Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You should shut up while you’re only 6 feet deep. How dare these tech companies have to obey the law since by censoring and trying to determine what THEY claim is “truth” they are not is confirmed tent providers with no legal protection from being sued. Your communist wish for censorship won’t fly here comrade.Nothing is more fascist than forcing a private corporation to promote and propagate the violent rhetoric of the government leadership under threat of government enforced sanction.Twitter proving yet again they are fascists who mean to enslave the american people and spread their propaganda.
One window was broken. No one has said how many doors. I'll bet only the one in the video that shows Ashli being gunned down in cold blood. How ar you "breaking in" if the door is unlocked? Who says they were "chasing the police?" What government property was stolen? You don't know anyone hit a police officer on the head with a fire extinguisher.I'm sure the breaking down of doors, windows, breaking into congressional offices, chasing the police, stealing government property, hitting a police officer on the head with a fire extinguisher and obstructing the business of Congress were not invited.View attachment 439491I guess we could say those four wouldn't have died if they hadn't committed a crime, right?
The next step will be to find out why some of the Capital police removed barricades and took selfies with the rioters. Looks to me like some of them will be soon out of a job and possibly also going to prison.
The bottom line: your claims are 95% bullshit.
One window? Offices were broken into the doors to the house and senate chambers were broken into? Cops were over run. What are you talking about? Furniture was piled up against the doors to keep these people out and they pummeled the doors in.
I saw a couple of doors broken into. That's it.
You didn't see the cops being over run or barricading the House chamber? Or even in other videos chasing the police up the stairs or fighting with the police?
View attachment 439507View attachment 439509View attachment 439510
Do you think the protesters were allowed to be in this room too?
View attachment 439512
You are the dumbest idiot on this board and that's quite a prize.
<YAWN!>
That's a lot of nothing. Want to see a riot?
I have a solution: Defund the capitol police!
I don't approve of either. You unfortunately can't say the same.
Also, one of them demonstrated to the world what a weak democracy we have become under Trump while the other didn't.
One window was broken. No one has said how many doors. I'll bet only the one in the video that shows Ashli being gunned down in cold blood. How ar you "breaking in" if the door is unlocked? Who says they were "chasing the police?" What government property was stolen? You don't know anyone hit a police officer on the head with a fire extinguisher.I'm sure the breaking down of doors, windows, breaking into congressional offices, chasing the police, stealing government property, hitting a police officer on the head with a fire extinguisher and obstructing the business of Congress were not invited.View attachment 439491I guess we could say those four wouldn't have died if they hadn't committed a crime, right?
The next step will be to find out why some of the Capital police removed barricades and took selfies with the rioters. Looks to me like some of them will be soon out of a job and possibly also going to prison.
The bottom line: your claims are 95% bullshit.
One window? Offices were broken into the doors to the house and senate chambers were broken into? Cops were over run. What are you talking about? Furniture was piled up against the doors to keep these people out and they pummeled the doors in.
I saw a couple of doors broken into. That's it.
You didn't see the cops being over run or barricading the House chamber? Or even in other videos chasing the police up the stairs or fighting with the police?
View attachment 439507View attachment 439509View attachment 439510
Do you think the protesters were allowed to be in this room too?
View attachment 439512
You are the dumbest idiot on this board and that's quite a prize.
<YAWN!>
That's a lot of nothing. Want to see a riot?
I have a solution: Defund the capitol police!
I don't approve of either. You unfortunately can't say the same.
Also, one of them demonstrated to the world what a weak democracy we have become under Trump while the other didn't.
No one noticed your disapproval of the riots in Portland-Seattle, douchebag.
Who are you trying to kid?
Nothing is more fascist than forcing a private corporation to promote and propagate the violent rhetoric of the government leadership under threat of government enforced sanction.Twitter proving yet again they are fascists who mean to enslave the american people and spread their propaganda.
Section 230, moron. Did the baker sign a contract where he agreed to bake wedding cakes for homosexuals?I believe defense contractors sign contracts that bind them to government rules.It sure as hell isn't. Do you believe defense contractors are able to ignore all the government's rules about discrimination?
Show me the contract Twitter signed with the government.
