Turley Explains Why An Impeachment Inquiry is Warranted

[rightwinger]

No… definitely not. Should Trump win, I don’t anticipate a good relationship between those two.

McCarthy has done Trumps bidding since Jan 6

 

[Lesh]

This isn’t about Trump being guilty or innocent. This is about the factual information we have on the Biden family, which most certainly can lead to Joe, particularly given the fact that he has lied about several things regarding his son’s buisness.

“Which most certainly CAN lead to Joe”

So it currently doesn’t

Got it

 

[LeftofLeft]

McCarthy has done Trumps bidding since Jan 6

You people think all of the Republicans have done Trumps bidding since he lost the election.

 

[rightwinger]

Again, that is the point of the inquiry. Joe lying about his contacts with Hunter’s business partners and several other facts warrant an inquiry.

How did that work with Devon Archer?
He testified under oath that Joe Biden never talked about business

What part of that warrants an inquiry?

 

[Lesh]

Not true at all. Jared helped negotiate the Abraham Accords and it’s an investment not a bribe. It may be pulled at any time, its an investment in Israeli tech and it was made in 2021 AFTER Trump was no longer president. Jared went to Harvard and Stern and understands business. Hunter didn’t speak Russian or Ukrainian and didn’t have a clue about the gas business. Apples and oranges.

Apples and apples

Save the excuses and rationalization

 

[rightwinger]

You people think all of the Republicans have done Trumps bidding since he lost the election.

Republicans had a chance to rid themselves of Trumps stranglehold on the party
They chose not to

 

[Lesh]

How
Do you explain the 150+ SARs? I worked in banking for 15 yrs and saw one.

One? You’re lying about that or about working in banking

There are millions generated every year

 

[Crepitus]

Brilliant response to his analysis.

What "analysis"?

He was just making excuses.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Republicans had a chance to rid themselves of Trumps stranglehold on the party
They chose not to

Having a stranglehold on a party does not mean you are behind them. Look on your own side of the aisle…. Hilary Clinton owned your asses for the longest time. You picked Obama over her in 2008 and you were split in ‘16 with many preferring Bernie.

 

[rightwinger]

Having a stranglehold on a party does not mean you are behind them. Look on your own side of the aisle…. Hilary Clinton owned your asses for the longest time. You picked Obama over her in 2008 and you were split in ‘16 with many preferring Bernie.

Hillary never owned the Democratic Party
Not even close

 

[BluesLegend]

Democrats passed LAWS that the American people must AVOID this type of corruption...wait for it...EVEN IN APPEARANCE. That's the LAW. Holding Biden to the very standard of law he himself voted to pass seems reasonable to me.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Hillary never owned the Democratic Party
Not even close

She owned it enough.

 

[postman]

The point of the inquiry is to find evidence of the crime they are convinced took place.

The difference is that there is no link of the crime to the president. So in effect congress wants to do an impeachment inquirery to gather evidence against private citizens.

 

[postman]

If you had to bet your life, would you bet Joe knew about this and garnered monies from this or as he claims he only called to talk about the weather, didn’t know how Hunter made money and didn’t get any kickbacks?

Even the testimony of Devon Archer disputes Joe Bidens involvement, either on the phone calls, or the influence peddling.

Hunter Biden and his associates were running a classic influence peddling operation using Joe Biden as what Devon Archer called “the Brand.”[1] While this was described as an “illusion of access,” millions were generated for the Bidens from some of the most corrupt figures in the world, including associates who were later accused of or convicted of public corruption

 

[postman]

Not true at all. Jared helped negotiate the Abraham Accords and it’s an investment not a bribe. It may be pulled at any time, its an investment in Israeli tech and it was made in 2021 AFTER Trump was no longer president. Jared went to Harvard and Stern and understands business.

Jared had to be bailed out because his "business" was underwater. His property at 666 5th avenue was hundreds of millions in debt. That's why he got Qatar to bail it out with a 100 year lease for $1.2 billion.

So Jareds "investment business" record, is one of failure. So why would the Saudi's trust a business investment failure with $2 billion.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

If you had to bet your life, would you bet Joe knew about this and garnered monies from this or as he claims he only called to talk about the weather, didn’t know how Hunter made money and didn’t get any kickbacks?

I think Joe is every bit as dirty as Trump

 

[rightwinger]

Democrats passed LAWS that the American people must AVOID this type of corruption...wait for it...EVEN IN APPEARANCE. That's the LAW. Holding Biden to the very standard of law he himself voted to pass seems reasonable to me.

I would have to see the law you are talking about before I give it any credibility

 

[rightwinger]

She owned it enough.

Enough to get the nomination in 2016

No more than any other candidate who wins a nomination

 

[BluesLegend]

I would have to see the law you are talking about before I give it any credibility

OMG you are uninformed, ENRON ring a bell? FFS

 

[Hellokitty]

No it doesn’t. The hearing this week revealed you got nuthin. Your own witnesses admitted it. This is a joke. Trump has 4 cases against him. That’s what this is about

Do you know how many hearing democrats had regarding TRUMP's impeachments? The 1st hearing was to give bases for an impeachment inquiry, which the witnesses agreed was justified. They will have plenty more hearings with witnesses presenting evidence of corruption involving Joe.
Why are democrats so fearful of investigations into the Biden's, if they believe Joe's done nothing wrong?