mean that FBI?

The one performing a criminal investigation into Russia's interference. That one.

 

[miketx]

No voter fraud? Then why are Dems so determined to fight being able to know for sure? Methinks where there is smoke there's fire. Trying to track voter fraud is reprehensible but covering it up isn't?

Dems control 41 states?

You meant the FBI under Comey, who admitted he participated in helping hilary cover up her felonies? That he leaked information to the press...which he stated under oath....

Or how about the Deputy Director of the FBI, McCabe....who is now under 3 investigations of his own...including violations of the Hatch act, sexual discrimination and going after Flynn because Flynn supported the accuser......

You mean that FBI?

The one performing a criminal investigation into Russia's interference. That one.

Serious question here, when do you think we may have some kind of proof of the Russian interference? What I assume is that if we are still "investigating" that there must not be any proof "yet".

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

41 states refuse request for voter information, including Montana

Trump is as reprehensible as he is wrong – there was no ‘voter fraud,’ it’s a ridiculous lie contrive by Trump and others of the dishonest right.

Now 44 States
Have Refused
Trump
Commission's Demand For Personal Info On Voters

 

[2aguy]

No voter fraud? Then why are Dems so determined to fight being able to know for sure? Methinks where there is smoke there's fire. Trying to track voter fraud is reprehensible but covering it up isn't?

Dems control 41 states?

You meant the FBI under Comey, who admitted he participated in helping hilary cover up her felonies? That he leaked information to the press...which he stated under oath....

Or how about the Deputy Director of the FBI, McCabe....who is now under 3 investigations of his own...including violations of the Hatch act, sexual discrimination and going after Flynn because Flynn supported the accuser......

You mean that FBI?

The one performing a criminal investigation into Russia's interference. That one.

Oh...the one where the Head said Trump isn't under investigation and he said that to the heads of all the congressional committees and to Trump himself 3 separate times? That one?

 

[2aguy]

41 states refuse request for voter information, including Montana

Trump is as reprehensible as he is wrong – there was no ‘voter fraud,’ it’s a ridiculous lie contrive by Trump and others of the dishonest right.

Now 44 States
Have Refused
Trump
Commission's Demand For Personal Info On Voters

Yes....the information the sell to political parties and give freely to journalists and law enforcement........

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

what is Trump hiding in his Tax Returns ..

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

41 states refuse request for voter information, including Montana

Trump is as reprehensible as he is wrong – there was no ‘voter fraud,’ it’s a ridiculous lie contrive by Trump and others of the dishonest right.

Now 44 States
Have Refused
Trump
Commission's Demand For Personal Info On Voters

Yes....the information the sell to political parties and give freely to journalists and law enforcement........

I trust Forbes more than I trust you ....I trust you like I trust Miss Cleo in making Investment decisions

 

[jknowgood]

No voter fraud? Then why are Dems so determined to fight being able to know for sure? Methinks where there is smoke there's fire. Trying to track voter fraud is reprehensible but covering it up isn't?

1a. Because the rhetoric will create a climate to reduce access to the polls, cutting days, hours and places and working to suppress voting by the poor, the aged, minorities and Democrats.

2a. You think where there is smoke there is fire? Do you not see the smoke surrounding Pence, Flynn, Manafort, et al and your beloved Trump?

Exposing Democrat voter fraud will suppress the vote how? Reducing illegal voters and dead voters?

 

[LordBrownTrout]

No voter fraud? Then why are Dems so determined to fight being able to know for sure? Methinks where there is smoke there's fire. Trying to track voter fraud is reprehensible but covering it up isn't?

1a. Because the rhetoric will create a climate to reduce access to the polls, cutting days, hours and places and working to suppress voting by the poor, the aged, minorities and Democrats.

2a. You think where there is smoke there is fire? Do you not see the smoke surrounding Pence, Flynn, Manafort, et al and your beloved Trump?

There is no smoke, just the medias narrative to keep their denial going.

 

[BlackFlag]

No voter fraud? Then why are Dems so determined to fight being able to know for sure? Methinks where there is smoke there's fire. Trying to track voter fraud is reprehensible but covering it up isn't?

Dems control 41 states?

You meant the FBI under Comey, who admitted he participated in helping hilary cover up her felonies? That he leaked information to the press...which he stated under oath....

