Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
. Different meanings of the word "charge" you crazy butthead. I charge thee to do this or do that. Got it ? Mueller has been charged to conduct an investigation based upon the commities charge/accusations of "cullusion", in which was presented to him by ? Can't have an investigation without the charge that something is arry or has gone wrong.The charge was cullusion..
What fucking "charge"??? Here, nitwit:
Former FBI Director Robert Mueller was assigned by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein to "oversee the previously-confirmed FBI investigation of Russian government efforts to influence the 2016 presidential election, and related matters."
ya............ president itnkles had a grand ol' time yukking it up with the russians all about comey in the whitehouse 'eh?
Many of trump's serious troubles stem from his opening his mouth.....Practicing his narcissism is a serious Trump ailment.
. A bazillion dollar investigation based on a conspiracy ? Say it ain't so.Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’
Bob Brigham
24 Nov 2017 at 20:58 ET
AddThis Sharing Buttons
Share to FacebookFacebook2.7KShare to TumblrTumblrShare to MoreMore78
Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’
Wow, this nothingburger is piled high 10 feet high with every kind of meat you can think of. It is fucking juicy!!! Trump is fucking going down!You silly liberals crack us up...
You just keep pissing in the wind
and all you end up with is piss on your face.....
Get use to President Donald J. Trump
You can't beat him.....
He has proved this over and over again.
Seven More Years my Butt Hurt foes....
Trump has done a great job at defeating himself. The article is correct they have enough evidence to indict Trump on Obstruction of Justice. You know when you get on an NBC interview and admit you fired Comey over the Russian investigation--I really don't think there is clearer evidence of Obstruction of Justice, and really am not certain what Mueller is waiting for on this one.
Comey did mention to others--regarding Trump pressuring him to drop the case on Michael Flynn, and when he didn't, Trump he fired him. Then they made up this ridiculous excuse that Trump fired Comey because he was mean to Hillary Clinton. That didn't fly--so he decided to do that NBC interview--That is Obstruction of Justice an impeachable offense.
James Comey testimony: Trump asked me to let Flynn probe go - CNNPolitics
Deputy AG briefs the full Senate after whirlwind week of controversy
So you believe the people not involved with the investigation? So sad. Who leaked this info?
You can avoid that video I just posted with Trumps lips snacking in sync with the words coming out of his mouth. He admitted he fired Comey over the Russian investigation, which is, Obstruction of Justice. That NBC interview won't ever get erased. Richard Nixon was never stupid enough to accept a televised interview and admit guilt.
This investigation is moving at the speed of light compared to Watergate which took 2 years 7 months before Nixon was forced to resign.
Robert Mueller has been in charge since late May 2017 and he has already delivered 3 criminal Federal Grand Jury indictments and one guilty plea, with more to come.
A good movie for you to watch about right now is "All of the President's Men."
. The charge was cullusion... No cullusion no charge.. Everything else is running on butt hurt emotion by mobs of liberals still hopeful for revenge after their cullusion to get Hillary elected failed. We all seen the fallout the next day, and all these months afterwards. LOL.No cullusion, no obstruction..One can't exist without the other.
Well, the above is further proof of your "scholarly legal conclusion" ...........as practiced by a 5 year old attorney....
there isn't a legal charge of 'collusion'. it would be conspiracy. that means to conspire, cowboy.
Conspiracy
A criminal conspiracy exists when two or more people agree to commit almost any unlawful act, then take some action toward its completion. The action taken need not itself be a crime, but it must indicate that those involved in the conspiracy knew of the plan and intended to break the law. One person may be charged with and convicted of both conspiracy and the underlying crime based on the same circumstances.
Conspiracy - FindLaw
ya............ president itnkles had a grand ol' time yukking it up with the russians all about comey in the whitehouse 'eh?
Many of trump's serious troubles stem from his opening his mouth.....Practicing his narcissism is a serious Trump ailment.
it goes beyond narcissism with capt crazy pants..
..
