Twitter Attacks Lawyer Representing American Patriot, Kyle Rittenhouse

[daveman]

This what I mean. We have a crazy sick gun culture in this country. It was nothing like this in my Grandfather’s time, and the weaponry was far less lethal. Guns were just a tool. Not a fetish you parade into 7-11 when you are getting a slurpy.

It's noticeable that you only hear of “crazy sick gun culture in this country”, or hear the right to keep and bear arms serialized as a “fetish” from those who openly side with criminal and tyrants, and who oppose the right of law-abiding citizens to be equipped to defend themselves and their freedom.

Freud did not say what is often attributed to him, about a fear of weapons being a sign of retarded sexual maturity, and I do not know who did say it, but there is certainly no shortage of examples to prove that this saying is true.
0

Other countries view guns as a tool. They have rational attitudes towards them and in many cases rational Restrictions. We used to have a rational attitude. The fact that we (thank you NRA) no longer do is telling in the huge amounts of deaths by gun violence we see.

So do you believe in the 2nd amendment or not?

Our forefather used to own cannons. Ridiculous notion that guns haven't been a thing in the past. Further, minors defending yourself from the pedophiles is EXACTLY what a legitimate use of a gun looks like. That's not any kind of fetish, that is indeed using the gun as a tool.

Further, you do your hobbies and we do ours. If you don't like it, that's is TOO FUCKING BAD.

He wasn’t defending himself against a pedophile in the sense you mean. Are you guys ever honest? You didn’t Even know he was until well after. Even more moronic...pedos don’t go after 17 yr olds.

He was there illegally armed. Had he not been no one would have died and he would not sitting jail.

At least two of his attackers showed themselves as willing to commit murder.

But you know they would never have hurt anyone.

How do you know that, exactly?

Which person did all the shooting?

Are you angry a pedophile didn't get to murder a kid?

 

[daveman]

This what I mean. We have a crazy sick gun culture in this country. It was nothing like this in my Grandfather’s time, and the weaponry was far less lethal. Guns were just a tool. Not a fetish you parade into 7-11 when you are getting a slurpy.

It's noticeable that you only hear of “crazy sick gun culture in this country”, or hear the right to keep and bear arms serialized as a “fetish” from those who openly side with criminal and tyrants, and who oppose the right of law-abiding citizens to be equipped to defend themselves and their freedom.

Freud did not say what is often attributed to him, about a fear of weapons being a sign of retarded sexual maturity, and I do not know who did say it, but there is certainly no shortage of examples to prove that this saying is true.

Other countries view guns as a tool. They have rational attitudes towards them and in many cases rational Restrictions. We used to have a rational attitude. The fact that we (thank you NRA) no longer do is telling in the huge amounts of deaths by gun violence we see.

MORON, since 1992 MORE firearms in private hands less restrictive laws on most books and GUESS what , major REDUCTION in firearms related incidents murder and such.

Everyone here, this is how DISHONESTY or PLAIN STUPID Coyote is... She disagrees with the above statement even though it is PROVEN NUMEROUS times on this board with links and articles and FBI stats. In threads she was in and commented on. So either she is so weak minded she can not read links or she is a lair. Or she is just to damn STUPID to be posting in threads where she does not even read the LINKS provided.

Here are a few more to prove just how fucking stupid she is.

Rate Of U.S. Gun Violence Has Fallen Since 1993, Study Says

The United States has seen a drop in the rate of homicides and other violence involving guns in the past 20 years, according to a Pew Research Center study released Tuesday.

www.npr.org

Reported violent crime rate in the U.S. 2022 | Statista

In 2022, the violent crime rate in the United States was 369.8 cases per 100,000 of the population.

www.statista.com

Gun Homicide Rate Down 49% Since 1993 Peak; Public Unaware

National rates of gun homicide and other violent gun crimes are strikingly lower now than during their peak in the mid-1990s, paralleling a general decline in violent crime, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of government data. Beneath the long-term trend, though, are big differences...

www.pewsocialtrends.org

https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/fv9311.pdf

Done with your psychotic rant? Compared to other western countries our gun violence stats reek. A big reason police end up shooting someone is they have a gun or the officer thinks he has a gun. Why are guns even allowed at protests? Dumb gun laws.