Or how about the Deputy Director of the FBI, McCabe....who is now under 3 investigations of his own...including violations of the Hatch act, sexual discrimination and going after Flynn because Flynn supported the accuser......

You mean that FBI?

The one performing a criminal investigation into Russia's interference. That one.

Serious question here, when do you think we may have some kind of proof of the Russian interference? What I assume is that if we are still "investigating" that there must not be any proof "yet".

What kind of proof are you looking for? We know that Russia regularly launches cyber attacks against us, we know they used bots to spread pro-Trump and anti-Hillary propaganda, and we know multiple people in Trump's campaign profited from relationships with Russia and stand to profit even further from the U.S. submitting to Russia's behavior.

 

[jknowgood]

Forty-one states have refused the Trump administration's request for certain voter information, according to a CNN inquiry to all 50 states.
[…]
When states began to express concerns about the legality of his administration's efforts to investigate voter fraud, Trump called them out on Twitter on Saturday, questioning whether they were hiding something.

41 states refuse request for voter information, including Montana

Trump is as reprehensible as he is wrong – there was no ‘voter fraud,’ it’s a ridiculous lie contrive by Trump and others of the dishonest right.

/---- "there was no ‘voter fraud,’" Then prove it.

How do you prove that something that didn't haplen, didn't happen? It's like if you accused me of having an imaginary friend, I said I don't, and you said "prove it"

Fraud has already been proven. Your party will never be in power without cheating.

 

[jknowgood]

what is Trump hiding in his Tax Returns ..

You have already seen one year and it proved you wrong.

 

[miketx]

No voter fraud? Then why are Dems so determined to fight being able to know for sure? Methinks where there is smoke there's fire. Trying to track voter fraud is reprehensible but covering it up isn't?

Dems control 41 states?

You meant the FBI under Comey, who admitted he participated in helping hilary cover up her felonies? That he leaked information to the press...which he stated under oath....

Or how about the Deputy Director of the FBI, McCabe....who is now under 3 investigations of his own...including violations of the Hatch act, sexual discrimination and going after Flynn because Flynn supported the accuser......

You mean that FBI?

The one performing a criminal investigation into Russia's interference. That one.

Serious question here, when do you think we may have some kind of proof of the Russian interference? What I assume is that if we are still "investigating" that there must not be any proof "yet".

What kind of proof are you looking for? We know that Russia regularly launches cyber attacks against us, we know they used bots to spread pro-Trump and anti-Hillary propaganda, and we know multiple people in Trump's campaign profited from relationships with Russia and stand to profit even further from the U.S. submitting to Russia's behavior.

I wonder who "we" is and how you "know" all this?

 

[Care4all]

No voter fraud? Then why are Dems so determined to fight being able to know for sure? Methinks where there is smoke there's fire. Trying to track voter fraud is reprehensible but covering it up isn't?

Dems control 41 states?

You meant the FBI under Comey, who admitted he participated in helping hilary cover up her felonies? That he leaked information to the press...which he stated under oath....

Or how about the Deputy Director of the FBI, McCabe....who is now under 3 investigations of his own...including violations of the Hatch act, sexual discrimination and going after Flynn because Flynn supported the accuser......

You mean that FBI?

The one performing a criminal investigation into Russia's interference. That one.

Oh...the one where the Head said Trump isn't under investigation and he said that to the heads of all the congressional committees and to Trump himself 3 separate times? That one?

old news! that was months ago!

Trump IS under investigation now...thanks to his own shenanigans...

And the Trump campaign IS UNDER CRIMINAL investigation...if they find something on the Trump campaigners then the very next step is investigating whether the head of the campaign was also involved...

 

[skews13]

Forty-one states have refused the Trump administration's request for certain voter information, according to a CNN inquiry to all 50 states.
[…]
When states began to express concerns about the legality of his administration's efforts to investigate voter fraud, Trump called them out on Twitter on Saturday, questioning whether they were hiding something.

41 states refuse request for voter information, including Montana

Trump is as reprehensible as he is wrong – there was no ‘voter fraud,’ it’s a ridiculous lie contrive by Trump and others of the dishonest right.

/---- "there was no ‘voter fraud,’" Then prove it.

Proofs on you pal. Take your time.