Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Doesn't change the fact that these are private enterprises and they have freedom from government intrusion either by censorship or demands they publish something.
Is being able to express your opinion on twitter a constitutional right now? If not should it be?
We'll, Biden broke that tradition dint he.Upholding the American Tradition of accepting the various state, and sometimes federal courts final decision in election disputes comes with it the nonviolent transfer of power that we once held sacred. The tradition is for the politicians not the common man, to concede with honor and convince the people to come together as one nation in the end.
This is exactly what the "Fairness" Doctrine allowed. A total monopoly on the media. President Ronald Wilson Reagan, the greatest President in my lifetime, rightfully shitcanned it to allow the truth to be spoken.No thanks to the MSM.
The left enjoyed a damn-near 100% monopoly on all media until a guy from Missouri got on AM radio and started pointing out the bullshit.
The left has been bat-shit crazy about it ever since.
Free speech is the enemy of your ilk and you know it.
Yes ignoramus, editorial process, that ANY publication worth a damn has to excercise.What a STOOPID fucking asshole. ^^^
Listen to this stupid shit.
Editorial censorship?
Fuck you, pal.
Eat shit and die.
Fuck you.
Go away, pigtard.
You mean any publication that agrees with the Far Left's sick POV.Yes ignoramus, editorial process, that ANY publication worth a damn has to excercise.
It literally did the opposite.This is exactly what the "Fairness" Doctrine allowed. A total monopoly on the media.
Really? Because prior to 1987 when the "Fairness" Doctrine was rightly shitcanned, we heard ZERO from Conservatives other than quick 1 minute snippets versus hours of spewing from the Democrat party propaganda department AKA the Lamestream media.It literally did the opposite.
The fairness doctrine of the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC), introduced in 1949, was a policy that required the holders of broadcast licenses both to present controversial issues of public importance and to do so in a manner that fairly reflected differing viewpoints.[1]
Fairness doctrine - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
How the hell can you have monopoly on the media that has to present viewpoints opposite of yours?
Silly nonsense, you don't need to be left or right to have publication STANDARDS for what you report and how.You mean any publication that agrees with the Far Left's sick POV.
Wrong! You support totally quashing the Conservative voice and support far Left one party rule, just like the rest of the pond scum you are.Silly nonsense, you don't need to be left or right to have publication STANDARDS for what you report and how.
Really? Because prior to 1987 when the "Fairness" Doctrine was rightly shitcanned, we heard ZERO from Conservatives other than quick 1 minute snippets versus hours of spewing from the Democrat party propaganda department AKA the Lamestream media.
Yes ignoramus, editorial process, that ANY publication worth a damn has to excercise.
Scruffy you sound like a 10 year old, posting ignorant nonsense that has no relation to reality.They WRITE the editorials, ya stupid asswipe.
They don't censor themselves.
Gawd damn you leftards are stupid.
Scruffy you sound like a 10 year old, posting ignorant nonsense that has no relation to reality.
Editorial process is what happens to articles or reporting submitted to the publication. To makes sure they meet standards such as sourcing and etc.
Senior editors themselves may also publish thier own articles, which are called editorials.
Maybe you should stop skipping the meds. You sound unhinged.Go back and read post # 151, dimwit.
Dammit, where do all these fucking brainless shitheads come from?
(I mean, besides the gutter?)
Anyone who votes Democrat is voting for THIS ^^^
Maybe you should STFU and GTFOMaybe you should stop skipping the meds. You sound unhinged.
Tucker Carlson: Without censorship, the Democratic Party can't continue to hold power
Fox News host Tucker Carlson dissects the media's response to the attack on Paul Pelosi and how Democrats will try to capitalize on it on 'Tucker Carlson Tonight.'
No democrat can withstand a one-on-one debate that is totally fact-based
Definetly...we should censor them!100 % correct ... msm is the enemy of the people.
Your way way too late to that party...Definetly...we should censor them!
Tucker Carlson: Without censorship, the Democratic Party can't continue to hold power
Fox News host Tucker Carlson dissects the media's response to the attack on Paul Pelosi and how Democrats will try to capitalize on it on 'Tucker Carlson Tonight.'
No democrat can withstand a one-on-one debate that is totally fact-based
what have they censored just curious ...Democrats greatest weakness is their reliance on Censorship to maintain power.
Democrats greatest strength is their ability to impose censorship.