Have you figured out how to get criminals to obey the law?

No one else has.

Have you figured out how to get white racists to stop being racist?

Nope. How about black racists?

Oh, wait, sorry -- you support that racism.

 

[freyasman]

This what I mean. We have a crazy sick gun culture in this country. It was nothing like this in my Grandfather’s time, and the weaponry was far less lethal. Guns were just a tool. Not a fetish you parade into 7-11 when you are getting a slurpy.

It's noticeable that you only hear of “crazy sick gun culture in this country”, or hear the right to keep and bear arms serialized as a “fetish” from those who openly side with criminal and tyrants, and who oppose the right of law-abiding citizens to be equipped to defend themselves and their freedom.

Freud did not say what is often attributed to him, about a fear of weapons being a sign of retarded sexual maturity, and I do not know who did say it, but there is certainly no shortage of examples to prove that this saying is true.

Other countries view guns as a tool. They have rational attitudes towards them and in many cases rational Restrictions. We used to have a rational attitude. The fact that we (thank you NRA) no longer do is telling in the huge amounts of deaths by gun violence we see.

MORON, since 1992 MORE firearms in private hands less restrictive laws on most books and GUESS what , major REDUCTION in firearms related incidents murder and such.

Everyone here, this is how DISHONESTY or PLAIN STUPID Coyote is... She disagrees with the above statement even though it is PROVEN NUMEROUS times on this board with links and articles and FBI stats. In threads she was in and commented on. So either she is so weak minded she can not read links or she is a lair. Or she is just to damn STUPID to be posting in threads where she does not even read the LINKS provided.

Here are a few more to prove just how fucking stupid she is.

Rate Of U.S. Gun Violence Has Fallen Since 1993, Study Says

The United States has seen a drop in the rate of homicides and other violence involving guns in the past 20 years, according to a Pew Research Center study released Tuesday.

www.npr.org

Reported violent crime rate in the U.S. 2022 | Statista

In 2022, the violent crime rate in the United States was 369.8 cases per 100,000 of the population.

www.statista.com

Gun Homicide Rate Down 49% Since 1993 Peak; Public Unaware

National rates of gun homicide and other violent gun crimes are strikingly lower now than during their peak in the mid-1990s, paralleling a general decline in violent crime, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of government data. Beneath the long-term trend, though, are big differences...

www.pewsocialtrends.org

https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/fv9311.pdf

Done with your psychotic rant? Compared to other western countries our gun violence stats reek. A big reason police end up shooting someone is they have a gun or the officer thinks he has a gun. Why are guns even allowed at protests? Dumb gun laws.

No, that ain't the reason.

 

[freyasman]

he was running away because people saw him kill a man and those people were chasing him to stop him from killing anyone else

The irony there that you’re ok with them being vigilanties but not for Kyle? Hmm you are officially demofk!

wrong again

I'm not Ok with violence or vigilantism


You seem to be though since you think it's OK to violate gun laws.

I merely stated a fact and did not indicate whatsoever that I supported the people who chased Rittenhouse.

The fact is the primary cause of this incident was Rittenhouse breaking WI gun laws.

He added to the problem.

Better get used to them both.

The Future of American Policing

Written by: Greg Ellifritz I had two different friends send me messages last weekend requesting my thoughts on what policing is going to look like in the future. I thought about it quite

www.activeresponsetraining.net

From the link;

"Fewer and fewer people will want to be cops. That will further lower hiring and training standards. Tax revenue losses and “defunding efforts” will drive salaries down and make working conditions more difficult. The only folks who will become cops in the future are those people who have no other career options.


As more and more low quality candidates are hired, public trust for the police will further erode. The police will become continually more corrupt and inept until they are almost useless.


The really good cops (and a lot of former soldiers) will move on to better paying private security positions. The rich will hire those security people as bodyguards and neighborhood patrols.