Malignant Narcissism: Collision of Two Personality Disorders
The intentional destruction of others while pathologically loving self
Posted Feb 22, 2017
Malignant Narcissism: Collision of Two Personality Disorders
. Not a crime.. lolya............ president itnkles had a grand ol' time yukking it up with the russians all about comey in the whitehouse 'eh?
Many of trump's serious troubles stem from his opening his mouth.....Practicing his narcissism is a serious Trump ailment.
it goes beyond narcissism with capt crazy pants..
..
Malignant Narcissism: Collision of Two Personality Disorders
The intentional destruction of others while pathologically loving self
Posted Feb 22, 2017
Malignant Narcissism: Collision of Two Personality Disorders
Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’
Bob Brigham
24 Nov 2017 at 20:58 ET
AddThis Sharing Buttons
Share to FacebookFacebook2.7KShare to TumblrTumblrShare to MoreMore78
Former Watergate prosecutors Jill Wine-Banks and Nick Akerman joined MSNBC host Chris Hayes on Friday night to discuss the latest revelations about Michael Flynn potentially flipping and testifying against President Donald Trump.
Acknowledging her history, Hayes asked Wine-Banks whether there was enough evidence for an obstruction of justice charge against President Trump.
Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’
Wow, this nothingburger is piled high 10 feet high with every kind of meat you can think of. It is fucking juicy!!! Trump is fucking going down!
Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’
Bob Brigham
24 Nov 2017 at 20:58 ET
AddThis Sharing Buttons
Share to FacebookFacebook2.7KShare to TumblrTumblrShare to MoreMore78
Former Watergate prosecutors Jill Wine-Banks and Nick Akerman joined MSNBC host Chris Hayes on Friday night to discuss the latest revelations about Michael Flynn potentially flipping and testifying against President Donald Trump.
Acknowledging her history, Hayes asked Wine-Banks whether there was enough evidence for an obstruction of justice charge against President Trump.
Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’
Wow, this nothingburger is piled high 10 feet high with every kind of meat you can think of. It is fucking juicy!!! Trump is fucking going down!
Seven more years, lol. I expect y'all loonbats will be full jonestown by then though.
Different meanings of the word "charge" you crazy butthead. I charge thee to do this or do that. Got it ? Mueller has been charged to conduct an investigation based upon the commities charge/accusations of "cullusion", in which was presented to him by ? Can't have an investigation without the charge that something is arry or has gone wrong.
Different meanings of the word "charge" you crazy butthead. I charge thee to do this or do that. Got it ? Mueller has been charged to conduct an investigation based upon the commities charge/accusations of "cullusion", in which was presented to him by ? Can't have an investigation without the charge that something is arry or has gone wrong.
Go take a nap......you're blabbing your nonsense....LOL
Yes it is. The whole thing is political.Faithfully executed means without political interference.You might want to read Article 2, Section 3 of the Constitution, the president is the only person charged by the Constitution to ensure the laws are faithfully executed. The DOJ and all it's appendages get their constitutional authority from him, not congress or anyone else.
.
Trump said during an interview that part of the reason he fired Comey was the Russian investigation. Donald Trump admits 'this Russia thing' part of reasoning for firing Comey. Didn't fire him for that. Comey couldn't investigate a local lemonade stand all due to his political corruption.Firing the FBI director who is investigating your and/or your people is obstruction of justice.There is no proof of obstruction.What law did he break?
obstruction of justice.
emoluments clause.
that's just a start...
There is no evidence that he obstructed.
The fact that they've found zero evidence isn't proof of obstruction BTW.
ya............ president itnkles had a grand ol' time yukking it up with the russians & laughed about comeywhilst they visited the whitehouse 'eh?
tick tock cowboy.
Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’
Bob Brigham
24 Nov 2017 at 20:58 ET
AddThis Sharing Buttons
Share to FacebookFacebook2.7KShare to TumblrTumblrShare to MoreMore78
Former Watergate prosecutors Jill Wine-Banks and Nick Akerman joined MSNBC host Chris Hayes on Friday night to discuss the latest revelations about Michael Flynn potentially flipping and testifying against President Donald Trump.