Since your side encouraged riots, looting, and murder by your BLM and Antifa pals, you get to shut up. People like you and your ilk belong in jail for treason. So quick you are to try to change YOUR rules which marked this a peaceful protest. How communist of you.Sorry idiot. Learn a definition. Not insurrection. Just because your media pukes use a word they don’t know, you start spouting it too. Peaceful protest. By your sides definition, now shut up.Only morons believe they committed insurrection, and I have never advocated shooting people for crossing the border illegally.When did any right winger say people should be shot for committing misdemeanors?Should, but wont.It's just weird watching someone celebrate censorshipLink coming
They need to kept the seditionist-in-chief under wraps.
His main means of communication needs to be taken away.
They should have done this years ago and for longer than 12 hours.
Maybe he shouldn't incite a mob riot on the Capital. I know, you don't think he did because you're illiterate between the lines.
They were mostly peaceful. The woman shot was unarmed. That cop should be arrested.
But if a drunk black woman in Detroit pounds on your door at 3 am and you tell her to leave but she refuses, and you shoot and kill her thru the door, YOU GET 50 YEARS IN PRISON FOR MURDER
Yeah, shooting a drunk black woman is murder.
I don't know yet what the circumstances were for the shooting of the woman at the capital but I guess she wasn't listening to police and was in the act of breaking the law and from what you guys seem to say that means she's a lawful target. For me, I'll wait to see more details before passing judgement.
Funny how suddenly being unarmed or a woman or not a threat or that the man was bigger, or blah, blah, blah,
suddenly doesn't mean shit to you lefties.
Suddenly someone committing a crime shouldn't be shot according to you numbnuts.
I'm willing to see the evidence, you've made up your mind.
Anybody who wants to shoot people for crossing the border for starters.
I'm also not so sure committing insurrection is a misdemeanor either.
Wingnuts have and it was insurrection. There purpose was to hold up our elections and they brought handcuffs and nooses because that's fun.
El Paso Shooting Suspect’s Manifesto Echoes Trump’s Language (Published 2019)
If the president did not originally inspire the gunman, he has brought into the mainstream polarizing ideas and people once consigned to the fringes of American society.www.nytimes.com
Insurrection
a violent uprising against an authority or government.
Meets the definition.
That's old speak. By newspeak rules, it was a mostly peaceful protest.
Your side made these rules and made them stick. Why are you now getting all dodgy?
I'm not interested and I don't think anyone else is either of prosecuting anyone who remained outside to protest. It's those that invaded the capital, destroyed property, brought weapons and rioted inside the capital. They are picking them off now and I look forward to more being arrested, prosecuted and thrown in jail where they belong.
One window was broken. No one has said how many doors. I'll bet only the one in the video that shows Ashli being gunned down in cold blood. How ar you "breaking in" if the door is unlocked? Who says they were "chasing the police?" What government property was stolen? You don't know anyone hit a police officer on the head with a fire extinguisher.I'm sure the breaking down of doors, windows, breaking into congressional offices, chasing the police, stealing government property, hitting a police officer on the head with a fire extinguisher and obstructing the business of Congress were not invited.View attachment 439491I guess we could say those four wouldn't have died if they hadn't committed a crime, right?
The next step will be to find out why some of the Capital police removed barricades and took selfies with the rioters. Looks to me like some of them will be soon out of a job and possibly also going to prison.
The bottom line: your claims are 95% bullshit.
One window? Offices were broken into the doors to the house and senate chambers were broken into? Cops were over run. What are you talking about? Furniture was piled up against the doors to keep these people out and they pummeled the doors in.
I saw a couple of doors broken into. That's it.
You didn't see the cops being over run or barricading the House chamber? Or even in other videos chasing the police up the stairs or fighting with the police?
View attachment 439507View attachment 439509View attachment 439510
Do you think the protesters were allowed to be in this room too?
View attachment 439512
You are the dumbest idiot on this board and that's quite a prize.
<YAWN!>
That's a lot of nothing. Want to see a riot?
I have a solution: Defund the capitol police!
I don't approve of either. You unfortunately can't say the same.
Also, one of them demonstrated to the world what a weak democracy we have become under Trump while the other didn't.
No one noticed your disapproval of the riots in Portland-Seattle, douchebag.
Who are you trying to kid?
Trump has only himself to blame.You guys do not learn anything. It is just the same Progressive Socialist agendas. If Trump chooses to, if he is not the president, He can be ours and Biden can be yours. We can set up massive tariffs for all the products we have and make and all the products you do not. in the cities.Trump has only himself to blame.Just heard it on NBC news!