The middle class and poor well have to contend with the corrupt police system or take care of things themselves (either by vigilante or gang action.)


This is essentially how it works in many third world countries. I have lots of experience traveling in Peru, so I’ll use the capital city of Lima as an example.


In the most affluent neighborhoods you don’t see many cops. But there are professional armed security guards at all banks, many public businesses and on roving patrol in marked vehicles in the neighborhood at night.


In the poorer neighborhoods, you don’t see many cops either. They’ll respond to something serious, but don’t expect them to investigate some kind of minor property crime without a significant bribe.


View attachment 385575

Most of the lower class residents ignore any petty criminal stuff. They band up with family or friends to handle any serious business. Sometimes the residents will pay the local criminal gangs to take care of such problems instead if they have some extra cash. The bad guy gets beaten or taken out. The cops don’t work hard to find the perpetrators of these crimes because they know exactly what is happening."

irrelevant.

And rittenhouse was not protecting his family or his property he was playing soldier while breaking the law.

There is no comparison with law abiding gun owners defending their homes to what Rittenhouse did.

You said you're not okay with vigilantism or violence; if this shit keeps up, you will get a lot more of both.

Defending your own home is not vigilantism

Taking a gun out of state carrying that gun illegally and shooting people is vigilantism


see the difference?

Defending oneself from assault is not "vigilantism", and the rifle seems to have been legal.

You got anything to offer besides a lot of bad will towards someone you never met, over the deaths of people no one wants to meet?

Yes, charges for kyle for Antoich.

LOL, oh you got charges huh?

Well, the rest of us have jury nullification.



Fuck you and your charges.

 

[freyasman]

What the Kenosha major failed to do, was keep white trash from out of state from coming to it.

Are you saying that the local government should have discriminated by race as to who was allowed to be in a given public area when certain events were happening? No white trash allowed, but black trash welcome?

Ironic, ain't it?

I remember when leftists protested against sundown towns.

 

[freyasman]

What the Kenosha major failed to do, was keep white trash from out of state from coming to it.

Are you saying that the local government should have discriminated by race as to who was allowed to be in a given public area when certain events were happening? No white trash allowed, but black trash welcome?

Yes, no white trash allowed.

But ok for black trash right? Say it out loud and be proud punk

Yes, it's okay for BLM to protest for social justice.

But not okay for whites, right racist fk!

The white trash wasn't there to advocate for social justice, but to incite violence.

Except, not really.

 

[freyasman]

This what I mean. We have a crazy sick gun culture in this country. It was nothing like this in my Grandfather’s time, and the weaponry was far less lethal. Guns were just a tool. Not a fetish you parade into 7-11 when you are getting a slurpy.

It's noticeable that you only hear of “crazy sick gun culture in this country”, or hear the right to keep and bear arms serialized as a “fetish” from those who openly side with criminal and tyrants, and who oppose the right of law-abiding citizens to be equipped to defend themselves and their freedom.

Freud did not say what is often attributed to him, about a fear of weapons being a sign of retarded sexual maturity, and I do not know who did say it, but there is certainly no shortage of examples to prove that this saying is true.
0

Other countries view guns as a tool. They have rational attitudes towards them and in many cases rational Restrictions. We used to have a rational attitude. The fact that we (thank you NRA) no longer do is telling in the huge amounts of deaths by gun violence we see.

So do you believe in the 2nd amendment or not?

Our forefather used to own cannons. Ridiculous notion that guns haven't been a thing in the past. Further, minors defending yourself from the pedophiles is EXACTLY what a legitimate use of a gun looks like. That's not any kind of fetish, that is indeed using the gun as a tool.

Further, you do your hobbies and we do ours. If you don't like it, that's is TOO FUCKING BAD.

He wasn’t defending himself against a pedophile in the sense you mean. Are you guys ever honest? You didn’t Even know he was until well after. Even more moronic...pedos don’t go after 17 yr olds.

He was there illegally armed. Had he not been no one would have died and he would not sitting jail.

