Two face Comey

[Manonthestreet]

PRoving once again he is a political op things that are ok for him suddenly become bad for Trump.
Top Five Facts and Examples Showcasing Comey’s Political Motives…
Number FIVE – James Comey stated under oath, and included in his written statement, that it was his decision to speak alone, one-on-one to President-Elect Trump on January 6th in Trump Tower as Comey asked everyone else to leave the briefing. Comey held no issues with a private conversation with the incoming President.

However, a month later on February 14th, in the oval office, when President Trump asked everyone to leave the room for a one-on-one, James Comey testifies it was “inappropriate” for a private conversation.

 

[Slade3200]

PRoving once again he is a political op things that are ok for him suddenly become bad for Trump.
Top Five Facts and Examples Showcasing Comey’s Political Motives…
Number FIVE – James Comey stated under oath, and included in his written statement, that it was his decision to speak alone, one-on-one to President-Elect Trump on January 6th in Trump Tower as Comey asked everyone else to leave the briefing. Comey held no issues with a private conversation with the incoming President.

However, a month later on February 14th, in the oval office, when President Trump asked everyone to leave the room for a one-on-one, James Comey testifies it was “inappropriate” for a private conversation.

Do you really not understand the difference between the two situations?

 

[Manonthestreet]

PRoving once again he is a political op things that are ok for him suddenly become bad for Trump.
Top Five Facts and Examples Showcasing Comey’s Political Motives…
Number FIVE – James Comey stated under oath, and included in his written statement, that it was his decision to speak alone, one-on-one to President-Elect Trump on January 6th in Trump Tower as Comey asked everyone else to leave the briefing. Comey held no issues with a private conversation with the incoming President.

However, a month later on February 14th, in the oval office, when President Trump asked everyone to leave the room for a one-on-one, James Comey testifies it was “inappropriate” for a private conversation.

Do you really not understand the difference between the two situations?

Its the same two men alone in a room dicussing issues between them....there is no difference.....more than ince Comey said Trump was not under invesitigation....nor had he impeded any investigation.

 

[Slade3200]

PRoving once again he is a political op things that are ok for him suddenly become bad for Trump.
Top Five Facts and Examples Showcasing Comey’s Political Motives…
Number FIVE – James Comey stated under oath, and included in his written statement, that it was his decision to speak alone, one-on-one to President-Elect Trump on January 6th in Trump Tower as Comey asked everyone else to leave the briefing. Comey held no issues with a private conversation with the incoming President.

However, a month later on February 14th, in the oval office, when President Trump asked everyone to leave the room for a one-on-one, James Comey testifies it was “inappropriate” for a private conversation.

Do you really not understand the difference between the two situations?

Its the same two men alone in a room dicussing issues between them....there is no difference.....more than ince Comey said Trump was not under invesitigation....nor had he impeded any investigation.

In coordination with the DNI Comey was asked to brief the president elect alone about sensitive and embarrassing intel.

In an attempt to schmooze Comey and ask him to back off an investigation into Flynn Trump dismissed the room to send Comey the message in the Oval Office.

Very different situations

 

[Manonthestreet]

PRoving once again he is a political op things that are ok for him suddenly become bad for Trump.
Top Five Facts and Examples Showcasing Comey’s Political Motives…
Number FIVE – James Comey stated under oath, and included in his written statement, that it was his decision to speak alone, one-on-one to President-Elect Trump on January 6th in Trump Tower as Comey asked everyone else to leave the briefing. Comey held no issues with a private conversation with the incoming President.

However, a month later on February 14th, in the oval office, when President Trump asked everyone to leave the room for a one-on-one, James Comey testifies it was “inappropriate” for a private conversation.

Do you really not understand the difference between the two situations?

Its the same two men alone in a room dicussing issues between them....there is no difference.....more than ince Comey said Trump was not under invesitigation....nor had he impeded any investigation.

In coordination with the DNI Comey was asked to brief the president elect alone about sensitive and embarrassing intel.

In an attempt to schmooze Comey and ask him to back off an investigation into Flynn Trump dismissed the room to send Comey the message in the Oval Office.

Very different situations

Not.............

