Tucker Carlson: Without censorship, the Democratic Party can't continue to hold power

[BlindBoo]

If there were censorship going on, how does a guy like Tuck get heard by the Flock?

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

It's not really censorship
The Democrats all live within The Democrat Cult Media Bubble -
If Democrat Media doesn't cover an issue - their cult members do not know about it.
However the Cult covers an issue is simply the way it is, to them.
Like any successful cult, the leaders have convinced the members that everything outside their bubble is false and evil.
Without the power of this cult - it is true that the Democrat Party would cease to exist,

You said that well.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

You truly are a bitter, angry, hate filled pig.

Dragonlady said:
Project Veritas forged those pages, you dolt.

^^^^PROVE YOUR ASSERTION!!

It won't.

It can't.

 

[BackAgain]

The OP is slanderous. It should be deleted immediately and the Original Poster should be sent to a gulag.

 

[bripat9643]

You ARE being called out. You want to be able to lie with impunity, like you've been doing since the Fairness Doctrine was allowed to expire. You consider being forced to tell the truth an affront to your "freedom".

How stupid are you?????

The First Amendment allows you to lie, dingbat. That's what freedom of speech is. The last thing we need is politicians deciding what the truth is.

 

[bripat9643]

If there were censorship going on, how does a guy like Tuck get heard by the Flock?

Facebook, youTube and Twitter have all admitted they censor, you fucking moron.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Speaking of censorship, wow!

Facebook Hired Ex-CIA, FBI Agents to Censor Content That Deviates From Official Narrative

So many ex-government workers are now employed by Facebook that it’s difficult to view Meta as a private company instead of a government partner, intent on silencing anyone who speaks out against the official narrative.

childrenshealthdefense.org

 

[notmyfault2020]

You said that well.

I 2nd that

The cult will not believe it.. but that's why it's called a cult (hard 2 break away from)

 

[Lastamender]

Looks like Twitter will no longer flag articles on fraud. That should bring many to tears in the Democratic party.

Twitter Removes Warning Flag on 'Just the News' Ballot-Harvesting Story After Direct Appeal to Musk - Tennessee Star

Twitter Removes Warning Flag on 'Just the News' Ballot-Harvesting Story After Direct Appeal to Musk

tennesseestar.com

“There is no reason that this content should’ve been flagged as potentially harmful, and I am confident that Twitter’s new owner will conclude so. A special thanks to Judicial Watch’s Tom Fitton for getting Elon Musk’s attention on this.”

The flag has been removed. Look for an avalanche of formerly censored posts. Got to love it!

 

[BlindBoo]

Facebook, youTube and Twitter have all admitted they censor, you fucking moron.

No they didn't. Show me where the Constitution requires media publishing companies to publish anything anybody says without the ability to control the content of their publication.

Perhaps if your guy violently takes over, ya'll can pass law that force them to, but till then, too bad.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

No they didn't. Show me where the Constitution requires media publishing companies to publish anything anybody says without the ability to control the content of their publication.

Perhaps if your guy violently takes over, ya'll can pass law that force them to, but till then, too bad.

"violently takes over"?

 

[Billiejeens]

Looks like Twitter will no longer flag articles on fraud. That should bring many to tears in the Democratic party.

Twitter Removes Warning Flag on 'Just the News' Ballot-Harvesting Story After Direct Appeal to Musk - Tennessee Star

Twitter Removes Warning Flag on 'Just the News' Ballot-Harvesting Story After Direct Appeal to Musk

tennesseestar.com

“There is no reason that this content should’ve been flagged as potentially harmful, and I am confident that Twitter’s new owner will conclude so. A special thanks to Judicial Watch’s Tom Fitton for getting Elon Musk’s attention on this.”

The flag has been removed. Look for an avalanche of formerly censored posts. Got to love it!

The standard was pretty simple, it was flagged because it was harmful to the Democrats.

 

[Billiejeens]

"violently takes over"?

No they didn't. Show me where the Constitution requires media publishing companies to publish anything anybody says without the ability to control the content of their publication.

Perhaps if your guy violently takes over, ya'll can pass law that force them to, but till then, too bad.

Have you really missed the entire
Platform versus Publisher era of history?

 

[Billo_Really]

Tucker Carlson: Without censorship, the Democratic Party can't continue to hold power​

Fox News host Tucker Carlson dissects the media's response to the attack on Paul Pelosi and how Democrats will try to capitalize on it on 'Tucker Carlson Tonight.'

No democrat can withstand a one-on-one debate that is totally fact-based

Tucker the Clown!

 

[BlindBoo]

Have you really missed the entire
Platform versus Publisher era of history?

Doesn't change the fact that these are private enterprises and they have freedom from government intrusion either by censorship or demands they publish something.

 

[Billiejeens]

Doesn't change the fact that these are private enterprises and they have freedom from government intrusion either by censorship or demands they publish something.

So you have missed it.

If they truly want freedom from Government, they need to refuse the Government protection of being a platform and except responsibility for any liability.
You can't say "free of Government" while existing under the protection of gGovernment.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

So you have missed it.

If they truly want freedom from Government, they need to refuse the Government protection of being a platform and except responsibility for any liability.
You can't say "free of Government" while existing under the protection of gGovernment.

Isn't it amazing how that just goes WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!! right over their heads?

 

[BlindBoo]

So you have missed it.

If they truly want freedom from Government, they need to refuse the Government protection of being a platform and except responsibility for any liability.
You can't say "free of Government" while existing under the protection of gGovernment.

Not being liable for user comments and 3rd party posts does not mean the owners of the platforms are prohibited moderating content on their platform. At this point they have broad powers to moderate content.

 

[Billiejeens]

Not being liable for user comments and 3rd party posts does not mean the owners of the platforms are prohibited moderating content on their platform. At this point they have broad powers to moderate content.

Whoooooooooooshhh

 

[notmyfault2020]

No they didn't. Show me where the Constitution requires media publishing companies to publish anything anybody says without the ability to control the content of their publication.

Perhaps if your guy violently takes over, ya'll can pass law that force them to, but till then, too bad.

What if NO "media publishing companies" ever published anything written by a particular party?

That would be the end of the party

Oh, that's right... just what the sickos ordered

never mind