At least two of his attackers showed themselves as willing to commit murder.

But you know they would never have hurt anyone.

How do you know that, exactly?

Which person did all the shooting?

There were several other people shooting actually, from the audio on the video.

 

[Mac-7]

so show me specifically what the Kenosha mayor that prevented the police from doing their job?

You keep asking that same dumb question that on one can answer

the liberal democrat mayor in kenosha has failed to protect his city from the BLM and ANTIFA vermin by establishing law and order in his city

just as the liberal democrat elected officials in portland and other cities have failed to do

What the Kenosha major failed to do, was keep white trash from out of state from coming to it.

Kenosha sees 175 arrested during civil unrest so far; 102 had addresses listed outside city, police say

But you have no problem with that, I'm guessing.

And the spineless democrat pajama boys will put all of them back on the street in tome for the next riot

 

[daveman]

This what I mean. We have a crazy sick gun culture in this country. It was nothing like this in my Grandfather’s time, and the weaponry was far less lethal. Guns were just a tool. Not a fetish you parade into 7-11 when you are getting a slurpy.

It's noticeable that you only hear of “crazy sick gun culture in this country”, or hear the right to keep and bear arms serialized as a “fetish” from those who openly side with criminal and tyrants, and who oppose the right of law-abiding citizens to be equipped to defend themselves and their freedom.

Freud did not say what is often attributed to him, about a fear of weapons being a sign of retarded sexual maturity, and I do not know who did say it, but there is certainly no shortage of examples to prove that this saying is true.
0

Other countries view guns as a tool. They have rational attitudes towards them and in many cases rational Restrictions. We used to have a rational attitude. The fact that we (thank you NRA) no longer do is telling in the huge amounts of deaths by gun violence we see.

So do you believe in the 2nd amendment or not?

Our forefather used to own cannons. Ridiculous notion that guns haven't been a thing in the past. Further, minors defending yourself from the pedophiles is EXACTLY what a legitimate use of a gun looks like. That's not any kind of fetish, that is indeed using the gun as a tool.

Further, you do your hobbies and we do ours. If you don't like it, that's is TOO FUCKING BAD.

He wasn’t defending himself against a pedophile in the sense you mean. Are you guys ever honest? You didn’t Even know he was until well after. Even more moronic...pedos don’t go after 17 yr olds.

He was there illegally armed. Had he not been no one would have died and he would not sitting jail.

At least two of his attackers showed themselves as willing to commit murder.

But you know they would never have hurt anyone.

How do you know that, exactly?

Which person did all the shooting?

There were several other people shooting actually, from the audio on the video.

But only bullets from white conservative males actually harm people.

Or so leftists stupidly insist we believe.

 

[otto105]

This what I mean. We have a crazy sick gun culture in this country. It was nothing like this in my Grandfather’s time, and the weaponry was far less lethal. Guns were just a tool. Not a fetish you parade into 7-11 when you are getting a slurpy.

It's noticeable that you only hear of “crazy sick gun culture in this country”, or hear the right to keep and bear arms serialized as a “fetish” from those who openly side with criminal and tyrants, and who oppose the right of law-abiding citizens to be equipped to defend themselves and their freedom.

Freud did not say what is often attributed to him, about a fear of weapons being a sign of retarded sexual maturity, and I do not know who did say it, but there is certainly no shortage of examples to prove that this saying is true.
0

Other countries view guns as a tool. They have rational attitudes towards them and in many cases rational Restrictions. We used to have a rational attitude. The fact that we (thank you NRA) no longer do is telling in the huge amounts of deaths by gun violence we see.

So do you believe in the 2nd amendment or not?

Our forefather used to own cannons. Ridiculous notion that guns haven't been a thing in the past. Further, minors defending yourself from the pedophiles is EXACTLY what a legitimate use of a gun looks like. That's not any kind of fetish, that is indeed using the gun as a tool.

Further, you do your hobbies and we do ours. If you don't like it, that's is TOO FUCKING BAD.

