Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Please respond in english.
Great, now you're switching gears again. You went from blaming Warren spouting unrelated rhetoric after Scalise was shot... to blaming Sanders spouting unrelated rhetoric after Scalise was shot .... to no pointing to Sanders blaming Palin for Laughner-- which still has nothing whatsoever to do with Trump inciting law enforcement officers to commit felonies.Labeling Republicans mass murderers is a call to violence.
Perhaps in the mind of a racist. Otherwise it definitely is not.Again, that had nothing at all to do with Scalise being shot. Your desperation is noted and dismissed.
That occurred more than two weeks after Scalise was shot. Clearly, their rhetoric had absolutely nothing to do with it.
'The View' Host Uses Bernie's Own Words Against Him. And He Explodes...
Sanders did not call for anyone to shoot Republicans.. No Democrats did. And saying that thousands will die based on studies issued about people losing ACA is not saying Republicans are mass murderers.
Saying that Republicans are going to kill thousands of people is calling them mass murderers you stupid fuck.
"Let us be clear and this is not trying to be overly dramatic: Thousands of people will die if the Republican health care bill becomes law." --Bernie Sanders
4:47 PM - Jun 23, 2017
Bernie Sanders on Trump: He "Wants Millions" to Suffer to "Win Some Political Points"
Sanders himself has blamed over the top rhetoric for political violence so spare me your bullshit.
Any officer. The felony is assault.If that's the case, Republicans doing the same to Democrats would also be an call to violence. Yet neither side is.Call Sign Chaos, post: 17824529,They incited it through their violent rhetoric, if you are calling people mass murderers that is a call to violence against the accused so shove you BS pal.
Why do you continue to show how stupid you are?
There is no call to murder Republicans anywhere in that link.
Even if a Democrat accused Republicans mass murderers which they didn't, it cannot be presumed it is a call to murder them. It's a call to vote them out office so they can do no harm.
Labeling Republicans mass murderers is a call to violence.
Both sides are calling for their respective supporters to vote out their opponents.
Whereas Trump specifically and categorically called on law enforcement officers to commit felonies.
Which officer did he direct to commit a felony? What was the felony? What's the officers badge number you lying fuck?
That's not how the law works you dumb fuck, it's called the clear and probable danger test, the call has to be direct, specific, and likely cause imminent violence.
Great, now you're switching gears again. You went from blaming Warren spouting unrelated rhetoric after Scalise was shot... to blaming Sanders spouting unrelated rhetoric after Scalise was shot ....Labeling Republicans mass murderers is a call to violence.
Perhaps in the mind of a racist. Otherwise it definitely is not.Again, that had nothing at all to do with Scalise being shot. Your desperation is noted and dismissed.
Sanders did not call for anyone to shoot Republicans.. No Democrats did. And saying that thousands will die based on studies issued about people losing ACA is not saying Republicans are mass murderers.
Saying that Republicans are going to kill thousands of people is calling them mass murderers you stupid fuck.
"Let us be clear and this is not trying to be overly dramatic: Thousands of people will die if the Republican health care bill becomes law." --Bernie Sanders
4:47 PM - Jun 23, 2017
Bernie Sanders on Trump: He "Wants Millions" to Suffer to "Win Some Political Points"
Sanders himself has blamed over the top rhetoric for political violence so spare me your bullshit.
to no pointing to Sanders blaming Palin for Laughner--
which still has nothing whatsoever to do with Trump inciting law enforcement officers to commit felonies.
Nope. And that post was still English. Any problems understanding it fall directly on you.Common core is how you were taught?That IS English.Please respond in english.Obama admitted that the shovel ready jobs wasn't shovel ready, but you still blindly follow. While you criticize Trump for any reason possible
Doesn't change the reality that infrastructure jobs were a very small part of the $800 billion ARRA that put an end the the Great Bush job destroying Recession of 2008.
The lie that the ARRA was a 'shovel ready' boondoggle is put to rest in honest people's minds. Sorry to see the lie live on in yours.
Call Sign Chaos, post: 17824619,That's not how the law works you dumb fuck, it's called the clear and probable danger test, the call has to be direct, specific, and likely cause imminent violence.
So no Democrat can be tied to the Baseball field shooter.
However Trump's role as top law enforcement officer in the nation does have a direct connection to all those that serve so bravely.