 

[Slade3200]

PRoving once again he is a political op things that are ok for him suddenly become bad for Trump.
Top Five Facts and Examples Showcasing Comey’s Political Motives…
Number FIVE – James Comey stated under oath, and included in his written statement, that it was his decision to speak alone, one-on-one to President-Elect Trump on January 6th in Trump Tower as Comey asked everyone else to leave the briefing. Comey held no issues with a private conversation with the incoming President.

However, a month later on February 14th, in the oval office, when President Trump asked everyone to leave the room for a one-on-one, James Comey testifies it was “inappropriate” for a private conversation.

Do you really not understand the difference between the two situations?

Its the same two men alone in a room dicussing issues between them....there is no difference.....more than ince Comey said Trump was not under invesitigation....nor had he impeded any investigation.

In coordination with the DNI Comey was asked to brief the president elect alone about sensitive and embarrassing intel.

In an attempt to schmooze Comey and ask him to back off an investigation into Flynn Trump dismissed the room to send Comey the message in the Oval Office.

Very different situations

Not.............

You make a compelling point but after consideration of such a brilliant argument I have to conclude that you lose. Thanks for playing

 

[Manonthestreet]

PRoving once again he is a political op things that are ok for him suddenly become bad for Trump.
Top Five Facts and Examples Showcasing Comey’s Political Motives…
Number FIVE – James Comey stated under oath, and included in his written statement, that it was his decision to speak alone, one-on-one to President-Elect Trump on January 6th in Trump Tower as Comey asked everyone else to leave the briefing. Comey held no issues with a private conversation with the incoming President.

However, a month later on February 14th, in the oval office, when President Trump asked everyone to leave the room for a one-on-one, James Comey testifies it was “inappropriate” for a private conversation.

Do you really not understand the difference between the two situations?

Its the same two men alone in a room dicussing issues between them....there is no difference.....more than ince Comey said Trump was not under invesitigation....nor had he impeded any investigation.

In coordination with the DNI Comey was asked to brief the president elect alone about sensitive and embarrassing intel.

In an attempt to schmooze Comey and ask him to back off an investigation into Flynn Trump dismissed the room to send Comey the message in the Oval Office.

Very different situations

Not.............

You make a compelling point but after consideration of such a brilliant argument I have to conclude that you lose. Thanks for playing

O shortcircuited several investigations,going beyond a simple inquiry if someone could see clear to dropping one........try to keep up.........

 

[Slade3200]

Do you really not understand the difference between the two situations?

Its the same two men alone in a room dicussing issues between them....there is no difference.....more than ince Comey said Trump was not under invesitigation....nor had he impeded any investigation.

In coordination with the DNI Comey was asked to brief the president elect alone about sensitive and embarrassing intel.

In an attempt to schmooze Comey and ask him to back off an investigation into Flynn Trump dismissed the room to send Comey the message in the Oval Office.

Very different situations

Not.............

You make a compelling point but after consideration of such a brilliant argument I have to conclude that you lose. Thanks for playing

O shortcircuited several investigations,going beyond a simple inquiry if someone could see clear to dropping one........try to keep up.........

The fact that you just abandoned the argument to bring up Obama shows that you got nothing. Like I said, thanks for playing

 

[Siete]

Two face Comey



ONE LYING ASS TRUMP.

 

[Manonthestreet]

Its the same two men alone in a room dicussing issues between them....there is no difference.....more than ince Comey said Trump was not under invesitigation....nor had he impeded any investigation.

In coordination with the DNI Comey was asked to brief the president elect alone about sensitive and embarrassing intel.

In an attempt to schmooze Comey and ask him to back off an investigation into Flynn Trump dismissed the room to send Comey the message in the Oval Office.

Very different situations

Not.............

You make a compelling point but after consideration of such a brilliant argument I have to conclude that you lose. Thanks for playing

O shortcircuited several investigations,going beyond a simple inquiry if someone could see clear to dropping one........try to keep up.........

The fact that you just abandoned the argument to bring up Obama shows that you got nothing. Like I said, thanks for playing

Didnt abandon anything....if Obama can impede them a simple request into whether Comey could see a way to drop one is not illegal. That you cant see the difference simply shows your partisanship

 

[NYcarbineer]

PRoving once again he is a political op things that are ok for him suddenly become bad for Trump.
Top Five Facts and Examples Showcasing Comey’s Political Motives…
Number FIVE – James Comey stated under oath, and included in his written statement, that it was his decision to speak alone, one-on-one to President-Elect Trump on January 6th in Trump Tower as Comey asked everyone else to leave the briefing. Comey held no issues with a private conversation with the incoming President.

