&
☭proletarian☭
Guest
![lol :lol: :lol:](/styles/smilies/lol.gif)
Here's a test for you. Get an old tv with a volume knob and let me know whether that knob moves on its own when the commercials come on.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
☭proletarian☭;1876495 said:when my tv is suddenly louder then it was, then YES, THE VOLUME has changed, whether manually done on my tv or not, it's still a louder volume.
You want every single sound to be the same volume, from the explosions to the whispers to the wind picked up by the mic on set?![]()
☭proletarian☭;1876495 said:when my tv is suddenly louder then it was, then YES, THE VOLUME has changed, whether manually done on my tv or not, it's still a louder volume.
You want every single sound to be the same volume, from the explosions to the whispers to the wind picked up by the mic on set?![]()
Oh boy.......
I watch mild stuff to go to SLEEP, not action packed adventures with explosions! Of course some programs get a little louder at times, but still not as loud as the damn commercials. I'm not complaining about the volume of my tv show i'm watching, i'm complaining about the COMMERCIALS, stay on topic!
You've got your hands full if you're gonna keep this crew on topic.
I suggest you just post:
"Palin is Stupid"
"Obama is Stupid"
"Its Bush's Fault"
"Democrats Bad"
Everyone will appreciate you more.![]()
See: Audio dynamic range compression.
Dynamic range compression - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The broadcasters aren't doing it. It's the advertising production companies who create the commercials. They are simply exploiting the peak audio range that the broadcasters are limited to at a more constant level.
Not quite right. The advertisers may be cranking up the volume on the fucking ads they sell to the broadcasters, but the broadcasters have control over the volume they send out over the airwaves. This is why I place the blame at both of their sets of feet, but primarily at the broadcasters'.
An advertiser cannot exploit jack shit if the broadcaster decides to turn down the volume as they send out the signal.
The problem with that is that the broadcaster doesn't change the audio levels constantly during broadcasting. Especially for television. It's set at a constant level, and the processing equipment keeps the peaks at a certain level.
There's no guy in a control room saying "OK, here come the commercials...crank it NOW".
This stuff is all automated now man. The computer doesn't care about the content of what is going on the air, all it cares about is the peak levels being sent out and keeping it below a certain level to prevent over-modulation. Doesn't matter if it's Law and Order or Crazy Sams Sunglass Emporium. The advertisers use the dynamic range processing to bring ALL the audio up to the peak levels and keep it there. And the system on the broadcast end doesn't care as long as none of it is going over the peak levels. Doesn't matter how often its getting to the peaks, as long as none of it goes over.
I gotta run, but next weekend when I'm at the station, and if this thread is going on, I'll post a couple of audio examples of a non-compressed song (what you normally would hear on a CD) and a compressed song (what you would hear on a commercial if the song was used as part of the ad).
See ya next week.
Not quite right. The advertisers may be cranking up the volume on the fucking ads they sell to the broadcasters, but the broadcasters have control over the volume they send out over the airwaves. This is why I place the blame at both of their sets of feet, but primarily at the broadcasters'.
An advertiser cannot exploit jack shit if the broadcaster decides to turn down the volume as they send out the signal.
The problem with that is that the broadcaster doesn't change the audio levels constantly during broadcasting. Especially for television. It's set at a constant level, and the processing equipment keeps the peaks at a certain level.
There's no guy in a control room saying "OK, here come the commercials...crank it NOW".
This stuff is all automated now man. The computer doesn't care about the content of what is going on the air, all it cares about is the peak levels being sent out and keeping it below a certain level to prevent over-modulation. Doesn't matter if it's Law and Order or Crazy Sams Sunglass Emporium. The advertisers use the dynamic range processing to bring ALL the audio up to the peak levels and keep it there. And the system on the broadcast end doesn't care as long as none of it is going over the peak levels. Doesn't matter how often its getting to the peaks, as long as none of it goes over.
I gotta run, but next weekend when I'm at the station, and if this thread is going on, I'll post a couple of audio examples of a non-compressed song (what you normally would hear on a CD) and a compressed song (what you would hear on a commercial if the song was used as part of the ad).
See ya next week.
Yep, it's called a "limiter". It's a typical processor in audio. It's also used with radio broadcast to keep levels constant. That's why when you have your volume set at a certain level in your car, it's actually more quiet on the radio than it would be if you had a CD in at that volume level.
Without doing a bunch of ridiculous unnecessary research on this commercial volume topic, I'd guess that the level peaks of the commercials are probably not topping the levels that are legally allowed.
If you have a problem with a company using this tactic, stop fucking buying their products and tell them WHY. When the revenue drops, so will the volume.
Or just be a fucking pussy and go cry to mommy.gov
A limiter doesn't keep broadcast levels constant. It keeps the signal from clipping...becoming too loud and/or distorted. So no, a limiter would be rather worthless in this case.The problem with that is that the broadcaster doesn't change the audio levels constantly during broadcasting. Especially for television. It's set at a constant level, and the processing equipment keeps the peaks at a certain level.
There's no guy in a control room saying "OK, here come the commercials...crank it NOW".
This stuff is all automated now man. The computer doesn't care about the content of what is going on the air, all it cares about is the peak levels being sent out and keeping it below a certain level to prevent over-modulation. Doesn't matter if it's Law and Order or Crazy Sams Sunglass Emporium. The advertisers use the dynamic range processing to bring ALL the audio up to the peak levels and keep it there. And the system on the broadcast end doesn't care as long as none of it is going over the peak levels. Doesn't matter how often its getting to the peaks, as long as none of it goes over.
I gotta run, but next weekend when I'm at the station, and if this thread is going on, I'll post a couple of audio examples of a non-compressed song (what you normally would hear on a CD) and a compressed song (what you would hear on a commercial if the song was used as part of the ad).