He wasn’t defending himself against a pedophile in the sense you mean. Are you guys ever honest? You didn’t Even know he was until well after. Even more moronic...pedos don’t go after 17 yr olds.

He was there illegally armed. Had he not been no one would have died and he would not sitting jail.

At least two of his attackers showed themselves as willing to commit murder.

But you know they would never have hurt anyone.

How do you know that, exactly?

Which person did all the shooting?

There were several other people shooting actually, from the audio on the video.

But only bullets from white conservative males actually harm people.

Or so leftists stupidly insist we believe.

I asked that question to and alt-white trumper in Portland and he didn’t reply.

 

[daveman]

This what I mean. We have a crazy sick gun culture in this country. It was nothing like this in my Grandfather’s time, and the weaponry was far less lethal. Guns were just a tool. Not a fetish you parade into 7-11 when you are getting a slurpy.

It's noticeable that you only hear of “crazy sick gun culture in this country”, or hear the right to keep and bear arms serialized as a “fetish” from those who openly side with criminal and tyrants, and who oppose the right of law-abiding citizens to be equipped to defend themselves and their freedom.

Freud did not say what is often attributed to him, about a fear of weapons being a sign of retarded sexual maturity, and I do not know who did say it, but there is certainly no shortage of examples to prove that this saying is true.
0

Other countries view guns as a tool. They have rational attitudes towards them and in many cases rational Restrictions. We used to have a rational attitude. The fact that we (thank you NRA) no longer do is telling in the huge amounts of deaths by gun violence we see.

So do you believe in the 2nd amendment or not?

Our forefather used to own cannons. Ridiculous notion that guns haven't been a thing in the past. Further, minors defending yourself from the pedophiles is EXACTLY what a legitimate use of a gun looks like. That's not any kind of fetish, that is indeed using the gun as a tool.

Further, you do your hobbies and we do ours. If you don't like it, that's is TOO FUCKING BAD.

He wasn’t defending himself against a pedophile in the sense you mean. Are you guys ever honest? You didn’t Even know he was until well after. Even more moronic...pedos don’t go after 17 yr olds.

He was there illegally armed. Had he not been no one would have died and he would not sitting jail.

At least two of his attackers showed themselves as willing to commit murder.

But you know they would never have hurt anyone.

How do you know that, exactly?

Which person did all the shooting?

There were several other people shooting actually, from the audio on the video.

But only bullets from white conservative males actually harm people.

Or so leftists stupidly insist we believe.

I asked that question to and alt-white trumper in Portland and he didn’t reply.

Which are you more upset got killed...the wife-beater or the pedo?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

This what I mean. We have a crazy sick gun culture in this country. It was nothing like this in my Grandfather’s time, and the weaponry was far less lethal. Guns were just a tool. Not a fetish you parade into 7-11 when you are getting a slurpy.

It's noticeable that you only hear of “crazy sick gun culture in this country”, or hear the right to keep and bear arms serialized as a “fetish” from those who openly side with criminal and tyrants, and who oppose the right of law-abiding citizens to be equipped to defend themselves and their freedom.

Freud did not say what is often attributed to him, about a fear of weapons being a sign of retarded sexual maturity, and I do not know who did say it, but there is certainly no shortage of examples to prove that this saying is true.

Other countries view guns as a tool. They have rational attitudes towards them and in many cases rational Restrictions. We used to have a rational attitude. The fact that we (thank you NRA) no longer do is telling in the huge amounts of deaths by gun violence we see.

MORON, since 1992 MORE firearms in private hands less restrictive laws on most books and GUESS what , major REDUCTION in firearms related incidents murder and such.

Everyone here, this is how DISHONESTY or PLAIN STUPID Coyote is... She disagrees with the above statement even though it is PROVEN NUMEROUS times on this board with links and articles and FBI stats. In threads she was in and commented on. So either she is so weak minded she can not read links or she is a lair. Or she is just to damn STUPID to be posting in threads where she does not even read the LINKS provided.

Here are a few more to prove just how fucking stupid she is.