However, a month later on February 14th, in the oval office, when President Trump asked everyone to leave the room for a one-on-one, James Comey testifies it was “inappropriate” for a private conversation.

Trump must be innocent if Comey is inconsisten? lol good one.

 

[Manonthestreet]

Number ONE – James Comey justified in his statements that on February 14th he did not inform his recently confirmed boss Attorney General Jeff Sessions, of the content of the oval office meeting with President Trump – or his suddenly overwhelming feelings of impropriety, because he anticipated Jeff Sessions would be forced to recuse himself from anything to do with the Russian investigation..

There was nothing known on February 14th which would establish a need for Sessions recusal. There’s no reasonable basis for such an assumption on February 14th, unless it was Comey’s intention to leak FISA-granted surveillance of Russian Ambassador Kislyak, having an innocuous meeting with Senator Jeff Sessions, to the Washington Post. A disingenuous, albeit politically framed, leak did factually surface on March 1st. Same link

 

[Slade3200]

In coordination with the DNI Comey was asked to brief the president elect alone about sensitive and embarrassing intel.

In an attempt to schmooze Comey and ask him to back off an investigation into Flynn Trump dismissed the room to send Comey the message in the Oval Office.

Very different situations

Not.............

You make a compelling point but after consideration of such a brilliant argument I have to conclude that you lose. Thanks for playing

O shortcircuited several investigations,going beyond a simple inquiry if someone could see clear to dropping one........try to keep up.........

The fact that you just abandoned the argument to bring up Obama shows that you got nothing. Like I said, thanks for playing

Didnt abandon anything....if Obama can impede them a simple request into whether Comey could see a way to drop one is not illegal. That you cant see the difference simply shows your partisanship

I don't remember the time Obama impeded an FBI investigation that was looking into his administration by firing the director of the FBI. Please refresh my memory

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Not.............

You make a compelling point but after consideration of such a brilliant argument I have to conclude that you lose. Thanks for playing

O shortcircuited several investigations,going beyond a simple inquiry if someone could see clear to dropping one........try to keep up.........

The fact that you just abandoned the argument to bring up Obama shows that you got nothing. Like I said, thanks for playing

Didnt abandon anything....if Obama can impede them a simple request into whether Comey could see a way to drop one is not illegal. That you cant see the difference simply shows your partisanship

I don't remember the time Obama impeded an FBI investigation that was looking into his administration by firing the director of the FBI. Please refresh my memory

Why would he need to fire Comey, when it was readily apparent that he was Obama's lap dog?

 

[Manonthestreet]

Not.............

You make a compelling point but after consideration of such a brilliant argument I have to conclude that you lose. Thanks for playing

O shortcircuited several investigations,going beyond a simple inquiry if someone could see clear to dropping one........try to keep up.........

The fact that you just abandoned the argument to bring up Obama shows that you got nothing. Like I said, thanks for playing

Didnt abandon anything....if Obama can impede them a simple request into whether Comey could see a way to drop one is not illegal. That you cant see the difference simply shows your partisanship

I don't remember the time Obama impeded an FBI investigation that was looking into his administration by firing the director of the FBI. Please refresh my memory

He didnt need to fire anyone to impede an investigation....and there is no evidence Trump impeded an investiagtion.....

 

[Slade3200]

Number ONE – James Comey justified in his statements that on February 14th he did not inform his recently confirmed boss Attorney General Jeff Sessions, of the content of the oval office meeting with President Trump – or his suddenly overwhelming feelings of impropriety, because he anticipated Jeff Sessions would be forced to recuse himself from anything to do with the Russian investigation..

There was nothing known on February 14th which would establish a need for Sessions recusal. There’s no reasonable basis for such an assumption on February 14th, unless it was Comey’s intention to leak FISA-granted surveillance of Russian Ambassador Kislyak, having an innocuous meeting with Senator Jeff Sessions, to the Washington Post. A disingenuous, albeit politically framed, leak did factually surface on March 1st. Same link

This is one of the lamest of the talking points. Do yourself a service and don't point to it again if you want to be taken seriously.