Acknowledging her history, Hayes asked Wine-Banks whether there was enough evidence for an obstruction of justice charge against President Trump.
Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’
Wow, this nothingburger is piled high 10 feet high with every kind of meat you can think of. It is fucking juicy!!! Trump is fucking going down!Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’
Bob Brigham
24 Nov 2017 at 20:58 ET
AddThis Sharing Buttons
Share to FacebookFacebook2.7KShare to TumblrTumblrShare to MoreMore78
Former Watergate prosecutors Jill Wine-Banks and Nick Akerman joined MSNBC host Chris Hayes on Friday night to discuss the latest revelations about Michael Flynn potentially flipping and testifying against President Donald Trump.
Acknowledging her history, Hayes asked Wine-Banks whether there was enough evidence for an obstruction of justice charge against President Trump.
Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’
Wow, this nothingburger is piled high 10 feet high with every kind of meat you can think of. It is fucking juicy!!! Trump is fucking going down!
You silly liberals crack us up...
You just keep pissing in the wind
and all you end up with is piss on your face.....
Get use to President Donald J. Trump
You can't beat him.....
He has proved this over and over again.
Seven More Years my Butt Hurt foes....
Trump has done a great job at defeating himself. The article is correct they have enough evidence to indict Trump on Obstruction of Justice. You know when you get on an NBC interview and admit you fired Comey over the Russian investigation--I really don't think there is clearer evidence of Obstruction of Justice, and really am not certain what Mueller is waiting for on this one.
Comey did mention to others--regarding Trump pressuring him to drop the case on Michael Flynn, and when he didn't, Trump he fired him. Then they made up this ridiculous excuse that Trump fired Comey because he was mean to Hillary Clinton. That didn't fly--so he decided to do that NBC interview--
James Comey testimony: Trump asked me to let Flynn probe go - CNNPolitics
Deputy AG briefs the full Senate after whirlwind week of controversy
comey was fired for cause....
He was not the Judge and Jury..........
its probably safe to say that every person to ever hold high public office has a share of narcissism. are you really so naïve that you think Obama was not a malignant narcissist? both Clintons? Pelosi? biden? franken? McConnell? McCain?
Seven more years, lol. I expect y'all loonbats will be full jonestown by then though.
its probably safe to say that every person to ever hold high public office has a share of narcissism. are you really so naïve that you think Obama was not a malignant narcissist? both Clintons? Pelosi? biden? franken? McConnell? McCain?
Donald Trump's malignant narcissism is toxic: Psychologist - USA Today
Trump's Deadly Narcissism - The New York Times
Trump's narcissism has taken over America - LA Times
Trump's narcissism is poisoning America - The Week
Yes it is. The whole thing is political.Faithfully executed means without political interference.You might want to read Article 2, Section 3 of the Constitution, the president is the only person charged by the Constitution to ensure the laws are faithfully executed. The DOJ and all it's appendages get their constitutional authority from him, not congress or anyone else.
.
Political with Russia
Seven more years, lol. I expect y'all loonbats will be full jonestown by then though.
Have your morning orange kool-aid........LOL
Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’
Bob Brigham
24 Nov 2017 at 20:58 ET
AddThis Sharing Buttons
Share to FacebookFacebook2.7KShare to TumblrTumblrShare to MoreMore78
Former Watergate prosecutors Jill Wine-Banks and Nick Akerman joined MSNBC host Chris Hayes on Friday night to discuss the latest revelations about Michael Flynn potentially flipping and testifying against President Donald Trump.
Acknowledging her history, Hayes asked Wine-Banks whether there was enough evidence for an obstruction of justice charge against President Trump.
Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’
Wow, this nothingburger is piled high 10 feet high with every kind of meat you can think of. It is fucking juicy!!! Trump is fucking going down!Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’
Bob Brigham
24 Nov 2017 at 20:58 ET
AddThis Sharing Buttons
Share to FacebookFacebook2.7KShare to TumblrTumblrShare to MoreMore78
Former Watergate prosecutors Jill Wine-Banks and Nick Akerman joined MSNBC host Chris Hayes on Friday night to discuss the latest revelations about Michael Flynn potentially flipping and testifying against President Donald Trump.