Rate Of U.S. Gun Violence Has Fallen Since 1993, Study Says

The United States has seen a drop in the rate of homicides and other violence involving guns in the past 20 years, according to a Pew Research Center study released Tuesday.

www.npr.org

Reported violent crime rate in the U.S. 2022 | Statista

In 2022, the violent crime rate in the United States was 369.8 cases per 100,000 of the population.

www.statista.com

Gun Homicide Rate Down 49% Since 1993 Peak; Public Unaware

National rates of gun homicide and other violent gun crimes are strikingly lower now than during their peak in the mid-1990s, paralleling a general decline in violent crime, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of government data. Beneath the long-term trend, though, are big differences...

www.pewsocialtrends.org

https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/fv9311.pdf

Done with your psychotic rant? Compared to other western countries our gun violence stats reek. A big reason police end up shooting someone is they have a gun or the officer thinks he has a gun. Why are guns even allowed at protests? Dumb gun laws.

You claimed our rate of violence did not drop that simply is NOT true, you lying moron. I linked to it to prove it further the incidence with the supposed assault rifle are almost none existent another retarded claim you made. We have 330 million people in this country and about 10 to 12 thousand murders a year not all by firearms. You wine about a number that is so small it barely registers while defending the race that does the most murders. You whine about a tool while ignoring the PEOPLE that are the problem.

Ohh look lying deceitful Coyote disagreed with this post too, she keeps claiming that violent attacks have not gone down by double digits even though I linked to the stats and the facts. I think everyone should disagree from now on with every post she makes that is a lie.

 

[Blues Man]

he was running away because people saw him kill a man and those people were chasing him to stop him from killing anyone else

The irony there that you’re ok with them being vigilanties but not for Kyle? Hmm you are officially demofk!

wrong again

I'm not Ok with violence or vigilantism


You seem to be though since you think it's OK to violate gun laws.

I merely stated a fact and did not indicate whatsoever that I supported the people who chased Rittenhouse.

The fact is the primary cause of this incident was Rittenhouse breaking WI gun laws.

He added to the problem.

Better get used to them both.

The Future of American Policing

Written by: Greg Ellifritz I had two different friends send me messages last weekend requesting my thoughts on what policing is going to look like in the future. I thought about it quite

www.activeresponsetraining.net

From the link;

"Fewer and fewer people will want to be cops. That will further lower hiring and training standards. Tax revenue losses and “defunding efforts” will drive salaries down and make working conditions more difficult. The only folks who will become cops in the future are those people who have no other career options.


As more and more low quality candidates are hired, public trust for the police will further erode. The police will become continually more corrupt and inept until they are almost useless.


The really good cops (and a lot of former soldiers) will move on to better paying private security positions. The rich will hire those security people as bodyguards and neighborhood patrols.


The middle class and poor well have to contend with the corrupt police system or take care of things themselves (either by vigilante or gang action.)


This is essentially how it works in many third world countries. I have lots of experience traveling in Peru, so I’ll use the capital city of Lima as an example.


In the most affluent neighborhoods you don’t see many cops. But there are professional armed security guards at all banks, many public businesses and on roving patrol in marked vehicles in the neighborhood at night.


In the poorer neighborhoods, you don’t see many cops either. They’ll respond to something serious, but don’t expect them to investigate some kind of minor property crime without a significant bribe.


View attachment 385575

Most of the lower class residents ignore any petty criminal stuff. They band up with family or friends to handle any serious business. Sometimes the residents will pay the local criminal gangs to take care of such problems instead if they have some extra cash. The bad guy gets beaten or taken out. The cops don’t work hard to find the perpetrators of these crimes because they know exactly what is happening."

irrelevant.

And rittenhouse was not protecting his family or his property he was playing soldier while breaking the law.

There is no comparison with law abiding gun owners defending their homes to what Rittenhouse did.

You said you're not okay with vigilantism or violence; if this shit keeps up, you will get a lot more of both.