Will provide link when I can get one or someone please add one!
There is no law requiring these tech companies to do your bidding.You should shut up while you’re only 6 feet deep. How dare these tech companies have to obey the law since by censoring and trying to determine what THEY claim is “truth” they are not is confirmed tent providers with no legal protection from being sued. Your communist wish for censorship won’t fly here comrade.
They agreed to follow public accomodation laws when they opened a public accomodation.Section 230, moron. Did the baker sign a contract where he agreed to bake wedding cakes for homosexuals?
Wrong.It's just weird watching someone celebrate censorshipLink coming
They need to kept the seditionist-in-chief under wraps.
His main means of communication needs to be taken away.
They should have done this years ago and for longer than 12 hours.
This is who they are. They hate free speech and this country. Their goal is ultimately to oppress.
Twitter should be disbanded. It's a Stalinist propaganda organ.
The doctrine of free speech doesn't apply to private media.They hate free speech and this country. Their goal is ultimately to oppress.
You, actually standing up for liberty. That would be very surprising.What could be more surprising than a Stalinist like you claiming to be a libertarian?I'm surprised you still remember how to spell it.Do you really believe anyone is swallowing your shit?I've been a libertarian for 40 years, and I've read hundreds of books on the subject.Sure I do. I also understand that you're a lying douchebag. You are not a libertarian.Then you, truly, do not understand the First Amendment.I'm done arguing about this shit. If you support Twitter and Google encoring people, then you oppose the First Amendment.You should actually read the First Amendment. It starts with "Congress shall make no law ..." It's a limitation on government power. It prevents Congress from passing laws that limit speech. It's not a mandate on businesses to cater to every moron who thinks he has something to say. Libertarians understand this. You, do not.What you don't defend is the First Amendment, and you endorse government protected monopolies the right to censor.You're the bully, asshole. You defend censorship and shooting people for committing misdemeanors.Says the fucking Commie who defends cnesorship this swindle election.No, it doesn't have that right. It's a government protected monopoly. If it wants to be free to censor, then it needs to give up it's government protection from lawsuits.You claim to be a libertarian, and you say twitter should ban Trump?You never considered the cost of all that division and hate you were pushing over the last 60 years?
Well, I'm only 56, so you're full of shit right out of the gate. And I don't recall pushing any division or hatred. Examples?
The constant race baiting is the big one. A whole segment of society is not allowed to even discuss their interests, because even saying the name of their group, gets one dog piled.
Well, I don't recall doing that. Do you have quotes or links to posts where I'm doing that? I think you're just making shit up.
That is one example of the division lefties like you have been planting in our society since at least teh 60s.
Ahhh... there's your mistake. I'm not a lefty. Try again.
YOu asked a question. I answered. The answer stands. IF you are not a lefty, you still have seen the actions of lefties.
So, you happy now? Your question is answered.
This is about Traditional Americans, Trump is just our current spokesman.
You answered nothing. You made a false claim. I called you on it. You said "You never considered the cost of all that division and hate you were pushing over the last 60 years?"
I haven't been pushing division and hate. I'm not a race-baiter and I'm not a liberal or a lefty. Your assumption was in correct.
Noted. You claim to not be a lefty. My answer still stands, even if it is not directly ABOUT you.
This is about Traditional Americans, Trump is just our current spokesman.
So, you happy with the answer? Do you have a comment on it?
So, you're just using my post to rail about "lefties". Ok.
Getting back to the topic, Twitter should have banned Trump long ago. He's a demagogue and thrives on division and hatred. He sows dissent and spreads paranoia.
You realize what a douchebag hypocrite you are, don't you?
No. But it's clear you don't have the slightest clue about individual rights. Twitter has every right to ban Trump from their website. The fact that you don't get that - that you have the same, fucked-up, inverted conception of rights that progressives do, is telling. Freedom of speech means government can't pass laws to silence you. It doesn't mean anyone has to listen, or put your horseshit on their website.
LOL - fucking hypocrite. You really an uber-authoritarian. Is it the 'strongman' thing that gets you hard? Or do you just love state run media??
Says the sore loser who can't admit he loves bullies.
Nope. Wrong again. I defend the right of any business to refuse service to anyone, for any reason. As far as shooting people for misdemeanors, you're just making shit up. 'Cause making shit up is all you got.