Acknowledging her history, Hayes asked Wine-Banks whether there was enough evidence for an obstruction of justice charge against President Trump.
Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’
Wow, this nothingburger is piled high 10 feet high with every kind of meat you can think of. It is fucking juicy!!! Trump is fucking going down!
You silly liberals crack us up...
You just keep pissing in the wind
and all you end up with is piss on your face.....
Get use to President Donald J. Trump
You can't beat him.....
He has proved this over and over again.
Seven More Years my Butt Hurt foes....
Trump has done a great job at defeating himself. The article is correct they have enough evidence to indict Trump on Obstruction of Justice. You know when you get on an NBC interview and admit you fired Comey over the Russian investigation--I really don't think there is clearer evidence of Obstruction of Justice, and really am not certain what Mueller is waiting for on this one.
Comey did mention to others--regarding Trump pressuring him to drop the case on Michael Flynn, and when he didn't, Trump he fired him. Then they made up this ridiculous excuse that Trump fired Comey because he was mean to Hillary Clinton. That didn't fly--so he decided to do that NBC interview--
James Comey testimony: Trump asked me to let Flynn probe go - CNNPolitics
Deputy AG briefs the full Senate after whirlwind week of controversy
comey was fired for cause....
He was not the Judge and Jury..........
"comey was fired for cause" -- That is something the investigation will determine.
Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’
Bob Brigham
24 Nov 2017 at 20:58 ET
AddThis Sharing Buttons
Share to FacebookFacebook2.7KShare to TumblrTumblrShare to MoreMore78
Former Watergate prosecutors Jill Wine-Banks and Nick Akerman joined MSNBC host Chris Hayes on Friday night to discuss the latest revelations about Michael Flynn potentially flipping and testifying against President Donald Trump.
Acknowledging her history, Hayes asked Wine-Banks whether there was enough evidence for an obstruction of justice charge against President Trump.
Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’
Wow, this nothingburger is piled high 10 feet high with every kind of meat you can think of. It is fucking juicy!!! Trump is fucking going down!Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’
Bob Brigham
24 Nov 2017 at 20:58 ET
AddThis Sharing Buttons
Share to FacebookFacebook2.7KShare to TumblrTumblrShare to MoreMore78
Former Watergate prosecutors Jill Wine-Banks and Nick Akerman joined MSNBC host Chris Hayes on Friday night to discuss the latest revelations about Michael Flynn potentially flipping and testifying against President Donald Trump.
Acknowledging her history, Hayes asked Wine-Banks whether there was enough evidence for an obstruction of justice charge against President Trump.
Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’
Wow, this nothingburger is piled high 10 feet high with every kind of meat you can think of. It is fucking juicy!!! Trump is fucking going down!
You silly liberals crack us up...
You just keep pissing in the wind
and all you end up with is piss on your face.....
Get use to President Donald J. Trump
You can't beat him.....
He has proved this over and over again.
Seven More Years my Butt Hurt foes....
Trump has done a great job at defeating himself. The article is correct they have enough evidence to indict Trump on Obstruction of Justice. You know when you get on an NBC interview and admit you fired Comey over the Russian investigation--I really don't think there is clearer evidence of Obstruction of Justice, and really am not certain what Mueller is waiting for on this one.
Comey did mention to others--regarding Trump pressuring him to drop the case on Michael Flynn, and when he didn't, Trump he fired him. Then they made up this ridiculous excuse that Trump fired Comey because he was mean to Hillary Clinton. That didn't fly--so he decided to do that NBC interview--
James Comey testimony: Trump asked me to let Flynn probe go - CNNPolitics
Deputy AG briefs the full Senate after whirlwind week of controversy
comey was fired for cause....
He was not the Judge and Jury..........
"comey was fired for cause" -- That is something the investigation will determine.