See ya next week.
Yep, it's called a "limiter". It's a typical processor in audio. It's also used with radio broadcast to keep levels constant. That's why when you have your volume set at a certain level in your car, it's actually more quiet on the radio than it would be if you had a CD in at that volume level.
Without doing a bunch of ridiculous unnecessary research on this commercial volume topic, I'd guess that the level peaks of the commercials are probably not topping the levels that are legally allowed.
If you have a problem with a company using this tactic, stop fucking buying their products and tell them WHY. When the revenue drops, so will the volume.
Or just be a fucking pussy and go cry to mommy.gov
paul,
can you explain why this ''limiter'' that you say functions to keep broadcast levels constant, would not be capable of keeping the volume levels constant between programs and commercials?
I love the idea.
So you believe the federal government is granted authority by the Constitution to regulate how loud a commercial on television is?
Yes of course, who else could do it?
Care, check and see if your television has an "auto volume" feature. If you enable it, it will level the volume between the programs and the commercials. It's not perfect because it will have some effect on overall sound quality but it might help you out.
☭proletarian☭;1876495 said:when my tv is suddenly louder then it was, then YES, THE VOLUME has changed, whether manually done on my tv or not, it's still a louder volume.
You want every single sound to be the same volume, from the explosions to the whispers to the wind picked up by the mic on set?![]()
Oh boy.......
I watch mild stuff to go to SLEEP, not action packed adventures with explosions! Of course some programs get a little louder at times, but still not as loud as the damn commercials. I'm not complaining about the volume of my tv show i'm watching, i'm complaining about the COMMERCIALS, stay on topic!
A limiter doesn't keep broadcast levels constant. It keeps the signal from clipping...becoming too loud and/or distorted. So no, a limiter would be rather worthless in this case.Yep, it's called a "limiter". It's a typical processor in audio. It's also used with radio broadcast to keep levels constant. That's why when you have your volume set at a certain level in your car, it's actually more quiet on the radio than it would be if you had a CD in at that volume level.
Without doing a bunch of ridiculous unnecessary research on this commercial volume topic, I'd guess that the level peaks of the commercials are probably not topping the levels that are legally allowed.
If you have a problem with a company using this tactic, stop fucking buying their products and tell them WHY. When the revenue drops, so will the volume.
Or just be a fucking pussy and go cry to mommy.gov
paul,
can you explain why this ''limiter'' that you say functions to keep broadcast levels constant, would not be capable of keeping the volume levels constant between programs and commercials?
The point is, why should anyone have to buy one. The new law will put an end to this abuse.A limiter doesn't keep broadcast levels constant. It keeps the signal from clipping...becoming too loud and/or distorted. So no, a limiter would be rather worthless in this case.paul,
can you explain why this ''limiter'' that you say functions to keep broadcast levels constant, would not be capable of keeping the volume levels constant between programs and commercials?
Rav you can set a limiter to control volume and maintain the peak at any level you choose. The limiter most certainly WOULD be useful for keeping the volume from passing the peak allowable level. This is EXACTLY why they are used in radio. It's required.
I've used just about every audio processor you can imagine, in my music production work. Don't try and tell me I don't know what I'm talking about.
And Care, I've never said it wouldn't be capable of it. I'm saying the opposite. It WOULD be.
Well that's just completely not true. I was watching Nip/Tuck last night and as Sean and Christian prepared to sew some guys lips back on they cranked the music (Queen) in the OR - they always have music on in the OR - and was louder than the commercials they were airing during the breaks. I had to lower the tv until that part was over. Oh, the effort of pushing that volume button . . . it was exhausting! I stated this earlier, most commercials are not as loud as you guys are making them out to be. Some? Absolutely, but not most and not the majority.
You know what's really good to fall asleep to? Soap operas. They'll knock you out in no time.
Pauli,
Why don't you try this at home and then report back. Perhaps you will discover the flaw in your logic.
![]()
Paulie,
Given that you are an honest libertarian (unlike frauderator Dude for example), I'm especially interested in your thoughts on these questions. If you have the time.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/100391-government-regulations-discussion-philosophical-and-or-constitutional.html
Pauli,
Why don't you try this at home and then report back. Perhaps you will discover the flaw in your logic.
![]()
LOTS OF LIBERTARIAN HOT AIR THAT I'LL IGNORE.
No.Should the government regulate what products we get hit with ads by? What if enough people don't like seeing a certain product on TV because they simply don't like it...should the government step in and regulate it off the air?
Because we shouldn't have to do it. The advertisers have no right to blast their commercials at volumes higher than what we've set on our stereo systems. And since we own/control the airwaves we are perfectly free to regulate them in this manner.I don't understand why you people can't hit a damn button on your remote. You're acting like it's causing you pain and heartache to have to pick up the remote and hit the fucking volume button for 2 seconds
It's SAD.
Pauli,
Why don't you try this at home and then report back. Perhaps you will discover the flaw in your logic.
![]()
LOTS OF LIBERTARIAN HOT AIR THAT I'LL IGNORE.
No.Should the government regulate what products we get hit with ads by? What if enough people don't like seeing a certain product on TV because they simply don't like it...should the government step in and regulate it off the air?
Because we shouldn't have to do it. The advertisers have no right to blast their commercials at volumes higher than what we've set on our stereo systems. And since we own/control the airwaves we are perfectly free to regulate them in this manner.I don't understand why you people can't hit a damn button on your remote. You're acting like it's causing you pain and heartache to have to pick up the remote and hit the fucking volume button for 2 seconds
It's SAD.
Obviously you read nothing on this thread or you are so married to your own idiotic beliefs that you've stagnated.
![]()