I could have told you the day Sessions got nominated as AG that he would have to recuse himself from an investigation that focused on a campaign that he was an active part of... especially given the communications he had with the Russians that he is now in hot water for lying about.

 

[Slade3200]

You make a compelling point but after consideration of such a brilliant argument I have to conclude that you lose. Thanks for playing

O shortcircuited several investigations,going beyond a simple inquiry if someone could see clear to dropping one........try to keep up.........

The fact that you just abandoned the argument to bring up Obama shows that you got nothing. Like I said, thanks for playing

Didnt abandon anything....if Obama can impede them a simple request into whether Comey could see a way to drop one is not illegal. That you cant see the difference simply shows your partisanship

I don't remember the time Obama impeded an FBI investigation that was looking into his administration by firing the director of the FBI. Please refresh my memory

Why would he need to fire Comey, when it was readily apparent that he was Obama's lap dog?

He sure lapped it up when he crucified Clinton twice during the campaign. The fact that he did that completely negates your point, but nice try.

 

[Manonthestreet]

Number ONE – James Comey justified in his statements that on February 14th he did not inform his recently confirmed boss Attorney General Jeff Sessions, of the content of the oval office meeting with President Trump – or his suddenly overwhelming feelings of impropriety, because he anticipated Jeff Sessions would be forced to recuse himself from anything to do with the Russian investigation..

There was nothing known on February 14th which would establish a need for Sessions recusal. There’s no reasonable basis for such an assumption on February 14th, unless it was Comey’s intention to leak FISA-granted surveillance of Russian Ambassador Kislyak, having an innocuous meeting with Senator Jeff Sessions, to the Washington Post. A disingenuous, albeit politically framed, leak did factually surface on March 1st. Same link

This is one of the lamest of the talking points. Do yourself a service and don't point to it again if you want to be taken seriously.

I could have told you the day Sessions got nominated as AG that he would have to recuse himself from an investigation that focused on a campaign that he was an active part of... especially given the communications he had with the Russians that he is now in hot water for lying about.

Why......Trump wasnt under investigation.....per Comey...........Sessions had no part of Flynn affair......

 

[Slade3200]

You make a compelling point but after consideration of such a brilliant argument I have to conclude that you lose. Thanks for playing

O shortcircuited several investigations,going beyond a simple inquiry if someone could see clear to dropping one........try to keep up.........

The fact that you just abandoned the argument to bring up Obama shows that you got nothing. Like I said, thanks for playing

Didnt abandon anything....if Obama can impede them a simple request into whether Comey could see a way to drop one is not illegal. That you cant see the difference simply shows your partisanship

I don't remember the time Obama impeded an FBI investigation that was looking into his administration by firing the director of the FBI. Please refresh my memory

He didnt need to fire anyone to impede an investigation....and there is no evidence Trump impeded an investiagtion.....

Then make your point man, don't make me keep asking for details... waste of time.

When did obama impede an investigation that was focused on the Obama campaign or administration?

 

[Slade3200]

Number ONE – James Comey justified in his statements that on February 14th he did not inform his recently confirmed boss Attorney General Jeff Sessions, of the content of the oval office meeting with President Trump – or his suddenly overwhelming feelings of impropriety, because he anticipated Jeff Sessions would be forced to recuse himself from anything to do with the Russian investigation..

There was nothing known on February 14th which would establish a need for Sessions recusal. There’s no reasonable basis for such an assumption on February 14th, unless it was Comey’s intention to leak FISA-granted surveillance of Russian Ambassador Kislyak, having an innocuous meeting with Senator Jeff Sessions, to the Washington Post. A disingenuous, albeit politically framed, leak did factually surface on March 1st. Same link

This is one of the lamest of the talking points. Do yourself a service and don't point to it again if you want to be taken seriously.

I could have told you the day Sessions got nominated as AG that he would have to recuse himself from an investigation that focused on a campaign that he was an active part of... especially given the communications he had with the Russians that he is now in hot water for lying about.

Why......Trump wasnt under investigation.....per Comey...........Sessions had no part of Flynn affair......

Trump personally wasn't under investigation but his campaign was, any findings of collusion impropriety would be politically damaging to him