Defending your own home is not vigilantism

Taking a gun out of state carrying that gun illegally and shooting people is vigilantism


see the difference?

who did that??

try and stay on topic,,

Rittenhouse

pay attention

he didnt take a gun across state lines and he worked in that city 20 miles away,,yet to be determined he was carrying illegal,,,
and he didnt just shoot someone,,he defended himself from attackers,,,

lying about the facts doesnt help your narrative,,

He lives in Illinois

He took a rifle across state lines and carried it illegally in WI

Why don't you learn the facts instead of making shit up?

And he was breaking the law. IF he was a law abiding gun owner he would not have put himself in the position where he had to kill anyone.

You can't claim self defense in the commission of a crime.

he didnt take it across state lines,,or do you have proof that goes against the current facts,,,

if I'm running a stop sign I have a right to defend myself if someone is attacking me,,,


youre just a deranged moron that know if he doesnt lie he loses,,,

HE LIVES IN ILLINOIS

So where did the gun come from if not his home?

And he was breaking WI gun laws.

his friend in Wisconsin you stupid fuck,,educate yourself before talking again,,,

He said it was his rifle not his friend's rifle.

And regardless he was still carrying that weapon ILLEGALLY.

not according to the 2nd A,,,

thats why you criminals hate it so much,,,

Really?

I happen to be a law abiding gun owner with a concealed carry permit.

Because I am a law abiding gun owner I do not condone the breaking of state gun laws.

The open carry gun laws of WI have not been found to be unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. So in reality it is you who is wiping his ass with the Constitution when you support the breaking of laws.

What law are you referring to?

WI open carry law that states one must be 18 to open carry

 

[Blues Man]

SCOTUS rules on the Constitutionality of laws.

No they don’t! Son, you’re very lost today! Congress make laws, SCOTUS interprets the use of the law by assholes who don’t like them

And what exactly happens if SCOTUS rules that a law is unconstitutional?

 

[Blues Man]

HE LIVES IN ILLINOIS

So where did the gun come from if not his home?

And he was breaking WI gun laws

Uninformed stupid yet a fifth time for you. Are you really that lazy not to do research ahead of declaring your ignorance? Thanks for showing us what ignorance looks like

Why don't you post something that says where Rittenhouse got his rifle?

i already posted proof that he is an Illinois resident

 

[Blues Man]

I don't support law breaking of any kind and I have said that repeatedly.
You do.

If that person was carrying illegally he is just as much a criminal as Rittenhouse is.

The Second Amendment is the law.

Apparently, you're perfectly fine with lawbreaking in the form of the enactment and enforcement of unconstitutional “law” that violates the Constitution which is the highest law in this nation.

You cannot credibly support any act of government which violates the people's right to keep and bear arms, and still honestly claim to oppose lawbreaking or to uphold the rule of law.

So you want felons, rapists and murderers to be able to buy guns and carry them in public?

The Supreme Court has ruled that states have the right to pass laws regarding firearms and those state laws that have not been ruled unconstitutional are just as valis as any other law.

And don't forget the Second Amendment does not give you the right to discharge any firearms but only to keep and bear.

 

[Blues Man]

[
Look you retard the law has been posted in this forum several times, Kyle was NOT in violation of the LAW. You can disagree all you want Coyote but that is a BALD FACED LIE and you keep repeating it. You are a LYING ASSHOLE.

Again:

948.60  Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.
(1)  In this section, “dangerous weapon" means any firearm, loaded or unloaded; any electric weapon, as defined in s. 941.295 (1c) (a); metallic knuckles or knuckles of any substance which could be put to the same use with the same or similar effect as metallic knuckles; a nunchaku or any similar weapon consisting of 2 sticks of wood, plastic or metal connected at one end by a length of rope, chain, wire or leather; a cestus or similar material weighted with metal or other substance and worn on the hand; a shuriken or any similar pointed star-like object intended to injure a person when thrown; or a manrikigusari or similar length of chain having weighted ends.
(2) 
(a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.
(b) Except as provided in par. (c), any person who intentionally sells, loans or gives a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age is guilty of a Class I felony.
(c) Whoever violates par. (b) is guilty of a Class H felony if the person under 18 years of age under par. (b) discharges the firearm and the discharge causes death to himself, herself or another.
(d) A person under 17 years of age who has violated this subsection is subject to the provisions of ch. 938 unless jurisdiction is waived under s. 938.18 or the person is subject to the jurisdiction of a court of criminal jurisdiction under s. 938.183.
(3) 
(a) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon when the dangerous weapon is being used in target practice under the supervision of an adult or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the supervision of an adult. This section does not apply to an adult who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age for use only in target practice under the adult's supervision or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the adult's supervision.
(b) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon in the line of duty. This section does not apply to an adult who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age in the line of duty.
(c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593. This section applies only to an adult who transfers a firearm to a person under 18 years of age if the person under 18 years of age is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593 or to an adult who is in violation of s. 941.28.
History: 1987 a. 332; 1991 a. 18, 139; 1993 a. 98; 1995 a. 27, 77; 1997 a. 248; 2001 a. 109; 2005 a. 163; 2011 a. 35.
Sub. (2) (b) does not set a standard for civil liability, and a violation of sub. (2) (b) does not constitute negligence per se. Logarto v. Gustafson, 998 F. Supp. 998(1998).

Same with curfew. I think that as well as allowing an illegally armed 17 yr old in are reasonable questions to ask and all you have is a partisan political response?

The streets were filled with anarchy and mayhem thanks to bedwetting liberal democrat mayors

Rittenhouse was only one small part of the insanity

True. But he is tbe one that killed two people and wounded another. That rather elevates it.

I think you are very confused. The law says "Shall not be infringed".

He was using the 2A EXACTLY for the purpose it was intended. If you think that's not going to come up in the trial, you are wrong.

By the way, have you not found any laws the rioters have broken? Is it only the guy who shot a pedophile that is in the wrong?

You xan argue 2A, but it is irrelevant. Wisconsin law says otherwise and age restrictions have long been upheld.

You realize your argument would allow toddlers to posess abd use fire arms right?

Oh heck, they're all for Toddlers with Guns. Always remember the immortal words of Steve Stockman!



View attachment 385672

This what I mean. We have a crazy sick gun culture in this country. It was nothing like this in my Grandfather’s time, and the weaponry was far less lethal. Guns were just a tool. Not a fetish you parade into 7-11 when you are getting a slurpy.

It's hilarious to me that they use quotes from 18th century Flintlock single fire fans as if they compare to today's weaponry.
Even Justice Scalia said that their are limits to the 2nd Amendment.
If I ever enter a Chipotle and encounter these assholes by the salad bar ...
I'll remember that I don't like their food anyway.

That guy on the left should be more concerned that he is a fat slob

 

[Turtlesoup]

But he is tbe [sic] one that killed two people and wounded another. That rather elevates it.

He did not kill nor wound any people. He killed two and wounded one, subhuman criminal pieces of shit.

Kyle from Antoich is a murderer.

Why do you support criminala?

show us where he was convicted of murder,,,

give it time

you said he was a murderer,,,so show us where he was convicted of murder or shut up,,,

kyle from Antoich will be convicted of murder (twice) once for attempted murder, illegal possession of a deadly weapon and by public opinion of being a white racist Asshole.

White guy shoots 3 other white guys..... and this makes him a racist?

Logic and you should meet sometime, maybe get know each other, because you're clearly strangers now.

bangoolo boi wasn’t there because white people were protesting in Kenosha.

boogaloo bois are LEFTISTS you idiot. They fucking marched with BLM you halfwit.

The Media such as CNN and Yahoo---the leftist lying media, have been lying once again about what the Boogaloo boys are---they have been desperately trying to have them called a right hate group when in fact they are the opposite...they are a left wing attack squad pro get this ISLAM.

 

[Mac-7]

Other countries view guns as a tool.

We are not other countries

which is why so many libs hate America

 

[Blues Man]

Other countries view guns as a tool.

We are not other countries which is why so many libs hate America

A gun is nothing but a tool

We just have a right to own that tool where people in other countries do not.