Sanders blaming Palin is not instructing anyone to commit violence.Great, now you're switching gears again. You went from blaming Warren spouting unrelated rhetoric after Scalise was shot... to blaming Sanders spouting unrelated rhetoric after Scalise was shot ....Labeling Republicans mass murderers is a call to violence.
Perhaps in the mind of a racist. Otherwise it definitely is not.Again, that had nothing at all to do with Scalise being shot. Your desperation is noted and dismissed.Sanders did not call for anyone to shoot Republicans.. No Democrats did. And saying that thousands will die based on studies issued about people losing ACA is not saying Republicans are mass murderers.
Saying that Republicans are going to kill thousands of people is calling them mass murderers you stupid fuck.
"Let us be clear and this is not trying to be overly dramatic: Thousands of people will die if the Republican health care bill becomes law." --Bernie Sanders
4:47 PM - Jun 23, 2017
Bernie Sanders on Trump: He "Wants Millions" to Suffer to "Win Some Political Points"
Sanders himself has blamed over the top rhetoric for political violence so spare me your bullshit.
He said it more than once the video was from May.
to no pointing to Sanders blaming Palin for Laughner--
Yes Sanders blames political violence on over the top rhetoric.
which still has nothing whatsoever to do with Trump inciting law enforcement officers to commit felonies.
What was the felony and what was the officers name and badge number who he incited to commit it?
Any officer. The felony is assault.If that's the case, Republicans doing the same to Democrats would also be an call to violence. Yet neither side is.Call Sign Chaos, post: 17824529,They incited it through their violent rhetoric, if you are calling people mass murderers that is a call to violence against the accused so shove you BS pal.
Why do you continue to show how stupid you are?
There is no call to murder Republicans anywhere in that link.
Even if a Democrat accused Republicans mass murderers which they didn't, it cannot be presumed it is a call to murder them. It's a call to vote them out office so they can do no harm.
Labeling Republicans mass murderers is a call to violence.
Both sides are calling for their respective supporters to vote out their opponents.
Whereas Trump specifically and categorically called on law enforcement officers to commit felonies.
Which officer did he direct to commit a felony? What was the felony? What's the officers badge number you lying fuck?
The felony need not be commited for it to be a crime. Inciting others to commit a felony is still a crime; even if no felony was committed.Call Sign Chaos, post: 17824619,That's not how the law works you dumb fuck, it's called the clear and probable danger test, the call has to be direct, specific, and likely cause imminent violence.
So no Democrat can be tied to the Baseball field shooter.
However Trump's role as top law enforcement officer in the nation does have a direct connection to all those that serve so bravely.
What was the felony and what was the officers name and badge number who he incited to commit it?
Sanders blaming Palin is not instructing anyone to commit violence.
Trump instructed law enforcement officers to break the law. That is a crime.
Says you, citing yourself, with absolutely zero proof.Any officer. The felony is assault.If that's the case, Republicans doing the same to Democrats would also be an call to violence. Yet neither side is.Call Sign Chaos, post: 17824529,Why do you continue to show how stupid you are?
There is no call to murder Republicans anywhere in that link.
Even if a Democrat accused Republicans mass murderers which they didn't, it cannot be presumed it is a call to murder them. It's a call to vote them out office so they can do no harm.
Labeling Republicans mass murderers is a call to violence.
Both sides are calling for their respective supporters to vote out their opponents.
Whereas Trump specifically and categorically called on law enforcement officers to commit felonies.
Which officer did he direct to commit a felony? What was the felony? What's the officers badge number you lying fuck?
Again that's not how the law works you stupid fuck, incitement to violence is only prohibited if it fails the clear and probable danger test IE it has to be direct, specific, and likely to cause imminent unlawful action. Now post the quote where Trump directs an officer to commit a felony.
The felony need not be commited for it to be a crime. Inciting others to commit a felony is still a crime; even if no felony was committed.Call Sign Chaos, post: 17824619,That's not how the law works you dumb fuck, it's called the clear and probable danger test, the call has to be direct, specific, and likely cause imminent violence.
So no Democrat can be tied to the Baseball field shooter.
However Trump's role as top law enforcement officer in the nation does have a direct connection to all those that serve so bravely.
What was the felony and what was the officers name and badge number who he incited to commit it?