Beats me. I never said she should have been shot. Again, you're just making shit up. I guess because you're cornered and have nothing else to defend your insane position.What felony did the woman the capitol police shot commit?
Fucking read a book. Whatever it is you think "libertarian" means, is way, way off the mark.
So what changed your mind?
You are no libertarian.
Dude, you are not convincing.
My experience has shown that Trumpsters aren't "convincible". They have their own reality, and will cling to it desperately.
Sorry idiot. Learn a definition. Not insurrection. Just because your media pukes use a word they don’t know, you start spouting it too. Peaceful protest. By your sides definition, now shut up.Only morons believe they committed insurrection, and I have never advocated shooting people for crossing the border illegally.When did any right winger say people should be shot for committing misdemeanors?Should, but wont.It's just weird watching someone celebrate censorshipLink coming
They need to kept the seditionist-in-chief under wraps.
His main means of communication needs to be taken away.
They should have done this years ago and for longer than 12 hours.
Maybe he shouldn't incite a mob riot on the Capital. I know, you don't think he did because you're illiterate between the lines.
They were mostly peaceful. The woman shot was unarmed. That cop should be arrested.
But if a drunk black woman in Detroit pounds on your door at 3 am and you tell her to leave but she refuses, and you shoot and kill her thru the door, YOU GET 50 YEARS IN PRISON FOR MURDER
Yeah, shooting a drunk black woman is murder.
I don't know yet what the circumstances were for the shooting of the woman at the capital but I guess she wasn't listening to police and was in the act of breaking the law and from what you guys seem to say that means she's a lawful target. For me, I'll wait to see more details before passing judgement.
Funny how suddenly being unarmed or a woman or not a threat or that the man was bigger, or blah, blah, blah,
suddenly doesn't mean shit to you lefties.
Suddenly someone committing a crime shouldn't be shot according to you numbnuts.
I'm willing to see the evidence, you've made up your mind.
Anybody who wants to shoot people for crossing the border for starters.
I'm also not so sure committing insurrection is a misdemeanor either.
Wingnuts have and it was insurrection. There purpose was to hold up our elections and they brought handcuffs and nooses because that's fun.
El Paso Shooting Suspect’s Manifesto Echoes Trump’s Language (Published 2019)
If the president did not originally inspire the gunman, he has brought into the mainstream polarizing ideas and people once consigned to the fringes of American society.
Insurrection
a violent uprising against an authority or government.
Meets the definition.
That's old speak. By newspeak rules, it was a mostly peaceful protest.
Your side made these rules and made them stick. Why are you now getting all dodgy?
I'm not interested and I don't think anyone else is either of prosecuting anyone who remained outside to protest. It's those that invaded the capital, destroyed property, brought weapons and rioted inside the capital. They are picking them off now and I look forward to more being arrested, prosecuted and thrown in jail where they belong.
Sorry idiot. Learn a definition. Not insurrection. Just because your media pukes use a word they don’t know, you start spouting it too. Peaceful protest. By your sides definition, now shut up.Only morons believe they committed insurrection, and I have never advocated shooting people for crossing the border illegally.When did any right winger say people should be shot for committing misdemeanors?Should, but wont.It's just weird watching someone celebrate censorshipLink coming
They need to kept the seditionist-in-chief under wraps.
His main means of communication needs to be taken away.
They should have done this years ago and for longer than 12 hours.
Maybe he shouldn't incite a mob riot on the Capital. I know, you don't think he did because you're illiterate between the lines.
They were mostly peaceful. The woman shot was unarmed. That cop should be arrested.
But if a drunk black woman in Detroit pounds on your door at 3 am and you tell her to leave but she refuses, and you shoot and kill her thru the door, YOU GET 50 YEARS IN PRISON FOR MURDER
Yeah, shooting a drunk black woman is murder.
I don't know yet what the circumstances were for the shooting of the woman at the capital but I guess she wasn't listening to police and was in the act of breaking the law and from what you guys seem to say that means she's a lawful target. For me, I'll wait to see more details before passing judgement.
Funny how suddenly being unarmed or a woman or not a threat or that the man was bigger, or blah, blah, blah,
suddenly doesn't mean shit to you lefties.
Suddenly someone committing a crime shouldn't be shot according to you numbnuts.