- § 7. Inciting to felony
A person who endeavors to incite, procure or hire another person to commit a felony, though a felony is not actually committed as a result of such inciting, hiring or procuring, shall be imprisoned not more than five years or fined not more than $500.00, or both. (Amended 1971, No. 199 (Adj. Sess.), § 15; 1981, No. 223 (Adj. Sess.), § 23.)
Says you, citing yourself, with absolutely zero proof.Any officer. The felony is assault.If that's the case, Republicans doing the same to Democrats would also be an call to violence. Yet neither side is.Labeling Republicans mass murderers is a call to violence.
Both sides are calling for their respective supporters to vote out their opponents.
Whereas Trump specifically and categorically called on law enforcement officers to commit felonies.
Which officer did he direct to commit a felony? What was the felony? What's the officers badge number you lying fuck?
Again that's not how the law works you stupid fuck, incitement to violence is only prohibited if it fails the clear and probable danger test IE it has to be direct, specific, and likely to cause imminent unlawful action. Now post the quote where Trump directs an officer to commit a felony.
What was the felony what is the name and badge number of the officer who he directed to commit it?
I see I'm dealing with a wigger, carry on.jknowgood, post: 17824586Please respond in english.
What do you want? Fourth grade level English that Trumpflakes get from their Great White Hope. Or is that Dope?
Your continued desperation is no longer even noted; but still dismissed.The felony need not be commited for it to be a crime. Inciting others to commit a felony is still a crime; even if no felony was committed.Call Sign Chaos, post: 17824619,That's not how the law works you dumb fuck, it's called the clear and probable danger test, the call has to be direct, specific, and likely cause imminent violence.
So no Democrat can be tied to the Baseball field shooter.
However Trump's role as top law enforcement officer in the nation does have a direct connection to all those that serve so bravely.
What was the felony and what was the officers name and badge number who he incited to commit it?
- § 7. Inciting to felony
A person who endeavors to incite, procure or hire another person to commit a felony, though a felony is not actually committed as a result of such inciting, hiring or procuring, shall be imprisoned not more than five years or fined not more than $500.00, or both. (Amended 1971, No. 199 (Adj. Sess.), § 15; 1981, No. 223 (Adj. Sess.), § 23.)
What was the felony and what was the name and badge number of the officer who he directed to commit it? For incitement to fail the clear and probable danger test of the 1st amendment the speech must be direct, specific, and likely to cause imminent unlawful action.
I guess you are part of the 7% of our population that thinks chocolate milk comes from Brown cows? LolNope. And that post was still English. Any problems understanding it fall directly on you.Common core is how you were taught?That IS English.Please respond in english.Obama admitted that the shovel ready jobs wasn't shovel ready, but you still blindly follow. While you criticize Trump for any reason possible
Doesn't change the reality that infrastructure jobs were a very small part of the $800 billion ARRA that put an end the the Great Bush job destroying Recession of 2008.
The lie that the ARRA was a 'shovel ready' boondoggle is put to rest in honest people's minds. Sorry to see the lie live on in yours.
Your continued desperation is no longer even noted; but still dismissed.The felony need not be commited for it to be a crime. Inciting others to commit a felony is still a crime; even if no felony was committed.Call Sign Chaos, post: 17824619,That's not how the law works you dumb fuck, it's called the clear and probable danger test, the call has to be direct, specific, and likely cause imminent violence.
So no Democrat can be tied to the Baseball field shooter.
However Trump's role as top law enforcement officer in the nation does have a direct connection to all those that serve so bravely.
What was the felony and what was the officers name and badge number who he incited to commit it?
- § 7. Inciting to felony
A person who endeavors to incite, procure or hire another person to commit a felony, though a felony is not actually committed as a result of such inciting, hiring or procuring, shall be imprisoned not more than five years or fined not more than $500.00, or both. (Amended 1971, No. 199 (Adj. Sess.), § 15; 1981, No. 223 (Adj. Sess.), § 23.)
What was the felony and what was the name and badge number of the officer who he directed to commit it? For incitement to fail the clear and probable danger test of the 1st amendment the speech must be direct, specific, and likely to cause imminent unlawful action.
A badge number is not required as Trump made his instructions to any and all officers. Incitement does not have to target a specific individual; such as inciting others to riot.
As it is, Trump is already being sued for inciting violence and the federal judge on the trial said, "It is plausible that Trump's direction to 'get 'em out of here' advocated the use of force. It was an order, an instruction, a command." -- and no badge number was necessary.
I see I'm dealing with a wigger, carry on.