I'm willing to see the evidence, you've made up your mind.
Anybody who wants to shoot people for crossing the border for starters.
I'm also not so sure committing insurrection is a misdemeanor either.
Wingnuts have and it was insurrection. There purpose was to hold up our elections and they brought handcuffs and nooses because that's fun.
El Paso Shooting Suspect’s Manifesto Echoes Trump’s Language (Published 2019)
If the president did not originally inspire the gunman, he has brought into the mainstream polarizing ideas and people once consigned to the fringes of American society.
Insurrection
a violent uprising against an authority or government.
Meets the definition.
That's old speak. By newspeak rules, it was a mostly peaceful protest.
Your side made these rules and made them stick. Why are you now getting all dodgy?
I'm not interested and I don't think anyone else is either of prosecuting anyone who remained outside to protest. It's those that invaded the capital, destroyed property, brought weapons and rioted inside the capital. They are picking them off now and I look forward to more being arrested, prosecuted and thrown in jail where they belong.
Why are you supporting the police living in teh past? Times have changed. Riots and political violence are acceptable now. That was demonstrated again and again, over the last 4 years with the "resistance" and the soft coup, and the open insurrection and the constant rioting, and ect.
Trump is a demon who thrives on chaos, deceit and lies. Break yourself free from that evil cult.Sorry idiot. Learn a definition. Not insurrection. Just because your media pukes use a word they don’t know, you start spouting it too. Peaceful protest. By your sides definition, now shut up.Only morons believe they committed insurrection, and I have never advocated shooting people for crossing the border illegally.When did any right winger say people should be shot for committing misdemeanors?Should, but wont.It's just weird watching someone celebrate censorshipLink coming
They need to kept the seditionist-in-chief under wraps.
His main means of communication needs to be taken away.
They should have done this years ago and for longer than 12 hours.
Maybe he shouldn't incite a mob riot on the Capital. I know, you don't think he did because you're illiterate between the lines.
They were mostly peaceful. The woman shot was unarmed. That cop should be arrested.
But if a drunk black woman in Detroit pounds on your door at 3 am and you tell her to leave but she refuses, and you shoot and kill her thru the door, YOU GET 50 YEARS IN PRISON FOR MURDER
Yeah, shooting a drunk black woman is murder.
I don't know yet what the circumstances were for the shooting of the woman at the capital but I guess she wasn't listening to police and was in the act of breaking the law and from what you guys seem to say that means she's a lawful target. For me, I'll wait to see more details before passing judgement.
Funny how suddenly being unarmed or a woman or not a threat or that the man was bigger, or blah, blah, blah,
suddenly doesn't mean shit to you lefties.
Suddenly someone committing a crime shouldn't be shot according to you numbnuts.
I'm willing to see the evidence, you've made up your mind.
Anybody who wants to shoot people for crossing the border for starters.
I'm also not so sure committing insurrection is a misdemeanor either.
Wingnuts have and it was insurrection. There purpose was to hold up our elections and they brought handcuffs and nooses because that's fun.
El Paso Shooting Suspect’s Manifesto Echoes Trump’s Language (Published 2019)
If the president did not originally inspire the gunman, he has brought into the mainstream polarizing ideas and people once consigned to the fringes of American society.
Insurrection
a violent uprising against an authority or government.
Meets the definition.
That's old speak. By newspeak rules, it was a mostly peaceful protest.
Your side made these rules and made them stick. Why are you now getting all dodgy?
I'm not interested and I don't think anyone else is either of prosecuting anyone who remained outside to protest. It's those that invaded the capital, destroyed property, brought weapons and rioted inside the capital. They are picking them off now and I look forward to more being arrested, prosecuted and thrown in jail where they belong.
Why are you supporting the police living in teh past? Times have changed. Riots and political violence are acceptable now. That was demonstrated again and again, over the last 4 years with the "resistance" and the soft coup, and the open insurrection and the constant rioting, and ect.
Stalin would approve.Twitter has permanently banned the seditionist in chief.
Good!
Yada, yada, yada.Trump is a deceiver who thrives on chaos, deceit and lies. Break yourself free from this evil cult.Why are you supporting the police living in teh past? Times have changed. Riots and political violence are acceptable now. That was demonstrated again and again, over the last 4 years with the "resistance" and the soft coup, and the open insurrection and the constant rioting, and ect.
